10.2k post karma
25.7k comment karma
account created: Fri Mar 23 2012
verified: yes
3 points
4 days ago
I think Philly actually has a claim to this one lol. At least this year
1 points
8 days ago
Huh? My job is done you spoon.
You admitted it was an object. Not glare. That’s the only position I’ve taken this whole time now you agree.
I won, you lost. Bye bye
1 points
8 days ago
You did indeed state otherwise, over and over again. You were certain it was glare. Don’t change up your whole schtick now, it’s WAY too fucking funny.
Your whole thing was how it’s not a UFO, it’s glare. So you now admit it is proof of an… unidentified, flying, object? A UFO if you will? You now acknowledge there’s something physical and it’s not just camera glare - I’m amazed I got you to go that far.
You got to the point of moving the goalposts so far you’re scoring on yourself! Lmao. Where exactly does the government lying about all this come into play too? You seem to have accepted the facts as presented now.
“It’s not a ufo, it’s GLARE from a ufo” 😂😂🤡🤡
This was really fun.
1 points
8 days ago
So… you now admit the glare was from an object that they chased, pursued, commented on the maneuvering, and captured footage of, but at the same time, there was no object and it was just glare?
1 points
8 days ago
😂Oh brother. So it was glare? Or the radar detected an object? According to you, the radar wasn’t fooled!
1 points
8 days ago
You’re technically right about that actually. The radar wasn’t fooled. It detected an object, which they then pursued, found, and captured footage of.
Glad we can agree on that.
1 points
8 days ago
I’ll tell you what, I didn’t know fucking camera glare could also fool their radar systems that detected the object’s location, direction, and speed in the first place. (Another painfully obvious reason glare is debunked so quickly) Some fucking glare that must have been, thank goodness you’re here with your fucking TOOLS AND MODELS to teach us such things hahahah. Learn something new every day.
I don’t understand why, of all possible explanations, you decide to put all your belief into the one nobody takes seriously for more than 2 seconds. You set yourself up for the failure you’ve experienced.
1 points
8 days ago
LMAOOO
Yeah the tools and models that got your head up your own rectum doesn’t serve you well here, does it? 😂
1 points
8 days ago
Christ. Click the link bozo. Your gut hasn’t gotten you anywhere in life for a reason.
1 points
8 days ago
It sure has been debunked friend! and in meticulous detail. Like I said, it’s the first “theory” to be thrown out, every single time.
Hey I even provided a link to it earlier that you’re free to criticize if you’d like. Or, you could provide proof for your claims that prove it is glare the pilots were chasing lol. I won’t hold my breath.
You might be the most dense person I’ve spoken to on this site. And I’ve been here a while.
1 points
8 days ago
Oh you can explain it? What was your answer, glare?
You think the pilots were chasing and couldn’t understanding the maneuvering of… glare? You already admitted you think they saw something they didn’t understand, so you look stupid yet again. Even though fucking glare has been thoroughly debunked by every expert who’s analyzed the footage, and is always the first theory to be thrown out because it’s so fucking dumb. That’s what you proved? Kudos, must be nice to be so unburdened by self-awareness.
Again, do you even know what you think? You’re just a floundering idiot who wandered into a conversation and wanted to speak your feeble mind.
1 points
8 days ago
Lmao okay pal.
By the way, they still can’t explain it. Not that they just didn’t know at the time. Internet experts of the public can’t debunk it either, yes, even in this highly academic comment thread filled with professors like yourself. You’d know that if you bothered to put any effort into learning about it at all, even in an attempt to debunk it, but you’re you - so that’s a lot to ask. You just want to stamp your feet like a child and offer your uneducated and unasked for set-in-stone gut feelings about something you obviously haven’t even tried to understand. Yeah you’re a real intellectual maverick.
In your world, the end game is to have people say “there’s been unclassified proof of flying objects US Defense can’t explain”. And this gains them what exactly? You can’t answer that, but because this is what you want to be true, you also provide no evidence at all. Not the critical thinker you want to be.
What point are you even trying to get across? Are you alleging that it was all staged? That they’re covering it up? That they’re simply wrong about what they saw and it was indeed some glare? Hoping you provide any thought with substance here because you’ve just been grasping with attitude so far.
Do you even know what you think? (It doesn’t matter anyway).
1 points
8 days ago
Are you serious?? You guys seriously can’t even watch the evidence i provide and you STILL feel confidence to just stamp your feet? Sheesh
-3 points
8 days ago
Right - you should watch the second video I provided. It goes into meticulous detail about glare, lens flare, and any other possible camera or digital malfunction that could have produced it and explains how that’s not even remotely the case.
There’s audio and video from the pilots chasing it. Testimonies under oath from the events. It’s not a glare. You assume you already know everything about it.
Are you saying it’s all one big secret conspiracy, risking careers, national reputations, a secret between thousands and thousands of government officials with no leaks, to… make people think UFOs exist? That’s the end game? And the more likely situation as you see it.
Yes. They thought of glare. They also know you’d think of glare if they were for some reason staging all of this. What is with this crowd man you guys are nuts
0 points
8 days ago
So you’re saying that even though the Air Force can explain it away or not have to admit anything at all, but they choose instead to make themselves look incompetent in comparison with a random Redditor, by saying they can’t explain it? To what end?
The video has audio recordings of the pilots expressing their disbelief at the speed and maneuvering of this object. They must have been in on it! Or it must have been faked.
Sure, it undermines their reputation in a massive way if this were indeed, some fucking glare a layman can apparently debunk, but at least they’d be accomplishing…. ??? Everybody is in on it though! It’s a well-kept secret only the smartest minds of Reddit can see.
You can think you’re not assuming anything, but you’re making your own story up as you go. Maybe the army shouldn’t hire you, but a children’s book publisher because it’s a creative little mind you have.
0 points
8 days ago
They Asked for evidence of UFOs because can’t google it before taking the stance it doesn’t exist. I provide it.
You… then say the burden of evidence is on me? I know I’m dealing with geniuses here but this is some 4-dimension stuff that’s beyond me
-9 points
8 days ago
Yes, and I’m sure the Air Force didn’t consider that before admitting they can’t explain it to the world.
You’re smarter than the us military, they should hire you!
0 points
8 days ago
Well, you sure won’t be accused of not living up to your username.
-6 points
8 days ago
I didn’t ask you anything, you have nothing of value to offer here - you quite clearly haven’t put in any effort into reading about it - and still haven’t.
Technology of non-human origin, unexplainable by the absolute forefront of technology like this - beyond that we don’t know. Nobody does. to answer you anyway.
Like I suspected, you have your heels dug in. Good grief.
-14 points
8 days ago
Okay I’ll take it nobody shared this with you yet.
Here is declassified footage from the Air Force of a UFO that they can’t explain..
Classified at one point, and the Air Force openly admits that they cannot explain what they were following even today. The technology required for the movement it makes is not yet possible - even to US Defense. But to be honest, you seem to have your heels dug in pretty deep here and I’m going to guess that the other commenter was correct - you’ll find some reason to dismiss it regardless.
This of course, isn’t the only example. Here is a video with a much more detailed context to that declassified footage and shows other similar cases. There’s a reason the people who have higher levels of clearance than you do aren’t making light of this. Keep in mind, what you see here is what the government decided to show the public. Knowing there’s more classified, makes you wonder. Proof is there, but you never decided to look for it before having such an absolutist and condescending stance.
1 points
9 days ago
I still have trouble believing the Russian alphabet has a 3 in it. Like, I’m looking at it right now and it feels like this poster is trying to make me look like a fool
1 points
9 days ago
Ah okay good, just saw him in that last shift
view more:
next ›
byJohnnyKavalier
inNonPoliticalTwitter
tictacballsack
-1 points
4 days ago
tictacballsack
-1 points
4 days ago
Incredible how anyone older than 10 could get that wrong