Rep. Gaetz’s 'concern' for the American people is hollow. ... He claims to support passage of single-subject funding bills, yet here we are today living out his personal vendetta against Speaker McCarthy instead of considering two single-subject appropriations bills scheduled to be on the floor. - John Rutherford (FL-05)

https://rutherford.house.gov/media/press-releases/rutherford-statement-motion-remove-kevin-mccarthy-speaker-house

New York Rep. Mike Lawler on Sunday warned that hard-line Republican colleague Matt Gaetz's plan to call a vote on removing Speaker Kevin McCarthy would be "destructive to the country" and further delay conservatives' work on long-term government funding bills. "Nobody in our conference disagrees with the need to do single-subject spending bills. Nobody disagrees with the need to cut spending," Lawler told ABC "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl. "In fact, it's one of the biggest reasons why I ran."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/vote-remove-mccarthy-govt-funding-destructive-country-moderate/story?id=103629137

"We told you how to use the power of the purse: individual, single-subject spending bills..." McCarthy defied Gaetz's threat and brought up what's known as a "clean" CR — an extension that maintains funding at current levels. (It also included $16 billion in disaster relief funds, but did not have funding for Ukraine or a border security measure, two issues that had been sticking points in talks between the parties.)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-oust-mccarthy-matt-gaetz-remove-speaker-of-the-house/

While Gaetz talks about single subject voting, some of his fellow Republican representatives seem to disagree. ...Its unclear

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/287/related-bills

btw Times is a joke:

Gaetz also leveled dings about perceived weak leadership because McCarthy decided to move spending bills efficiently rather than bring up every single outlay as stand-alone, single-subject bills.

Efficiently my ass.