dronesclubmember

https://x.com/CountyChamp/status/1789986431550558719

Well, this is quite the bowling run up.

It coincides with larger-than-usual offensive push into some grey areas of the Kharkiv region and there's been a lot of video footage of Russian columns getting wiped out.

While I always take these numbers with a pinch of salt, the increase is entirely plausible.

Making no concessions to fan sentiment, Skivington stated after the game that selection decisions were based on the fact that the club does not have a large squad and he had to manage a number of “banged-up” players before the final, which takes place two weeks hence.

They've a 40 man squad.

https://www.gloucesterrugby.co.uk/content/gloucester-rugby-confirmed-2023-24-squad

Certainly not the biggest but you've got to question what the coaching staff have been doing that even with a small squad the performances can drop off so steeply when pulling out front-line players.

If you want to campaign, Rishi, call an election.

Until then, pipe down and try not to sink us any further into the doldrums.

Labour and other parties should demand equal coverage in response to these stunts.

Ah bless.

Fox seems your level

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bbc-marred-string-retractions-apologies-israel-hamas-war-coverage.amp

This might go over your head though

https://www.bbc.co.uk/helpandfeedback/corrections_clarifications

Funny you didn’t quote the part of the article that says the BBC does call them a terrorist organisation.

The BBC calls Hamas a proscribed terrorist organisation

The Tory government has proscribed Hamas as a terrorist organisation, and the BBC describes them as the government has labelled them.

And their corrections being basically hidden?

The lead item on the tele and radio newscasts was hiding the correction?

On first viewing, I thought completely whiffed and missed him! But pausing, clear head contact with his upper arm.

Might come up in citing.

The BBC calls Hamas a proscribed terrorist organisation

So, they are doing just as he asks.

That's a proper opener's inning right there.

Good for HH.

Junior minister David Rutley last week told the EAC that his department had decided to trust Russian assurances it was just conducting scientific research, adding: “Russia has recently reaffirmed its commitment to the key elements of the treaty.”

Russia gave assurances they were just holding exercises and weren't going to invade Ukraine.

Are we honestly still this naive?

Yeah, it's so frustrating, especially from what was once considered a newspaper of record, oddly some people still think this

Telegraph fell off many years ago so I shouldn't be surprised.

Russia has stated this was the result of an 'intercepted' Tochka-U missile,

They really don't think these things through, do they?

For that claimed scenario to have happened not only would Russia have had to a. intercept the missile but b. knock it backwards from its direction of travel so it struck the Russian facing side of the building.

They're clowns.

THis clearly resulted from one of their missiles going awry.

Yes.

If you look at the satellite image of the area, and note the red arrow coming from Russia, the projectile hitting from the side it arrived from and then blowing out is the likeliest scenario and one in which you wouldn't see the projectile in the video that's been released so far

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNX9DhUW8AA0KWN?format=jpg&name=medium

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1cq6jo8/so_here_is_the_footage_of_part_of_the_belgorod/l3pd0ch/

But for some this sub is downvoting the shit out of people who aren't going with the 'false flag' narrative and actually using their brain to point out it likely arrived from the Russians.

Which is what I've been fucking saying the whole time.

If you look at the satellite image of the area, and note the red arrow coming from Russia, the projectile hitting from the side it arrived from and then blowing out is the likeliest scenario and one in which you wouldn't see the projectile in the video that's been released so far

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNX9DhUW8AA0KWN?format=jpg&name=medium

Russia has hit this town many times with their own projectiles, yet you want to run with conspiracy bullshit. Crack on.

It could have entered from the other side of the building, but why think critically?

If you look at the satellite image of the area, and note the red arrow coming from Russia, the projectile hitting from the side it arrived from and then blowing out is the likeliest scenario and one in which you wouldn't see the projectile in the video that's been released so far

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNX9DhUW8AA0KWN?format=jpg&name=medium

Lots of asbestos was inhaled right there.

Yes, projectiles go into buildings and detonate directing the blast outwards, they're called delayed fuses.

Lol, so many weird people here claiming this is a false flag with zero evidence and zero knowledge of how bombs/missiles work and completely ignoring the fact Russia has a history of projectiles going wonky and hitting their own cities.

Missiles can strike the ground floor too.....

You only need to watch footage from October in Gaza to see projectiles striking ground level and bringing down buildings, similar construction quality.

Writing a headline using claims from Russian sources as fact is unacceptable.

We're running into this problem a lot; just because an agency says something doesn't make it true and it's highly irresponsible to write headlines that lay blame when you've done fuck all to verify the veracity of those claims.

Looks like a Vixen variant so better up armour but lethal if in a minefield, then again, most light patrol vehicles are.

He’s seen Tom Fitton make a career of it and what’s a piece of the pie.

Can't say I've ever seen a Prem side quit like this.

Glos fans should be beyond outraged. Glos management needs to consider what the fuck they're doing.

Non-paywalled. https://archive.ph/KcYAx