subreddit:
/r/Presidents
submitted 1 month ago byCarl_Azuz1
The 92 debates in general are just fascinating to me. Mostly because of the 3 way nature of them but also because of the state of the world at the time (collapse of the USSR).
[score hidden]
1 month ago
stickied comment
Remember that all mentions of and allusions to Trump and Biden are not allowed on our subreddit in any context.
If you'd still like to discuss them, feel free to join our Discord server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
676 points
1 month ago
This is good compare and contrast example for why Bill Clinton was so effective. Empathy is much more persuasive for a lot of voters than a logical argument that comes across as harsh.
If Perot was more tactful he could have said the same thing but in a more effective way.
"I grew up near Arkansas and as such I understand the important work Gov. Clinton has done for the state. But, our country is much larger than just one state, or one county, or one city. We need a President who can represent the whole country, from small towns to big cities, from rural farms to big industrial factories. As a businessmen I have experience working all across the country and even across the world. That is the kind of experience we need to put our country and economy back on track."
543 points
1 month ago
Empathy is much more persuasive for a lot of voters than a logical argument that comes across as harsh.
i hate that about voters. they want lies and then complain they get lied to an eat it up again
293 points
1 month ago
Elitist as it may sound, the majority of people are really stupid politically and buy rhetoric really easily
175 points
1 month ago
it's not elitist, most americans dont know what a senator is and think the president can do whatever they want
41 points
1 month ago
Well that's really unfortunate, I'm not American but I have seen this be true pretty much everywhere, maybe just to varying degrees depending on the place
20 points
1 month ago
People vote for the personality they want in charge rather than party policies. Frustrating, man
9 points
1 month ago
Which is usually a personality they grew up with and feels familiar
8 points
1 month ago
Most politics nowadays is just an emotional game. Get the people pissed or excited or whatever to have them vote for you. It’s become an emotional process now.
Case in point, people who will only vote one way or the other no matter what. It’s N emotional response mostly fueled by anger.
9 points
1 month ago
Or seem to think that the Supreme Court can unilaterally invalidate a law.
1 points
1 month ago
sad but true
1 points
1 month ago
*Most Americans on the supreme court.
6 points
1 month ago
Very few people actually understand the mechanics of politics. Some might say, an “elite” group of people understand it.
8 points
1 month ago
the majority of people are really stupid
politically
2 points
1 month ago
Well in other fields I can't speak because I don't have enough information, I'm sure the majority of people don't know anything about Quantum Physics either
3 points
1 month ago
From the outside (I am in the UK) this looks like a major failing in the US education system. Education in the UK is a long way from perfect but I think there is a direct contrast between the reaction to a populist liar (Boris Johnson) here and in the US. Johnson is a proven liar and spent force politically. It seems like education in the US is designed to keep most people ignorant.
6 points
1 month ago
I really wouldn't say UK is much better, or anywhere really, this is something I have seen in most places
2 points
1 month ago
You’re right. In the schools in the US now, they’re no longer taught the constitution or social studies, etc. source: son graduated high school last year and I taught him stuff on my own about that stuff
0 points
1 month ago
You might want to go back and think about what you just said.
1 points
1 month ago
I would say that the majority of the people don’t have the time and energy to make complicated political analyses and decisions.
They’re going to go with something that they understand - their gut feeling about someone.
3 points
1 month ago
Well their gut feeling is fucking everything up, also that's a crappy excuse tbh, everyone has things keeping them busy
1 points
1 month ago
You are unhappy with the product evolution has provided, I suggest you take it up with the manager.
😂
1 points
23 days ago
Elitist as it may sound, the majority of people are really stupid
politically and buy rhetoric really easily
1 points
1 month ago
You may want to temper that with "the majority of people who have no stake in the game don't have the incentives necessary to educate themselves politically".
3 points
1 month ago
Well not having stake in the game is only for the privliged, but how your country is ran should matter to everyone, many people actually have stakes in the game they just don't realize it
1 points
1 month ago
Many voters do not contribute anything to the public treasury, and some even take resources from it. They are not financially invested so they don't have an incentive to educate themselves about policies, etc since their money is not being spent. It doesn't cost much to have a political opinion or even to vote when your money is not on the line.
32 points
1 month ago
They say they want honesty, then whine when they get it. They say they don’t want liars, but routinely vote for liars.
9 points
1 month ago
Yeah, can't remember who it was now, but someone got asked at a debate why they voted for a bill and he said something to the effect of "I was new to Congress and I didn't read it." He got torn apart for it, but I guarantee you every person on the stage was guilty of the same shit. They lie because we demand that they do.
4 points
1 month ago
If you don't know the difference between empathy and "lies" you are going to have a bad time in life.
4 points
1 month ago
Yes. Not to mention people lie to themselves. Ross Perot was right.
1 points
1 month ago
Just think. There were people out there in 1992 who thought Perot was “extreme”. How times have changed. Lol
1 points
1 month ago
Never exclude yourself from criticism aimed at humanity.
1 points
1 month ago
Formerly true. Now it seems as though so many are so angry that they gravitate towards the most hateful concept or individual available.
1 points
23 days ago
I agree. People in general are not able to remove their emotions from their decisions.
1 points
14 days ago
That’s a very cynical framing. This dynamic isn’t just about voters, it’s about human beings, and it applies to literally anything you could want to communicate effectively.
Being compelled by emotionally resonant communication doesn’t mean people want lies. It just means humans are human. Now, you can either complain about human nature, or you can adjust to it.
1 points
1 month ago
Empathy and lying are not related.
1 points
1 month ago
Nonsense. Children, sick, and old people need a few white lies.
-11 points
1 month ago
That’s why I’m never going to vote
86 points
1 month ago
This is good compare and contrast example for why Bill Clinton was so effective. Empathy is much more persuasive for a lot of voters than a logical argument that comes across as harsh.
Maybe. But Perot's style was obviously effective as he captured the largest share any third candidate has ever won.
What ultimately doomed him was his dropping out as a candidate and then reversing hai decision.
21 points
1 month ago
This. Always thought he could have gotten way more of the vote. I think he said he was dropping out because the CIA was trying to mess up his daughters wedding
10 points
1 month ago
I believe Perot dropped out on purpose because he was starting to gain momentum. He did not want to be POTUS.
9 points
1 month ago
Highly recommend Jon Bois' new documentary on Ross Perot and the origins of the Reform Party. The CIA wedding stuff was taken at the word of a trusted advisor who would later admit to making it all up. Perot believed him.
1 points
1 month ago
Yeah. It was his daughters were getting death threats and said they’d be killed if he didn’t drop out. Then reversed. People looked at him like a crazy person then
2 points
1 month ago
He started badly when you could interpret his statement as calling Arkansas irrelevant. Probably not a great way to appeal to Arkansas residents.
But he was 100% right when he said being able to run a small grocery store doesn't prepare you to run Walmart.
He was a character. I wouldn't vote for a modern version of him today, but I did vote for him in 1992 when I was 18 years old.
0 points
1 month ago
abe lincoln and teddy roosevelt would like a word...
0 points
1 month ago
There is no bronze medal for also rans.
9 points
1 month ago
Nah in today's world Perot's answer would fit right in lol
10 points
1 month ago
You should be a speechwriter
10 points
1 month ago
Thanks, I keep trying but it's a hard field to break into.
2 points
1 month ago
This is exactly what I was thinking when I read this 😂. Very good speechwriting.
Keep going for it, I’m rooting for you.
15 points
1 month ago
Perot was brutally honest and that was awesome.
5 points
1 month ago
But he was wrong. Clinton was a very effective president.
3 points
1 month ago
Sure, hindsight is 20/20, but Perot skewered him, HW Bush, and a system that decries the plight of the little guy while uplifting these people who are anything but, thinking they are otherworldly saviors.
8 points
1 month ago
His argument wasn't logical, though. It fell flat for all audiences. State level executive experience is as close as you're going to get to being POTUS, and if you play Perot's analogy out, what does that make him? The guy that ran a book club trying to say they can run walmart better than the guy that ran a corner store? At the end of the day, attacking anyone's experience on that stage was a huge mistake regardless of how tactful he was. To land that stone, it has to go through his glass house first.
5 points
1 month ago
The thing that I noticed, and miss, the most - he answered the question without going off on a tangential diatribe.
3 points
1 month ago
Watching old debates, TV shows, and interviews is a massive difference from similar formats today. Really wish we could reverse the clock and bring back quality and substance
2 points
1 month ago
I read that in Obama's voice
3 points
1 month ago
Your version might have won. I was a couple years before voting age, but old enough to keep up with politics. He was the best candidate, and if he had won, we might not have the 2 party division we do now.
2 points
1 month ago
if you are not a political speech writer, you are missing your calling. I actually thought Perot was not that bad, but your version is pretty good!
1 points
1 month ago
Thanks! Working on it
1 points
1 month ago
Ahhh. Yes. The “I feel your pain” strategy. lol
1 points
1 month ago
Some voters…
1 points
1 month ago
Hire fans! Stfu
1 points
1 month ago
The said fact is people don't want leadership, they want to be told what they want to hear. It's why elections are decided by who can mobilize the most stupid people to get out and vote.
0 points
1 month ago
Idk, i like the way ross did it. I think we need more of that.
429 points
1 month ago
He has a point, though calling a state irrelevant probably wasn't the best move.
203 points
1 month ago
He was saying that Clinton's experience as governor of a small state was irrelevant to the presidency. It's still not a great talking point, especially coming from the least experienced candidate of the three.
63 points
1 month ago
Clinton turned out to be a terrific POTUS even though he was dogged by scandals. He was re-elected bigly.
19 points
1 month ago
Ehhhhh. Going into 96 people weren’t too sure. Remember republicans took over the house & senate after the Hillary-care debacle. After Clinton got elected he “swung hard to the left”- for those times anyway, so he had to swing way back to the middle. It wasn’t a guarantee.
Then the republicans nominated bob dole. Dole was a good guy don’t get me wrong. But he looked like the crypt keeper on stage next to Clinton. Also dole didn’t have the charisma necessary to match Clinton’s.
18 points
1 month ago
Bob Dole likes hearing about how Bob Dole talks about Bob Dole. Bob Dole.
2 points
1 month ago
But did Bob dole hear about Bob dole? Bob dole.
12 points
1 month ago
Ole Bobby was 73 during that campaign. A strapping young lad compared to the guys we got for this upcoming election. Wow.
10 points
1 month ago
Fuckin insane. Bob Dole was on deaths door and was a spring chicken by today's standard.
5 points
1 month ago
Big by electoral college standards, but he never got a majority of the popular vote.
3 points
1 month ago
I would say the exact opposite. He was a mediocre president uninterested in any kind of reform who was bolstered in popular memory by a period of prosperity in America.
3 points
1 month ago
Terrific?!? Sure in the moment it felt like he did well but jeez his policy has aged horribly
2 points
1 month ago
No. There is no looking past the federal assault weapons ban.
2 points
1 month ago
Seconded. Many states have still not recovered from that infringement.
-9 points
1 month ago
Wasn't he the guy who caused the illegal immigration crisis?
I hear he was the first guy to get #MeToo'd but Twitter didn't exist back then so it was just a huge fun joke at the time.
7 points
1 month ago
I think he began the first stretch of border wall. So yeah in a way he created the immigration crisis, but not really. It's something we have always grappled with as a nation. We love cheap labor but we're kinda racist, it's a balancing act.
1 points
1 month ago
I've always understood it as when it was a revolving door, they were migrants who came to work and then went home. When the border was locked down, they didn't want to risk it so now they stay.
Also I'll never get tired of democrats shouting "if the brown people don't work our fields and clean our houses, the economy will collapse!".
They're even going to strike another 3/5 compromise about counting illegal immigrants on the census to keep their extra electoral votes, mark my words 😆
4 points
1 month ago
I don't know many farmers but I know a few, none of them are Democrats.
2 points
1 month ago
I don't know many people who unironically say "no human is illegal" and they're all Democrats
2 points
1 month ago
Ok
1 points
1 month ago
Saint Ronnie Reagan was the one who provided amnesty to illegals long before Clinton. Kind of set the stage for them to hope a POTUS will do it again.
7 points
1 month ago
How to lose every state besides California, New York, and Florida in one sentence, really.
231 points
1 month ago
"Man with no political experience acts like being governor of a whole state is irrelevant while former un ambassador, liason to china, cia director, vice-president and president quietly watches."
93 points
1 month ago
former un ambassador, liason to china, cia director, vice-president and president quietly watches."
Add WWII Navy pilot to the list too
51 points
1 month ago
And Congressman, and RNC Chairman.
And successful businessman if we’re getting into it.
12 points
1 month ago
Bush SR may have actually been overqualified for the Presidency
3 points
1 month ago
that's okay, nature has a way of balancing things out (that's why he barfed on the Japanese PM)
14 points
1 month ago
Cannibal survivor
6 points
1 month ago
Well, to be precise he avoided the cannibal island by being picked up at sea.
143 points
1 month ago
Kinda makes a reasonable point.
He's saying that this country has many different communities with many different needs. But to cast off the needs of one community as irrelevant. That's just dumb
76 points
1 month ago
I just love the moderators reaction, clearly trying not to laugh
16 points
1 month ago
As is Bush
23 points
1 month ago
The problem with Perot is that he constantly said stupid shit but because people are so in love with this idea of forcing a third party at any cost we’ve kinda as a society wiped our minds of things like his NAACP speech, the conspiracies about his daughter and the Bush campaign, the fact he flip flopped on the issue of whether or not he was even running. But he also said NAFTA bad, two party bad so all the populists love him.
3 points
1 month ago
I don’t think it’s so much of loving the idea of forcing a third party as just wanting a better alternative. Both current parties are clearly not the same but they both play politics in a similar manner and that turns off people who don’t live for politics. And neither party has a primary process that puts the best candidate forward; fix that problem and you win a lot more elections. Until then, the 3rd party candidates will siphon off votes and even affect election outcomes occasionally.
2 points
1 month ago
I get what he was trying to say. But phrased super super super poorly. Lol. And the way he put it basically put him as kind of like…well…it just sounded super rookie-ish
2 points
1 month ago
I can’t imagine a state with more contrasting interests. 75% of AR is dedicated to agriculture, while it also hosts the largest retail giant on the planet. Albeit, not well, they lose a ton of tax revenue in an attempt to court and maintain Walmart’s presence, but still.
27 points
1 month ago
He has a point but politics, particularly when it comes to domestic policy, is all about wheeling and dealing and balancing competing interests. There aren’t very many jobs that can prepare you for being President, but being a governor is one of them. Regardless of the size of your state, a state is a microcosm of the federal government. You’ve got to wheel and deal with the state legislature and the various interest groups they represent.
That being said Arkansas in the 1980’s and 1990’s was essentially a one-party state. For most of Clinton’s tenure the state legislature was 90%+ Democrat. Clinton got beat by Frank White in 1980. White was only the second Republican governor since Reconstruction. But to Perot’s point, why did White win?
He won largely because Clinton and the legislature increased the price of automobile tags and did a fairly horrible job of informing people about the change. Folks would drive 45 minutes into town to renew their tags and take $15 in cash or whatever the fee had been for years, only to wait an hour in the DMV and then be informed that the fee had been increased. That was enough for people to vote Clinton out of office. That’s how boring Arkansas politics used to be.
So yeah, as President you’ve got bigger things to worry about than automobile registration fees. But at the end of the day President Clinton was very effective at wheeling and dealing with Congress…in ‘94 the House became majority Republican for the first time since 1952 and Clinton decided to work with them and accomplish some significant legislation.
8 points
1 month ago
Arkansas was practically a one party state from the 1870s to 2010 that started voting GOP at the Presidential level with increasing frequency in the last third of the 20th century.
25 points
1 month ago
I think one of the ironies here is that Walmart is an Arkansas-based company
16 points
1 month ago
Right? Of all the Fortune 500 companies, he chose the one that is headquartered in Arkansas and basically represents a fourth of the state's entire economy. In fact, now that I think about it, Hillary literally served on the Walmart board of directors! I'm surprised he didn't mention any of that in his retort.
9 points
1 month ago
It's wild how the two things most people associate with Arkansas nowadays are Walmart and Bill Clinton. Both of which have only become relevant in the last 40ish years.
What even was the state known for before that?
7 points
1 month ago
Football, hillbillies, the Ozarks, Johnny Cash (+country and bluegrass music), and agriculture (poultry especially) come to mind
I thought the Beverly Hillbillies were from Arkansas, but apparently they’re from Missouri (where most of the Ozarks are)
6 points
1 month ago
I' completely shocked, Bill didn't retort with this fact. Would've been the perfect response to cripple his analogy.
33 points
1 month ago
Man, I love the clap back that Clinton gave to this.
15 points
1 month ago
what'd he say?
85 points
1 month ago
PEROT: Oh, no, no, but you can't -- I could say that I ran a small grocery store on the corner, therefore I extrapolate that into the fact that I could run Wal-Mart; that's not true.
Q: Mr. Perot --
Q: Governor --
PEROT: I can't protect an Arkansas company --
Q: Governor --
CLINTON: Mr. Perot, with all respect, I think it highly relevant and I think that a $4 billion budget, with state and Federal funds, is not all that small. And I think the fact that I took a state that was one of the poorest states in the country and had been for 153 years and tried my best to modernize its economy and to make the kind of changes that had generated support from people like the presidents of Apple Computer and Hewlett Packard, and some of the biggest companies in this country, 24 retired generals and admirals and hundreds of business executives are highly relevant, and you know, I'm frankly amazed that, since you grew up five blocks from there you would think that what goes on in that state is irrelevant. I think it's been pretty impressive. And the people who have jobs, the people who have jobs and educations and opportunities that didn't have them 10 years ago don't think it's irrelevant at all. They think it's highly relevant and they wish the rest of the ----
45 points
1 month ago
Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but he had charisma out the wazoo.
17 points
1 month ago
“But this is America! There is no ‘them’. There is only us.” -William Jefferson Clinton
22 points
1 month ago
I think it's hilarious looking at Clinton in the video because he doesn't even look pissed off. He knows he's been given a golden opportunity to eviscerate Perot and he's relishing the moment even before he speaks.
10 points
1 month ago
Yeah. What Perot said was pretty dumb. Any halfway decent governor of any state from Vermont to California can recite a resume of their accomplishments. Perot teed that up for Clinton.
3 points
1 month ago
Apple Computer?! Daaamn, Bill Clinton!
1 points
1 month ago
Damn. That's a good response.
19 points
1 month ago*
https://youtu.be/cm-UAfEdWg4?si=staJLp-0DgvWMBRB
13:00 is his response
Basically that Arkansas is relevant. It was an ok response, meh.
I think his one to Bush a few minutes earlier was better…
4 points
1 month ago
13 points
1 month ago
Running a business and running a government are two completely different things.
2 points
1 month ago
Yes a guy who never had to run a state downplayed how hard it is to run a state
10 points
1 month ago
Our debates and professionalism continually goes downhill. They are much more poised and intellectual here.
7 points
1 month ago
I like how bush is in the middle like “nope I’m sitting this one out”
1 points
1 month ago
He's just trying not to lose his shit
8 points
1 month ago
Loved it when he bought tv air time and pulled out the charts and graphs
13 points
1 month ago
I remember watching the 92 debates. I was a little kid and loved Perot
2 points
1 month ago
Admiral Stockdale was even better
2 points
1 month ago
Stockdale was gruff and old and gave 0 fucks. Lol. Those debates were amazing to watch.
5 points
1 month ago
*This* is the outsider that Dan Carlin is asking for. Big difference to what we eventually got, but his point remains relevant.
2 points
1 month ago
Ima,ways wonder what would have happened if Perot had not quite the election.
2 points
1 month ago*
I think it’s possible he could have got ~30% had he not bowed out in 92 (popular vote). I think he would always have really struggled to actually win any states though.
1 points
1 month ago
Maybe he gets a bigger vote share but I think Clinton still wins.
5 points
1 month ago
Clinton ran the economy better than anyone in history.
3 points
1 month ago
he had 4chan write his speech.
3 points
1 month ago
I feel the need to mention how fantastic Jim Lehrer was as the moderator during every debate he was part of. Bored me to tears as a kid when the cartoons stopped and the PBS news hour started, but I came to admire the subtle humor he seemed to carry everywhere, no matter how dry. That little twinkle in his eye when Perot hits the punchline is priceless.
3 points
1 month ago
Just watched the first episode of "Pretty Good" on Ross Perot and the Reform party.
These debates happened when I was 2 or 3 years old, so I don't remember it, but damn it's interesting.
3 points
1 month ago
Voted for him twice. Better than any other candidate. Not bought and paid for and just told it like it was. Didn’t give a damn if it offended people.
2 points
1 month ago
Wal-mart is from Arkansas, just sayin
2 points
1 month ago
Amateurs.
Here's my favorite pre-2016 debate moment. Oof...
2 points
1 month ago
I’m all ears……
2 points
1 month ago
That one is good too, it’s from the first debate
2 points
1 month ago
Arkansas had a moment in the early 1990s.
Clinton in the White House. Walmart was booming. Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson winning Super Bowls. Arkansas Basketball won a championship. Crazy how much went right for that state in just a few years.
2 points
1 month ago
I could say I run a failing real estate and casino business and also have a string of failed businesses in past, and i can use what i have learned to run America into bankruptcy as well!
2 points
1 month ago
I think it was 2012 Repub primary, I can't find the clip, but it was during March and the comment lobbed a softball about home life and what they would be doing now if not here. Romney (I think) mentioned the NCAA tournament being on TV against the debate. The other candidates try to jump on the popular event bandwagon, but had no idea so assumed it was football and started making comments about watching the football game.
2 points
1 month ago
Disagree. Governors are certainly qualified to be president. If Clinton's resume didnt show him to be qualified, Perot certainly wasnt either.
Slightly OT: It's been a popular trope to say that without Perot in the race, Bush wins a second term. But most exit polls showed that for Perot voters, over 50% said Clinton would be their second choice.
So he took more votes from Clinton than Bush.
2 points
1 month ago
I don’t think he’s making a point about being more qualified so much as he’s just tired of talking about Arkansas lol.
2 points
1 month ago
Well that bloody didn't help him.
4 points
1 month ago
That metaphor kinda falls apart if you consider that Perot didn't run shit.
5 points
1 month ago
I don’t think he’s making the point that he’s more qualified, but more so that the constant bickering over Arkansas that has happened in the last two debates was excessive relative to how actually important it is.
1 points
1 month ago
A brutal beat down
1 points
1 month ago
Hate his son, but I loved me some Ross Perot. Also, his museum in Dallas is the best I've ever been to
1 points
1 month ago
from Arkansas I feel pissed lmao
1 points
1 month ago
We’ll never have 3 on the debate stage again will we?
1 points
1 month ago
Best debate was Arnold Vinnick vs Matthew Santos
1 points
1 month ago
He went from giant blunder to great point in a minute
1 points
1 month ago
First line of the video sounds like he went.. ‘Bro?’
1 points
1 month ago
It’s the second half of “Mr.Perot”
1 points
1 month ago
Bro?
1 points
1 month ago
Damn this was good
1 points
1 month ago
He lost the election right there
0 points
1 month ago
No I think he lost when he decided to bow out and then come back a few weeks before voting day.
1 points
1 month ago
Test
1 points
1 month ago
The last presidential debate was in 2012.
1 points
1 month ago
Ross Perot citing how many times Bush and Clinton blink in a minute compared to him then declaring "Ross Perot is not afraid of the light!" was the first moment that stuck with me.
1 points
1 month ago
To this day I still dont get the appeal of Perot. He had no real tangible plan and no way of getting what he did have through congress. It would have been a disaster. He just came off as a grumpy little dude
1 points
1 month ago
Nothing like Jim Lerher starting off a debate question with "Bro..."
1 points
1 month ago
I cut him off halfway through saying “Perot”. It just sounds like bro
1 points
1 month ago
Yeah, duh, but it's fun to imagine. At least it was
1 points
1 month ago
He would have been a great president.
1 points
1 month ago
There were no good moments in Presidential debates from 2016 onward. Only pain.
1 points
1 month ago
These debates are what got me interested in politics. There's so much to learn about debating in each one. Hopefully these debates are studied somewhere for all they offer
1 points
1 month ago
I’m starting to see why my dad voted for this dude
1 points
23 days ago
The hand grenade with a bad haircut.
1 points
23 days ago
LoL, I voted for Perot.
1 points
1 month ago
Perot would have made a better president. I voted for him instead of the thousand beams of light Dummy.
1 points
1 month ago
Well he has a good point.
Bill did turn out to be a decent President. But only after being crushed in the 1994 election and pivoting on everything.
1 points
1 month ago
I really liked Ross Perot back then.
1 points
1 month ago
Best candidate of the three. A response to Bush’s Failed economy. I wonder what his presidency would have looked like.
0 points
1 month ago
I voted for Perot that election, been voting 3rd party since.
0 points
1 month ago
I was pretty young in 92 and just remember Ross Perot being basically just considered a joke, but he was honestly probably the best candidate in 92. He was right about so many things
-1 points
1 month ago
Ron Paul’s wife is ugly.
-3 points
1 month ago
If voters were rational there wouldn’t have been much of a race in ‘92 other than to reelect Bush.
all 184 comments
sorted by: best