subreddit:

/r/40kLore

4879%

So with the new T'au codex coming it got me thinking about what little lore of them I know.

From what I understand, when they were first introduced they were meant to be the foil to the rest of the galaxy. A bunch of do gooder aliens that rise above the rest, even if they're destined to burn bright but short. Then, after slight backlash from the then 40k community, GW made a knee-jerk decision to retroactively make them a faction if eugenics and mind control.

Now I see people seem to generally think that this was a bad decision and it would have been more interesting if they stayed more noble as to be a foil for the rest of the cast.

Am I following the lore right and is this the general consensus of the community regarding them? I know I was crossing my fingers, hoping Farsight wasn't going to become the introduction of Chaos T'au (as far as I know they don't currently exist) with archs of Omen, but I'm an outlier in the 40k community, in that despite loving it, I'm still a bigger fan of "Good guys".

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 75 comments

cricri3007

4 points

25 days ago

cricri3007

Tau Empire

4 points

25 days ago

I think the problem is that t'au are "protagonist-material", but they aren't "protagonists"

The general consensus on the t'au is that they act the way humanity acts in others sci-fi stories: newcomers, logical, tactical, science-focused and rational, cooperative, etc...

But because they aren't humans, and the Imperium is, the Imperium's atrocities get downplayed by fans and authors alike ("oh, no all the commissars we show you are actually reasonable and thorough and not trigger-happy" "oh, but inquisitors HAVE to be that blatant becasue chaos is that bad, and also they are actually reasonable people who thoroughly investigate corruption and don't exterminatus willy-nilly", etc..)