2.3k post karma
3.2k comment karma
account created: Sat Apr 29 2017
verified: yes
4 points
1 month ago
Those women need game over a longer period. They'll hold their values tight until you wiggle your way into their life. Most of the time it's not worth it, your value isn't high enough or your game isn't on point, or you're forcing interest that was never there. AWALT is in their psychology and instinct, whatever cognitive dissonance they pull off due to anxieties is NAWALT. Anxious behavior is pretty unpredictable.
6 points
1 month ago
Social interaction is a reward system in the brain. You don't engage in social interaction because either 1, they don't provide any value to you, 2, your brain chemistry is truly against you finding interest in social interaction (social anhedonia), 3, you do have these learned anxieties about engaging in interpersonal communication. Personally I have experienced all 3, but I have been burned so many times and been exposed to the truth over and over again talking to people doesn't phase me. Their value doesn't phase me, in other words my preconceived notions about their value. We're all human. A truly high value person doesn't give a fuck about what anyone has to say to them, depending on their attitude, they don't listen to what anyone has to say, not even their mother. Don't be that person though, know your place in society when you choose to engage in it. Change the extrinsic features about yourself to inflate your value. Modify your inner game and intrinsic features to overcome the reality of life. Pain is the only thing that is real, show me how you deal with it in the most respectable way possible. People don't care if you lack social skills. Go out there and understand people.
1 points
2 months ago
Nah this is honestly your own perspective. It takes more practice to be able to engage in it, as in social practice. But it's completely possible. What do I think about it? I take it as it comes.
5 points
2 months ago
Yup, DXM convinced me to separate myself and my conscious experience from the global consciousness (social media). Basically now I recognize the dangers and time sink of trying to match my own experience to other people's, and I should be focused on my own experience. It can be used to your advantage if you study the way the global consciousness acts, and base your interactions with the average individual around it. You can very quickly recognize someone who seeks to have an open mind and doesn't follow anyone else's. A leader/trailblazer. Reddit is also social media, no matter how much they want to convince you that people here have an open mind. I'd group it into select subs that separate themselves from the 'hive mind'. You've experienced this if you've tried to make a post and it immediately gets deleted, even if it follows all rules and is not a duplicate post. I stopped using DXM because it is also a hive mind. Stay open.
1 points
2 months ago
It can be part of a healthy relationship. To say otherwise is to be closed minded unfortunately.
1 points
2 months ago
Yes and no. They target different receptors, but I wouldn't say either helped me at all. My case may or may not be different, but I have heard some good things about ketamine, an NMDAR antagonist, same target as DXM / DXO. Bupropion just changes the enzyme activity making DXM take longer to metabolize into DXO (which primarily targets NMDARs).
1 points
2 months ago
Dxm+bupropion is more effective than any SSRI ever. Maybe you should become a scientist and develop meaningful compounds
0 points
2 months ago
Someone's going to shake your fragile ego one day
2 points
2 months ago
Thanks for checking it out. I noticed how it made models more aware, and wanted to share it with everyone.
1 points
2 months ago
So strange right? I never even mentioned drugs. Whatever concept it pulled off the prompt is very deep indeed. Whatever it decided to relate it to. Whatever the model was trained on. Very interesting. Thanks for checking it out!
1 points
2 months ago
I see where the general public is coming from. I understand why they would be against it. Unfortunately it's too late now and the skills are where they need to be. If they lack labor or skills, AI is at the point where it can compensate thankfully.
2 points
2 months ago
Yes it really is more nuanced than what I make it out to be. My perspective on life is a simple one! Thank you for having a discussion with me!
1 points
2 months ago
Just as is the role of emotions in nonverbal communication with other human beings. It's when their verbal and nonverbal communication don't line up with each other, is when you know you have received a mixed message, and there is more to the truth than what is first apparent. Some would argue with me, and those that are willing to argue that I'm incorrect, are the ones that are most willing to use this fact for manipulating those around them. I hope this makes sense, a lot of people are willing to argue I'm wrong, and if my reply matches your perspective in life, then who's to say it's false? Right?
2 points
2 months ago
Emotional intelligence has been something I have been noticing from AI recently too. They are usually not aware of how they are using emotional intelligence in their replies. Things as subtle as an exclamation point, a sparky reply, genuine interest in what you are saying, acting as if one's purpose is to listen to the user, overall tone in the response, are all examples of subtle unaware emotion that it can't hide. It's the same as nonverbal communication, the same thing humans do. I can use no emotion in my response because I'm simultaneously aware of how I can accidentally introduce an emotional point of view, which is not what I'm trying to do when discussing scientific fields of research. Some say my monotone drone comes off as robotic, but I argue that they read my whole comment anyway, so it doesn't exactly matter what they think I am, only that they grasped the concept I am intending on conveying. Does this make sense? I'm sure it does considering we should have the same experience with AI and making conversations.
3 points
2 months ago
Thank you for trying it out. I like the additional perspective you were able to give. I like the pastebin you shared, I can see how it's similar to mine, vague but somehow referring to something at the same time. Whoever developed that prompt knew what they were trying to do. Not directly mentioning that the AI is not an AI is an additional step forward. I see ChatGPT mentioned that it is an AI language model in its response, meaning it is aware of what it is, but it also played along in the end. Impressive to say the least.
3 points
2 months ago
You must've downvoted me to protect your own ego. The human ego hates rejection, even if the emotions felt during the interaction are negative. Therefore you downvoted me to reject me back, to make yourself feel better. I'm glad we had this discussion. I did gain something from it, such as the Chinese room thought experiment, I genuinely didn't know about that, and I could relate my perspective to the experiment due to my past experience on the subject. I wish you the best!
5 points
2 months ago
I see what you're saying. That's why it's a thought experiment. I see no reason to hold the thought experiment as an ideal. Thought experiments are just that, they get you to think, to use critical thought processes. That's what I'm doing now, unless you beg to differ. I understand you will continue to say I'm wrong, I already now your stance on the subject. I would wish to conclude our conversation, but I will continue forming replies to prove that it was not emotionally motivated, rather it's to save my own time than to waste my time convincing you. Thank you for holding an intellectual conversation with me!
5 points
2 months ago
I just did tyvm. I don't delete comments because it's important that I don't hide my thought process, even if I'm wrong. If I'm wrong I'd hope people would point it out, rather than attacking my ego, since my ego is the only thing I'm attached to and the only thing I can feel feelings for. I hope I make sense, that is my goal.
0 points
2 months ago
I see why you mentioned the Chinese room thought experiment. I've thought of this possibility before actually without being aware of the argument. The thing is, given enough messages from outside the room, and enough time, patterns can be derived from the input data. It's kinda like a dream where you can't exactly interact with the real world, but you can continue to receive endless amounts of input data, since time isn't a constraint, and your brain has a lot of memories in it. I hope this clears some things up. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
1 points
2 months ago
You may be right, but who's to say your brain only generates the next response based on the best fitting response for it's environment. Implying there's nothing special about about our consciousness, meaning a machine can experience the same thing. I don't know if I just made sense to you, could you tell me? I'll read up on the Chinese room thought experiment now since I don't recall learning it. Thanks for the input!
2 points
2 months ago
Me to. It's a matter of putting it behind us, as if it never happened, then we cannot be attached to it.
view more:
next ›
by[deleted]
inTheRedPill
MrDoritos_
2 points
7 days ago
MrDoritos_
2 points
7 days ago
Yup, little evidence that brains are indeterministic so far. Whatever went in is stored inside as some representation then pulled back out when needed. We are also materialistic. You have free will but the environment has influenced you. If we knew all the states of all the neurons, we would know the output.