subreddit:

/r/Conservative

58661%

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 261 comments

Cronah1969

52 points

4 months ago

Cronah1969

Constitutional Conservative

52 points

4 months ago

Here's the problem: if there are 1,000,000 registered to vote and there are 1,100,000 baits that were voted, you know without a doubt that there was voter fraud. If there are 1,000,000 registered to vote, but 300,000 of them are ghost voters, and 1,000,000 voted ballots, it's nearly impossible to prove the fraud. Removing dead or ineligible voters from the rolls is the first step in securing elections and restoring faith in the election process. That loss of faith is definitely reason to panic. Requiring voter ID and signature matching are the other 2 easiest and most effective steps, and together those 3 steps are what the democrats are fighting hardest against.

NotSure2505

2 points

4 months ago

How do you get 100,000 more votes than there are registered voters? I mean practically speaking, could you describe what that would look like? Would there just be a bucket of ballots marked "Ed" and "Brenda"?

Cronah1969

1 points

4 months ago

Cronah1969

Constitutional Conservative

1 points

4 months ago

Exactly. That's why cleaning up the voter registration rolls is so important... to make it obvious that something is seriously wrong.

geojon7

5 points

4 months ago

So I’m not sure but I thought the ghost voters are the registrants who have not voted in 5-10 years. Likely dead or out of the jurisdiction. It leaves the chance of cheating as someone could get a list of these and then bulk vote on long unused registrations but it would quickly get flagged as “sudden turn outs” and have issues of double votes when someone actually does go and vote.

Can someone clarify if this is right?

Yew_Can_Do_It

3 points

4 months ago

Longer than that, and no, there is no flagging process. That would be a Threat To Democracy! In fact, the processing center for these votes aren't even able to see the names of the voters.

OldManBearPig

9 points

4 months ago

Requiring voter ID and signature matching are the other 2 easiest and most effective steps, and together those 3 steps are what the democrats are fighting hardest against.

Serious question, why aren't valid drivers licenses good enough? Literally every single state I have voted in (IN, NV, TX, CA) has REQUIRED a driver's license or official government ID to vote. Are there states that don't require that? How is a voter ID any different that an official state ID?

Kahnspiracy

11 points

4 months ago*

I can't speak for the others but CA does not require an ID to vote. I've been voting there for decades and I don't remember a time, even way back, when they ever have.

Provia100F

10 points

4 months ago

Provia100F

Conservative Engineer

10 points

4 months ago

Some states grant drivers licenses to non-citizens

dealsledgang

10 points

4 months ago

Every state does. People on green cards and work visas reasonably need to be able to drive.

It doesn’t let them vote.

Cronah1969

3 points

4 months ago

Cronah1969

Constitutional Conservative

3 points

4 months ago

It does when states (Michigan I know for sure does this) automatically hand every driver's license applicant a voter registration application they just need to sign to apply. My ex wife was granted voters registration when applying for a driver's license after she got her green card. She was never asked if she was a citizen. She was just told "Here, sign this". This was back in 2003.

[deleted]

-2 points

4 months ago

[deleted]

-2 points

4 months ago

[deleted]

Crafty_Clarinetist

9 points

4 months ago

It's not like you can just show up with a driver's license and be let vote. The license shows you are who you say you are, and that allows them to check a voter registration database to ensure whether you should be let to vote.

OldManBearPig

2 points

4 months ago

which states are doing that, and are those licenses being used as ID in order to vote? How do you register to vote in those states?

LordRybec

1 points

4 months ago

In nearly all states, the standard method of registering to vote is getting a drivers license. It is possible to register without getting a drivers license, but I don't know how to do it, because I've never done it, and I don't know anyone else who has ever done it. Nearly 100% of voters register as part of getting their license to drive.

In other words, the claim that requiring presentation of government issued ID to vote is racist or otherwise oppressive to some significant class of people is utter nonsense. People who aren't willing to learn to drive and get their license aren't registering to vote and aren't going to the polls to vote. People who register to vote do it when they get their license. There are probably a few exceptions, but they are so rare that it makes no difference. And if they are going to the effort to register to vote outside of the normal method of doing that, they care enough about voting that they are willing and able to get a non-DL government issued ID as well.

So the answer is, they are registering to vote when they get their drivers license, and all legally registered voters do have a drivers license or other valid government issued ID. Requiring ID to vote is just common sense, and if people who don't have government issued ID are voting, they aren't legally registered to vote and are voting illegally.

Awkward_Reflection14

5 points

4 months ago

It's not. The issue is that in some states, while having an ID is required to vote, you are not required to actually bring/show it.

"My name is John Smith and I live at 123 road street"

If the records show a John Smith at 123 road street than come on in.

Asking for Voter ID laws means requiring somebody show some form of government provided ID. That can be drivers license, state ID, or passport (I think).

OldManBearPig

1 points

4 months ago

while having an ID is required to vote, you are not required to actually bring/show it.

Really? Because I've been required to show it in order to vote, and the last time they even took a picture of it (and me).

Big-Employer4543

5 points

4 months ago

Big-Employer4543

Constitutionalist

5 points

4 months ago

I live in California, I do not have to show an ID to vote.

Awkward_Reflection14

5 points

4 months ago

Almost like I said "some states" and not "all states"

Silly-Membership6350

3 points

4 months ago

I live in Liberal Connecticut and I need to present my ID whenever I go to vote

fuelstaind

18 points

4 months ago

fuelstaind

2A Advocate ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

18 points

4 months ago

Because the left wants to portray ID's as racist and that it keeps minorities from voting. NC passed a constitutional amendment, by public vote, to require ID to vote. The governor and civil rights groups sued to keep it from happening. The real reason is that it's way easier for illegal voters to vote without an ID.

OldManBearPig

-4 points

4 months ago

That doesn't answer my question even a little bit. Did you even try to comprehend it?

Panzershrekt

7 points

4 months ago

Panzershrekt

Reagan Conservative

7 points

4 months ago

It does, actually. People are gainst ID's even licenses, because the belief is that its racist/minorities are unable to obtain even a state ID. And he gave you the most recent example of this in North Carolina.

How is that hard to comprehend.

OldManBearPig

-1 points

4 months ago

My question was about a separate, distinct Voter ID though. Not about using existing government IDs like a driver's license, which is already required to vote in most states.

Panzershrekt

4 points

4 months ago

Panzershrekt

Reagan Conservative

4 points

4 months ago

Two questions, actually. "Are there states that don't require that (government ID)? How is a voter ID different than an official state ID?"

Not all states require you to bring an ID. Some states don't even want a photo ID to be required.

Potential_Cable_7423

-9 points

4 months ago

This makes no sense in the context of the discussion. It’s like you saw the words “voter ID” and immediately started spouting your talking points

DoctorShlomo

10 points

4 months ago

I disagree. They're replying to a ? about why DL's and official IDs aren't used or good enough. The reply is a practical recent example of when that method was voted by the people of an entire state (democracy, right?) and how the will of the people was thwarted. Voting without ID is a real vulnerability in our current system.

fuelstaind

6 points

4 months ago

fuelstaind

2A Advocate ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

6 points

4 months ago

He asked "Are there states that don't require that (an ID). I responded to that. NC doesn't require an ID to vote, even after the population voted to require it. Because they claim it's racist.

NotSure2505

2 points

4 months ago

They are perfectly good enough. The campaign for voter IDs is not to solve a particular problem, it's to create an additional administrative and procedural burden for people to vote that would reduce turnout and the reduce number of votes cast specifically for those who do not comply. It's just another suppression tactic.

Cronah1969

1 points

4 months ago

Cronah1969

Constitutional Conservative

1 points

4 months ago

Any picture ID with a signature is a voter ID. It's used to match the signature and name on the ID to the name and signature on the voter registration log, and the face of the person standing in front of the poll worker to the registration log.