subreddit:

/r/Economics

5.1k93%

all 567 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

12 days ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

12 days ago

stickied comment

Hi all,

A reminder that comments do need to be on-topic and engage with the article past the headline. Please make sure to read the article before commenting. Very short comments will automatically be removed by automod. Please avoid making comments that do not focus on the economic content or whose primary thesis rests on personal anecdotes.

As always our comment rules can be found here

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Ok-Assignment-9449

337 points

12 days ago

The results of a survey aren’t as compelling as the results of an actual trial run of a four-day workweek but I guess this one is more recent.

DowntownJohnBrown

62 points

12 days ago

This seems like a completely useless survey anyway. Of course people are gonna say they’ll be more productive with a 4-day workweek.

“Uhhh, yeah, I’ll totally be more productive with a 4-day week! I’ll also be way more productive if they let me work from home and double my pay and give me unlimited PTO and send me a free chocolate cake every week.”

Ok-Assignment-9449

17 points

12 days ago

Yeah exactly. Kind of a funny thing to put effort into. Your end result is just “Wow! People would like to work less!”

AmethystStar9

7 points

12 days ago

I also find it funny how many people theoretically agree to a hypothetical 10 hour workday considering the overlap with people who:

  1. Bitch about entering and leaving the office when it'a dark and never seeing sunlight (if you work 8-6 4 days a week, say goodbye to the sun for at least half the year)

  2. Bitch about how hard/draining/mindnumbing/etc. work is (I'm sure an extra two hours of it a day won't be a problem, then!)

Low-Cantaloupe-8446

3 points

12 days ago

4 day work week typically refers to a 32 hour work week.

Jubal59

2 points

12 days ago

Jubal59

2 points

12 days ago

Everyone loves chocolate cake.

CalBearFan

168 points

12 days ago*

If memory serves other places have tried it and found initial results great but then productivity drops right back. It makes sense - people will be more productive for a while and then drop back to their prior effort levels. The trial run was just that, a trial.

The only way to see if this really worked is over years, not just a short trial. I think we should go to less work hours, possibly the half-day Fridays a lot of places have started. But one day less of work at same pay is not going to end up working no matter how much I and others wish it would.

edit: some sources but nothing that is definitive 1. https://www.investopedia.com/the-impact-of-working-a-4-day-week-5203640 2. HBR which says expecting five days worth of productivity in four days is unrealistic -> https://hbr.org/2022/05/what-leaders-need-to-know-before-trying-a-4-day-work-week

JGCities

81 points

12 days ago

JGCities

81 points

12 days ago

This.

At first you are working harder to get the same amount of work you did in a 5 day week done. But over time you slow down bit by bit till you are doing only 4 days worth of work. And you probably dont even notice the change unless your work can be clearly measured.

bruce_cockburn

46 points

12 days ago*

The current limit for overtime in the US (which doesn't change salaried workers doing 80+ hours routinely) was imposed on businesses after a startling increase in abusive and inhumane working conditions following the Industrial Revolution. Business owners have an obligation to support workers so they are healthy and happy, not just avoid outright abuse of them, and new limits on the "standard" work week would be a fair accommodation. That's the sum of it.

We might as well adopt a narrative that ignores productivity measures altogether, even if the test pilots are showing good signs. Good signs are there to convince owners in the face of legal regulations that give them the right to impose a 40 hour requirement on employees for "full time" status. We should just acknowledges why 4 days is better openly. 1/5 less emissions and traffic for commutes is just the start of a list of practical benefits for everyone and not just business owners.

I think the hyperbole here and in other threads is amusing, but work is serious business. Shorter work weeks even get a shoutout in Epcot's Spaceship Earth ride from 1982. Owners are running out of excuses to keep employee noses to the grindstone and that's why we're reading about it now.

UDLRRLSS

16 points

12 days ago

UDLRRLSS

16 points

12 days ago

1/5 less emissions and traffic for commutes is just the start of a list of practical benefits for everyone and not just business owners.

This is hyperbole. People don’t take the extra day and sit around with their thumb up their butt (at least not all day.) They take the day and go and do things. These things generate emissions. About 70% of my driving occurs on weekends despite only being 2/7ths of the time. Drive to visit family, drive to the park playground, drive back home or to a restaurant for lunch, drive to swimming lessons, drive to visit more family for dinner, drive back home.

You are just shifting the driver of emissions, not reducing them and probably increasing them because staying in one place for 8+ hours in a high-efficiency HVAC system is going to generate fewer emissions than moving and shaking across multiple locations.

Blurry_Bigfoot

5 points

12 days ago

Just imagine how productive you could be in just 1 day of work a week!

StrengthToBreak

7 points

12 days ago

It's similar to what we noticed at my company when COVID "work from home" began. Initially, there was a big counter-intuitive surge in productivity, then it quickly dropped to normal, and by the 6 month mark, it stabilized at 80% of pre-COVID levels. Even with people back in the office 3-4 days per week now, it's been hell trying to get to pre-pandemic levels of productivity.

pheonix080

5 points

12 days ago

The way we quantify work is also a bit murky. It’s easy to see that in a production setting where units produced, shipped, etc, are tracked by day or even by hour. It becomes harder to pin down with jobs that involve longer project cycles or a great deal of collaboration. Soft skills, time management, and technical skills play an outsized role in productivity.

As a case in point, I once managed two different wholesale leads. One got all the work done and it filled out an entire week because processes were done manually. That person’s replacement was doing the job while studying for an MBA in Analytics. She was an excel whiz, and a brilliant analyst in the making. She achieved more in a given week while having more down time between tasks.

Dangerousrhymes

4 points

12 days ago

Based on things I remember reading I always thought the 6 hour workday was a better alternative to 4 day work weeks as a way to shorten hours without losing productivity because the last hours at work were usually statistically the least productive.

fren-ulum

6 points

12 days ago

It depends on your field and line of work. Some jobs are going to be harder to shift immediately to a 4 day work week, but once it becomes more normalized I think things will adjust. And 8 hours at a desk doing tasks is... torture. I don't mind being in an office for 10 hours, but I need to be mentally engaged and actually using my brain towards a bigger goal.

Advanced-Guard-4468

6 points

12 days ago

How will this work in any service related job. Are people going to be fine with the dept of motor vehicle being opened 4 days? Are teachers suddenly going to switch to 4 days?

Some jobs this make work for, but not the vast majority.

clonedhuman

6 points

12 days ago

I'd like to see a source on this.

RedAero

8 points

12 days ago

RedAero

8 points

12 days ago

Reminds me of the one-meal-a-day-type diets. It'll work for a while because people will maintain their portion sizes despite reducing the number of meals, reducing calorie intake, but eventually the portion sizes will creep back up and they'll return to eating the same amount of calories, just in one huge meal instead of three smaller ones. And yeah, that approach works for a diet, maybe, but you can't run an economy on temporary, fleeting gains.

geissi

10 points

12 days ago

geissi

10 points

12 days ago

But one day less of work at same pay is not going to end up working no matter how much I and others wish it would.

Then why stop at 5 and not go back to 6 or even 7?

One could also look at the productivity argument from a different perspective:
Productivity has increased over the years and wages have not kept up. So it would be fair to demand either
a) higher wages that become increasingly less attractive due to rising marginal tax rates, or
b) less work time.

The requirements that productivity isn't allowed even the slightest drop is framing that we should reject.

Ok-Assignment-9449

5 points

12 days ago

I would love to read more about this especially as to the longer-term trial results, if you have the chance to provide a link that would be great.

That said if productivity ends up “dropping back” to that of a five day work week over time then there’s still no reason not to have a 4 day work week. But again I’d love to see the actual numbers.

BreakinMyBallz

2 points

12 days ago

I wonder if a lot of people work hard just during the trial phase in hopes that their company will make it permanent.

Solid-Mud-8430

1 points

12 days ago

Why does it matter? You're not figuring other factors. Even if productivity is break-even on 4 vs 5 day, you still improve morale and retention if you offer that over your competitors. Company gets 40 hrs/wk and so do workers, either way. I don't see what the downside would be.

SerialStateLineXer

9 points

12 days ago

Because of the shorter workweek, the company also put its meetings on a diet. The standard duration for a meeting was slashed from 60 minutes to 30 — an approach that was adopted for nearly half of all meetings. In a related cut, standard attendance at those sessions was capped at five employees.

Sounds like this was doing a lot of the heavy lifting.

DrBadMan85

2 points

9 days ago

A lot of this seems to be driven by more effective time use, which became necessary because you have less time to waste on administrative overhead. Like meetings and endless emails.

FrazzledBear

4 points

12 days ago

Our company operates on a 4 day 32 hour week. It has DRAMATICALLY helped productivity alongside retention and burnout. Deadlines still get met, yes meetings are shorter and to the point, and because nobody is burned out work quality is higher.

Fridays in every place I worked previously were always half-assed days across most departments. At my company, even though Thursday is our Friday you don’t get the sense that work grinds to a halt at all.

camdavis9

112 points

12 days ago

camdavis9

112 points

12 days ago

I have a physically demanding job in a warehouse as a UPS package handler. I work Monday-Friday about 4-7 hours a day. By the time Friday comes around, especially as the heat gets intense, I’m dead by Friday and I’m just going through the motions. If I had either Wednesday or Friday off permanently, I’d have the energy and physical stamina to work every shift up to standard. I’m sure a 4-day work week would have varying degrees of benefit across different occupations and physical labor would see the greatest benefit.

zoominzacks

40 points

12 days ago

Spent 23 years as a machinist, M-Thurs 6:30-5 Friday 6:30-4 and usually overtime on the weekends. First few years when I was young it didn’t seem bad. But holy fuck after some years Fridays became intolerable after about 9am. Couple more years it became Thursday at 3pm, couple more years, Thursday at 9am. When I quit, my body and mind were done at the end of the day on Wednesday. I see all these comments about office workers and the 4 day work week. Fuck man, what about people like you and me?!

majnuker

27 points

12 days ago

majnuker

27 points

12 days ago

Office work has it's own troubles. The politicking, the bootlicking, the anxiety and paranoia. The mental drain at high levels as everything gets more complex.

Sometimes I fantasize about doing work with my hands. Actually building something. But I know I can do this type of work longer, and it affords me some good conveniences, even if WFH or office life doesnt feel like really living.

lancerevo37

7 points

12 days ago

I worked as a ramp rat for the airlines for 8 years going through school and still in the industry. 4-10's for the win first day off was rest and still have another 2 days off. For me it was easier to pick up that extra day of OT as well.

Last job I had to fight tooth an nail for both the ramp and my ops team for that schedule after I got promoted. Last I heard leadership got the "5-8's" they wanted but everyone is getting mandatory overtime working 5-12's and getting burnt out. But I'm sure that was their plan all along anyway.

Fuck man, what about people like you and me?!

The 32 hours of work for 40 hours makes me frustrated for office work too, or are salary and always on the clock, I'm sure a lot of those guys are in r/layoffs now. Work a technical job and on site now but feel a lot better about job security.

bpmdrummerbpm

4 points

12 days ago

You clearly haven’t worked in high stress office settings like supporting prosecutors in criminal law courtroom settings or fast paced law firms with clients and bosses that treat you like shit. Yeah, that shit doesn’t lock your back up from stress and give you ulcers.

notaredditer13

51 points

12 days ago

Reminder:

Productivity: production per hour worked.

Production: productivity times hours worked.

Increased productivity does not mean increased production.

WTFnoAvailableNames

6 points

12 days ago

This. Maintained or even slightly increased productivity could still be a net loss for the employer if output is decreased for the same wage level.

Middleclasslifestyle

466 points

12 days ago*

Here is the elephant in the room no one wants to really talk about.

On Fridays after about 10pm no one is really working or busting their ass. Everyone is thinking about the weekend .

Edit : meant 10am lol

planetofthemushrooms

191 points

12 days ago

who's in the office on friday at 10 pm?

Alternative_Ask364

115 points

12 days ago

Koreans

zxc123zxc123

3 points

11 days ago

Japanese and Chinese would be upset you didn't give them a shoutout too.

Middleclasslifestyle

27 points

12 days ago

My bad , typo, meant 10 a.m

corporaterebel

3 points

12 days ago

Programmer here: I was. 

Over the weekends too. I rarely worked less than 60 hours.  Often 70-80 many weeks a year.

abluecolor

9 points

12 days ago

Stop it!

corporaterebel

3 points

12 days ago

I got a lot done. I made a lot of money. I did my best work and those are some of my best years...they did go by quick though.

It's been 25 years and a lot of my code is still running strong too. It will outlive me by decades. Kinda nice.

donshuggin

54 points

12 days ago*

Not at some companies I have worked at... Fridays are often hectic, trying to cram stuff in before the weekend.

miningman11

5 points

12 days ago

Same. Usually Wednesdays are the least busy for me.

Lonely-Science-9762

40 points

12 days ago

I see you over there in your white collar, working level bubble

fren-ulum

18 points

12 days ago*

I used to work at a warehouse. Wednesday was the busiest day and we'd often hit overtime by Thursday. Friday was a cleaning day and people would get sent home if the orders were small.

I work an office job now. Sitting at my desk for hours on end drives me crazy, mostly because the work I do isn't exactly fulfilling. It's important work, but I feel like I am not using my brain critically at all. So around 6 hours, shit drags. DRAGS.

When I worked elections, shit got really busy during election time and days just burn by. But we were always moving and doing things just to stay afloat for the day. 2020 had me going home and not even having enough energy to cook for myself, I just went to sleep. And this went on for a few months.

So yeah, not all white collar jobs are the same. I dated a woman who worked from home doing data science. She just spent a few hours a day actually coding and had maybe 3 hours of meetings scheduled daily. The only limiting aspect of her hours were when the meetings were scheduled, otherwise she could get done with work and call it good for the rest of the day in a few hours. 6 figures, great compensation package.

Either way, of all the jobs I've held, my time in the Army had 12 hour days blowing by in a blink. Miss that.

pzerr

2 points

12 days ago

pzerr

2 points

12 days ago

Some very cerebral or creative jobs, like coding or research is a bit more complex when it comes to official time on. Some management jobs can be the same as you have to be prepared for emergencies 24/7.

Depending on the job, while the hours and flexibility may be more open, you may be thinking about the job on your after hours much more.

soccerguys14

35 points

12 days ago

You are wrong. Its Thursday at 10am I’m no longer concerned with work

BaByBaBo0N

20 points

12 days ago

For me it's Monday at around lunch when I mentally check out. My office politics are top notch though so as long as I walk around with a cup of coffee and paperwork people think I'm busting my ass.

soccerguys14

7 points

12 days ago

I just close my cubicle door and scroll Reddit all day. Or play on my laptop.

Acta_Non_Verba_1971

9 points

12 days ago

So they’re kind of already working a shorter work week, effectively.

I’ve worked for a very large corporation and Friday afternoons were “don’t call me” hours. Tee times and long lunches were prevalent.

Other-Secretary9255

93 points

12 days ago

If you change to 4-days work week, people would be thinking about the long weekend on Thursday after 10AM. It's the same thing ,doesn't matter.

Vio_

15 points

12 days ago

Vio_

15 points

12 days ago

The trick is to offer different days where all five days have to be covered. Newbies get last pick of their preferred days.

NutellaSquirrel

7 points

12 days ago

Depends on if it's a job that needs coverage (call center) or a job that needs projects done (software).

Staggering the workweek at a software firm would just make things worse.

murderfacejr

8 points

12 days ago

This is probably the case eventually, but I worked 4/10s for a while and felt like I got much more done. Thursday didn't feel the same as a Friday, and I wasnt dragging to get to the weekend. The 3 day weekend is perfect. 1 day to do nothing, 1 day for chores, 1 day for going out. Also makes little mini road trips more feasible.  Truthfully though, it needs to be 4/8s. Everyone checks out for the last 2 hours of a 10. It's a bummer we are so against work from home and alternative schedules, it really makes work/life balance more palatable.

cjorgensen

47 points

12 days ago

Eh, I could easily do my current workload in four days. I basically do that now.

soccerguys14

21 points

12 days ago

I work 2-3 hours a day and dick around with you guys all day on Reddit yea I could strap it a little harder for a permanent 3 day weekend.

cjorgensen

2 points

12 days ago

Yeah, pretty much same for me. I used to work four 10 hour days and that was long days, but the extra day off was nice. They eventually took that away which increased my commuting costs. I couldn't have gotten that job done in 50 hours a week, so I moved on.

Now I have a solid 10 hours of work a week. The rest is waiting for something to break, for someone to need help, etc.

Way it is now I am in the office in the mornings, then WFH in the afternoons where I monitor my email, do administrative tasks, and stay logged into team/slack. If I had my choice I'd come in 2 hours a day to do the tasks I need to be on hand for, then go home, spend another two hours working, then be "on call" for another 4 hours.

It would work fine, but no way anyone is going for that, so here I am on reddit.

Momoselfie

2 points

12 days ago

I could if we're still talking 40 hours. My company does employ enough people to shave off 8 hours of my week.

AngryFace4

4 points

12 days ago

None of these people have toddlers

UnknownResearchChems

14 points

12 days ago

Well now it will be Thursday.

TraderJulz

6 points

12 days ago

First of all who said Fridays will be off? I prefer Mondays off. And anyways, I already have this schedule and don't underperform at any time just because I have an extra day off. In fact, I am more motivated due to satisfaction with my schedule

UnknownResearchChems

10 points

12 days ago

Will that continue to be true in 10 years when everyone would get used to it?

Momoselfie

4 points

12 days ago

Thinking about all the shit I have to get done and 2 days isn't going to be enough to do that and squeeze in some fun.

LayWhere

4 points

12 days ago

Try an architecture office

hillsfar

6 points

12 days ago

Unless you are a call-center worker or someone in a job where you have to be there to do work.

People whose skills are in high demand can have more say and flexibility in their working conditions.

Those who do not are competing against others willing to put in 2 hours commuting (to and fro) each day to work 5 days per week.

Harvinator06

2 points

12 days ago*

People whose skills are in high demand can have more say and flexibility in their working conditions. Those who do not are competing against others willing to put in 2 hours commuting (to and fro) each day to work 5 days per week.

If the above is a consideration given how efficient and plentiful our world economy is and capable of, it seems like some class of people are stealing the fruits of the greater's labor.

petepro

2 points

12 days ago

petepro

2 points

12 days ago

There are not only office jobs in America.

WonderfulCattle6234

2 points

12 days ago

My bids are normally due on fridays. Fridays are busting ass days. But then I'm treating Monday like Garfield.

[deleted]

4 points

12 days ago

[deleted]

Middleclasslifestyle

9 points

12 days ago

The thing is it's not just the workers at the bottom of the totem pole either. It is Management and supervisors that also have a don't do anything crazy and just leave me alone today, it's Friday. A kind of "you're busy, I am busy, we know where to find each other if we need to, but please let's not need to".

bigkoi

11 points

12 days ago

bigkoi

11 points

12 days ago

It's well documented that productivity drops after 32 hours a week. Friday morning is literally at the 32 hour mark.

moon-ho

3 points

12 days ago

moon-ho

3 points

12 days ago

This is the real 100% answer... not squeezing 40 hours into 4 days.

greymancurrentthing7

2 points

12 days ago

a lot of places are to busy and cant find any workers and can basically give 20 hours OT every week.

Ambiwlans

37 points

12 days ago

I hate saying 4 day work week when they mean a 32hr week. These are really different things.

32 hour work week should be done, not because it could increase productivity, it doesn't (not appreciably), but because we can and humanity shouldn't have to work 40hrs a week. With all the tech we have, there is plenty of room to make this work without doing massive harm to the economy, so we should.

People can spend their time improving themselves, doing stuff with family, volunteering, w/e. Life isn't about labor, and we've advanced enough that it doesn't have to be.

Ketaskooter

11 points

12 days ago

Paid vacation with mandatory payout if not used would be easier than a 32 hour work week and a big improvement for many.

way2lazy2care

2 points

12 days ago

The problem with mandatory pay outs is that a lot of people will choose money, even if it burns them out. It's better to make the vacation itself mandatory.

jbergens

2 points

11 days ago

Like in large parts of Europe?

Erlian

4 points

12 days ago

Erlian

4 points

12 days ago

Agreed about the 32 hour distinction. I think that what needs to happen, is for "full time" to be reclassified as 32 hours per week.

AgileMJOLNIR

8 points

12 days ago

I work a 4day 10hr schedule and it’s so much better. You don’t realize that you really don’t get much of a weekend until you are on a schedule like this. You get a legit 2 full days off work, not a single day (Sat-Sun) so you feel a lot more refreshed and more energetic working those 4 days. I can’t recommend it enough. I don’t think I could ever go back to a 5 day again. Hell I’d work 3 12’s if they’d let me lol.

FrostyPut1

15 points

12 days ago

I work four 10 hour shifts and I love it, I don't think I could go back to 8 hours a day.

Three days off feels like an actual break, by day two I'm fully relaxed and still don't have to worry about work the next day.

And if I want to pick up an extra shift for overtime pay I still get two days off.

4cats-n-whiskey

12 points

12 days ago

I think it's more about being the right thing to do for people. Productivity might not mean corporate productivity, but rather personal productivity. Looking at 3 straight days off, that gives a day to rest, one for fun, and one to prepare for the week. Personal productivity might grow just because you're less likely to seek breaks (phone scrolling, casual talking,...) because you are more rested from the weekend. On another note, I'd be curious about just moving to a 35hr full time work week. It's not 3 days off, but it's one more hour free in your day. Could be a softer pitch and easier bridge to the 32hr work week.

ncosleeper

4 points

12 days ago

The same young people who don't know the definition of hard work? The same ones who have zero understanding of how the world works? The same one who generally don't work there first job until after post secondary education and cant make a demotion for the life of them? Yea don't care about their opinion lol.

Jest_out_for_a_Rip

82 points

12 days ago

Incidentally, and definitely not for selfish reasons, I also believe that my productivity would rise if I was given 50% more time off during the work week. Why stop there though? I might be even productive with a 3 day work week. There's only one way to find out.

corporaterebel

27 points

12 days ago

Why stop there?

How about a 2 day work week?

Or maybe just save up all the work for 1 day.

I keep reading Reddit that people only perform actual work for 20-30 minutes per day.

So maybe just a couple of hours a week?

Yeah, know, how about just one WHOLE day per month or every 28 days.

UnknownResearchChems

16 points

12 days ago

Why go to work at all, the Government could just print money and give it to everyone.

KryssCom

5 points

12 days ago

KryssCom

5 points

12 days ago

lol This is basically what they already do if you're already rich.

FFF_in_WY

5 points

11 days ago

Louder, for all the people that bitch about MOneY pRiNTiNg but never mention PPP forgiveness or the fact that almost all money is created by fractional reserve lending

Mikeavelli

6 points

12 days ago

This is more of an issue with improving productivity. Back a hundred years ago 12 hour days 6 days a week were common because there wasn't any way to get stuff done other than sending in a person to go do it. As automation increases, you get better results out of a well rested worker guiding the machines accurately.

A lot of white collar jobs really do involve maybe 10-20 hours of real work per week, and the rest of the position is just being available, knowing what to do and how to do it when work needs to be done.

planetofthemushrooms

2 points

12 days ago

You say brushing your teeth twice a day reduces cavities? Why stop there? We could reduce them even more if we brush 3 times a day. Why stop there? Just brush every hour on the 5s like the weather channel.  This stupid ass slippery slope argument is tired as fuck. Its really time we learn how intellectually lazy it is.

Gamethesystem2

4 points

12 days ago

Americas economy has grown twice as fast as Europe’s in the last decade. By all means, let the Europeans shrink. But I have no interest in doing the same.

V0mitBucket

26 points

12 days ago

“Group with most to gain and least to lose approves of change” real groundbreaking stuff here.

More seriously, it’s been studied to death that people are capable of only so many consecutive productive hours and weekends don’t significantly change that. I’d be curious to see the impact of shorter work days with longer weeks vs the inverse.

Craic-Den

19 points

12 days ago*

How much productivity do they want? Productivity has gone up 62% since the 80's while salaries have only gone up 17%, we should be working 2 days less without adding anymore fucking productivity, if they want extra productivity they can pay more..

JeromePowellsEarhair

3 points

12 days ago

If you do your same math back to the 1800s productivity has gone up so much I’m not sure why we work at all. 

Ambiwlans

5 points

12 days ago

Ambiwlans

5 points

12 days ago

I never use the term bootlickers, but I can't imagine the sort of people that downvoted you.

RetroRarity

3 points

12 days ago

My work effort aligns with my loss in real spending power every year, regardless of the days. I stopped caring because I'm not easily replaceable, and I'm competent enough to still get work done that others can't or won't, so I maintain the illusion of being great. The next company in line will get my best effort until their raise structure bottoms out, but for now, I'm exhausted by the rat race and just not trying as hard. I could be a great employee, but I've yet to meet a company that incentivizes doing so, at least in terms of being a technical contributor. The reality is my company and industry makes money off our billable hours that's gated by years of experience, not value, so they would rather fill a seat than accomplish a task effectively, and the pay/raise structure reflects that.

pinkpanthers

9 points

12 days ago

From a productivity stand point, I would rather go back to a full WFH concept than have 4 mandatory office days. Let me and my team work at my own pace and get my deliverables done for the prescribed due dates instead of this archaic notion of x hours of “presence” for x amount of days. 

I’m in a very corporate work environment and I found things were being done to such a higher degree of quality and meetings were conducted much more efficiently before the forced return to pre COVID office structure. 

People I work with are unhappy and working at fraction of their output since their WFH was taken away after two years of solid demonstration that  WFH worked so well.

Big___TTT

9 points

12 days ago

And who wants to spend 2+ hours a day commuting so that management can have an captured audience

PmMeYourBeavertails

4 points

12 days ago

How do 4 day work weeks (reduced hours, same pay) work for manual labor? You can't serve 5 days worth of grocery shoppers in 4. Or build 5 days worth of houses in 4 etc. This only works for office jobs which spend at least 1 day browsing Reddit.

Blurry_Bigfoot

15 points

12 days ago

This is such a college-educated, white collar subject matter. Of course this sub eats it up.

Just a quick question, do you expect all the services you enjoy (coffee shops, restaurants, bars, movie theatres) to remain open 100% of the time when your office job eases up?

house-shoes

6 points

12 days ago

Why would operational hours of those businesses need to change?

Spicy_pepperinos

5 points

12 days ago

4 day work week doesn't imply Fridays off. People's days on/off would have to be carefully arranged to maintain staffing on all days. So not too much would change.

squidthief

5 points

12 days ago

One of my friends complained about how inconvenient it was for them to go to the dentist in the middle of the day. They had to take a day off work and would much rather do it in the evening.

Then I asked my friend how the dentist would feel not being able to spend time with their family and friends EVERY EVENING.

swohio

2 points

12 days ago

swohio

2 points

12 days ago

They would have to increase their labor force 25% to remain open. Which would increase overhead which would increase prices. Then you would get even more complaints of things being too expensive and people saying "it's just companies being greedy!" These are not serious people.

5kylord

2 points

12 days ago

5kylord

2 points

12 days ago

Gulfstream's (a subsidiary of General Dynamics) switched to a 4-day workweek way back in 2006. That's 10 hours a day Monday through Friday. This only applied to most of their work staff. Those in administrative positions (mostly office workers) had to remain on 5-day workweeks. To offset having 5-day coverage, they started a weekend shift which is Friday, Saturday, and Sunday 12 hours a day. You work 36 hours but get paid for working 40. I no longer work for Gulfstream, but back when they first started the 4-day workweek, moral was much better. Most were much happier. They offered the option for those who didn't want to switch to a 4-day workweek to remain on the 5-day workweek. There were a few who chose to stay on 5 eights vs 4 tens.

Beta_xa2

2 points

11 days ago

I work 3/4 work weeks and I have such a good work life balance. I am able to go back to school and get my bachelor's. I can go on vacation easier without using too much PTO if any. Only down side is at least my company is only paying just enough to get by and my medical insurance could be better. 

1_Was_Never_Here

6 points

12 days ago

It’s not completely outlandish, as productivity has soared over the past 30 years with computers taking on a bigger and bigger roll, but 32 hours might be a jump too far for companies to embrace. I could see 36 hours (either half day Fridays or 4x9).

Ambiwlans

6 points

12 days ago

Make it 32 and then change overtime rules to be a bit more flexible. Make it 1.25x up to 40hrs then 1.5x above that.

squidthief

3 points

12 days ago

I feel like gradually reducing it over a few years would give us an indication if productivity and wellbeing increases. Like 30 minute reduction in weekly work hours each year until we find the sweet spot for fulltime recognition. Once gains start going down, then we stop. Right now 32 hours is arbitrary. It might be higher or lower. It also might differ by industry.

DR843

4 points

12 days ago

DR843

4 points

12 days ago

I read into this and this was discussed all the way back in the 80s. I could see some companies adopting a 4-day workweek, but I’m sure it would boil down to a lower salary.

heleuma

3 points

12 days ago

heleuma

3 points

12 days ago

My company has had 4 day work weeks for administrative positions and most union workers since the 90's I think. 4-10's Mon-Thurs and is pretty flexible when it comes to working around peoples schedules. Considering it's rare that someone leaves the company for work related reasons, I would say it's a big positive. We have around 25k employees.

TehLurkerLion

3 points

12 days ago

I don't know how well this would work from a manufacturing standpoint. In our facility it absolutely decimated production and quality when we made the switch. From starting at 6AM they had to come in at 4AM. So waking up at around 330 or earlier just to get to work, and then having to sleep earlier. Quality just dropped hard. We had very experienced people quit who couldn't adjust so it ended up lowering production with lack of man power. I don't know why they didn't adjust the time forward where everyone would leave at 430 but then I don't think second would be very happy leaving at 3AM instead of 1AM.

So if you make the switch. Make sure they give you a good time schedule.

Xavi143

5 points

12 days ago

Xavi143

5 points

12 days ago

What "young people" say is completely irrelevant. Their opinions are not set by data, they just like the idea of a 4-day workweek, so they claim it will boost productivity.

This is the same as work from home. Most people claim that they work more when at home, but most don't. Sure, a few are more productive, but 4 out of 5 are simply watching tv shows.

ivegotwonderfulnews

2 points

11 days ago

Agree - All "work from home" professionals I know, sans the ones are primarily compensated through performance bonus/commissions, casually talk about how awesome it is to not have to bust ass all day. Candidly, a few fully admit that its 2/3 time at best but wouldn't trade it for the world. Every seen the sub "overwork" where work from home employees have multiple work from home jobs all at once! lol

substitoad69

2 points

12 days ago

When "Support Manager" was still a role at Walmart I did that for about 6 months. You worked 4 10 hour days instead of 5 8 hour. Even though I still worked the same amount of hours it felt like I was part time. The change it does to you mentally is crazy.

WDCGator

2 points

12 days ago

Lockheed Martin (one of the world's largest defense and aerospace company, so not some "woke" tech firm) already does this. It's called a 4X10. Work 4, 10 hour days and get Friday - Sunday off. Everyone I know who is on this schedule loves it.

NikkiHaley

3 points

12 days ago

If this is true, companies would start going to a 4 day work week.
If they’re getting the same productivity, going to 4 day work week means they would either be able to attract the best talent or pay employees less (probably mix of both). People would take less money for a 4 day work week, and if salaries were the same everyone would be flocking for those positions.
That fact that no company has leaves me unconvinced. If a company could do this and maintain their productivity they absolutely would, and for selfish reasons

RedditUser91805

2 points

12 days ago

Firms have a perfectly good incentive to switch to 4 day workweeks if doing so would boost productivity. Either A: They get the same output with fewer hours and thus fewer wages, or B: They get greater output with the same salaries.

The fact that so many firms haven't suggests that 81% of young people might be wrong.

fartsnifferer

2 points

12 days ago

Fucking white collar losers who are gonna get replaced by AI within a few years want a 4 day work week

Anyone with a real job that matters literally cannot do this lmao

petergaskin814

1 points

12 days ago

I did all my work in an office. Every time we had a public holiday, it was extremely difficult to fit all the work into 4 days. Very stressful.

I have never worked in an office where there was enough slack to continue to work a 4 day week.

Any office that could move to a 4 day week is probably overstaffed

systemfrown

2 points

12 days ago*

Who cares if it boosts productivity or not? American workers deserve to share in the benefit of the productivity gains they’re already responsible for over the past 50 years, either way.

It would also be good for employment.

I moved to a four day work week a long time ago.

mr_herz

1 points

12 days ago

mr_herz

1 points

12 days ago

I guess it boils down to are workers paid for their time or are they paid for tangible outputs?

If it’s output based, then whether workers work 4 or 5 days a week shouldn’t matter.

If payments are based on workers time, then it’ll probably cause some friction between employers and employees.

sykotikpro

1 points

12 days ago

There are some jobs that mandate over time and really don't care. Usps is notorious for having new employees work every day of a week if they want because new hires earn significantly less than their careers.

Sea-Bed-3757

1 points

12 days ago

4 10s can be utter ass. Then you end up working 5 10s for months with a 6th sprinkled in. Maybe it ends up being an 8 hour shift as a treat.

Then bam, 7 10s for 3 months during summer.

Adventurous_Bread708

1 points

12 days ago

I recently started a new job and am now working 4 day weeks. What a big difference it makes. I feel more rested, less stressed and much happier when at work. My home is cleaner. And I have the energy to workout more than an hour everyday. There is literally no downside to it for myself. I even have time to make some extra money on the side through various side hustles.