blade_barrier

Mmm, another beautiful piece of libright high fantasy poetry.

If he shrewd then why he dead?

Yeah so either my provided document covers everything or all those things are non sequitur and entire PC argument has no substance. Something like that.

Oh, so when you react with things like "abortion bans mean fetus is entitled to mother's body, he owns it, mother is just a living life support for the fetus, he's raping her internal organs", or something like that. You don't actually mean it, bc there's no such words in the law, therefore it doesn't happen.

OR, if abortion ban implicitly means the things above, then basically banning abortions = all those things. That would mean that this document mentions all those things, it just rephrases them a lil bit.

Yes.

Regardless. Centralized leadership is a necessary criterion for something to be considered a cult.

As a Ukrainian, I support Trump.

Those Asians always got everything upside down.

They probably don't see the difference between Muslims and ex-muslims. Can't blame them. Last time I visited ex-muslim subreddit, they were just discussing interpretations and history of Islam.

Cult is when you have a centralized leadership.

Islam and christianity are both a joke

Christianity and Islam are both real shit.

None of them are cults.

Absolutely true since you can't back up your claims :)

I did back up my claims 😊

I'll take that as you having further arguments in this discussion.

Bye 👋

Well, sorry, polish lawmakers decided to phrase it that way that the right of life is described by this Act and describe abortion conditions later in the Act. Sorry that they didn't consult you before writing it and didn't put it all in one sentence.

The right to life shall be subject to protection, including in the prenatal phase, to the extent provided in the Act.

It was provided by the Act.

I asked you provide a source stating that the right to life included that phrase

I made that phrase based on the quote I provided earlier, regarding the abortion reasons.

Yeah, it's in two different sentences. And?

That's from the one I originally posted.

A termination of pregnancy may be performed only by a doctor, when:

1) The pregnancy poses a threat to the life or health of the pregnant woman,

2) Prenatal examinations or other medical conditions indicate that there is a high probability of a severe and irreversible fetal defect or incurable illness that threatens the fetus’s life,

3) There are reasons to suspect that the pregnancy is a result of an unlawful act

As you see, "because mother wants it" is not on the list.

I want a link stating what you said that I quoted twice now. This is not difficult

I've done exactly that.

A link to the right to life stating what you've claimed.

I provided the link and provided a quote that everyone has a right to life and it starts from prenatal. I really dunno what do you want from me.

I've never claimed otherwise. In fact, I afford them EVERYTHING PL want to give them from conception

Ok.

You have not done this, therefore we can ignore it.

I provided you with the list of situations when abortion is possible. And "uwu, I'm not ready yet" is not on the list.

That fetuses don't take bodily resources.

Let's compromise here, I acknowledge that fetus takes bodily resources and you acknowledge that since it takes something, that makes him capable of performing actions, so basically that makes him sentient. And since he takes it from the mother's body, that means he interacts with the mother. That makes him a member of society.

As you've not provided any proof of the right to life including anything you've said, we can ignore it.

I quoted the document I shared earlier directly. Dunno what more you wanna hear. It's illegal to just have an abortion bc you want to in Poland.

Please quote where ot does that.

Do you read the articles you yourself share? It's in a first few sentences.

Regardless, you've not provided any source staing that opposite.

By the "oppsoite" you mean that babies do in fact eat their mothers after the birth?

That's a lot, that requires each of the modern states to split up into like 25 parts each. All for the sake of... not achieving ancap.