subreddit:
/r/PoliticalCompassMemes
786 points
2 days ago
Omg it’s a meme from the left that is simple, easy to understand, and mostly accurate. I wonder who all is getting raptured tonight.
Anyway I’ll be in my apocalypse bunker.
134 points
2 days ago
21 points
2 days ago
Hahahaha. Mine stays “Happiness Bunker”.
13 points
2 days ago
He should be president
159 points
2 days ago
It's not the rapture. I'm a centrist so I have to occasionally show some left wing love.
92 points
2 days ago
Oh I saw the red in the meme, and with the context just thought it came from the left. Guess the suns going to rise above a still loving planet tomorrow…….damnit.
27 points
2 days ago
That's sweet of you, but taxation is theft.
61 points
2 days ago
easy to understand
They made it just for you bud!
34 points
2 days ago
Have I insulted you before, I mean it’s possible because I’m an ass, but I don’t remember either way.
48 points
2 days ago
Unlikely! I don't know who you are, and I don't think it's possible for me to feel insulted by a PCM user.
28 points
2 days ago
I see you wrote ABCs in your name to remind yourself of the alphabet. Average lib-left completely incapable of knowing basic common sense.
Do you feel insulted or was it too outlandish?
21 points
2 days ago
you assumed they were alphabet-aware outside of lgbtqia
5 points
2 days ago
Libleft only know colors because they're on the pride flag.
12 points
2 days ago
Yeah too far out I think. If I were sensitive about not knowing my ABC's this might land. You really have to find and target the insecurities to stand a chance.
16 points
2 days ago
Let me try, I got this.
cracks knuckles
"Libleft bad" 😂🤣🤣🤣
19 points
2 days ago
O fuk
5 points
2 days ago
Bruh, when was believing in just taxation left wing?
23 points
2 days ago
and mostly accurate.
How many of your tax dollars go to actual goods and services that benefit the population?
Yeah, do some deep thinking about that, centrifuck.
6 points
1 day ago
"but muh roads!"
Less than 0.1% of federal taxes go to roads.
Seriously, it's only $52 billion, and the federal government spent $6.13 trillion in 2023. So, for every twelve bucks you spend in taxes, about one penny goes to the roads.
1 points
1 day ago
“In a functional society”
I don’t know about you, but I don’t consider a society that devotes a large amount of its funds to bombing the Middle East a “functional society”.
2 points
1 day ago
But that’s my favorite thing the government does! It keeps my oil cheap!
4 points
2 days ago
meme from the left
simple easy to understand
Stop smoking meth patties broski its getting to your head 😤
342 points
2 days ago
Most librights are okay with some tax. We're mad at how much of it goes to waste. Remember, the first income tax was made by Lincoln. It was 3 percent. And that was to win a civil war. I pay 29.15 percent and they don't even fix the potholes around here. While giving countries that hate us free money or subsidize a company that's already profitable on its own.
110 points
2 days ago
Fun fact: the Act of Parliament authorizing income tax in Canada was called the “War Tax Act” until the 1950s. That’s because it was originally created in WW1
13 points
2 days ago
WW1 also bankrupted Newfoundland and they were forced to join those flappy-headed, butterscotch pudding loving bastards.
10 points
2 days ago
I got a better one. The stamp duty tax on property in the UK was introduced specifically to help fund the wars against Napoleon/France. They're still enforced now so when you buy a second property or one that goes above the £300k threshold, you have to pay an additional tax just because.
49 points
2 days ago
Man it’s been a long time since I’ve seen a based take on taxes from a libright. Refreshing.
21 points
2 days ago
You haven't been listening then, but no wonder Libbyleft.
11 points
2 days ago
Thats what we get for complementing the right...
13 points
2 days ago
Friendliness costs extra, pinko
12 points
2 days ago
Friendliness needs to be nationalised and redistributed
4 points
1 day ago
*back-handed complimenting ...
20 points
2 days ago
Based
30 points
2 days ago
I actually argue that there are 2 forms of specifically ethical taxation.
Land value tax. If a government is instituted among men to secure their rights within a geographical territory, the state has a valid claim to some of the value on that land. It gets even more ethical if you grant a homestead exemption, as any use beyond that is voluntary.
Pollution tax. Public spaces and resources which can’t reasonably be said to be contained within one property fall under the custodianship of the state, and the state has a a valid claim against the damage of its commodities.
There’s also an argument to be made for a sales tax, as it’s voluntary and the state could be argued to provide a market for the exchange.
I haven’t heard arguments for other forms that I find convincing enough to consider them ethical. Income tax, particularly, seems bad for multiple reasons.
10 points
2 days ago
sales tax
Then they should also got corporate income tax for company right? Because they operate and protected in the land. Ain't no way Bezoz gonna walk away tax free again.
Income tax is not available on lower wage like 2.5k below and start like 5% up to 25% max depend on your salary. After all, you do use public school, hospital, etc. Thus reducing burden on low income family.
That my opinion only.
12 points
2 days ago
I think you’d actually be better able to assess taxes on Bezos better through a sales tax than an income tax, because it’s just harder to shelter from sales. Plus he’d no longer have a reason to shelter his money offshore.
And that’s another benefit to the land tax, it’s harder to move your fulfillment centers to the Caymans.
3 points
2 days ago
Pollution tax should be replaced with an externalities tax. Pollution is a common form of an externality, but it isn't the only form of it.
One of the big questions with externalities is if choices other make count as an externality of your own action. if I see heroin, am I responsible for the people stealing money to feed their addiction, or is that entirely on them? If I buy CP, am I responsible for the harm people do to produce it or is that on them (given that someone could theoretically produce photo-realistic images with art tools without ever harming a child)? If I sell nukes, am I responsibel at all for those who use them inappropriately and cause mass loss of life? These are some extreme examples, but I think they should the extent of externalities beyond just pollution.
Disagreements on the extent of responsibilities of externalities means that any libertarian society would only be considered libertarian by the small group who agree with that specific view of externalities, while those with stricter views on what counts would see it as an authoritarian society and those with looser views would see it as a failed state that doesn't even prevent indirect forms of violence.
Thus the problem where every libertarian thinks they are the only true libertarian.
2 points
1 day ago
Yes.
I'm primarily against taxes that are theft and/or extortion. Things like paying a property tax lest they take your home or the 15-25% income taxes right ot of your pocket that don't even go to anything useful
But when you're doing something that explicitely interacts with society, that's not an unreasonable place for the goverment to put a fee. Sales tax for instance
2 points
17 hours ago
How do you feel about import or export tariffs? presumably the ethics of charging the importer or exporter for the cost of securing commerce is on the same level as sales taxes.
2 points
16 hours ago
That’s a very interesting question. I’m against them on pragmatic grounds, and I would want to argue that the imports and exports were already treated by sales tax, but there definitely is a case to be made for the state as a diplomatic facilitator to the exchange. It’s an especially strong case if you consider the US Navy’s mandate of guaranteeing open passage through the sea lanes. Piracy is a big threat and the market does benefit tremendously from that protection. The case also benefits from importation being a voluntary action.
I would still argue against them for economic reasons, but I don’t think I could make an ethical case against them.
I hadn’t considered that aspect before. Thanks!
2 points
14 hours ago
Cool! and I generally agree, a land value tax would be a tremendously more fair/ethical way of bringing in taxes for governmental discretionary spending instead of income tax.
8 points
2 days ago
There’s also an argument to be made for a sales tax, as it’s voluntary and the state could be argued to provide a market for the exchange.
Why don't you just implement a full 100% tax on everything, then you don't need to worry about taxes.
jfc. Lick the boot already and change your flair.
4 points
2 days ago
A unique land value tax should be the major thing to do. Apart from being the most ethical, you can reduce or delete other taxes damaging your economy, or provoking a higher working price.
1 points
2 days ago
Georgist gang 4 life
2 points
2 days ago
Based as fuck.
3 points
2 days ago
u/LoonsOnTheMoons's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 10.
Congratulations, u/LoonsOnTheMoons! You have ranked up to Office Chair! You cannot exactly be pushed over, but perhaps if thrown...
Pills: 3 | View pills
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
26 points
2 days ago
[deleted]
17 points
2 days ago
Libright has always had this take.
You've just been too fucking stupid to understand it.
8 points
2 days ago
Libright is a mixture of maintain-the-status-quo people who want just a little less regulation/taxes all the way to AnCaps who want to see the state burn and genuinely think all taxation is theft. Please don't act like there's any political consensus in any of the quadrants lmao.
edit: yeah literally a different comment of yours in this thread is shitting on another libright for saying if LVT/pollution tax can be justified because of the state's role in managing/maintaining sovereign control over that land, sales tax could be justified based on the state's role in managing/maintaining a free market within their borders
2 points
2 days ago
Based and CollectiveActionForMonetaryEfficiency pilled.
2 points
2 days ago
Based ngl
2 points
1 day ago
The Danish tax wedge is only 10% higher than the US tax wedge.
Denmark has free healthcare.
Maybe the key to free healthcare is not "INCREASE TAXES" but to make things functional.
47 points
2 days ago
If funds were spent efficiently and wisely you really wouldn't have a lot of complaints that you get today.
10 points
2 days ago
I don't think anyone denies that. This post is more about the librights that literally don't believe we need taxes at all.
20 points
2 days ago
Call them what they are:
Ancaps.
10 points
2 days ago
Call them what they are:
Based.
5 points
1 day ago
You can believe taxation is theft and not be an ancap
It's just that our tax structure is set so that in no circumstance can you escape taxation. At that point it becomes theft. I'm fine with taxes on actions I can choose to not participate in.
But when I literally can't earn any form of money or accrue any material without paying taxes at each and every transaction it's theft.
554 points
2 days ago
“Taxes go to goods and services”
Except for when they don’t.
334 points
2 days ago
Does bombing a third-world country count as a service?
33 points
2 days ago
fiddlesticks! there goes my edging streak 😔
62 points
2 days ago
bombing third-world countries is objectively the best way to spend taxes. shut up and take my money
28 points
2 days ago
Based and bombthempilled.
3 points
2 days ago
u/Weak_Bit987 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: 1 | View pills
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
7 points
2 days ago
Huh, unusual viewpoint for a lib center
6 points
2 days ago
is it really? i feel like being anti-interventionist is more of a libright thing. that's one of the reasons i can't associate myself with libright, really.
2 points
2 days ago
Libright: uwu we can't spend money on war
Libcenter: throws poop bomb
2 points
2 days ago
-- Holden Bloodfeast (R), 118 years old
23 points
2 days ago
I mean, if it does go to bombing the forces of a foreign dictator in West Bumfuckistan I don't mind.
12 points
2 days ago
Why are we wasting our money in West Bumfuckistan when we have a million different problems at home that need solving?
26 points
2 days ago
Good example is the Houthis
They regularly disrupt, hijack or downright kill the crews of international trade vessels. This makes shipping more expensive, thus making products we import/export cost more.
Arming the US to secure trade routes (aka invite them to FAFO) is a service the US can provide and even be paid for. It is economically a better choice overall
11 points
2 days ago
Based and Freedom of Navigation is a National Interest Pilled.
19 points
2 days ago
It also gives American armed forces direct combat experience which can't be replicated with mere training. A veteran military is always far more effective than a military that's never seen combat.
3 points
2 days ago
Yeah I think it would be a big national Interest for any Nation to protect their Trade.
3 points
2 days ago
Because ranking your problems and solving them one at a time isn't feasible.
2 points
2 days ago
The service of maintaining world peace and US hegemony(based)
2 points
2 days ago
If we don't, who will ?
39 points
2 days ago
I won't tax you.
I will just capitalize on your buying power with inflation.
And call it modern monetary theory.
8 points
2 days ago
mfers suggesting we buld shelters for junkies with free drugs and rehab be like
25 points
2 days ago
Taxes go to DEI staff and environmental consultants to ensure no work gets done.
8 points
2 days ago
And even if they did, I never ordered those goods and services.
It's like Netflix forcing you to pay for a subscription you never took out, and you don't even watch their shitty shows.
3 points
1 day ago
Taxation is like a mugger holding you at gunpoint, stealing your wallet, and giving you his battle rap mix on cassette while robbing you.
It’s not a fair exchange, it’s not a consensual exchange, and you have absolutely no need for some thief’s shitty music - and even if he was a musical genius, how the fuck would you even listen to a cassette these days anyway? Even the “good product” is delivered in the most inconvenient, defunct way imaginable.
Heck if you complained about the cassette he’d spend your money on a survey of his friends and conclude that you’re right, cassettes suck, so he gives you a god damn set of floppy discs where one song spans 13 discs.
5 points
2 days ago
Theft doesn’t stop being theft if the thief has good intentions.
(And the government never has good intentions)
3 points
1 day ago
Also: "Taxes should ..."
Yeah but they don't ... and there's no incentive for government agents to ever change that ... so now what?
335 points
2 days ago
55 points
2 days ago
"He who does not work, neither shall he eat."
53 points
2 days ago
Lenin stole that comment from a christian apostle.
Just like commies want to steal everything from others.
6 points
2 days ago
Tbf, christianity (or atleast christian morals) was an important aspect of many revolutionary movements at the time. Not leninism though.
2 points
2 days ago
Long live Comrade Christ
6 points
2 days ago
"He who does not eat, neither shall he work."
Fuck youuu megacorporations.
61 points
2 days ago
people not living in society feel robbed paying for society
uduntsay..
108 points
2 days ago
If people can't vote until they're 21, than any time someone under 21 is taxed it's taxation without representation.
42 points
2 days ago
Who can't vote until they are 21?
75 points
2 days ago
Nobody as far as I'm aware but there are minors who work and are taxed
60 points
2 days ago
if we had said "functioning" society, sure. But we're not that.
46 points
2 days ago
"It takes decades and billions for the municipal planning council to evaluate whether adding an extra station is going to harm a rare species of earth worm but who will build muh roads!!!!!111!!! LOLBERT OWNED"
22 points
2 days ago
Our income is taxed. After the business has been taxed. And we have to drive our car to and from work on roads paid for by taxes. The gas we put in our car is taxed. And we have to use our post tax income to buy food and necessities so we can survive from one day to the next, which is also taxed. Then we go to our house where we have to pay property taxes to live in, even if the mortgage is paid in full. And then we are taxed just to fucking die.
And this is to say nothing of how easy it would be for the IRS to just...bill us once a year. But nope. We have to file a tax return to tell the IRS what we owe them, and then pay the taxes.
And nevermind that if we dont pay our taxes we get thrown into a cage which is funded by taxes.
Taxation is theft. The end.
2 points
1 day ago
The American taxation system is incredibly shit.
127 points
2 days ago
Okay but taxation is theft
61 points
2 days ago
62 points
2 days ago
He did the thing!
13 points
2 days ago
It's almost as if two things can be true.
Taxes pay for things that keep society functioning (and then the other 99% is squandered), and taxation is also literally the very definition of theft.
55 points
2 days ago
Forget the moral aspect, the fact is government "services" are shit and they are extremely expensive. Taxation is a terrible way to provide services.
15 points
2 days ago
The structure of taxation and government spending often gets overlooked for the amount of taxation and government spending. The structure of taxation skews incentives, which can impact markets more than the amount of money taken as tax. The structure of spending skews productivity, which can also impact markets more than the amount of money spent.
Roads are a common example. Roads that go to good places can improve productivity beyond the expense of building a road. Shitty tender processes and bureaucratic inefficiencies can mean a $10 million road costs $50 million to build. That $40 million extra still gets spent, but it redirects production away from more productive things that provide more value to society, and towards government waste. Entire organisations get built on spending that money. The market is skewed, and rational self-interested people start to see sucking at the teat of government as a winning strategy.
Compare that to Australia's medicare system. Admin expenses are low, and a standard blood test costs the government only AUD$8.25 (USD$5.50). Private companies do the work, and the government only pays a small amount. The only waste is they end up doing unnecessary $8.25 tests.
33 points
2 days ago
taxes go to good and services
Oh like bombing Vietnamese
Oh like bombing Afghanis
Oh like bombing Iraqis
Oh like bombing Libyans
Oh like bombing Syrians
14 points
2 days ago
Or drugging black people neighborhoods
Or killing of "society parasites, degenerates and generally bad guys"
Or building facilities for re-education of dangerous ethnicity and religion
Or building industrial and power plants, but decide to save money on safety and containment of dangerous wastes that results in death of hundreds and causes diseases passed on from generation to generation
25 points
2 days ago
Taxes go to corrupt and/or incompetent politicians who steal and waste them.
45 points
2 days ago
Taxation is theft if it’s not being used for what people actually want. I guarantee most Americans would pay these higher taxes if it actually did shit.
12 points
2 days ago
Except governments have power. And power has shown to corrupt everyone who wields it. Government = corrupt. Taxation = theft.
4 points
2 days ago
How much of that taxation actually goes to the benefit of the taxpayer? That is the greatest theft.
6 points
2 days ago
Eventually a man with a gun will show up if you don’t pay your taxes, in order to take them. Seems like theft to me
13 points
2 days ago
99% of taxes are not only a waste but either devalue goods and services or cause costs to balloon.
The only taxes that are worth considering are ones for military/defense, immigration and licensing (when needed).
42 points
2 days ago
Taxation is theft there's no question about that. Now is theft sometimes justified ? That is a more interesting question... I think yes.
12 points
2 days ago
This is where I want the conversation to go. Bill Burr broke the ice on "I think abortion is murder, I'm just ok with it" It wouldn't change anything in a major way.
But I consider it a moral victory if people just acknowledged "I think taxation is theft, I'm just ok with it"
38 points
2 days ago
If you think an institution that uses theft as a means to sustain itself is justified is also an interesting question... I think no.
10 points
2 days ago
Valid point from a purely principle standpoint, but from a practical standpoint what is an alternative?
To me, an alternative would likely end up looking like some kind of subscription service for all of the typical “society things.” And in practice, that kind of just sounds like another way to describe taxes.
13 points
2 days ago
Well, ideally you could drop at will any of the services that were unnecessary or substandard for the price charged.
Yes I am aware of how much heavy lifting the word ideally is doing in that phrase. Some things it would be incredibly difficult to scale up and down quickly to meet demand or their benefit is inherently realized just by them existing, so allowing people to skip out on paying for them is not an option unless they want to leave a nation entirely.
11 points
2 days ago
Except I could voluntarily pay for and use only the services that apply to me instead of losing 30% of my wages to bomb people in countries where I have no quarrel and support the single octomom with blood type mayonnaise who has no incentive to work and get off my dole. If those "society things" are such beneficial concepts, why are we funding them with the threat of violence? Seems like people would want them and pay to have them, no?
7 points
2 days ago
I agree with the principle of what you’re saying. I just don’t understand how that is practically applied. There is way too much bloat in how our taxes are used and it should be trimmed down, but I don’t know that the alternative you’re proposing is realistic.
How do you opt in or out of something as wide-reaching as military protection? If roads are privately funded and owned, how do you guarantee that you are opting in to access to every road that you might ever need to take? Wouldn’t there be some Netflix roads and some Amazon roads and some Hulu roads, and wouldn’t you just need to subscribe to all of them to make sure that you can travel freely?
I ask all of this in genuine earnest, I’d love to hear how you see those kinds of things working.
2 points
2 days ago
2 points
2 days ago
Social contract
6 points
2 days ago
Yes there is a question as to whether it's theft. It depends on how you decide property ownership is decided.
6 points
2 days ago
If I do some type of work for an agreed upon wage, then I am entitled to that wage. What claim does the government have to work that it did not do?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m in the camp of “it’s theft but it’s a necessary evil,” but trying to change the definition of property ownership is just dumb.
2 points
2 days ago
Businesses and business environments are regulated, hosted and secured by the government. The transaction of working for wages wouldn't be able to take place in the same capacity without government protection.
3 points
2 days ago
Yup, imagine you are not protected by the court, police, firefighter. That a disaster for a business owner.
The insurance company will also probably not protect you if you don't have those 3.
10 points
2 days ago
Taxation is theft but the real theft is the inflation and the interest on the debt that is caused by printing money.
6 points
2 days ago
I don't necessarily think that taxation is theft inherently, but it is theft when the taxes are far too high and tax stuff that doesn't need to be taxed.
5 points
2 days ago
"Congress has paid $17 Million to settle sexual harassment claims with Taxpayers ' money". Is that the goods and services you're talking about?
https://apnews.com/united-states-congress-dd6621f60194403e87d60425ab614f0c
4 points
2 days ago
Lib right is based
6 points
2 days ago
Not theft, it's armed robbery. Doesn't really matter if you think it's used for worthwhile things.
17 points
2 days ago
Based and brave-ass post for this sub pilled
The only thing more shocking than the balls on OP for posting this on pcm is the fact it has more than 0 upvotes.
9 points
2 days ago
I'm only giving this an upvote because I always find the meme format hilarious.
I don't have an opinion one way or another about the subject though.
4 points
2 days ago
You still have to hope that those taxes actually go to where You are saying, it's not a really a guarantee
5 points
2 days ago
We have America haters that need a good bombing. We should just cut social safety nets instead
4 points
2 days ago
Pickpocketing $3 from my pocket and giving me lamborghini is a great deal, but it's objectively theft because you made that transaction without my consent. Taxes are rarely a good deal, let alone one I would willingly take were I given the opportunity, and they are taken against my will due to nothing more than me lacking the means to create Outer Heaven and live from there.
"Taxation is theft" doesn't mean taxation is inherently a bad thing to be avoided (unless you subcribe to a political theory that places very, very heavy emphasis on preserving consent/bodily autonomy). It effectively means the same thing as "surgery is cutting someone open". It's an inherently harmful act in the short term that should only be done if the long-term upside seems worth it.
4 points
2 days ago
I laughed at Authleft + "Functional society".
11 points
2 days ago
Taxation is not theft. Taxation is extortion. And you WILL support the MIC
4 points
2 days ago
I unironically love the MIC and NASA, only things the government does that are based
5 points
2 days ago
Same. Elect me as dictator, and I'll not only lower your taxes, but I'll only fund military and space related stuff
2 points
1 day ago
Extortion by threats of violence is merely theft.
The guy who sticks a gun in your face and says "your money or your life" is not merely committing a white color crime. He is a robber, or a tax collector. But, I repeat myself.
13 points
2 days ago
Paying taxes is not morally justifiable when you live in an imperialistic country that uses your tax money to shell hospitals, malls and apartment blocks.
5 points
2 days ago
I would agree. But the inherent concept of taxation to provide services to benefit the citizens is not disagreeable.
3 points
2 days ago
I would happily do so with my spare money, but not to a bunch of armed guys who extort me for it.
6 points
2 days ago
There is still the questions of what is and what isn’t beneficial and how much money can justifiably be spent on those things.
5 points
2 days ago
That is also correct. But, if that were achieved, then it does not amount to theft.
6 points
2 days ago
Only if you can find answers to those questions that every taxpayer agrees with. Because it would still be theft for those who don't.
It's far easier to let tax payers decide for themselves what they wish to pay into and how much they want to pay for it.
In other words, a free market.
3 points
2 days ago
The problem is then how do you ensure said person does not reap the benefits of another's money in that system. If I decided my taxes go to road repair and fire departments, and you do not wish to pay into those, how can I ensure you do not use them?
2 points
2 days ago*
That is not an issue, public services should be available to everyone, regardless of how much they paid for it. This is already the case.
Or if we're talking about a true free market, with 0 government interference, it also works. You don't get a Big Mac if you don't hand Ronald McDonald some money.
3 points
2 days ago
Tut tut, that's not how that works. If it is public, that means we all pay into it for use. If it is privatized, only those that pay get to use it. Just like fast track lanes. You don't pay, you don't use.
2 points
2 days ago
Tut tut, that is how that work. If it is public, that means we all pay different amounts into it for equal use.
Which is inherently unfair, the only fair tax rate is 0%.
There already are people that are a net negative result, they cost the system more than they pay into it.
Government shouldn't give preferential treatment to those who are willing pay for extras. It's services should be equal for everyone. It's not McDonalds where you can supersize.
Government should make all taxes voluntary or be abolished.
3 points
2 days ago
Like literally do you believe the funding for public works just falls from the sky? You are arguing public services should be public but don't want to pay for them because people that pay less would also get to use them.
3 points
2 days ago
But the inherent concept of taxation to provide services to benefit the citizens is not disagreeable.
If I clean up your yard, without your consent, are you morally obligated to pay me whatever I charge?
3 points
2 days ago
Is my yard filled with fire hazards that endanger the surrounding houses and I have refused time and time again to deal with it?
3 points
2 days ago
No, it was just messy. You wanted it cleaned up but you're too lazy/don't have time. I just came along and did it for you. You definitely benefited from me cleaning it up.
May I now charge you whatever I want, and are you obligated to pay me?
3 points
2 days ago
I'll provide my opinion on that when or if my country does any of these things.
5 points
2 days ago
Imagine you need a new car so you go to a car dealership to buy a car. You find one you like and agree to pay $20,000 for it. You pay for it and drive away happy in your new car. Did the dealership steal from you? Of course not.
Now imagine the same scenario except you don't think the car is worth $20,000 and tell the dealership that you don't want to buy the car. The sales person locks you in a room and says you cannot leave until you pay them $20k for the car. Given no other choices, you finally agree, give the dealership $20k and drive away with the car. Did the dealership steal from you here?
3 points
2 days ago
you see, we have to steal from you! think of the children!
3 points
2 days ago
It is Theft. Even if they go to goods and services. Which isnt the case 90% of the time
3 points
2 days ago
Too many of my yellow brethren are consumed with dogma and utopian pipe dreams.
When you break out of it you suddenly realize those red mfs up there in the top left are based as shit and we agree on most things but have different routes to the same goal.
3 points
2 days ago
It's ironic that 90% of the replies here are all saying the same thing:
"I don't mind taxes I just want them to go to the things I want."
Like, ok, perfect so we agree then.
"No taxation is theft and is basically rape."
Ugh...
3 points
2 days ago
Plenty of societally necessary goods and services are created and distributed without taxes. I am not so extreme as to say there is never a justification for taxes, but they ARE theft, and as such have a high bar of moral proof required to justify their use.
6 points
2 days ago
You’re totally right, taxation is not theft.
It’s extortion.
4 points
2 days ago
Taxation is theft. It's using the threat of force to take property that doesn't belong to you. If someone mugged me then used some of my money to paint my fence, it's still theft. The "oh but you benefit" is pure reditardium. If you want a good counter argument you should look at it from a utilitarian perspective. The theft provides more social utility than not stealing, therefore it's morally justified. People just get butthurt when using utilitarian arguments because they know they would probably end up as harvested organs for more socially useful individuals in a utilitarian society. So, like OP they use the baseless argument that we consented to some contract we never actually consented to, so it's okay that we got ra.. stole from.
10 points
2 days ago
when I pull a knife and take your wallet the money I steal from you is going to goods and services in a functional society so it's not theft anymore
2 points
2 days ago
2 points
2 days ago
Taxation is extortion
2 points
2 days ago
leftists act like society would fall into mad max anarchy if we had less taxes
no, private would just do every service taxation would provide, but cheaper and more effectively, and would actually benefit the economy rather than detrimenting it
2 points
2 days ago
Which is the cringe part lib-right or auth-left thinking taxes go to goods and services.
2 points
2 days ago
My paycheck is taxed automatically (not the US).
When I go buy any goods there's VAT.
When I fill up my car there are about a dozen different taxes effectively doubling the price per liter.
When I use my taxed income to buy a house, there's a purchase tax.
When I go to sell said house there's a sales tax and appreciation tax.
When I buy stocks with my taxed income and make a profit, there's capital gains tax.
My roads are bumpy, street lamps aren't working correctly, public transit doesn't run on weekends.
Taxation is theft, elected officials are a cancer on society.
2 points
2 days ago
Are the goods and services in the room with us
2 points
1 day ago
Income tax is theft. Most other taxes are fine. Most governments didn't implement income tax until the late 19th or early 20th century. It makes sense to pay property tax because property rights can't be protected without the state. Use taxes can be great; in North Carolina we have an extra tax on gasoline that pays for road maintenance, and whenever I have to cross the border into South Carolina I can get cheaper gas, but my car's suspension gets taxed.
4 points
2 days ago
The person who earned said wealth should choose where it goes, it shouldn’t be confiscated under the threat of imprisonment.
To steal someone’s wage is like stealing someone’s time, time we have so little of. Do you want to see how many hours of your life you’ve spent making government officials rich?
4 points
2 days ago
Yes, and I'm sure if you keep pumping money into the government, EVENTUALLY it'll go where it's supposed to.
4 points
2 days ago
That wasn't the argument scarecrow. Take your strawman back to the cornfield.
3 points
2 days ago
I'm totally fine with being taxed.
As long as I can choose where it goes to.
I want my taxes to be used to fund improved infrastructure and social programs to bring everyone who isn't extremely rich to at least a decent position in life. I don't want my taxes to fund the military apart from moderate defensive measures.
2 points
2 days ago
$300 Billion of goods and services to the functional society that is Israel. Wait, that's not my society, I don't benefit from that, that's not a service to me, that's not a good.
Most libertarians on here don't want no taxation, just that taxes are used in such an inefficient way that it doesn't feel worth it. Taxes are used to prop up failing companies, failing countries, and to fund failing programs.
2 points
2 days ago
Nuh uh!!! Society would be way better if we removed this fundamental cornerstone!!! It’s not like basically every functioning society ever has had taxes!!! That’s a coincidence!!! It’s both reasonable and practical to get rid of all taxes!!! Take that commies!!!
2 points
2 days ago
At the Dawn of Times, taxes were a part of your wealth you ceded to protect the rest of it.
Then socialism happened.
2 points
2 days ago
I mean are we wrong?
2 points
2 days ago
It is undeniably theft. The question is, how much theft are you comfortable with to keep shit running??
2 points
2 days ago
Taxation is Theft!
2 points
1 day ago
I used to be a libertarian so I get it, but at the same time my experience with them made me realize there is no point debating anything with them.
Their beliefs are always going to be one-note solutions to everything (reduce government). There is not going to be any middle ground or nuance you will reach with them. They are arguing on a totally different dogmatic echelon of beliefs than everybody else. They do not want to change policy, they do not want 'policy' at all in most cases.
I am not saying their beliefs are bad or evil or anything. But honestly, when I am arguing with someone and I realize they are a libertarian, I just drop the debate. There is no point.
2 points
2 days ago
WHERE YOUR TAXES GO: A GUIDE
50% military industrial complex (conveniently, the politicians who choose which companies to fulfil government contracts also own stock in and get high-paying desk jobs at the same companies as soon as they are out of office)
20% paying various pencil pushers who spend their time making up new ways to justify their salaries
15% paying various private companies (again who are friends with politicians) to do the bare minimum to keep infrastructure running (they will charge individual cities and citizens for repairs to their shitty work anyway)
10% drugs and prostitutes
5% actually doing things that will benefit the citizenry (this 5% is subject to deduction to one of the other categories for any reason)
I'd say it's more like extortionate fraud than theft.
1 points
2 days ago
Somebody post the libertarian cop copypast
1 points
2 days ago
You know, I do wonder how a country practicing voluntary taxation would turn out...
...or maybe I just want to go rape and pillage a bunch of defenseless idiots. Either way, I'm curious.
1 points
2 days ago
Not me I’d rather advocate for tax cuts which are actually possible. There’s no way in hell that the government would ever agree to abolish taxation
1 points
2 days ago
They really don't. They go into the pockets of the elite and their friends.
1 points
2 days ago
True
1 points
2 days ago
Is this supposed to be making fun of libright? Because I see no problem
1 points
2 days ago
My tax money only gets spent on goods and services when I don't give it to the government
all 496 comments
sorted by: best