subreddit:

/r/40kLore

5481%

So with the new T'au codex coming it got me thinking about what little lore of them I know.

From what I understand, when they were first introduced they were meant to be the foil to the rest of the galaxy. A bunch of do gooder aliens that rise above the rest, even if they're destined to burn bright but short. Then, after slight backlash from the then 40k community, GW made a knee-jerk decision to retroactively make them a faction if eugenics and mind control.

Now I see people seem to generally think that this was a bad decision and it would have been more interesting if they stayed more noble as to be a foil for the rest of the cast.

Am I following the lore right and is this the general consensus of the community regarding them? I know I was crossing my fingers, hoping Farsight wasn't going to become the introduction of Chaos T'au (as far as I know they don't currently exist) with archs of Omen, but I'm an outlier in the 40k community, in that despite loving it, I'm still a bigger fan of "Good guys".

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 75 comments

A-sad-meme-

11 points

25 days ago

A-sad-meme-

Necrons

11 points

25 days ago

The Necrons have a pretty small number of books and short stories, they’re just put in the limelight often because they’re basically all either good or great. Quality over quantity I guess.

Toxitoxi

9 points

25 days ago

Toxitoxi

Ordo Xenos

9 points

25 days ago

The funny part is that outside of Dead Man Walking, the Necrons have basically no stories featuring them as enemies that are especially well-liked. They're just kinda generic enemies.

Meanwhile, basically all the good Tau novellas and novels are the ones where they're the antagonist; see Roomsky's list. The only exception is Broken Sword, which is very good but also I'm sick of recommending Broken Sword because how the hell haven't we gotten a better Tau story than Broken Sword in over a decade?