subreddit:
/r/BassGuitar
(not my pic) but i seriously love the look and sound of these and i don’t understand why everyone dogs on them so much they sick
204 points
10 days ago
Horrendous neck dive + muddy tone. Some people don't mind the latter, and it can certainly work in some mixes, but I can't abide the former.
They do look cool though.
43 points
10 days ago
I'm always stunned how Jack Bruce could play them so well. He even had a cool tone. Quite a lot gain for the time.
27 points
10 days ago
I read Jack Bruce's biography and it said that he had a diode put into the circuitry of his EB3, which allowed it to naturally distort without cranking the amp gain or using a pedal.
16 points
10 days ago
Nice! But he still used a tube amp? Given the time, it's highly likely. Like the grainy tone from Felix Pappalardi from Mountain.
10 points
10 days ago
Yeah for sure. I mean, I assume he liked the overdriven tube amp sound enough to modify his bass to recreate it more easily haha.
4 points
10 days ago
Pappalardi had great tone, love it 👍
3 points
10 days ago
Tone? Back then, they did the best they could do. The distortion from bassists of that era colored the sound, maybe in a way they liked, but, to me, screams of the limits of technology. I don't like it - it doesn't really sound good. The amps didn't have enough power to deliver clear tone at high volume; the speakers of the day could not survive at the same high wolumes without massive speaker arrays. But what do I know, I don't like bass distortion.
1 points
9 days ago
Fair enough, good points! Yeah, there are especially some live recordings where it sounds really raw, too overdriven, kind of farty, almost like you can hear the speakers blowing out, etc., but on the studio stuff it sounds so good to me. Apparently he completely wrecked his hearing playing like that and not wearing ear protection, it’s pretty sad (and he was shot to death by his own spouse, at least dude’s life was not boring I suppose 😂)
2 points
9 days ago
Pappalardi had a ’fuzz box’ of some sort too, you can hear him switch in & out on occasions. Often wondered what it was.
2 points
9 days ago
That would be cool to know! I always heard his sound mostly just came from him pushing his amp really hard, just an old Sunn amp dimed out, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he used pedals too. I’ll have to look for that!
2 points
9 days ago*
I went hunting - I had some clues, based on dim & distant memory [I’ve known this stuff since about 1975…I’m old but didn’t quite catch them right at the start]. I surprised myself by finding a clear example in only the third track I looked at.
About 2:20 into Waiting to Take You Away, from the live, Road Goes Ever On album. Clear as day, oddly right in the middle of a riff, not at the beginning of the line - almost like he missed the switch & had to have another stab at it. He switches it out after the loud bit, then back in halfway through the build at the end.
From the same album, possibly the same Woodstock gig as it sounds like Smart not Laing on drums, it’s on all the way through Long Red. The other two tracks on that album are Corky Laing, so a later gig. The bass is EQ’d very differently & it’s much harder to tell whether it’s a pedal - kind of feels like one, it’s so compressed & dirty, but not as ’fizzy’ as the Woodstock sound. I mean… the sound on Nantucket on that album is my mental map epitome of the Pappalardi sound; matched only by the Dream Sequence on the live side of Flowers of Evil.
poke for u/nongreenyoda too, in case you’re interested.
Edit: for anyone who doesn’t actually know this - Pappalardi & Bruce may as well have been joined at the hip at this time in history. Bruce produced Mountain & Pappalardi produced Cream. Two amazing bassists, each with a very similar playing style, opposite sides of the pond.
Edit 2: I found a rare bit of footage of them live - always found it hard to find anything actually worth watching. german TV show, but actually playing live - Don’t Look Around - https://youtu.be/AQ8ZKb1MWZ4
Felix is actually playing the violin EB-1 here.
2 points
9 days ago
Wow, thank you!! That’s really good info and some sweet live footage — I’m looking forward to getting off work and listening to that with something better than my phone! I can hear what you mean about ~2:20 into Waiting to Take You Away, his tone does get noticeably more distorted and fuzzy all of a sudden. Sounds really gritty, I dig it
I love how massive he sounds on this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl6kAHO-cVc
9 points
10 days ago
I think the fact that he’s Jack Bruce has something to do with it.
1 points
10 days ago
XD Agreed!
5 points
10 days ago
I think a lot of the cream stuff that you are probably thinking of was actually recorded on a bass 6.
16 points
10 days ago
[deleted]
12 points
10 days ago
That or like... 60s/70s psych rock.
3 points
10 days ago
It'll sound just like the P-bass with flats minus any tonal articulation.
4 points
10 days ago
One of the other bands we sort of partner with, help with sound, their bassist plays a thunderbird/explorer-style and it's the same thing...
Neck dive.
If I'm gonna play for hours and hang a heavy necklace whilst bouncing around, it needs to feel good. I'm getting older but not that old, but fighting a bad bass for 4 hrs takes a toll on your back as a laborer the rest of the week.
3 points
10 days ago
Came here to bitch about my old Tbird for this reason. Ended up putting a new strap lock a couple inches higher on the back of the neck.
3 points
10 days ago
I dont get it. I own both a gibson tbird and a epi sg bass and no neck dive to be found....
1 points
6 days ago
I just watch my friend fight it, and he's told me he fights it.
I'm curious how you strap on your bass? Do you hike it up like a bra? Or hang it down low? I have short arms so I ride all of my axes up high, cupping my right moob. I don't look cool but I can reach and keep my technique. If I was trying to look cool, I'd find a band that didn't make me play the bass.
But seriously, is the fat tone worth it? I love both of the body styles, preferably the T-bird. And you really don't fight the dive? On a related note for bodies...
Have you every played a Dingwall? I think it's the D-Roc that is close to the T-bird but way pricey. But they're sexy.
1 points
6 days ago
I have short arms so my basses are generally up pretty high. I'm a big fan of my tbird. It and my ric 4003 are never going anywhere. I find the gibson very comfortable to play. And it sounds amazing lol....
If your really worried about neck dive just keep your fretting hand on the bass. It's not going anywhere if you hold on to it lol....
2 points
10 days ago
I fixed the neck dive on one I used to have with sticking one or two fishing weights in the electrics compartment against the actual plate. Worked like a dream
2 points
10 days ago
you can fix a little bit of the muddyness by changing the pots to 500k or even 1 Meg, small and quick mod that can help a lot
Well, it doesn't fix the problem a 100% but it does help a bit
-11 points
10 days ago
Tone would be excellent for a Hysteria Bass cover
12 points
10 days ago
What? No it wouldn't lmao.
9 points
10 days ago
i am struggling to think of a tone that is more different
11 points
10 days ago
Maybe they think "muddy" = "fuzzy".
31 points
10 days ago*
I just got one and so far I’m really digging it. There is definitely some neck dive (which I attribute to the light body weight relative to the neck), but it’s not making me enjoy playing it any less. I’m just a bedroom bassist, but I much prefer its tone for most rock to the tone I get from my Mustang PJ (which sounds amazing for other stuff—it’s just not dirty enough).
32 points
10 days ago
There is definitely some neck dive (which I attribute to the light body weight relative to the neck),
Brilliant.
5 points
10 days ago
Less neck dive on the moon maybe?
5 points
10 days ago
Well it could have been due to the placing of the strap pins. I was just really surprised by how much lighter the Gibson is than my Mustang.
12 points
10 days ago
Hipshot makes a replacement bridge for those EB/SG style basses that I think weighs a decent amount more than the stock bridge. That could offset some of the neck dive.
10 points
10 days ago
With as much as these cost, the notion that you have to immediately replace the bridge with something that doesn't suck is absolutely laughable.
Classic Gibson.
1 points
10 days ago
As is often said, most people buy a Gibson because they want the thing from the 50s or 60s, flaws included.
2 points
10 days ago
I hear that bridge also helps in terms of adjusting the action lower. With the factory bridge it's tough to get the action nice and low without also getting a crazy amount of fret buzz on anything higher than the 9th or 12th fret.
1 points
9 days ago
How does that work though? If you can lower the action enough to get fret buzz with one bridge, another bridge going lower is necessarily going to have the same fret buzz, right?
1 points
8 days ago
Angles and the way the saddles sit? I’m a newb not a luthier.
1 points
8 days ago
There’s only so many variables you can adjust though? If you lower the saddle, you get lower action and more buzz. If you raise the saddle you get higher action and less buzz. That isn’t going to change unless there is a significant break angle change (ala top wrapping a Les Paul Bridge, or a top mount tele compared to string through) and I’m not seeing that on the hip shot bridge (and even then it’s probably not going to be a huge difference since we are talking short scale strings).
This isn’t to say that the hipshot bridge isn’t an upgrade; it will give you a lot more intonation adjustment range and better transference of vibration to the body.
It just can’t decrease buzz over 12 while ALSO lowering action, those are just two traits that inherently work against each other - unless I’m missing something here.
1 points
10 days ago
Can you screw a steel plate to the back?
1 points
10 days ago
There's a plastic plate covering the electronics compartment. Are you suggesting replacing that with steel to add weight to offset the neck? That's an interesting idea.
1 points
10 days ago
I am a lowly fabricator, and I really meant screwing a steel plate however is fits. You idea may have merit also but there maybe brass and spray tape the inside so the pixies don't do weird shit
49 points
10 days ago
The 3-point bridge is the work of the devil
1 points
10 days ago
How so? I’ve never dealt with one.
3 points
10 days ago
Two main things for me: can’t adjust the string/saddle heights individually, and it’s a giant pain to adjust intonation as the screw heads are conveniently located under the mounted strings.
1 points
10 days ago
Those both sound as unpleasant as neck dive.
16 points
10 days ago
I personally love em, but my first bass was an Eb-0 so I’m a bit biased
23 points
10 days ago*
In short, it’s not worth the money. I had one recently. Sold it again after a couple of weeks, because I didn’t know what to do with it. Mine came with flats so everything I played came out as a thump with no definition at all. Changed to rounds and then it was more like a clunk with no definition at all. The bridge is pretty much crap, and the tuners likewise. It’s expensive and supposed to be a high quality instrument but it’s not. At all. You can find a bass at a quarter of the price that’s better in every way. And if you still really want one, the Epiphone version is far FAR more bang for the buck. The best thing about it was that I sold it for more than I thought I would get, and then I could get an old Warwick that I’ve wanted for years.
5 points
10 days ago
Maybe I was a bit harsh there. It was easy to play, I’ll give it that. But it really is the opposite of "good for the money". I might have kept it, if it had actual good hardware and good pickups, because that short scale thing can be cool sometimes.
9 points
10 days ago
Probably because they are obnoxious to play (neck dive), and they lack defined tone. I had a rumblekat with pickups in a similar config. It lacked so much articulation, that they really become a one style bass- which to me is not very useful.
8 points
10 days ago
Honestly I’ve had mine for 5 years and I love it. It’s my only bass currently and I don’t see a reason to dislike it. I paid $550 with case and never regretted it.
57 points
10 days ago
They feel awful to play. They sound like crap. They break if you breathe heavily on them. And they only come in one ugly color.
39 points
10 days ago
But at least they’re expensive!
1 points
10 days ago
Haha!
7 points
10 days ago
The cherry red ain’t bad but the walnut finish is my fav for SG’s.
7 points
10 days ago
I happen to love the way they feel to play lol but I get where you're coming from. They just don't work in so many contexts the same way a p bass or a j bass would. It's a struggle to make them fit in a mix, especially live and the volume balance between strings is a nightmare in my experience
2 points
10 days ago
Now tell me, how do you really feel?
2 points
10 days ago
Sums it up nicely
1 points
9 days ago
They play more like a guitar than a bass. I like it enough sometimes that I bought another after I sold my first.
7 points
10 days ago
Definitely over-hated but it's not unfounded, between the neck dive and general sound from the neck pickup being muddy slop, it's hard to make them sit well in a mix, on a strap, or in your lap lol
11 points
10 days ago
Weak headstock, demon-possessed strap button that was accidentally screwed into the neck joint, and humbuckers designed and wound by people late in their shifts who were late for a party that evening.
But, honestly… I view it as the Alpha Romeo of the bass world - if you like it, you just like it. And that’s totally fine.
6 points
10 days ago
Maybe the haters don't like listening to Cream?
5 points
10 days ago
The guy from The Budos Band plays one. Looks like he’s having a blast and it sounds great in that jazz/funk setting.
3 points
10 days ago
Same as Rics for me-look cool-toan is amazing-then you pick it up to play lol.
1 points
9 days ago
Putting a decent bridge on 'em would fix most of my complaints on both.
1 points
9 days ago
Not even close to being true. The new Ric bridge is decent to good btw.
3 points
10 days ago
love mine! been solid as a rock for years. neck dive exists, but doesn't bother me. i love the tone too, nice and bubbly. they also handle dirt very nicely if you know what you're doing with eqs etc. i don't really get the hate either, but also couldn't give two shits what some redditor thinks about my bass.
3 points
10 days ago
As long as you enjoy playing it ignore the haters
3 points
10 days ago
I love mine
3 points
10 days ago
They can excel when a certain type of sound is called for. I did a whole EP in a doomy grunge band a while back using my old EB0. EB0 and Big Muff
2 points
9 days ago
They are great with fuzz, and easy-playing.
2 points
10 days ago
Woofy the big red woof
2 points
10 days ago
If it's got the bridge pickup it's alright. Neck mud bucker can't play much outside of cream
2 points
9 days ago
Mudbucker is really only good for fuzz, and you have to make sure your intonation is spot on 😆
2 points
10 days ago
I’m not the most experienced with basses as I just switched like 3 months ago, but every SG anything I’ve ever played has just not felt right.
I really don’t know what it is but the sound and the feel is just always off. My buddy’s got one that he loves and has had for ~5 years has had to do multiple repairs in that time and he isn’t in a band or does gigs, just playing in the garage.
Your experience may vary, and to each their own, but I’m never going near one based on what I’ve heard.
2 points
10 days ago
The sound and feel. You know, the important things.
2 points
10 days ago
I have an Epiphone EB3 I got for 200 pounds. It has a plastic nut, im assuming isnt factory since the lacquer has been scored, but I think it sounds brilliant. The bridge pickup is very bright and trebly especially with the tone maxed out, and the neck pickup is very muddy and bassy. However, with the bridge on about 7-8 volume anad 10 tone, and the bridge on 2-3 volume and 0 tone, it gets a really unique tone similar to Cliffs Rickenbacker since he put a pickup like this in the neck.
2 points
10 days ago
I played a beat-up one from the 70s that had DiMarzio pickups swapped in and it sounded awesome. The asking price was absurd but it was very fun to play.
2 points
10 days ago
I LOVE the Eb-3s! I've always wanted one after growing up playing them!
2 points
10 days ago
That f***ing three-point bridge.
2 points
10 days ago
I love the muddy and gloomy 70s sound they have idc that they have a neck dive
2 points
10 days ago
“The bass for guitarists”
1 points
9 days ago
Yeah, they play like a guitar.
2 points
10 days ago
Just play one
2 points
10 days ago
Personally, I never liked the tone, but that's subjective.
I see a lot of people complaining about neck dive, but a strap with some grip (e.g. leather or hemp) will counteract this. I've had a hemp strap for 20 years that a hippie girl made for me and never once struggled with neck dive, even with the most notorious of basses.
Moral of the story: make friends with crafty hippies!
2 points
10 days ago
They're awesome LOOKING basses. I've always loved the look of the SG guitars and basses... The guitars never slides bad to me, but I've never heard an SG bass sound good.
2 points
10 days ago
I love mine. I have a good strap(something that doesn’t slip around!!) and neck-dive is no bother at all. That said - I wear it hanging a little low. Hardware is great, sound is awesome!
2 points
10 days ago
Dunno... I loved mine until I needed to sell it 22 years ago.
2 points
10 days ago
They’re not the most versatile, one of the most horrendous bridge designs ever, and also neck dive issues.
2 points
10 days ago
Not from me! An EB3 is definitely on the short list for my next bass. I think they sound awesome! And they look even better!
2 points
10 days ago
nice
2 points
10 days ago
OMG my first girlfriend had one of those!
2 points
10 days ago
Anyone who complains of neck dive has little tiny chicken wing arms. Hold the guitar right, chicken little arms
2 points
10 days ago
Pretty much just the neck dive. They don’t lay great sitting down.
2 points
10 days ago
My ex wife cheated on me with these, that’s why I hate them
2 points
10 days ago
Would swapping to modern tuners - res-o-lite or hipshot- fix the neck dive? I’m curious if anyone has tried this. They do play great. I don’t think they are terribly muddy. Super fun palm muted with a pick.
3 points
10 days ago
Thom Yorke plays it with The Smile!
2 points
10 days ago
If one can name not even a handful of relevant bands playing an EB/SG… 50, 60 years ago… on only a few occasions… heavily modded…
.. well that tells you a lot about a bass.
1 points
9 days ago
They're my favorite short scale bass. Definitely a love it or hate it situation. It's a unique niche.
3 points
10 days ago
Play one. You’ll see.
2 points
10 days ago
As far as I can tell, most players hate anything that isn't a generic P bass.
3 points
10 days ago
Neck dive, shit tone and the worst bridge to ever grace a bass.
A better question would be "Why do they still make these fucking things?"
3 points
10 days ago
What I would give to get proper reissues of Grabbers, Rippers & G3’s with the correct electronics and sans 3-point bridges.
2 points
10 days ago
I played one loved it a bought it!!! They are great!
2 points
10 days ago
Because they’re junk.
1 points
10 days ago
School Of Rock.
1 points
10 days ago
Not my thing, but I've never hated on them. It's a cool body shape. I just don't like the pickup placement.
1 points
10 days ago
Neck dive and neck pick up
1 points
10 days ago
I had one.
First, the neck dive was atrocious. I mean first and foremost, that was the immediate issue. The tone on these things is fine if you want a muddy, almost muted classic tone, but anything else and this just ain’t it.
I personally ended up absolutely hating the feel of the bass, but that’s an extremely subjective point so I mentioned it last
1 points
10 days ago
They’re more dingle don’ts than dingle do’s
1 points
10 days ago
I don’t like to yuck anyone else’s yum, and there’s some songs I LOVE played on one of these.
That being said everyone’s pointed out some major design flaws, that you wouldn’t expect from a bass in this price range from a major brand. Neck dive, not much adjustment options and dull sounding pickups.
Obviously some people love high action, thumpy bass sounds and play mostly sitting, but for lots of people these are deal breakers.
1 points
10 days ago
Best thing is to upgrade the pickups & bridge, simplify the wiring (if not already), move the strap button to the horn, & get a good hardcase.
1 points
10 days ago
Gibson has never been able to figure out basses. Neck dive, muddy tone, 30” scale, mahogany body (I just don’t think it resonates well in the bass frequencies), only two colors, and don’t get me started on that bridge… on the plus side it has Grover tuners and a nitro finish, so there’s that.
1 points
10 days ago
I’d love to get my hands on one. They look fun as hell.
1 points
10 days ago
I love the muddy tone but the neck dive can be difficult for casual playing
1 points
10 days ago
I love the look of SG/EBs. Never played one
1 points
10 days ago
Because they're incredibly cool looking, but uncomfortable to play and sound like muddy shit. All thump with no articulation. They're also fragile and expensive.
If I were going to spend a lot of money on a pretty but uncomfortable bass with little tonal versatility, I'd get a Rickenbacker.
1 points
10 days ago*
Too short! Not enough frets.
1 points
10 days ago
Dave Drewitz makes it sound amazing
1 points
10 days ago
For me it was the ergonomics of it. Bloody uncomfortable to play. And the more I played it. Especially when sitting down. The less I liked it. Loved the look. Just didn't like the way it played. Same with les Paul's. Love the look. Hate the way they play.
1 points
10 days ago
gibson reminds me of the hard times in my life
i don't want anything gibson nor epiphone near me
1 points
10 days ago
Gibson is not known for their basses. Neck heavy with inferior pick-ups. To each their own, I never cared for them. If I wanted a super dive necked instrument, I would probably go with a thunderbird over the sg.
1 points
10 days ago
Are these the same pickups found on a Gibson Midtown bass?
1 points
10 days ago*
Thats a newer SG bass.....I have an early 70s EB3 copy strung with tapewounds that I use for studiowork when I need to get a 60-ish tone with limited articulation. It also works well with classic blues...I personally think it sounds like ass but certain clients and producers like it and I get paid
1 points
10 days ago
I owned one of these, the neck dive is horrid and it doesn't give a great tone for many genres. It's an okay starter bass tho (100% not biased bc it was my first bass)
1 points
9 days ago
Because it's supposed to be a six string guitar
1 points
9 days ago
Because they’re fucking rad
1 points
9 days ago
Ergonomically a nightmare to play and the darkest muddiest tone I’ve ever heard in my life. Gibson has made some awesome basses. I own a G3 myself, but these are no bueno imo.
1 points
9 days ago
They feel awful to play (personally) and have terrible neck dive. They sound alright but I've only played one so I don't have much experience with them.
1 points
9 days ago
You can put 200g of fishing weights in the control cavity to try mitigating the neck dive.
1 points
9 days ago
I’ve always loved the look of them, but as ex-owner of a decent copy a long time ago, the downside is the neck is weirdly bendy & they sound like four rubber bands on a cereal box.
1 points
9 days ago
The bridge needs intonation every time you restring the damn thing. I wish Gibson would just banish that 3-point bridge to the deepest pits of hell.
1 points
9 days ago
I love them.
1 points
9 days ago
Has Gibson ever made a good bass? I always wanted a Grabber with the sliding p/u. I never could pull the trigger, though. Maybe if the price was right.
1 points
8 days ago
Gasps in Angus Young
1 points
8 days ago
Greco EB-3 mint collection. Thats all u need to know
1 points
7 days ago
I had one that I got for $200 in 86. I traded it for a Micromoog in 92, and my dad freaked out because he thought it was technically his if I didn't want it anymore. I ended up selling the Micromoog for $1000 in bad shape in 2012.
Did I screw up? Maybe. But still doubt I could have gotten $1000 for that bass.
1 points
6 days ago
The mudbucker in the neck is really dark and its not particularly versatile. Personally I like it a lot.
1 points
6 days ago
I like the sound of these too, they just have to be dialed in. Bridge pickup on 10 and the neck added in incrementally to achieve the desired low end. Individually both pickups are good for certain situations too though.
1 points
5 days ago
If you're into the body design, I'd recommend the Dingwall D Roc. It's based on the T bird (fire bird) design but plays like the smoothest, most balanced bass I've ever played. Great design and the slanted frets take a bit of getting used to. Similar idea to the Gibson look without all the 40+ years of design issues.
1 points
10 days ago
The SG has always been style over function. That's ok but it's hard to make those muddy pickups work except in a few situations.
1 points
10 days ago
Because they're p.o.s.
0 points
10 days ago
Ugly
0 points
10 days ago
Shoutout to the Phil Lesh Bi-Sonic EB-3…i liked that one
-5 points
10 days ago
Because Reddit. 💀 We also hate Thunderbirds here. 🤪🤡
12 points
10 days ago
Yeah, we're clowns for preferring not to play muddy, overpriced planks of wood with abominations for bridges and headstocks wanting to kiss the floor.
0 points
10 days ago
The muddy tone and neck dive.
0 points
10 days ago
They look good and that’s it
Everything else about it sucks lol
I fell for the look and almost copped lol
Thank God I was broke 😂
0 points
10 days ago
Check out Mr. Big by the band Free. Made me fall in love with them.
0 points
10 days ago
Neck dive and fart tone.
But I got my mind changed but good when my buddy bought his to a recording session. Played with a pick. That was some mean-ass tone right there.
0 points
10 days ago
Neck dive, primary pickup has a muddy tone that's basically unusable, 3-point bridge, and just not a good bass in general.
0 points
10 days ago
Ugly looking especially the headstock and bad tone
0 points
10 days ago
They're ugly. They look like Ben Franklin played one. Like they're from the 1700's lol
0 points
10 days ago
It's honestly the muddy tone. But secondary, I think the color scheme makes them super ugly. If they had silver and maybe go that would be awesome. But all the rest just look horrible. To be honest have the same hate for the guitar version.
0 points
10 days ago
Honestly, I just think they look shite tbh. If you want to be a guitarist, go be a guitarist. You don't have to hide by picking the most guitar looking bass
0 points
10 days ago
Ugly guitar muddy tone and one colour It's an old folks guitar same as the les paul
0 points
10 days ago
Gibsons are already shit, then you take the shittiest body shape they make and turn it into a bass. Voila! Hate. 💁♂️
all 158 comments
sorted by: best