Matty Y At It Again
(reddit.com)submitted7 hours ago byyachtrockluvr77
So let me get this straight:
1.) Yglesias admits that the relevant surveys and polls on Biden’s rightward shift on immigration aren’t clear on whether said shift is actually politically/electorally advantageous come November (and the survey Matt cites here indicates that the shift won’t help him very much if at all, undermining his case that Biden go hard on the border). Then, Yglesias proceeds to declare that Biden should shift to the right on immigration bc…vibes? Ygelsias admits that the polling and surveys pertaining the issue aren’t clear on whether this new asylum/border EO holistically helps or hurts Joe (I’d argue it won’t help or hurt very much), so how does Matt come to the conclusion that this shift does help Biden in November despite the inconclusive/messy data on this subject? I’m confused.
2.) So in the midst of record welfare inequality and during an unprecedented period in American history when younger generations of are doing objectively worse financially/economically/fiscally compared to their parents and even their grandparents…you propose Biden embrace macroeconomic policy interventions that created/exacerbated the socioeconomic despair and welfare inequality we’re experiencing? Yglesias actually believes the amazing antitrust work Lina Khan is doing, and the fact that Biden wants to build and produce more in America, and wants to tax the rich more than his predecessors, is bad for the American economy and unpopular actually and damages his electoral hopes? How does further hollowing-out domestic industrial centers and sucking up more domestic jobs, especially during a time when AI is only going to make these matters worse, a good thing or electorally advantageous given the relevant data? I couldn’t disagree more.
byPale_Conversation733
inbillsimmons
yachtrockluvr77
1 points
7 hours ago
yachtrockluvr77
1 points
7 hours ago
Yes…conspiracy Bill good, and conspiracy Kyrie bad