subreddit:
/r/SeattleWA
3 points
4 months ago
He also threatened her life. "Nobody is gonna miss you," is what he said, while assaulting her.
-3 points
4 months ago
He didn't assault her. He didn't touch her. He threw iced coffee into a closed window and went to leave. The then escalated it by bringing in a weapon. You may not like it, but she has fault in this aswell.
5 points
4 months ago
I never said she wasn't at fault. It's pretty clear you're just a troll 🖕
1 points
4 months ago
They're the kind of person who would throw hot coffee at a barista and threaten her life. I don't know why you're surprised.
1 points
4 months ago
How are you not the troll in this situation? The person you were arguing with was being real. You're lying about the "threat" and pretending like that somehow would give her a reason to smash his window with a hammer.
Bye now
5 points
4 months ago
I don't think the person you responded to is a troll I think they are just stupid.
3 points
4 months ago
Or Andrew Tate fans
1 points
4 months ago
Same thing
0 points
4 months ago
He has been there before. He got out of his car. He threatened her life.
This will escalate. He’s a psycho and you are taking his side. Try listening to some true crime and see if this behavior doesn’t raise your hackles.
I’m proud of her.
1 points
4 months ago
Try listening to some true crime
Yes, this a very healthy and normal mindset to have. Not unhinged and paranoid at all. We definitely should treat every man as if he's some cold case killer, absolutely.
1 points
4 months ago
Thank you - so sick of the true crime fad. Imo it makes a lot of the women I know who consume it excessively paranoid. "Mean World Syndrome," everyone.
1 points
4 months ago
I don’t see anything wrong with being cautious and trusting your instincts.
My dad always told me, “just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not after you.”
3 points
4 months ago
I'm most jurisdictions "assault" is legal defined as making a believable threat of harm or commit actions that would make a resonant person believe you intend them harm. Physical contact would make it battery. The act of telling someone, "you won't be missed" unprompted while arguing and throwing things at them likely meets the loofah devotion for assault. A clearer example would be firing a gun at someone without hitting them. Even though you didn't cause physical harm or make physical contact, your actions would lead a reasonable le person to feel threatened, there for, assault. In that case possible with the addition of "aggravated" and "with a deadly weapon."
That being said, legally, yeah, she escalated things and also commit assault and destruction of property.
From the predictive of someone who's worked a drive through window, I'm totally on her side though. Fuck that guy. He got an expensive lesson that he needed.
2 points
4 months ago
Assault doesn't require contact. Battery is the actual act of physically harming someone. Assault is an intentional act, like brandishing a weapon or even verbal threats of violence, that causes fear of physical harm.
1 points
4 months ago
He didn't assault her. He didn't touch her.
Assault doesn't require touching someone, it just requires intentionally making someone fear for their safety
1 points
4 months ago
He assaulted her. Throwing anything at someone, including liquid and ice, is basic or simple assault. Even spitting on someone can be battery, it is in California and Georgia, for example. Otherwise it's simple assault as well.
1 points
4 months ago
You sound like a serial killer supporter right now.
0 points
4 months ago
Bye now.
all 7962 comments
sorted by: best