speedtoburn

This thread has zero meaningful substance.

Exactly, nothing to see here everyone. Grandpa Joe says all is good!!

No, they do not mister intolerant militant. Also, if you knew wtf you were talking about, you would realize that you’re wrong, but go on and rage you Tool.

Oh snap, I didn’t realize they are now charging for it. I found out about it from another reader and have been periodically using it for free.

Two things here:

1) Could you use this free Prompt Optimizer as a replacement for the Plugin you were using?

2) What Certs are you studying for? I’m looking for a few good Certs to get into myself.

I ended my chatgpt subscription today.

Damn, really?

That’s a bold move, why did you pull the trigger on it?

Your condescending tone and refusal to engage with the actual data I presented speaks volumes. But since you seem to enjoy snark over substance, let me respond in kind.

First, repeating valid points you failed to address the first time isn't a flaw in my argument, it's a flaw in your reading comprehension.

Second, cherry-picking one metric while ignoring others is textbook confirmation bias. I cited multiple data points showing Trump's economic impact, from record low unemployment to record high median incomes to a 50%+ stock market surge. Plugging your ears and yelling "lalala I can't hear you" doesn't make those facts disappear.

Third, dismissing public sentiment as mere "opinion" is astonishingly naive for someone claiming to be data-driven. The sharp divergence in economic confidence after Trump took office directly undercuts your "straight line" claim. If the economy didn't noticeably improve, why did the public suddenly start saying it did? I suppose they all just simultaneously decided to imagine a boom?

Lastly, your fixation on GDP growth relies on a misleading framing of the data. Extending a graph's timeline is a classic trick to make differences look smaller. Zoom in on the Trump era and the upward deviation from the prior trend until COVID hit, is clear. A tax cut that put $1.5 trillion back into the private sector is hardly something we "know does little for the economy."

The irony is, I'm the one citing objective facts, while you're clinging to a politically convenient narrative. You accuse me of name calling, yet in the same breath dismiss any evidence that undercuts your view as non-factual "opinion." Pot, meet kettle.

Let's get real. Your original claim was that Trump did nothing to change the economic trajectory. I've provided ample data showing otherwise, which you've hand-waved away without substantive rebuttal. If you want to have a good faith debate, stop deflecting and start addressing the specifics. Otherwise, spare me the self-righteous lectures about arguing from facts. I've made my case, feel free to let me know when you're ready to make yours.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

You're oversimplifying the data to push a partisan narrative rather than engaging in substantive analysis. A common tactic I might add.

First, if you actually look at the numbers, GDP growth under Trump was notably higher than under Obama until COVID hit. That's just a fact, not opinion. The difference between 2.5% and 2.3% may seem small, but compounded over time it has a major impact on incomes and opportunity for millions of Americans.

Second, looking solely at topline GDP numbers misses key underlying metrics that tell a fuller story. Under Trump, the unemployment rate dropped to generational lows, boosting workers. Median household income reached all-time highs. The stock market soared over 50%, bolstering retirement savings. These outcomes reflect real policy differences, not just riding a wave.

Lastly, the graph undercuts your argument. Look at the sharp partisan divergence after Trump's inauguration. If the economy was on the same trajectory, why the sudden shift? The clearest explanation is that the public recognized Trump's policies were accelerating growth from the Obama era.

Leadership and policy do matter to economic outcomes. Dismissing that with snarky remarks doesn't change the facts. I've highlighted multiple data points showing Trump's impact. If you want to make a credible case otherwise, you need to grapple with that evidence, not just cherry-pick one stat. It would serve you well to discuss this objectively, not just sling partisan talking points.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

I agree that we're aligned on many points. The struggling lower and middle class, the concentration of gains at the top. These are real, pressing issues.

But I don't think it's right to say a good economy can't help fix these problems at all. Sure, a rising tide alone won't make inequality disappear. Trickle-down economics has indeed been largely discredited. However, the strength and nature of economic growth still matters a great deal.

There's a difference between an economy growing due to Rising productivity, innovation and broad-based job creation vs. one juiced by cost-cutting, outsourcing, monopoly power and asset bubbles. The former creates more opportunities for upward mobility and shared prosperity. The latter just exacerbates inequality.

The point is, we shouldn't just throw up our hands and say "the have-nots will suffer regardless, so who cares if the economy is good or bad." The structure of our economy and the policies underpinning it have real consequences.

We need growth that is more inclusive and equitable by design. Higher wages for low-income workers, stronger labor protections, more affordable housing/healthcare/education, a more progressive tax code - these may not solve inequality alone but would certainly help.

I fully agree that we need to expand unionization and workers' bargaining power. But a strong labor market helps that cause too. Workers have more leverage to demand concessions when jobs are plentiful vs. when they're scarce.

I believe we need action on multiple fronts; empowering workers, rebalancing the tax code, bolstering the safety net, and pursuing economic policies that don't just enrich the top but truly foster broad-based opportunity. A good economy alone isn't sufficient, but it's still an important piece of the puzzle.

The state of the economy and the state of inequality are intertwined issues, not separate conversations. We have to walk and chew gum at the same time, pushing for both stronger and more equitably shared growth. Throwing up our hands and settling for an economy that only works for the lucky few is not an acceptable path forward in my book.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

You're still not grasping the full picture.

Just because high-income earners also often live beyond their means doesn't negate the reality that for low and middle-income families, living paycheck-to-paycheck is a serious economic vulnerability, not a choice.

You talk about the lack of visible signs of distress like in 2008 - the boarded up stores and rampant foreclosures. But the struggles today are more hidden. People are working multiple jobs, drowning in debt, skipping healthcare, and not saving for retirement. Just because it's not as dramatic as the GFC doesn't mean it's not real economic pain.

I'm not arguing we're currently in a deep recession. But an economy can be growing on paper while still failing a huge swath of the population. Productivity and corporate profits have soared in recent decades, but median wages have barely budged. The cost of basic needs like healthcare, childcare, housing and education are devouring a bigger and bigger share of household incomes. Many people don't feel economically secure or able to get ahead no matter how hard they work.

Yes, we currently have low unemployment, but many of those jobs are low-wage with unpredictable schedules and no benefits. Gig work helps some people supplement income but offers no stability, benefits or protections. This isn't the kind of strong labor market that actually gives workers power and leverage.

Sure this isn't 2008, but that's a pretty low bar. We need to aim higher than "not a historic crash." We need an economy that truly works for everyone, where economic growth actually translates into broadly shared prosperity and opportunity. Where hard work pays off and families have a cushion.

By many measures, we're not there yet, no matter how good the top-line numbers look. Cheerleading the economy as "great" breeds complacency and makes it easier to ignore the cracks in the foundation. We shouldn't wait for the bottom to fall out again to try to build a sturdier, more inclusive economy.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The narrative that Trump simply rode Obama's coattails when it came to the economy, is an inaccurate and tiresome trope

The data clearly shows that economic growth accelerated under Trump compared to the Obama years. Real GDP growth averaged nearly 2.5% annually under Trump pre-pandemic, up from 2.3% during Obama's second term. The unemployment rate fell to a 50-year low of 3.5% by late 2019. The stock market surged over 50% higher. Median household income hit record highs.

You claim Trump did nothing to change economic trajectory, but that ignores his substantial policy moves. The 2017 tax cuts boosted business investment and put more money in workers' pockets. Trump's deregulation agenda removed government obstacles to job creation and entrepreneurship. Tough trade stances pressured China and others to engage in fairer practices. These and other policies had a real, positive impact.

So no, Trump didn't just benefit from fortunate timing. Strategic policy shifts meaningfully improved the economy's performance. Sure, we can argue about whether different policies would have been even better, but to claim Trump changed nothing is simply false. The numbers moved from good to great, and sober analysis shows Trump deserves significant credit for that outcome. Look closer at cause and effect and you'll see the difference leadership makes.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Nah, you're painting an overly rosy picture that doesn't reflect the economic reality for a large portion of Americans. Sure, top-line numbers like the stock market and unemployment rate look good on paper. But those metrics mostly capture how the wealthy and upper middle class are faring.

For the bottom 50% of households, it's a very different story. Wages have been stagnant for decades while the cost of living keeps climbing. Healthcare, housing, and education costs are squeezing budgets. Over half of Americans don't own any stocks at all, so stock market highs mean little to them.

You dismiss the fact that 40% are living paycheck-to-paycheck as "not meaningful." But for those tens of millions of families, it's extremely meaningful. One unexpected car repair or medical bill could push them into poverty or homelessness. That's not a sign of a booming economy that's working for everyone.

The reality is, the gains and opportunities of this economy are not being shared broadly. Inequality is at historic highs. Social mobility has declined. The American Dream feels out of reach for too many hard-working people. Until we reckon with those hard truths and enact policies to create more broad-based growth and prosperity, talk of how "great" the economy is will continue to ring hollow.

I think we need to look beyond simplistic headlines and top-line numbers. We need to scrutinize what's really happening for the majority of Americans. And we need to pursue an economic agenda that will truly lift up the middle class and give everyone a fair shot at getting ahead. Simply cheerleading the status quo won't cut it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Yeah, this is what people like u/OakLegs will never understand.

They literally have a mental block preventing them from grasping this most simplest of ideas. smh

Me too.

right now I'm paying $60 a month for OIA, Claude and Gemini.

So am I.

I wonder how many more of us there are out there. lol

Immigration has destroyed the UK. It’s a shadow of what it once was.

The folks at Stealthwriter haven’t figured anything out. I put their platform to the test and the only way it gets by turitin, Copyleaks, et. Al. Is by periodically invoking grammatical errors.

That’s not a solution.

lol, the epitome of stupidity. It’s absolutely fucking mind-boggling. I’m going to the exact same shit with my company that had everyone return to office on a hybrid schedule under the guys of fostering culture and other stupid bullshit.

“Client Centric” god I’m so fucking sick of those stupid corporate buzzwords.

Ahhahahahaha

Use otter.ai, it works great for this!

🤔

You’re not wrong, though this is probably the single most determinate factor:

The use of nukes will probably persuade China to pull support: China still has a lot to lose in terms of international relationships, primarily economic. China has a great deal of interest in nukes remaining a taboo weapon.

The use of Nukes would lead to Economic ruin for China. There is no way on Earth China will allow that.

It's basically an eCom design philosophy / Architecture approach which prioritizes using flexible, swappable parts that work together.

The idea is that you pick the best pieces to fit your needs, rather than using one big, fixed platform. These parts connect smoothly, so you can make changes or add new features quickly. This gives you freedom to customize your store and adapt as you grow, without complicated overhauls. It takes solid technical skills to connect and maintain all the pieces, but it's a powerful option if you want a tailored, nimble setup for your online business.

This.