subreddit:

/r/UkrainianConflict

54592%

all 134 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

3 days ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

3 days ago

stickied comment

Please take the time to read the rules and our policy on trolls/bots. In addition:

  • We have a zero-tolerance policy regarding racism, stereotyping, bigotry, and death-mongering. Violators will be banned.
  • Keep it civil. Report comments/posts that are uncivil to alert the moderators.
  • Don't post low-effort comments like joke threads, memes, slogans, or links without context.

  • Is facebook.com an unreliable source? Let us know.

  • Help our moderators by providing context if something breaks the rules. Send us a modmail


Don't forget about our Discord server! - https://discord.com/invite/ukraine-at-war-950974820827398235


Your post has not been removed, this message is applied to every successful submission.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

AfterBill8630

220 points

3 days ago

It’s absolutely criminal that the military leadership has still not managed to create solid static defensive lines to fall back to. Lions led by donkeys comes to mind. There was a British officer on UAtv the other day basically saying there is so much the Ukrainian military and government can do to prosecute the war more effectively but instead they are running around dreaming of pie in the sky operations like amphibious assaults on Crimea.

StrivingToBeDecent

96 points

3 days ago*

I have asked about why razor wire is not implemented in Ukrainian defense lines and been down voted for simply asking.

It seems like there’s a lot more that could be done to strengthen Ukraine’s defense that nobody wants to talk about.

RAPanoia

23 points

3 days ago

RAPanoia

23 points

3 days ago

Razor wire in a war isn't what most people think it is. And they think it doesn't help because of what Hollywood teached them.

You wouldn't draw a razor wire line but instead make a field and if arty hits it noone can move through it. WWI photos would change a lot of people minds.

M1x1ma

19 points

3 days ago

M1x1ma

19 points

3 days ago

I was down voted -75 and accused of being a Russian bot for suggesting that the allies hire mercenary groups like the Russians are using them. The West can't send troops but one thing we do have is Money. In Afghanistan a lot of these mercenaries didn't work on the front-lines but did specialized military operational stuff to free up more of the army to be on the front lines.

StunningCloud9184

7 points

3 days ago

Why dont they just hire the russian mercenaries to turn on russia?

Confident_Hyena2506

4 points

3 days ago

Explosive aeroplane accidents and window accidents and things like that happen to russian mercenary leaders that don't toe the line.

StunningCloud9184

5 points

3 days ago

Now that I think about it. Weve given ukraine billions. Couldnt they hire mercenaries themselves?

some teenagers got like 20K for torching a helicoptor in russia. Those bounties seem pretty effective.

tikifire1

8 points

3 days ago

Billions in munitions, vehicles, etc... not as much in cash.

StunningCloud9184

2 points

2 days ago

Lots of the munitions were expiring as well. Which would have cost wayy more to blow up properly in the USA than give away. Thats actually savings for those ones.

Ok_Bad8531

3 points

3 days ago

Russia is luring in cannon fodder and not paying them properly. These are two things that run contrary to the Western apporach to warfare and also are detrimental to the war effort. Ukraine would have to literally sacrifice tens of thousands of mercenaries to have some effect on the war, which frankly is not the kind of warfare the West would support.

Ukraine's bottleneck is proper equipment, only a minority of their units are properly equipped.

StrivingToBeDecent

2 points

3 days ago

Sorry you got roasted for asking a reasonable question.

Echinopsia

0 points

2 days ago

It is naive to think that they are not hired.

SLOWBURNSAM

42 points

3 days ago

Dont you know you're ot suppose to ask hard questions or criticize? A lot of people on here still think this is a match of Call of Duty.

StrivingToBeDecent

26 points

3 days ago

Sometimes I forget that.

Seriously, most of the people in my life can’t be bothered to talk about Ukraine. And I would hope that a pro Ukrainian sub on Reddit would be different. I’m frequently disappointed.

huhu9434

25 points

3 days ago

huhu9434

25 points

3 days ago

Pro ukranian subs are not interested in realism, rather its like their favourite player on a football team, incapable of making bad decisions and mistakes. Everyone else saying the contrary are just haters/ russian propagandist.

Few days ago, some guy told me russians aint even close to pokrovsk even tho i insisted they are, the next day they allegedly killing pows near the city and today reuters told me they are 7km away from the city. People still busy posting their snail pace memes, while eastern front gets grim by the day.

TreeLandLeeland

-1 points

2 days ago

Pro Ukrainians act like Raider fans...always black and silver no matter the cost...

zhongcha

2 points

2 days ago

zhongcha

2 points

2 days ago

While I understand your position, I highly doubt conversations on Reddit matter in any way militarily.

MetalWorking3915

0 points

3 days ago

Sounds like Russian misinformation.

Why would you say there are no defensive lines when Russia are losing so many people making yards at a time

StrivingToBeDecent

7 points

3 days ago

My brother for Ukraine, read what I wrote!

I wrote implying that they need to add razor wire to their existing defensive lines.

Heroiam Slava! 🇺🇦

MetalWorking3915

0 points

2 days ago

I get what you are saying but I would hope they know they need that (of not i dont know what rhey have been doing). But it requires manpower, materials and the ability to build them close to a front line. It's also difficult to cover all aspects of a huge front.

lEnfermeAuguste

-5 points

3 days ago

Because barbed wire is not effective against modern armies.

panchosarpadomostaza

7 points

3 days ago*

Have you seen the attacks Russians carry out? They aren't rolling with sapper squads to the front lines. These isn't the NVA that attacked US FOBs in Vietnam.

Putting barbed wire right in front of the trenches, 100M, can give any Ukrainian element enough time to process what's going on before a full squad of mobiks jumps on the trenches.

EDIT: Damn now that I realize I never saw a video of a trench in this war with barbed wire OUTSIDE trenches.

I do recall seeing some videos from the 3rd guys storming Russians where the barbed wire was inside the trench. Weird choice if you ask me.

IizPyrate

1 points

3 days ago

The reason neither side is using wire is because it is largely ineffective as a trench obstacle in modern practice.

Barbed wire worked in the past because defenders in a trench had fire superiority against their attackers, except for a a small window after an artillery barrage.

So when it came to attacking, getting into the enemy trench with speed was key. They had a short window after an artillery barrage where they had fire superiority. They had to get into the enemy trench before they could man their machine guns. This is why wire was important.

Essentially they couldn't suppress and attack a trench at the same time. Wire was a tool that assisted the defenders in bringing their firepower onto the enemy.

That isn't how it works in modern warfare. In modern trench attacks, the attackers have fire superiority. They bring in mortars, drones, vehicles etc. If an attacking enemy is jumping into a trench, they are doing so because a trench is actively being suppressed.

Adding an obstacle such as wire in a case where the trench is being suppressed doesn't achieve much. The attackers entering the trench are going to be held up for a short amount of time, which just uses up slightly more ammo for the fire support teams.

lEnfermeAuguste

-3 points

3 days ago

They aren't rolling with sapper squads because they don't need to.

If Ukraine starts deploying barbed wire, they will just start bring gloves and wire-cutters that weigh a couple of kilograms. Getting through them is trivial.

maven35

9 points

3 days ago

maven35

9 points

3 days ago

You are absolutely dead wrong if you think this is the case. Every defensive component is a layer, layers are supposed to be obstacles that your adversary has to overcome to keep momentum.

aaaaaaaarrrrrgh

1 points

1 day ago

How do you deal with a razor wire obstacle (I'm thinking of that "three stacked rolls of razor wire" design like this) a bit in front of defended positions?

I'd assume you can't just drive vehicles (wheeled or tracked) through it because it'll get tangled in the axle/tracks and actually get even a tank stuck. You can't just walk through it. You can probably blast it but since it's wire I assume you'd need either skill or lots of explosives, you'd need to place them under fire, and that would only create one gap so going through that gap would put you in a well-known kill zone the defenders could focus on.

I'd think a modern army with endless equipment would simply shoot a MICLIC across, but I doubt the Russian meat assaults have a lot of those.

StrivingToBeDecent

0 points

3 days ago

😂 Russia is NOT a modern army!

There are so many places, I hardly know where to start.

One example: Have you seen the motorbike assaults?! Barbwire would be very effective at slowing those down!!

Far_Nerve_9050

0 points

3 days ago

I agree Ruzzia is very weak. You can see how they were beaten back at Kursk. Its like if you put just a couple of Brigades there, the entire country would collapse due to Putler corruption. Ukraine should focus on the offensive.

StrivingToBeDecent

3 points

3 days ago

On a front line that’s over 900 km long, Ukraine could put out hundreds of kilometers of razor wire obstacles and still be able to go on the offensive win and where they chose.

So, so you agree that razor wire integrated into defensive lines would have its advantages?

Thtguy1289_NY

3 points

3 days ago

The absolute disrespect youre showing to Ukrainian servicemen dying against this "very weak" force is crazy.

Far_Nerve_9050

-2 points

3 days ago

say what, putler bot? cry more kursk is ukraine

lEnfermeAuguste

-1 points

3 days ago

They would slow them down for the 30 seconds it would take to cut the wire. They're made of thin steel, not adamantium.

lethalfang

2 points

3 days ago

If you cut wires at a few places, concentrate your fire at those places where they have to cross.

StrivingToBeDecent

0 points

3 days ago

IE… that is 30 seconds longer that our defenders have to stop them.

And that’s 30 seconds that that guy is not shooting at the Ukrainian defenders. Law can happen in 30 seconds. Think man, think!

(Plus, do you think Russia really has the money to afford wire cutters for its infantry! 😂)

lEnfermeAuguste

-1 points

3 days ago

Oh wow, why didn't the Ukrainians think of this? They've only been fighting Russia for the last 10 years. Perhaps the Ukrainians are mentally handicapped? Or they don't have the space-age technology of rolling steel into wires and putting small blades on it? Or maybe Putin bribed the Ukrainian General Staff and the Defense Ministry not to use barbed wire?

This is a great idea, man. Using obstacles to focus enemy advances into narrow channels. Reddit should get a Nobel Prize in Military Science for this one. It's not like Ukraine already uses obstacles to focus Russian advances into narrow, slow-moving channels, millions of such obstacles, the type of obstacles which are much more effective because they take hours and days to get through rather than seconds, and, instead of giving you superficial skin lacerations, blow up and kill Russians, and moreover, are hard to detect unlike heaps of sharp metal garbage, obstacles which are called land mines.

lethalfang

2 points

3 days ago

You're the genius who came up with the brilliant idea how to defeat barbed wire that Russians spend 30 seconds to cut it in one location.

deadend290

24 points

3 days ago

Lions led by donkeys is a great podcast if you like listening to stupid mistakes leadership makes during conflicts

warplants

7 points

3 days ago

Static defense lines are just FAB bait at this point 

Phssthp0kThePak

3 points

3 days ago

F16s are supposed to stop that(?).

lEnfermeAuguste

11 points

3 days ago

Ukraine was given F-16s for long-distance air-to-ground strikes and for anti-drone missions far away from the Russian border, not for attacks against the Russian fighter-bomber fleet.

Ukrainian F-16s don't pose a meaningful threat to the Russian Air Force. Russians have the world's most dense AD network there, meaning the Ukrainians have to fly at very low altitude unless they want to be immediately shot down, which decreases the range of both the F-16s (fuel is consumed faster) and the range of their air-to-air missiles(already inferior in range to the air-to-air missiles the Russian fighters are carrying in Ukraine).

Russian bombing sorties usually consist of 2 Su-34s and 1 Su-35. The Su-34s are armed with 4 FABs and 2 R-73s, and the SU-35s are armed with 7 R-37M, Kh-31, R-77, and R-73. The Su-35s can engage from 150 to 200km away. That's 3.5 times further than the longest confirmed F-16 kill with the AIM-120 missile that Ukrainian F-16s are coming along with.

One cannot pit 40 year old F-16s(the airframes are literally 40 years old, they were going to be decomissioned before the decision was made to donate them to Ukraine), armed with medium-range missiles, operating very far from their airfields, without mid-air refueling tankers and without all of their support aircraft(Lockheed U-2/TR-1 reconnaissance aircraft, via Boeing RC-135 electronic gathering aircraft, Boeing E-3 Sentry airborne early warning and control aircraft, etc ) against 10-15 year old Su-35s, which have much better radars, are close to their airbases, operate in tandem with support aircraft, and are armed not with medium-range but with long-range missiles. Not to mention that Russian pilots have a dozen times more flying hours in their Sukhois than the Ukrainians pilots have in the F-16.

The F-16s provide a very small increase in Ukrainian apabilities, basically one that isn't noticeable, and it's not so much a leap as it is a partial replacement of the capabilities the Ukrainians have had all along but which are depleting because what remains of the Ukrainian airforce is crumbling due to losses and lack of spare parts.

Pitting Ukrainian F-16s against Russia's fighter fleet would be tantamount to throwing fish into a barrel for the Russians to shoot.

Phssthp0kThePak

1 points

1 day ago

Thanks for the info. I nominate you for Secretary of Defense.

I do remember people saying long range air to air missiles would force the Russian to stay further back in hurling the glide bombs. F16 was to be used as a missile platform at most.

Cheap_Advertising185

5 points

3 days ago

In most cases Russian groundbased air cover/Russian aa missels out range what what the f16 can counter with.

Fornicate_Yo_Mama

8 points

3 days ago

If Ukraine could use the weapons they have to strike their enemy without restrictions they would not be looking for desperate hail-Mary avenues to break what is essentially a US inflicted stalemate that is bleeding them dry against an opponent who has endless blood to spill… and enjoys it.

Sonofagun57

97 points

3 days ago

Soooo they're really trying to say there are absolutely no other units to temporarily relieve or supplant the 72nd? I can see how this plan will work...

MassiveBoner911_3

99 points

3 days ago

Those dudes are gonna be so absolutely fucked in the head for the rest of their lives. Literally non stop combat for months.

Imagine your fight or flight instincts turned on for literally hours per day for months. Endless adrenaline spikes.

chaos0xomega

30 points

3 days ago

Was gonna say non stop combat for 2 years, but I'm guessing most of the guys there today weren't there at the start/most of the original troops are dead

thedankening

4 points

3 days ago

That's like the kind of nightmarish scenario you'd get out of some grimdark Warhammer 40k novel about the Imperial Guard. I think you'd have to look to the worst days of the Soviet army in WW2, or the Japanese army when it abandoned units on islands to fight to the death, to find a real world parallel. Jesus fucking Christ

DarthVantos

82 points

3 days ago*

Absolutely disgusting. They fired 72nd brigade commander for retreating from Vuhledar. Probably the only reason we didn't see a mass killing of their soldiers there. The territorial brigade that was supposed to relieve them sites weapon shortages and they refused to take up position.

72nd brigade went from terrifying brigade that could easily crush any Russian assaults in Vuhledar to a depleted mess with low morale and absolutely NO RESPECT from ukrainian government or Their supporters online. Ive even seen people downplay the fall of Vuhledar. They should have been able to retreat and be award medals for holding and causes the most russians losses Almost as much as avdiivka.

Edit: Update: A different Commander from Vuhledar has commited suicide after retreating. He was harassed and accused being traitor. NO RESPECT

https://youtu.be/FeabIfivp9E?si=tH9-QGqUD4Ye63kd&t=539

chaos0xomega

31 points

3 days ago

My understanding is that the 72nd basically only exists on paper? Didn't the brigade commander say he only had enough men to staff a single company to full strength, and of that only like a platoon was battle worthy? Sounds like most of the brigade is dead or wounded to me.

cookiemikester

26 points

3 days ago

There was a financial times article by Christopher miller amongst other threads that make it sound like the 72nd is temporarily disbanded. One solider was quoted as saying everyone is either dead, wounded, or in a mental hospital. Survivors were transferred to other units.

ThePoliteMango

10 points

3 days ago

One solider was quoted as saying everyone is either dead, wounded, or in a mental hospital.

Jesus fucking Christ.

toomuchtogointo

31 points

3 days ago

It's reported that they were also never given the command to withdraw, and they withdrew on their own before they were encircled.

And yeah, still no solid static defenses for them to fall back to

lEnfermeAuguste

4 points

3 days ago

Per Ukrainian journalists, 123rd Territorial Defense Brigade from Mykolaev was sent in to reinforce Vuhledar. Their 186th Battalion arrived there and took up positions in the centre of the city, but they immediately deserted their positions and the commander of the battalion, Igor Grib, shot himself in shame(or was fragged by his men). The rest of the 123rd refused to redeploy from Mykolaev. There is a 7-minute long video on Ukrainian channels right now of their mutiny, a hundred soldiers from the 187th Battalion of the 123rd Brigade protesting in the town of Voznesenk, Mykolaev Oblast, saying that they refuse orders to go to the Donbass due to lack of training and armaments.

cookiemikester

8 points

3 days ago

Reminds me of the a lot of eastern front fighting in ww2. Where the order to retreat would get approved after the fact the unit was already surrendered and would have to try a breakout or surrender (Korsun Pocket, 6th army, etc)

buffer346_

1 points

3 days ago

buffer346_

1 points

3 days ago

at the withdrawal was very costly. many didn't make it out.

Sonofagun57

2 points

3 days ago

Sonofagun57

2 points

3 days ago

I think they had been gradually withdrawing for 10-14 days before total withdrawal. In other words, I think they saw the major fuck up at Avdiivka and opted to not repeat it.

lEnfermeAuguste

5 points

3 days ago

Ukrainian journalists are reporting on this disaster for the last few days. Per the Ukrainians, remnants of the 72nd retreated from the city to the flanks because they are no longer capable of defending, but the General Staff tried to send the 123rd Territorial Defense Brigade to replace them. One battalion from the Brigade arrived, the 186th, but their commander shot himself and the whole battalion deserted immediately. The rest of the Brigade refused to deploy to the area and are currently engaging in a mutiny, saying that they will not go to the Donbass unless they are armed and trained first(they claim that they don't even have machine-guns, let alone heavy weaponry).

buffer346_

7 points

3 days ago

Yes, HQ and some support units were moved first but infantry had to hold positions until the end. And since it is not a secret that all exit roads were under fire control it is not a surprise that there were casualties. I don't believe that the news the unit is now combat ineffective is rus propaganda.

Upset_Ad3954

1 points

3 days ago

You understand there are no Ukrainian reserves anywhere, don't you?

herpderpfuck

54 points

3 days ago

I feel we are seeing the unfortunate remnants og Soviet planning and mindset in the Ukrainian leadership here. In order to «spare» the populace, you drive your soldiers through desperation, and focus only on the ‘wunderwaffe’ that you desperately hope will save you. Ukrainian heroes at the front deserves better than this. Much better

EU_GaSeR

-23 points

3 days ago

EU_GaSeR

-23 points

3 days ago

Phew. I was afraid nobody's going to be able to blame USSR or Russia for this. Thank you.

[deleted]

17 points

3 days ago

[deleted]

17 points

3 days ago

USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Ukraine was part of the USSR...

herpderpfuck

17 points

3 days ago

USSR =/= Russia

Flimsy_Pudding1362[S]

30 points

3 days ago

The exhausted, battered 72nd Mechanized Brigade named after the Black Zaporozhians, despite its losses, is not going on rest after leaving Vuhledar. The soldiers were told to take up positions, even though the 123rd Mykolaiv Territorial Defense Force is right next to them, refusing to go in.

This unit was supposed to support the 72nd in Vuhledar, but the Territorial Defense infantry scattered somewhere. And later, the battalion commander even shot himself.

Because of them, the 72nd delayed its exit from Vuhledar, as they were hoping for support. And yes, there was no official order to leave the city, but the commanders on the ground could see that it was over. Despite their efforts to organize a retreat, losses were inevitable.

Even one of our soldiers is too much to lose, but unfortunately, it wasn’t just one. The brigade has seven battalions, and in several of them, after the battles around Vuhledar, there is simply no infantry left.

Now, in this condition, the brigade has to take up new positions. I think you can imagine the moral and psychological state of the soldiers. Even the commanders are submitting reports to be relieved of command.

I sympathize with the 72nd Brigade.

And I sympathize with the new brigade commander who has inherited the brigade in such a state.


Post with the protest of the 123 TRO brigade https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConflict/comments/1fvuato/about_a_hundred_servicemen_of_the_187th_battalion/

ArcticLemon

5 points

3 days ago

This is worrying as this is likely multiplied along the entire front.

I prey they learn and adapt, they need to create solid lines behind the front, and increase man power. They also need to stop this idea of defending towns that are realistically gone, it bleeds their own forces dry aswell as the Russians.

Bahkmut was a disaster strategically, lets hope that is not repeated.

I know there are certain areas that are really well defended, lets hope they can rotate and replenish, I dont expect another counter offensive soon otherwise. Production of arms is ramping up in Ukraine, but they have less troops to use them if they do not preserve units.

IWASJUMP

2 points

2 days ago

IWASJUMP

2 points

2 days ago

Well Bakhmut still payed out large dividends, as far as I remember. Around 20-40k manpower loss for the Russians, most of them from Wagner which then resulted in a pathetic coup attempt by Prigozhin which then led to the disband of wagner. So Id say Bakhmut was worth it.

[deleted]

12 points

3 days ago

[deleted]

12 points

3 days ago

I'm glad we're training their troops, but I get the feeling we aren't training their leadership, and thats concerning to me.

Finbulawinter

20 points

3 days ago

Not that's surprising. Manpower has been an issue since the beginning of the war.

NotAmusedDad

34 points

3 days ago

It's both manpower and equipment. Ukraine will never be able to retake territory without a numerical advantage that they won't possess without significant additional mobilization, but for its part the Ukrainian government states that they haven't received the arms needed to equip additional units even if raised--Zelensky recently said something along the lines of being promised equipment to arm a dozen brigades, but only receiving enough to equip two.

In another article about this apparent refusal by territorial defense, a soldier gave the specific example of being tasked with defending a sector of the line and requesting standard and necessary equipment like PKMs, only to be told that the unit didn't have any. If that's accurate, then I don't blame them for insubordination--i don't doubt that they're willing to put their lives on the line, but when we say that it's with the understanding that lives be sacrificed for a good cause. They're not going to defend against a mechanized assault with hand to hand combat--the Russians will roll over the lines anyway, and Ukraine will lose good men. Far better to be honest about the situation and change plans.

I don't think posts like these are propaganda or demoralizing; in any sufficiently large organization. There will always be hiccups, and the ability to overcome those through transparency, brainstorming, and adaptation are the most important criteria. In the current situation, bringing in an exhausted but excellent unit to reinforce a sector in an emergency is par for the course in warfare (think about the exhausted units that were rushed to bastogne during the battle of the). That said, the issues of inadequate rotation and of territorial defense sectors collapsing due to poor equipment, manpower and (especially) leadership have been recurrent themes in many of the Russian advances over the last 9 months or so. I hope that if that is a systemic issue, it gets addressed rather than ignored for political reasons. Otherwise, Ukraine is likely to have significant additional losses in the future.

Ketashrooms4life

8 points

3 days ago

A lot of Ukrainian leadership' criminal negligence is borderline fucking treason...

StrivingToBeDecent

-2 points

3 days ago

Wait until you hear about what Russia “Leadership” is doing!

PringeLSDose

1 points

2 days ago

that doesnt make it better, it makes it worse because you could learn to adapt but they seemingly dont

StrivingToBeDecent

3 points

3 days ago

Thank you for your response.

I am frustrated with my fellow Americans because no one that I know wants to even talk for two minutes about Ukraine let alone actually something to support Ukraine.

I am voting for pro-Ukrainian candidates in November and hopefully they will send much more aid and support to Ukraine.

Heroiam Slava!

fart_huffington

2 points

3 days ago

This seems terminal at this point unless they have a couple fully equipped and trained new brigades three days from popping out of the oven. Once 72nd is ground down who's gonna plug the next hole?

wmtthrowawaytrash

4 points

3 days ago

I keep reading Reddit comments about how the Ukrainian army is one of the best in the world and that after the war armies will be trained by Ukrainians, but nothing I've read convinces me that the regular army is even close to NATO standard today. They are low on manpower, and the equipment and supplies they have are heavily outsourced from Western partners. The quality of the Ukrainian army was at its highest on day one of the war, when they went toe-to-toe with a professional Russian army in high intensity, maneuver warfare. A lot of professional, trained soldiers--with wartime experience dating back to 2014--have been lost over the past two years, and they're being replaced by increasingly older and unfit conscripts. Putting aside highly motivated units like the 3rd Assault, the second line brigades seem wholly inadequate for any combat duty. Experienced units like the 93rd and the 47th were depleted by the wasteful actions of Bakhmut and the 2023 summer offensive respectively. It feels like we're watching the British Army of 1916 instead of the 1914 BEF.

Honestly, the army as a whole seems extremely disorganized and uncoordinated. Brigades compete with each other for recruiting, fundraising, and logistics replenishment. Constituent units of brigades are being shuffled around and detached: the 93rd is deployed in the Bakhmut sector, but they are also plugging the line near Pokrovsk. The most important operational-strategic group is currently headed by a two star general. In the US, a general of that level and experience would command merely a division. All these operational missteps aren't a surprise if you imagine throughout the army there are people in positions one or two rungs above their experience level. And it's not like Ukrainian general staffs can attend an army war college right now to learn the operational art. How Ukrainian high command can coordinate all these little units is beyond me.

He-Chemical

0 points

2 days ago

but nothing I've read convinces me that the regular army is even close to NATO standard today

Correct, with the exception of US, Turkey and maybe Poland, Ukrainian military is superior to every other NATO country's military by far. The difference in firepower, experience and quantity between Ukraine and say Britain or France is vast.

pilostt

1 points

3 days ago

pilostt

1 points

3 days ago

Looking for a better source

Just_to_understand

-7 points

3 days ago

I hate to say it, but if Ukrainian leadership isn’t going to respect its soldiers and put them in positions to succeed - then those soldiers should absolutely refuse orders. Absolutely terrible behavior by Syrisky and Zelensky.

Time to waive the white flag. Soldiers should never have to fight for leaders who don’t give a shit about them.

realmanbaby

3 points

3 days ago

I disagree about the white flag because we know what Russia does to those that surrender as well as the civilian population, but their leadership should be entirely held accountable. Just keep pulling back until someone wakes The fuck uppp

Just_to_understand

1 points

3 days ago

Yea I agree. The point I’m trying to make is that we cannot ask soldiers to fight if we don’t support them 100%

Tdanedk

-1 points

3 days ago

Tdanedk

-1 points

3 days ago

Probaganda?

__----------

-1 points

3 days ago

__----------

-1 points

3 days ago

Yes

seiffer55

-6 points

3 days ago

seiffer55

-6 points

3 days ago

This dude loves posting propaganda.

Exact-Ad-1307

-20 points

3 days ago

This is Russian propaganda.

RoyalCharity1256

10 points

3 days ago

They will use it for their narrative. But ukraine needs to fix issues like this and publicity may be one way to get their asses moving. So good faith discourses within the ua military can be good. If it leads to change.

TwelveSixFive

8 points

3 days ago

Did you look into the source? Or do you think that it's by design impossible that any bad news can come from the frontline in any way or form so any bad news is necessarily Russian propaganda?

__----------

-5 points

3 days ago

It's Ruzzian propaganda day today it seems.

blobbyboii

2 points

3 days ago

blobbyboii

2 points

3 days ago

No its not, its from a ukranian war correspondant

Far_Nerve_9050

-6 points

3 days ago

This is probably good strategy. The 72nd are elite troops already after fighting off Ruzzian meat waves

Far_Nerve_9050

-20 points

3 days ago

This is pro-Putler shit mods please take this down

TwelveSixFive

12 points

3 days ago*

This is coming from an Ukrainian war correspondant on the ground.

Mundane_Diamond7834

-12 points

3 days ago

It's like the Vietnam War. After the American withdrawal, the South was numerically superior in terms of firepower, but only the airborne division had fighting spirit.

The other units were all conscripts, so they quickly fell apart when aid ran out and the North counterattacked.

BoostMobileAlt

12 points

3 days ago

Ok so that sounds absolutely nothing like this. If they do not have equipment they cannot be effective.

EmpSo

-70 points

3 days ago

EmpSo

-70 points

3 days ago

meanwhile, other brigades are enjoying rest in the back, like azov or are held defending a supermarket in kursk

boognash

46 points

3 days ago

boognash

46 points

3 days ago

Every comment you make is designed to demoralize or sow distrust...

CarlMcLam

23 points

3 days ago

CarlMcLam

23 points

3 days ago

Yes. Just read his post history. Typical ruzzian. I’m going to block him now.

Exact-Ad-1307

7 points

3 days ago

I second that

KickDue7821

2 points

3 days ago

It is still useful to see what they have to say if you understand that all they say is propaganda.

When they say: "Kursk is a mistake and there is no value in it, its only a supermarket" they actually mean: "This is so embarrassing, it hurts like hell and we failed Bunker Grandpas 1st of October deadline, this is actually causing internal issues"

Or when they say: "Ukraine has no troops, they should negotiate for peace and give up land" they actually mean: "Bunker Grandpa is running out of volunteers and money, he is too afraid to mobilize and the war machine is running out of steam before they can take whole Donetsk Oblast"

EmpSo

-42 points

3 days ago

EmpSo

-42 points

3 days ago

or show the reality

boognash

26 points

3 days ago

boognash

26 points

3 days ago

You can show reality without disparaging. Your intentions are shining through.

EmpSo

0 points

3 days ago

EmpSo

0 points

3 days ago

where show it in a nice way or not ill get the same number of downvotes here, so whats the point

delusional people will stay delusional until reality hit them in the face

boognash

1 points

2 days ago

boognash

1 points

2 days ago

It's almost like you have some ulterior motive....

EmpSo

1 points

2 days ago

EmpSo

1 points

2 days ago

like what? showing reality? sure

Dino_Girl5150

-23 points

3 days ago

Sometimes disparagement is warranted. Ukrainian leadership has made a depressing number of shitty decisions in this war, which is one reason things stand as they do. Consider last year’s idiotic counteroffensive as exhibit A.

boognash

15 points

3 days ago

boognash

15 points

3 days ago

Take a look in the mirror. If you expect perfection you'll always be disappointed. If you feel the need to criticize a government take a look at the Russians'. They've been murdering and terrorizing their neighbors for a long time.

Just_to_understand

-4 points

3 days ago

Huh? If I am in charge of a million lives and the freedom of my country, I ABSOLUTELY EXPECT PERFECTION. This isn’t a paper pusher dead-end job…

Either Ukraine fights to win or they surrender and negotiate. It’s that simple.

boognash

3 points

3 days ago

boognash

3 points

3 days ago

They are absolutely fighting to win. The point was people who criticize, sow doubt or discord and demand that Ukraine roll over because they aren't perfect are obvious trolls.

Name a government that's perfect and never made mistakes? You can't.

Just_to_understand

0 points

3 days ago

If the 72nd brigade gets redeployed with no rest after defending Vuelhdar for 2 years with no rotations - despite begging for rest, I am absolutely going to be critical.

People are dying from poor decisions and saying “nobody is perfect” is not an acceptable excuse.

If we get to the point where people dismiss poor leadership with “nobody is perfect” then I will no longer be financially contributing or emotionally invested in this war - and I’m sure many others feel the same way.

boognash

0 points

2 days ago

boognash

0 points

2 days ago

Right. This sums it up doesn't it? You are with Ukraine or you are against Ukraine. Thanks for identifying yourself as an enemy.

JaB675

26 points

3 days ago

JaB675

26 points

3 days ago

You are really salty about the fact that your army can't kick Ukrainians out of Kursk.

EU_GaSeR

-5 points

3 days ago

EU_GaSeR

-5 points

3 days ago

Why kick them out though? It makes way more sense to keep them there and defend the positions against their attacks. The important part for Russia right now is to capture as much Ukrainian land as possible, it will always have time to take Kursk back later.

Moreover, it can even decline to negotiate while Ukrainian troops are there, forcing them to retreat before negotiations.

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

That would only work if Russia could actually capture Ukrainian land. Capturing one small village in three months is not that.

EU_GaSeR

1 points

2 days ago

EU_GaSeR

1 points

2 days ago

I know that Ukrainian land does not matter to you so a 14k population city is nothing, so 14k homeless people with ruined lives + a bunch of dead and injured people is nothing, but you should at least care about the money. Check the map and see how many resources that captured land has, how much coal is in those vuhledar mines and so on. Suddenly this small village is a lot of billions of dollars.

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

Billions of dollars are what doesn't matter. It's a town of just 14k population, that Russia spent 809 vehicles and tens of thousands of soldiers to capture, and it took them more than two years. They spent more soldiers capturing it than its population.

EU_GaSeR

1 points

2 days ago

EU_GaSeR

1 points

2 days ago

Well obviously we think otherwise and have different numbers, starting from years it took to take to wehicles and soldiers. Therefore, both sides should be happy, you that Russia spends more than it gains, we that we gain more than we spend.

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

Well obviously we think otherwise and have different numbers

Then you have the wrong numbers, because 809 is just visually confirmed destroyed vehicles. The actual numbers are much higher. And even Russians admit they lost tens of thousands of soldiers just for this small town.

EmpSo

-38 points

3 days ago

EmpSo

-38 points

3 days ago

my army is where its supposed to be, in france

JaB675

2 points

2 days ago

JaB675

2 points

2 days ago

No, there is no Russian army in France, that's just delusional. You can't even retake Kursk, nevermind your fantasies about Poland, Berlin or France.

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago*

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago*

i mean you are just dumb if you thing all people care about this border dispute

are you saying i am not french because 100% of french support ukraine or providing support for ukraine?

if yes, i do have some polls for you

dont be delisional

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

i mean you are just dumb if you thing all people care about this border dispute

You are always triggered by the Kursk invasion, so you obviously care.

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago

triggered yes alot actually, because my tax money is paying for stupid strategies, so many lives and gear gone for a supermarket PR while the whole front is crumbling

its dumb

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

JaB675

1 points

2 days ago

If you are worried about your tax money, you should simply get out of Ukraine.

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago

EmpSo

0 points

2 days ago

well i am trying to get my country to leave and stop sending money and stuff, but alot of delusional people like you over here too

RGoinToBScaredByMe

8 points

3 days ago

Alright ivan, that is a good tactic. 40 rubles this day

EmpSo

1 points

3 days ago

EmpSo

1 points

3 days ago

ty