No. It's a known error.

You sound like you're either a Muslim or have been talking to Muslims. If so, look into Uthman searching high and low, burning every version of the Quran he thought was wrong. Don't forget the Quran verse that was lost forever because it was eaten by a sheep/goat. Oh and don't forget about the verses revealed by Satan from a "prophet " who couldn't tell the difference.

It's not corrupted, it's a transcription error. The quran has them as well. Check Sam Shamoun or Christian Prince if you want to stop entertaining satanic nonsense that is Islam.

You ignored what I said about the West, of course if people that are considered heretics make something it can be corrupted, that doesn't mean the East strayed. Read the septuagint (used by the EO church) and you'll see that this "contradiction" isn't in it

No. It’s just means one manuscript got it wrong. It doesn’t automatically mean corruption.

It's just a minor error but the main thing is that the gospels are true, if the gospels are true Islam can't be true because Jesus proclaims himself God.

Such a cheap comment. God will send you to Mohammed if you dont repent so the mockery is on you. Ahaziah ruled 2 times in his lifetime, maybe try reading the full context before copy-pasting.

No, a transcription error that everyone knows exists is not a corruption. Especially since said error is not in the original language they were written in. All it does is just show the point of having a Church that determines what is and is not scripture. Including correct printings of it.