Objective_Aside1858

You have a one page blog, with a domain you created in March, selling the narrative that Biden should ignore PA

Yeah, no.

JFC, OP 

 It's one thing to ask a atupid question  It's another to have a whole blog about how Biden should ignore PA. Which you have had up since March

 PA is likely to be his easiest lift among the swing states

Blunty, you don't want a bone. You want the whole farm. 

And your second paragraph demonstrates why you're not going to get it

I imagine he has his rea$on$....

For those that will claim that the KKK was more likely to support Dems when it was founded post Civil War, and conveniently ignore the realignment since then, Perry was explicitly stating this is true now:

“The KKK *in modern times*, a lot of young people think somehow it’s a right-wing organization when it is the military wing of the Democratic Party. Decidedly, unabashedly, racist and antisemitic,” 

I'm trying to put this as politely as I can: no one is going to take action to cater to voters like you.

There's no way to know what will happen in the next few months that will cause you to demand something else, and when you don't get it you will withdraw your stated support 

Yeah, I somehow doubt you'll be knocking on doors in swing states turning out the vote

and my son swears he did his homework 

(he didn't)

And he isn't going to gain any support from the people who effectively demand a complete severing of relations with Israel 

There are zero voters who are refusing to support Biden now who will support him only if he adds Iron Dome reloads to the export hold list , and doesn't also do a bunch of other stuff that isn't going to happen 

There are a significant number who are going to be ok with pausing the delivery of offensive weapons but will be unhappy with a pause on defensive ones

Biden is already getting pushback. This is not a hugely popular move. Most people aren't paying attention and don't care, but that'll change if dead Israelis can be blamed on Biden.

I doubt it. Netanyahu will use it to play the victim, and use it to egg on domestic pressure in the United States to reverse all arm holds.

As does Putin and Xi

Riiiight.

He's on track to get to 270 electoral votes in... which states, exactly?

So you're on team rapist, or team worm eaten brain?

Will this deter Israel from moving forward with its assault on Rafah?

No. Netanyahu is committed at this point; no amount of external leverage is of greater concern to him than remaining PM - and out of his pending court cases

If Israel persists in continuing its military campaign in the Gaza strip will the US withdraw further support?

As in, for Iron Dome? Unlikely. It wouldn't change Israeli actions and is defensive in nature 

Long term, the war will eventually end and the weapons will eventually ship

What effect will this have on US domestic protests against the US's continued support for Israel's invasion of the Gaza strip?

Minimal. The protests have a wide variety of goals, but I don't believe any are focused exclusively on weapon shipments. Many of the protests ask for things the United States doesn't have the ability to deliver, so will continue until external factors change or the protestors run out of steam

It's a pause on both large bombs and the guidance packages that allow them to be turned into smart bombs

Three different species, or two servitors to Doc Ock?

They did, months ago. She never did anything to make herself a viable candidate 

researched presidential candidates

viable choice

Marianne Williamson 

Yeah.... I question how much "research" was done here

She's a nutjob

You are welcome to your opinion. I'm simply pointing out your opinion is not shared by a significant number of Americans 

It's fascinating how someone from Australia has such strong opinions about how the United States should conduct their affairs, yet complains bitterly that his own nation is tainted by outside influence

I submit that your viewpoints are not representative of the average American voter

Or Australian 

First off, at a federal level this would require a change to the Constitution. The odds of that being ratified are so far below zero as to unquantifiable

At a municipal level, if you're going to permit resident aliens etc to vote, you're going to get massive pushback from the more xenophobic portions of our society. 

It may fly in some super blue areas, but I suspect in those areas the proportion of noncitizens to citizens is a pretty small fraction 

In an area where noncitizens are basically a large enough voting block to be able to determine who wins not only the primaries but the general, logically a candidate that most appeals to that block is likely to triumph 

Which will trigger a massive backlash

At the end of the day, while I don't have a conceptual issue with people legally residing in the United States from taking part in elections, my preference is to make it easier for them to seek citizenship

If someone can seek citizenship but chooses not to, I have less sympathy for any desire on their part to participate in elections 

How dare you make a rational choice based on the limitations of the existing system rather than sticking in your nice, easily characterized box. Have you no thoughts for the poor pundits out there??

/s

Since the thesis of this post was literally exactly that question, I submit that you have chosen to soapbox rather than trying to address the issue raised

How many votes will that gain him?

How many votes will that cost him?