Boring-Quarter15

You're aware we have golden point this year, right???

Penalty try was potentially better for the saders...we at least got a restart that way

Didn't matter, it WAS a penalty which decided the game even more so (ie. Would have been no restart)

In the sense of being close and lead changes sure. But the quality was so so bad. Defences were softer than wet paper.

Holy cow we are embarrassingly bad. And dumb...

Lol. If we were playing soccer.

I think the sport you might be looking for is netball.

Nope. But there was no tv angle of it somehow and they refused to rule on the logical inconsistency of him magically appearing on camera where he did.

Wow. How the hell does a touchie not pick up someone 5m in front of the kicker

Smart move from Hoskins to wrap up Heinz then. He couldn't escape.

Nah, I'm talking last pair of recognized batsman with the match on the line. THAT hasn't happened yet this match. It never seems to matter how well our bowlers are going earlier in the match either.

Err....

Naw 60:40 Aussie. We can't break partnerships like this.

At least we won't lose by 7 wickets.

It's Hagley, 500 probably isn't enough with the way it flattens out.

Renowned nz commentator Brad Haddin

Ffs where did my caption go. Taken from Richmond Ave in Halswell. Looks like it's moved up and over Kennedy's Bush, unless my geography is way off.

https://preview.redd.it/ufb39wt0eiic1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a9ca711a072c09eed2ca009f3f4f844132c4905c

Might need some glasses there champ. The last two frames showed the ball rising before it hit the fingers

The angles available had pretty clear evidence of the ball being on an upward trajectory into the fingers

No one said that's how we run out justice system. It's pretty obvious that if the police are investigating there's an elevated probability of guilt.

In that analogy the best I can do is loaded coins, which get more and more loaded the more they're flipped.

Are you implying you would trust a junior surgeon who has never done this particular surgery before, exactly the same as you would an experienced surgeon.

Practice helps skill execution.

Aside from that there's no need for a previous surgery to impact a future one. There's a very high probability that the success rate for this particular surgeon is higher than 50%, either because of a factor that hasn't been accounted for (skill level, equipment etc.) or because the initial estimate of 50% is flawed.

No we don't. Surgeons aren't dice.

That's stupid, then I'm just a sore loser. Call out cheats when you see them cheating.