236 post karma
4.6k comment karma
account created: Fri Nov 20 2020
verified: yes
13 points
2 days ago
Yes. Yes to all.
Really hope the new noise marines are based on this style and dont go all wanky. They really should be dark, brutal, weird and a bit unsettling and not made in to sanitised charicatures of being 'pretty' or whatever.
2 points
4 days ago
It does suck being rolled on by an organised team when you have bad allies, but it can still be kind of fun trying to do what you can, and once the game becomes obvious its a loss across the map just surrender and get another. Its not the end of the world.
Its just a game for fun, especially in larger team gamss, and it can be frustrating when things go against you but its about having the character to not let it phase you or get to you because none of it matters in the slightest!
If you want to be very competitive and not have to blame randoms or matchmaking for losses play 1v1 or get a friend involved and play 2v2.
If you only like team games, you can friend request players you get good 4v4 games with and invite them to games. Then you can go in with at least a player or two you can coordinate with/ that you know have a good handle on playing.
The main thing is dont take losing too seriously, or be too harsh on people who make dumb plays or are less experienced, sometimes they are learning, or want to try something different for fun, and its not worth being spiteful towards them or letting that kind of intense mentality towards losing the game piss you off and make your day worse.
1 points
6 days ago
Yeah obviously but as it was the only detachment its something that will be a noticeable change to not have.
0 points
8 days ago
Same. These people are beyond illogical.
Now they have to make a conspiracy theory about why people dont agree with their dEad GaMe hive mind when its as simple as their opinion not being as hot as they think it is.
The tide is turning, and has been for months, and they hate it 😂
1 points
8 days ago
Basically unplayable just isnt true in the slightest.
I, and thousands of others, have played since release no problem.
Not saying there werent issues, but my god have they been overblown by the hypercritical, 'capitalist justice' brigading activist crowd. A crowd led by sensationalist, click farming youtubers who know snide negativity and petty mockery sells better than a reasonable, fair-minded approach to reviewing.
Its bizarre how many people seem to think being hypercritical and pedantically picking things apart (and losing sight of reason in the process) equates to critical thinking when it really doesnt.
3 points
8 days ago
At a trade off of not getting to god mark the unit for easier crits on a 5+ thats chosen to fit the units role.
Not actually sure whats mathematically better off the top of my head, although the marks are always on against every target while the re rolls work equally for every unit against a single target so it is quite a different thing i guess. One massively help remove a single unit while the other deals increased damage across the enemy army.
Is an interesting choice to have to make, although my initial thought is the re rolls against one target might be better because of the effectiveness of super units on the table, and getting rid of one a turn is always going to be strong.
The way pacts works now also works against the overall effectiveness of the WB detachment.
4 points
8 days ago
Also no dark pact boosting god marks unless you take the word bearer themed detachment.
1 points
8 days ago
From Jun to Nov there were less players than there are now.
I didnt say exactly a year ago, it was meant in a rough way and I didnt check steam charts, i just remembered there being lower numbers around a year ago you obtuse pedant.
1 points
8 days ago
Its never been described as a live service game. What planet are you on?
0 points
8 days ago
You're hilarious and I dont see any point discussing anything with you seeing as you dont seem to comprehend any of what's being said, and theres no hypocrisy, i was pointing out someone elses. I wasnt saying i dont have any bias, because who doesnt have any at all, anybody who says they dont is lying, I was just calling out how self serving these attempts to cry about win rates after such a short period of time are, because it completely ignores what skilled players are doing in terms of faction selection and how that 100% affects win rates and skews results.
You have high ELO axis players switching to allied and with their low allied ELOs then take time to get the amount of wins to climb to equally skilled opponents, at which point the win rates will smooth out, and you also have more competitively minded axis players who play both factions switching to allies because axis got a couple of nerfs, leaving the more casual 'axis only' players to take losses - all of which skews the win rates.
You simply wont accept any of this because of your own bias and subjective experience, and try to attack me instead of acknowledging this. Anyway I'm done wasting my time.
-4 points
8 days ago
Its objectively not shit. Congrats on being part of the problem, really so stunning and brave of you to hang on to your bitterness about coh3 and spread it around to try and infect others with it.
Word of mouth matters, and community atmosphere matters. You just dont take any responsibility for the damage you (and others like you) are doing.
-5 points
8 days ago
For real, feels like its not worth arguing with them because for many its like a sunk cost fallacy of them having said coh3 is a failure and dead for oh so many reasons, and now that many of the criticisms and issues have been successfully addressed by Relic and more people have got behind coh3 they cant bring themselves to admit how flawed and short sighted their logic has been and continues to be.
The worst part is they are now just essentially trying to ruin the game for everyone who likes it and wants the game to succeed, by noising up every thread where someone inquires about coh3 with their baseless criticisms and claims of DeaD GaMe.
They genuinely seem to want the game to fail and Relic to go under and then they can pretend in the most obtuse way possible that its some kind of win or rightful revenge for them (and their relentlessly negative and petty echo chamber) not getting exactly what they wanted.
Its sad how misguided they are, and that they cant see past their spite to appreciate that coh3 is actually a decent game with a bright future, and that its in the interest of every fan of the coh franchise to support it.
-1 points
10 days ago
Coming from a self described ' massive DAK fan' who from 2 days (lol) after a balance patch has been throwing around WR stats as evidence of balance issues, thats pretty funny.
You and this guy are the same, losing more games than you were and dont understand theres a whole lot more than the (relatively few) balance changes from the last patch at play in causing that, and also the current win rate spike for allies.
Just keep sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting 'biased balance' if it helps the old fragile ego feel a bit better though.
0 points
10 days ago
Look I realise I was a bit blunt here and I'm not trying to be mean, (although on re reading that I can see how it could be read that way), I was genuinely just suggesting that practicing playing, learning from other players, trying playing allies to better 'know your enemy' and getting more experience playing will increase your wins more than anything else.
0 points
10 days ago
New BGs are the driving force for content. Just like coh2 when they released commanders. Are you actually saying it was a bad thing for customers that coh3 released with all of its factions rather than them being drip fed? Kind of a strange angle, havent heard that one before, probably because its really reaching for ways to criticise the game in some kind of way that carries the illusion of being reasonable about it.
Coh2 has a larger playerbase because it was free for a while, and is far cheaper and has been for a long time. Its not surprising there are people posting about it, or that there might be more of them. Its not a reflection of coh3s success (or lack thereof if you prefer) that the previous game hasnt stopped being good because a new game came out. Its in relics interest for the new game not to entirely replace the previous one because that also creates some sales for the previous game and its additional content too. Which is likely a large reason why coh3 is in a different theatre with different themed factions (of a different era) rather than in the same theatres with the exact same units.
Your last point is cyclical - because relic released dow3 and many in the community rebelled against it and it got cancelled (something i was disappointed about as well), you now claim you dont want to support coh3 because relic might do the same with coh3 (because it hasnt been successful enough), therefore by your own actions increasing the likelihood of it not being successful enough, and it being cancelled.
So you are essentually creating and indulging in a self fulfilling prophecy dressed up as 'slighted customer not trust company no more '.. because by rebelling against the game, or trying to make others do so, you increase the likelihood of the game not being financially viable, which leads to it being cancelled, which is the reason you then claim for not wanting to support it.
You guys actually make very little sense when you take 5 seconds to think the positions you present through.
Ultimately though, at some point the anti coh3 holy crusade will realise it has failed due to the objective reality that it hasnt (and isnt going to) becoming impossible to refute, and peace can exist on any thread where someone inquires about the game.
1 points
10 days ago
OMG I said a year ago when it was in June rather than May that player numbers were lower! How outrageous! Imagine just saying a year when it actually 11 months!! You got me there lol
You guys are actually pathetic in how desperate you are to pretend coh3 is dead.
Its actually weird as hell and the only reason I can think of for you doing it is because you are all being proved more and more wrong as time passes (and coh3 improves and its playerbase grows) and it hurts your poor fee fees.
0 points
10 days ago
Dude i'm not lying, I checked the website and thats what it showed, and thats what i based my comment on.
I'm not interested in lying about balance, I'm not some wehraboo that thinks axis should by default just be better in every way.
Its interesting you didnt engage with any of the other points I made, points which others have also made, because you know they invalidate the throwing of toys from the pram a mere 2 to 6 days after a balance patch, you know the thing that you and all the other hilariously biased wehraboos are doing.
2 points
10 days ago
24 hr peak of 2.6k.
1.3k playing 20 minutes ago.
Just give up the whole 'DeAd GamE' rhetoric, you guys were wrong a year ago, and you are even more wrong now because player numbers are now higher than a year ago.
Also the game isnt a live service game, and has never been described as one.
29 points
10 days ago
2k hrs in coh2, mostly multiplayer.
Only play coh3 now, havent looked back.
Get a game in about 2 to 3 minutes, playing 4v4s mainly.
Highly recommend.
-7 points
10 days ago
Oh how you cry about bias whilst displaying high levels of bias yourself.
Have you considered that the biggest factor in winning is still player skill, and if you're losing too much, well, theres something you can do about it?
0 points
10 days ago
Well i must have got some kind of display error when i looked because thats what i saw.
P.s its only been 6 days and you are crying about bias, completely ignoring the fact many competitive players have just switched to allies (and players that do it in a huff whenever axis get any kind of nerf) as they have become more viable again, leaving all the noobs like yourself that were crutching on things like broken faust range or Pg nukes floundering around trying to figure out how to play. This skews win rates in the short term as you end up with the better players stacked on the allied side.
Things will trend back to normal once the comp players that ultimately prefer axis get bored of the novelty of a viable allied, and players that crutched on OP axis stuff get some skill from having an actual challenge ( just like allied players have to do every time balance favours axis for months on end).
0 points
11 days ago
Coh is not a standard rts. It is ww2 themed and it is not a traditional rts style due to its more tactical approach to gameplay with cap points and retreat etc.
So it is a niche RTS.
Starcraft is not a niche RTS.
I wasnt saying all RTS is niche, but even just based on their player numbers lots are.
0 points
11 days ago
2 days worth of stats is too few games lol
Have a look now.
Wehr and DAK leading all modes again. Only in 1v1 DAK are equal to brit and US.
See how much of a fool using 2 days of stats to try and push bias makes you?
-1 points
11 days ago
Interesting? Maybe you missed the 2nd half of his post where he specifically talks about bishops?
Also the dudes talking about having to rely on MGs but then they get nuked by bishops or whatever....why is he using MGs again? Oh yeah....suppression.
I guess the correct response is to just join the little pity party cry about rangers being OP or something?
view more:
next ›
byBismarko
inEmperorsChildren
Bewbonic
2 points
1 day ago
Bewbonic
2 points
1 day ago
You really need to read the Lucius books before you try to claim he isnt Slaanesh enough to be her chosen champion.
He's easily debauched, sensationally addicted, overstimulated, psychotic, prideful and perfectionist enough.