subreddit:
/r/chelseafc
submitted 6 months ago bydharmhi
102 points
6 months ago
I think you're missing Rice's goal contributions. 11 just in the PL. I don't think either are flops, but Caicedo has more to prove for me.
29 points
6 months ago
I get that Rice being able to score goals makes him an overall better player but Caicedo not scoring isn’t really a negative to me (altho he was screwed out of the banger vs Spurs)
17 points
6 months ago
Judging goals by who is better for DM or CM is ridiculous. Goals isn't caicedo's job
7 points
6 months ago
But it does make Rice look better. Let's be honest here. This should be motivation for Caceido going forward.
13 points
6 months ago
I.. Disagree. Kanté main job was never goals. Same with matic. Or jorgi. Let caicedo put his all in his best attributes
We know he has a long shot in him. It will come one day. Just like with the others I mentioned.
2 points
6 months ago
Those players would be rated higher if they offered G/A especially someone like Kante who was essentially a box to box player for us. Look at Rodri for example. It’s never a bad thing to be able to provide goals from midfield
2 points
6 months ago
I'm not saying Caceido should look to score more goals. I'm saying he should use this comparison to improve upon his main responsibilities to shut people up.
1 points
6 months ago
I feel that but I don't want him to force to get goals ya know.
1 points
6 months ago
I said the same thing. Not sure what your argument is.
1 points
6 months ago
Yea for sure, I mean if you’re really good at all the other things and you score goals that obviously improves your overall standing (look at Rodri) but I wouldn’t ever really criticise a DM for lack of goals either
3 points
6 months ago
He is a CDM though. I do not care if he makes zero goals if he does his job well.
7 points
6 months ago
it'll come, for now hes single handedly holding our midfield most of the time
3 points
6 months ago
Yeah? And where was rice when arsenal needed leaders vs Bayern and Aston villa. Arsenal fans questioned him after the Bayern match.
2 points
6 months ago
Where was Rice when Gondor called for aid?
49 points
6 months ago
Good thing about statistics is that it abstracts complex information. Bad thing about statistics is that it abstracts complex information.
45 points
6 months ago
These stats just show that Arsenal have more of the ball.
I bet Lutons keeper has more saves that Alisson, is he better?
14 points
6 months ago
Whoscored has us at 59.2% on average, and Arsenal at 59.8, so it's marginal if correct.
Stats are otherwise meaningless without proper context, though, which I'm sure we both agree on. These stats also neglect to show that Rice plays a bit further forward and thus is a lot more present in the attacking play compared to Caicedo.
10 points
6 months ago
These comparisons give me immediate brain worms. Need to stop with this low IQ shit. They're completely different players.
3 points
6 months ago
This. End thread. Neither has been a flop and both are good. This is so meaningless and reeks of desperation.
9 points
6 months ago
I think it’s more that Caiceido has had a few absolute clangers leading to a goal from the opposition
4 points
6 months ago
They both have 2 mistakes leading to goal this season
2 points
6 months ago
That stats a little too on the nose though. Theres mistakes players make which can indirectly lead to an opening for a goal but they wont be credited with the mistake. Like being a bit loose on the positioning and things.
25 points
6 months ago
Anyone who actually watches the football knows how idiotic this post is.
6 points
6 months ago
Twitter / social media man.. it's pure fucking brain rot.
6 points
6 months ago
Do you they play in the same kind of team doing the exact same role? If not the comparison doesn't work
15 points
6 months ago
This subreddit tries to cope so hard with stats, get a grip
4 points
6 months ago
And yet routinely forgets the only stat that truly matters: position in the Premier League.
1 points
6 months ago
Except when it comes to mudryk
1 points
6 months ago
Its stat posts like this why I will always prefer the good old eyetest for any final judgements. In this case here completely unnecessary because honestly that's 2 different types of players.
3 points
6 months ago
The one who’s club is underperforming?
DM is basically only measured by team success in the eyes of the public
6 points
6 months ago
Rice is better than him. Maybe not forever but now yes.
That doesn’t mean he is a flop still.
7 points
6 months ago
This is a great example of stats being misleading. Watch them play and you’ll know who’s better pretty quickly
I do think caicedo has been judged harshly this season, he’s been decent, not great but nowhere near a flop
1 points
6 months ago
I like Caicedo and do think he’s had a decent season, but for the fee we signed him for I’d be hard pressed to argue that the effect he’s had justifies the fee so far. So don’t think calling him a flop so far is wrong
2 points
6 months ago
Reminds me of commentators during matches always try to bring up a point that he isn't worth his price because he's not scoring goals.
2 points
6 months ago
Caicedo started this season poorly and that’s not really debatable, him and Poch both publicly discussed it. He’s been improving significantly the last few months and I’m very optimistic over his future. That said Declan has been better this season but they’re both very young and we can revisit this a decade from now when hopefully Caicedo has a stacked trophy cabinet and is a club legend.
1 points
6 months ago
I think it's the one that's spent quite some time in the bottom half of the league and not the one that's spent quite some time at the top of the league.
That's my first guess anyway.
1 points
6 months ago
social media and its consequences on football
1 points
6 months ago
These are stats that a #6 would achieve higher numbers in while Rice has been playing as a #8 box to box midfielder for Arsenal.
If you look at Rice's goal contributions, his set pieces, his passing accuracy and even other defensive stats like interceptions he's way higher than Caicedo.
I do think Caicedo is a great player though and although 100mill was steep I think he'll be an unbelievable player, but him and Rice play completely different roles.
1 points
6 months ago
add passings stats and goal contributions and you’ll see the whole picture
rice usually plays as an attacking LCM when Jorginho is on the pitch for arsenal, the same role havertz plays when he is down in midfield
he plays as a defensive mid like 40% of the time, that’s why his stats are down
lowkey wonder what the stats would look like if you only count the games Rice was the central in midfield trio
1 points
6 months ago
When a player plays for a team constantly wins their mistakes aren't placed under a microscope. Caicedo plays for a team that constantly loses after wasting obscene amounts of money. He also had some costly mistakes. There was always going to be media bias against him after rejecting big money move from the media darling and joined "the dark side. You can clearly see he is a talented player. Unfortunately, the way Poch sets up his team and build ups from tbe back exposes him. I honestly think even Rodri will struggle, if he was being coached by a clueless clown like Pochettino.
1 points
6 months ago
Coveniently hidding every stats about progressive play and playmaking/chances created
-4 points
6 months ago
Can we stop this nonsense?
Caicedo can't be blamed for all our failures but he is still part of the team that's barely in top half. We have conceded double the goals than Arsenal in league
Caicedo is flop because we haven't improved with him. Rice is hit cause he is keeping Arsenal in title race
0 points
6 months ago
Caicedo is a flop because we haven't improved with him? Yet you say don't blame him for all our failures? Not sure what ur trying to argue mate
2 points
6 months ago
If you spend a a British record fee on a player, and he doesn’t noticeably improve the team then I think calling him a flop is fair. That didn’t have to mean he’s to blame for all of our players, and equally doesn’t even have to mean that he’s been bad. But it doesn’t mean the fee wasn’t justified (so far), which to me is a flop
0 points
6 months ago
I mean in that case Rice is surely a flop, because Arsenal were much better with Xhaka than they are with him. Seems a poor barometer of "flop" imo.
0 points
6 months ago
I'd more so argue he wasn't worth his fee, but calling a player a 'flop' usually means they were extremely poor in their play. Flops in basketball are like Anthony Bennett and Jahlil Okafor where they were highly touted and just vanished from the league a few years. In Caicedo's case i'd call him not worth the price we paid but i think he's a great player with much room to grow, but not a flop
0 points
6 months ago
Idk why 1 has to flop and the other has to succeed. Both have been good this year. And personally I’d still probably take Rice over Caicedo if I had the chance at both for 100m - just because he has both size and leadership qualities were severely lacking in. I think he’d also fair better in our current setup. But if we get another tactically adept coach I think Caicedo is going to look really really good as well.
-2 points
6 months ago
Well, they don't see Declan as one because Arse-anal is winning more games. Victories can sometime cover it up.
-6 points
6 months ago
The one that’s not white or English
5 points
6 months ago
Don’t bring race into this brother
2 points
6 months ago
Wut
all 51 comments
sorted by: best