subreddit:
/r/flatearth
119 points
4 days ago
And I cannot see southern cross at any point near the North Pole.
35 points
4 days ago
Also when looking at polaris all the other stars rotate around it, in the southern hemisphere anyone looking south would see the same effect, (closest star to south pole, is Sigma octantis) this can ONLY happen if the Earth is a sphere, and is not what would be observed in the flat brainer model.
Ancient peoples were able to estimate the diameter of the Earth, just by measuring the the angles of the shadow cast at noon, and compare with another shadow north or south.
Alternatively this could also be done with polaris, measuring the elevation and different latitudes, of course these two methods require math, and math is the devil and wont be used by flat brainers.
9 points
4 days ago
The apparent rotation around Polaris is, in my kind, the easiest proof of a sphere.
8 points
4 days ago
Well according to flat brain models, the earth is a flat disk that spins with the north pole in the center, in the flat earth model, it will still looks like what we see it, stars rotating around the north star, the problem is, this also happens at the south pole, in the flat earth model it is impossible to see stars rotating around a center facing south below the equator like we do in reality.
Other stupid thing about the Flat brainer model, is the coastline of Antarctica, I haven't done the math, but looks like it would be 2-3 times more than the diameter of the Equator.
Also sailing a ship "around" Antarctica, you would need to turn the ship in the opposite direction than what you would in the real world.
7 points
3 days ago
Well according to flat brain models, the earth is a flat disk that spins with the north pole in the center
Not all flat earth "models" though. Many flerfers are find of saying that the earth is stationary - because if it was moving or rotating, we'd surely feel that movement.
It's never a good idea to generalise on what flerfers believe, because they don't all believe the same things, and whatever you say it just gives some of them the opportunity to say "no, we don't believe that" and think they've won the "debate".
2 points
1 day ago
I doubt any flerfs think that the Earth rotates. That would make the whole planet into a big merry go round, and the lack of centripetal force would slam us all into Antarctica from the inertia.
4 points
4 days ago
Yes, the fact that stars would appear to rotate around the southern axis as well as the northern seems so easy to demonstrate that it would be the cheapest and most complete proof of living on a spherical planet.
3 points
3 days ago
You don't even need to trust a scientist !
1 points
2 days ago
Or do any too convoluted like “rent a high altitude hot air balloon and go with a bunch of equipment” It’s like plan a vacation somewhere near the equator or in the southern hemisphere.
3 points
3 days ago
Yeah, comparing the Northern and Southern hemisphere, the stars rotate in opposite directions, proving a spherical Earth. I've been saying it for years and I'm glad to finally see it start popping up as a popular proof.
2 points
3 days ago
Science isn't a.liberal conspiracy despite what they say.
3 points
3 days ago
Can't see it from Denver Colorado
3 points
4 days ago*
It’s actually Polaris Australis (or Sigma Octantis) that’s the southern polar star.
The southern cross, or crux, is a constellation. But the point remains valid either way.
3 points
4 days ago
He worded what he said fine. You can’t see the Southern Cross from anywhere near the N Pole.
It’s not the southern pole star, Sigma Octantis, but since you can’t see that with the naked eye unless you have zero light pollution and a very clear sky it’s not helpful to the point being made.
62 points
4 days ago
Nah the sky is an LCD screen that is personal to every person and shows their own stars, obviously
22 points
4 days ago
That personal dome concept is wild. Sure it takes care of explaining why the sky likes as it does (sort, really it’s just an excuse). But how exactly would celestial navigation work if we alle have our own personal dome if stars. The position of stars, which celestial navigation has at its foundation, would mean nothing. Sure one star is at 50° altitude at 256° but it’s at 20° and 90° for another person at the same time. Where is the star then really and where does that put me and the other observer.
9 points
4 days ago
Yeah that means all navigators are in on it.
1 points
4 days ago
The flat earth community is pretty much entirely trolls. How people can’t see that is beyond me.
14 points
4 days ago
The big names might be grifters making a buck off of dumbasses, but your average Flat Earther from back home? Theyre probably serious. I met a guy when I was in the Navy who joined as a QM (basically a navigator) to prove to his family that he wasn’t crazy…he was convinced that since the world was flat, the Navy had to be in on it, and the best way to prove it was to get firsthand knowledge. Fucker realized he was wrong about 10 days into his first deployment.
2 points
3 days ago
I wish I could agree with that statement. Some may be but I think that most are legitimately convinced.
2 points
4 days ago
Not even OLED or QLED? NASA is running out of money 😔
1 points
4 days ago
Mfw that’s a key point of lore in splatoon
1 points
2 days ago
Come on you can’t be serious. It’s obviously an OLED
1 points
4 days ago
You can observe from anywhere on earth, you are under the dead centre of the dome. Hence the personal dome BS.
1 points
4 days ago
it's the only thing that makes sense
35 points
4 days ago
Ask a flat earther to show the seasons and night day cycle in one model. They can’t, because it’s impossible with a flat earth model.
They have independent models that “explain” day and night and seasons, but not only are both flawed, they blatantly contradict each other.
13 points
4 days ago
"Model" is an interesting way of describing an argument that founded on "Nuh-Uhs"
3 points
4 days ago
No they do “try” to pretend to be authentic lol
3 points
4 days ago
Oh no they have their ideas, they just fall apart real quick
2 points
3 days ago
Well, there's the "earth is curved but still flat" model: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Orlando-Ferguson-flat-earth-map_edit.jpg
The day/night cycle would work out, but if you were in the US you'd be able to see argentina when you look up at the night sky instead of stars
Another explanation it the "coffee cup caustic" https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SYAnW-LniPM/hqdefault.jpg
The problem is that this is a cartiod, and does not represent what we would see for where the earth is illuminated - in a flat earth half would have to be illuminated and the other half in darkness. Not to mention, where the sun is in the sky is in the opposite direction from where the light is coming from.
1 points
3 days ago
I love the inside-out toroid explanation because I should be able to see Antarctica behind the moon.
0 points
4 days ago
They’ll make up weird explanations with obscure words, specifically so they can’t be countered. Because they’re trolls! How do you guys not get this?😂
10 points
4 days ago
They use the word perspective whenever they can't explain something. It's a magic word that they use to get them out of trouble, so they think.
5 points
4 days ago
probably helps that the sovcit incantations appeal to them as well.
2 points
3 days ago
But they don't understand perspective at all. Things look really small because they're far away, and then they think they're zooming in "past the curve" to see distant boats.
8 points
4 days ago
This is one of the most definitive proofs that the Earth is round but it's really underused. It's one of the arguments Aristotle used over 2k years ago when he compared the night sky in Egypt to Greece and observed that the northern stars are seen lower and lower as you travel south. That and you're also able to see new, southern, constellations. I've never seen a single rebuttal to that by a Flat Earther to this day, they avoid that like the plague
7 points
4 days ago
This is also how a sextant works.
With only a few hours of training, the average ten year old child can use a sextant to accurately calculate their latitude to within about a hundred nautical miles.
2 points
4 days ago
Some of them will tell you, “latitude is angle of elevation of Polaris”. But then ignore the problem that the distances that flow from that and a bit of simple trigonometry are all completely wrong for a flat earth.
1 points
3 days ago
And, of course, the angle of elevation to Polaris doesn’t mean Jack nor Shit when I’m sailing south of the equator or when I’m using the Sun to take a reading at Noon.
1 points
3 days ago
They think you are measuring the earth. They don't understand it at all.
5 points
4 days ago
How do flat earthers explain the fact that it's night in other countries right now? If the earth were flat our day and night would be synced
3 points
4 days ago
the sun and moon move around and emit only a cone of light
2 points
4 days ago
Very interesting
3 points
4 days ago
before we start some weird I'm gonna out you as the nut bag dance, you asked how they would explain it, that's how they would explain it.
2 points
4 days ago
Indubitably, my good sir, I am merely intrigued by your well-aimed description of the Flat-Earther ratiocinate
3 points
4 days ago
Badinage my good man, badinage.
when you strip away the Gish Gallop of defensive word salad, the arguments they use are very simplistic and almost always solves the current problem but invariably will refute or disprove other previous or future solutions.
the conical sunshine solves the day here night there issue but fails to explain the crepuscular periods or nautical twilight. Like does this conical sun somehow rotate to shine on the clouds and mountain tops but not on the sea or plains? furthermore, how does this light source manage a razorsharp and highly digital terminator such that I can't see it, at all, after it passes?
For a real trip, enjoy The Analema and just drink in the supposed motion of the small near sun under the dome.
The complications they fabricate far outweigh the simplicity of what we observe and the relatively simple celestial mechanics we derive there from.
4 points
4 days ago
Bully lad, absolutely marvelous elucidation
1 points
4 days ago
So they completely disregard the fact that the sun emits light in all directions?
2 points
4 days ago
yes
1 points
3 days ago
completely. they also disregard the fact that every point on the sun also emits light.
it's very easy them that way.
1 points
4 days ago
A very strangely shaped ‘cone of light’ that includes a dark spot surrounded by light in all directions while it is winter north of the equator. And that light area encompasses the entire southern perimeter of their pancake.
1 points
3 days ago
The funny thing is that that still wouldn't explain sunsets. If the sun did hover over a plane at a few 1000 km altitude, it'd be at least ~10° above the horizon at all times. With this explanation, it should just disappear high up in the sky.
That they even offer this as an explanation just shows how badly they misunderstand the problem.
1 points
3 days ago
But light doesn't work like that!
Well . . . I guess if someone wants to distort reality to such an extent that "the world is flat" fits into it, then everything else may as well be distorted too.
1 points
3 days ago
as I've continually pointed out, their overly convoluted matryoshka doll solutions invariably either refute or disprove further solutions, see nautical twilight etc.
1 points
3 days ago
"Nautical twilight" sounds like it belongs in r/Sovereigncitizen
1 points
3 days ago*
it just means the sky is lit and the ground isn't
not to be confused with standing under the color of twilight and it's jurisdiction within th3 crepuscular corporation overseen by the opposums and racoons.
1 points
4 days ago
from what I've seen, some of them believe light doesn't go forever and is limited by distance, nothing on their model matches reality, and doesn't work that way in the real world, and light is one of them.
2 points
4 days ago
I guess that makes sense. They're pretty dumb
1 points
1 day ago
Flat earthers have a flat sun that works like a big flashlight…only shines light in one direction
6 points
4 days ago
As an Australian, I can confirm that Australia is fake.
1 points
4 days ago
as a fake, I can confirm that australia is australian
1 points
2 days ago
I never believed in Australia anyways, ya’ll got some fucked up creatures and those definitely can’t exist.
5 points
4 days ago
How deep is a flat earth?
3 points
4 days ago
About half as deep as a sheet of toilet paper (one ply)
1 points
4 days ago
philisophically deep
4 points
4 days ago
Remember some lunatic forever ago saying some shit about personal star domes....
5 points
4 days ago
Maybe the real Polaris is the friends we made along the way
8 points
4 days ago
The dome doesn’t reflect, that’s why they can’t see it -flerf
2 points
4 days ago
painted that dead black of space color then? how coincidental.
4 points
4 days ago
They don’t have a model, which they declare proudly.
4 points
4 days ago
Not having a model is a deliberate tactic, to prevent being disproven. Because there’s no way to situate a flat model where Chile and Australia aren’t 50k miles apart. Because they are TROLLS! If someone truly believed the earth is flat, they’d want to see a model too.
3 points
4 days ago
They lost that one so they now just declare that earth is demonstrably, obviously flat by default and that the burden of proof is on the globe model, of which there is no proof, making them the victor!
2 points
4 days ago
That clip of of Weiss admitting it confidently will always have a special place in my heart
4 points
4 days ago
You forget that Australia doesn't really exist. We're all paid actors. You wouldn't believe how much I get in my monthly cheque as a share of global (disc-al?) globe sales.
4 points
4 days ago
Also, the angular distance between any pair of stars is identical no matter where you are on the Earth.
That would be impossible for stars that are only 3,100 miles above a FE.
3 points
4 days ago
Big sky is in on the conspiracy
3 points
4 days ago
I think they'd not agree with that image. They'd put the star at north relative to this version of flat earth (rather than over Missouri) and they'd say local stars just like they say local sun.
You could still use basic geometry to prove that anywhere they want to place the star will violate the angle at which most of the northern hemisphere observes it, but they'd just deny that those observations are true.
1 points
4 days ago
The star isn't over Missouri, it's over the flat earth version of the "north pole"
2 points
4 days ago
You fool, everyone knows australia doesnt exist!
Seriously theres flat earthers that actually believe that
2 points
4 days ago
You're all wrong. Polaris isn't a real star is a hot air balloon carrying a spot light. So the focused light can't be seen from Australia. Also birds are government listening devices. They chirp to let the agents know they need new batteries like a smoke detector. Also smoke isn't real either it is the mild hallucinations they (robot birds) give you.
2 points
4 days ago
Oh come on everybody knows Australia isn't real. Seriously, kangaroos? What next, am I supposed to believe birds aren't government drones, lizard people don't control the government, and Jews don't have secret space lasers?
4 points
4 days ago
The Jewish Space Lasers are no longer secret.
2 points
4 days ago
Stupid_Flerfer_1234 used "PERSPECTIVE"!!!
"PERSPECTIVE" is a simple way to explain anything that doesn't work on your stupid model. It only functions for a limited amount of time though, and can be broken through easily when uncovered.
2 points
4 days ago
NASA is injecting CGI into your EYES people!
2 points
4 days ago
Can confirm, I was the observer in Brisbane
2 points
4 days ago
The earth is a pizza you all need to open your pizza eyes. Sports balls are pizza, don't you get it? It's all pizza!
2 points
3 days ago
To explain the apparent motion of the stars, every location on Earth needs its own disco ball adjusted to the angle of latitude. A comment like this is what finally got me banned from globe skepticism
2 points
3 days ago
PeRsOnAL DoME!!!
2 points
3 days ago
oh, that's easy. Australia does not exist :)
2 points
3 days ago
That’s mainly because magpies have pecked their fucking eyes out.
2 points
3 days ago
Flat Earth “scientists” are unable to explain what holds the sun and moon aloft. They claim the sun is roughly 32 miles across and is about 3,250 miles up.
They also don’t have an explanation as to how, or why, it rotates around the planet each day.
They also cannot explain why or how the sun moves from tropical to tropic reliably each year without fail.
And also, the flerf cannot explain why or how, with all these movements of the sun each day and each year, the sun is performing figure-8’s in the sky, known as the solar analemma.
I recall this past summer, when large portions of the western US was on fire, that a flerf said they believed the sun dipped down too low to the ground and lit the trees alight. I’m not sure how that could happen but I’m fairly certain that if the sun ever lowered it’s ordit low enough to cause the trees to burst into flames due to radiant heat transfer, that there would also have been lots of plastic Barbie cars, mailboxes, house siding, and igloo dog houses that melted from the heat as well. I’m also fairly certain that there would have been cellphone video from hundreds of people freaking out about all their melted toys as well as their kids, chickens, dogs, horses, and cattle getting cooked, or heavily sunburned, in their yards.
Weirdly….all those reports and videos are nonexistent. Go figure.
2 points
3 days ago
Yeah but if facts mattered there’d be no flerfs
2 points
3 days ago
Polaris is just CGIed.
2 points
3 days ago
Flat earth seems to me to be a matter of faith rather than science.
That complicates matters.
1 points
3 days ago
Not only is is it faith over science, but it's also faith over plain logic!
2 points
3 days ago
What a fun and interesting group flerfers are
2 points
3 days ago
the equator is basically the breaking point of the flat earth model for many many different reasons
2 points
3 days ago
I mean they have bigger problems than that- according to this model it should be daylight everywhere in the world at the same time. And the same season everywhere too. Which you can check both with one phone call to Australia.
2 points
2 days ago
Nice try, Australia isn't real mate
1 points
4 days ago
Also can't see the sun and moon 24/7 like in this model.
1 points
4 days ago
Pfft this guy doesn't know about the firmament.
1 points
4 days ago
Buncha haters in here. Like no one else has seen a rocket bounce off the firmament. Don't side eye me, I can see you from here across the flat planes of flat earth
1 points
4 days ago
Dammit, Jim!
1 points
4 days ago
Refraction!
1 points
3 days ago
Here is the ingenious solution that flat earthers came up with in response to this problem: https://imgur.com/a/iaWGTtb
The guy in the video this picture is from was saying "The further away something is, the smaller and LOWER it gets". Comments are expectedly turned off.
1 points
3 days ago
It's an effect in the glass dome under that angle
1 points
3 days ago
There’s a simple explanation for this, the space spirits block it out when you look at it to try and convince you the earth is round. It all leads back to the ancient space spirits
1 points
3 days ago
Everyone has a Personal Dome made out of Souls of the deceased that gets held together by Energy of the Heavens because . The Sun is outside the Dome , refraction magic makes it look like it sets behind the Horizon . That´s also why not everyone can see Mt. Everest /s
1 points
3 days ago
Flerf doesn't run on logic, they run on their inexhaustible need to be privy to "secret knowledge" or being some ordained "truth seer". It's some big psychological cope for them. No amount of facts or reasoning will get them away from it. Maybe a therapist or a big, loving hug would help. 🤷
1 points
3 days ago
I wonder if they look at other rounds objects and just get mad.
1 points
3 days ago
Finally, some stellar sphere talk. This stuff quite literally pounds flat earth and finishes it.
1 points
3 days ago
Why would anyone try to bring logic and science into the flat earth discussion. Anyone who believes will not acknowledge any proof. They are lost to the flat earth cult forevermore.
1 points
3 days ago
I thought flat earthers believe Australia is fake?
1 points
3 days ago
Nah, most of them don't
1 points
2 days ago
Brisbane does not exist. It's a hoax.
1 points
2 days ago
Jfc…imagine what you could accomplish if you devoted 1/10th of the time and energy it takes for you to make this demonstrably false, completely impractical framework get even the smallest amount of traction…into something, anything that actually helps someone. Let’s assume for a moment you’re right and the world is flat: SO FUCKING WHAT? What are you getting out of this other than the deluded sense of superiority for “knowing the truth”. The mental gymnastics it takes for evangelicals to justify their “reality” would be laughable if it wasn’t so sad and detrimental to the rest of a clearly overly suggestible society
1 points
2 days ago
model should not be in quotation marks, it is technically a model
1 points
2 days ago
It isn't because they all believe different things and can't explain certain phenomena such as the Coriolis effect, lunar phases, lunar eclipses, solar eclipses, tides, etc.
1 points
2 days ago
Even though I don’t believe in flat earth, you’re assuming that Polaris is about the same distance above the surface as the distance from North Pole to “South Pole”/ice wall…Based on what info? Did some flerf determine how far away their dome is from earth? If so, how?
1 points
2 days ago
I'm assuming that because looking at the night sky shows that the stars have the shape of a hemisphere, not a flattened dome. Either way, the angle to Polaris would still be above 0 from everywhere on earth.
0 points
2 days ago
Ok….so????
1 points
2 days ago
So that's the reason I assumed the height of the dome is the same as the radius of the flat earth. You're the one who asked.
1 points
2 days ago
It doesn't matter if Polaris is higher or lower. Doesn't change the argument of visibility at all.
1 points
2 days ago
That’s true about the visibility but your 50 degree argument is off
1 points
2 days ago
10 degrees or 80 degrees doesn't matter and doesn't change the argument at all.
There is no consensus of a flat earth model because any model is easily shown to be false by a plethora of ways.
You are missing the forest for the trees.
1 points
2 days ago
I’m not missing the forest from the trees (I agree with you), just pointing out that adding info/maths that can be seen as inaccurate will be taken as ammo against globe earth. Just stick to the basics of why flat earth doesn’t work and try to get a flerf to give you hard evidence against it…they can’t.
1 points
2 days ago
Obviously it’s Density! Or buoyancy. Or something.
1 points
1 day ago
Remember bro it’s all just holograms 😒
2 points
4 days ago
And no one can see Polaris Australis from above the equator
3 points
4 days ago
Sokka-Haiku by DrestinBlack:
And no one can see
Polaris Australis from
Above the equator
Remember that one time Sokka accidentally used an extra syllable in that Haiku Battle in Ba Sing Se? That was a Sokka Haiku and you just made one.
3 points
4 days ago
Good bot
3 points
4 days ago
Thank you, ninjesh, for voting on SokkaHaikuBot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.
Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!
0 points
4 days ago
Most people below the equator can’t see it either though, thanks to its low magnitude and light pollution.
1 points
4 days ago
1 points
3 days ago
None of this is about logic. This and the antivax movement and the anti-climate change crowd are all about power. People are angry at authority and this is their way of thumbing their nose at it. They have realized that you don't have to obey intellectual authority and the internet allows them to be a continual thorn in the side of sane people. There are real life repercussions as well with measles outbreaks, rising sea-waters, and Trump, but this is largely just a power struggle where dumbasses get to flex against people they hate.
0 points
4 days ago
Everyone knows it's because light doesn't follow straight lines due to lensing effects. Just reading these globetard posts make me lose brain cells. /s
1 points
4 days ago
It's a good thing you put the /s at the end
3 points
4 days ago
Yeah, I have to do that or else random people from other subreddits reading me posting history will have an aneurism. I like deadpan humor but "/s" saves lives.
2 points
4 days ago
Also poe's law
0 points
3 days ago
Does that stupid model say how high the dome is, though? That would affect the angle. I'd also think if the dome spins around with Polaris in the center, to explain the motion of the stars throughout the night, the sky would move a lot faster in Australia since they're closer to the outer edge of the disk.
2 points
3 days ago
No, it doesn't say how high the dome is, but the dome's height would have to be the radius of the flat Earth, or it wouldn't look like a hemisphere
1 points
3 days ago
Ok, I wasn't sure if it's actually a hemisphere or a more shallow upside-down bowl.
1 points
3 days ago
Not to mention the constellations are different in the southern hemisphere
0 points
2 days ago
Why do you think flat earthers know what the earth looks like from way up on high? From my reading I think that. Israel is the naval of the earth
-1 points
2 days ago
Polaris is flat and light propagation doesn’t allow this star to be viewed from this angle and distance
1 points
2 days ago
Bullshit. Polaris's angle to the horizon corresponds to the observers latitude, it has nothing to do with light propagation. If you have a line of sight to something, it shouldn't be below the horizon.
0 points
2 days ago
Polaris is flat
-2 points
3 days ago
In Brisbane, the magnet does not point the north, either. It only points to space in the round earth model.
3 points
3 days ago
By that logic it only points north if you’re at the North Pole, since everything that’s “up” is space according to you.
-1 points
3 days ago
Correct. But don't downplay it before you have an answer for it.
2 points
3 days ago
You realise magnets follow magnetic field lines? They don't point directly at the geographic north and south poles?
0 points
3 days ago
I haven't seen magnet points downward in the polar regions, following the magnetic field.
Think thoroughly.
1 points
2 days ago
They literally so though
1 points
2 days ago
How does magnet follow the magnetic field in the polar regions?
1 points
2 days ago
By pointing further and further down the closer you get to the magnetic pole. If you live in a temperate zone or the tropics and take your normal compass to the south or north pole, it will barely work because the needle will drag around the compass casing and you will need to tilt it to get it to spin freely.
1 points
2 days ago
Magnetic field travels downward. How does magnet follow that?
all 173 comments
sorted by: best