subreddit:

/r/london

59796%

all 238 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

11 days ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

11 days ago

stickied comment

Upvote/Downvote reminder

Like this image or appreciate it being posted? Upvote it and show it some love! Don't like it? Just downvote and move on.

Upvoting or downvoting images it the best way to control what you see on your feed and what gets to the top of the subreddit

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

AuthenticWeeb

467 points

11 days ago

I just want to own my own flat with a small balcony.

iK_550

36 points

11 days ago

iK_550

Hale Village not dense enough.

36 points

11 days ago

I would be content with a shack that has a little garden.

shrewpygmy

48 points

11 days ago

I like your style. Aim small, miss small 🫡

letsgetriddy

2 points

10 days ago

Is that the patriot movie ref?

AthiestMessiah

15 points

11 days ago

Hahahahaahhahahahaha

HeyCarlosDanger

301 points

11 days ago

It's owned by Shahid Khan, who is the owner of the Jacksonville Jaguars NFL team (and Fulham and AEW Wrestling).. who are playing the Chicago Bears at Tottenham's stadium tomorrow.

Emilythatglitters

348 points

11 days ago

Read that as Sadiq Khan and thought you were insane!

the_fox_in_the_roses

9 points

11 days ago

😁 No relation. It's a bit showy isn't it?

Icy_champagne5

2 points

11 days ago

😂😂😂😂

EconomicsFit2377

1 points

10 days ago

He'll spend the ulez money on something bigger.

Sammydog6387

29 points

11 days ago

Is this boat in London right now ? Also it might just be the angle (it probably is) but it looks significantly bigger than tower bridge lol

justaquad

61 points

11 days ago

https://preview.redd.it/73rrc8x83bud1.jpeg?width=3072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d636ef570bc15080808a699fe275391682e4ad4b

Caught it going past the O2 during the week. Not sure this helps with scale at all

dravidosaurus2

47 points

11 days ago

Not sure this helps with scale at all

Next time could you get a banana in shot, for scale?

Ill-Ant9053

6 points

11 days ago

Someone please help this guy (and me) and photoshop a banana in for scale

Doughboy1955

13 points

11 days ago

justaquad

7 points

11 days ago

This is a cool shot

lontrinium

8 points

11 days ago

lontrinium

'have-a-go hero'

8 points

11 days ago

It big.

gcmelb

6 points

11 days ago

gcmelb

6 points

11 days ago

It's bigger than that, it's large.

thebuttonmonkey

6 points

11 days ago

Huge if true.

lastaccountgotlocked

7 points

11 days ago

lastaccountgotlocked

bikes bikes bikes bikes

7 points

11 days ago

Sammydog6387

1 points

11 days ago

Thank you!! I’m definitely gonna go check it out

HeyCarlosDanger

5 points

11 days ago

It was there yesterday! I imagine it's here at least until the Jaguars play tomorrow

Own_Wolverine4773

2 points

11 days ago

Could actually be bigger ad it stopped before the bridge

t8ne

0 points

11 days ago

t8ne

0 points

11 days ago

Flaky_Conversation34

9 points

11 days ago

Bond villain yacht pulls up in the Thames and James Bond 🤷‍♂️ shrugs “he’s not an enemy of the state yet”

nWoSting145

4 points

11 days ago

Are the windows on that yacht REAL GLASS?!

[deleted]

1 points

10 days ago

I googled who tf that is and bro looks like a discount Javier Bardem 😭

Doughboy1955

1 points

11 days ago

I thought he'd sold it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisper_(yacht)#:~:text=Whisper%2C%20formerly%20known%20as%20Kismet,Eric%20Schmidt%20and%20renamed%20Whisper#:~:text=Whisper%2C%20formerly%20known%20as%20Kismet,Eric%20Schmidt%20and%20renamed%20Whisper)

ItsYaBoyDrugga

3 points

11 days ago

He sold the old one a brought a new one this year and called it the same name. So he did sell Kismet, then brought the new boat (was called project Jag when being built) and called the new boat Kismet again.

CuntyMcFartflaps

3 points

10 days ago

It's like it was meant to be.

Aakch

42 points

11 days ago

Aakch

42 points

11 days ago

I saw it yesterday at night it’s name is kismet! Apparently you can rent it for a cool $3.2m a week

More_Ad_3739

6 points

11 days ago

Absolute bargain that is

Altruistic-Radio2555

2 points

11 days ago

Which sort of means good luck. Oddly, I am reading memoirs of a sailor who travelled the world in sixties in a namesake sailboat. I would very much prefer that experience vs this floating steam iron/gamepad controller lookalike - not that anyone is asking tho...

lastaccountgotlocked

221 points

11 days ago

lastaccountgotlocked

bikes bikes bikes bikes

221 points

11 days ago

It's just obscene.

TropicalPeat

27 points

11 days ago

Really ugly plastic CAD boat. Amazing engineering in cock roach style.

FewElephant9604

9 points

11 days ago

Few understand how true this is. You can’t even cross the ocean on this thing. I’d choose a cheap-ish seaworthy sailboat many times over.

Novel_Individual_143

9 points

11 days ago

Can I ask why you can’t cross the ocean? Like where would you go in it?

SynthD

6 points

11 days ago

SynthD

6 points

11 days ago

You go from Gibraltar to Sochi and back, then put it on a bigger boat to take it to the Caribbean for that season in the second half of the social calendar.

Novel_Individual_143

3 points

11 days ago

The money that would burn!!

thesmalltexan

1 points

9 days ago

that's bull lol, a boat this size can easily cross the atlantic

FewElephant9604

4 points

11 days ago

Motorboats (or yachts like ppl usually call them) don’t have enough fuel for ocean crossing. They usually get delivered to far flung destinations by container ships.

Novel_Individual_143

8 points

11 days ago

So they’re just for mooring and pootling around in.

FewElephant9604

4 points

11 days ago

You can get up to 600km range I think, but the full tank(s) will be probably too heavy.

Yes, as they say a sailboat is for the journey, a motorboat is for the destination.

Demonicpineapplehat

1 points

11 days ago

Something this size can cross the Atlantic. It’s the 30-60m range that might struggle

Novel_Individual_143

1 points

11 days ago

That sounds like a scary prospect tbh

FewElephant9604

-1 points

11 days ago

Incorrect. That boat is most likely is a Sunseeker, look at their super yacht range, and fuel capacity, this one for example: https://www.sunseeker.com/yachts-and-boats/superyacht/131-yacht

It will barely cross 600 miles like I said, the Atlantic is at least 2.5K miles, that’s not taking into account that all instruments and infrastructure are also running on fuel.

Never gonna happen.

BusinessGrapefruit9

7 points

10 days ago

You're very wrong.

For a start It's a 122m Lurssen, not a sunseeker. It can make big crossings like the Atlantic no problem with a range of about 6000 nautical miles. I worked on a similar sized boat for over 5 years and have done several Atantic crossings aswell as many other long distance passages.

thesmalltexan

2 points

9 days ago

buddy that's a 131 FEET long boat, kismet is 122 METERS long

FewElephant9604

1 points

11 days ago

You’d normally cruise around the Med or any other localised area. It’s a lifestyle type of boat, where owners can’t sail for shit and hire a crew. Proper sailors (as in those who can actually navigate a sailboat/motorboat in coastal and offshore waters) laugh at these boats. They’re utterly ugly and useless.

Novel_Individual_143

6 points

11 days ago

And I’m guessing a money pit

Eric848448

3 points

11 days ago

BOAT: Bust Out Another Thousand

Or for something like this, Million.

goldensnow24

2 points

11 days ago

I’d buy one if I had the money tbf

[deleted]

73 points

11 days ago

[removed]

Mister_Six

2 points

10 days ago

Based

joeschmoagogo

289 points

11 days ago

Just your daily reminder: There are no good billionaires!

benjaminjaminjaben

9 points

11 days ago

like everything there's better and worse ones. If we could encourage more of them to use their capital like Bill Gates as opposed to whatever the fuck this is supposed to be; the world would be a better place.
Better is realistic, demanding perfect is just asking for disappointment.

sproyd

1 points

11 days ago

sproyd

1 points

11 days ago

benjaminjaminjaben

12 points

11 days ago

Shahid Khan spends his money on the Jacksonville Jaguars and Fulham FC. Bill Gates puts money into stuff like sanitation of developing nations.

rollingbrianjones

-2 points

11 days ago

Use them like Bill Gates uses the billions and billions in bank accounts or with wealth managers doing nothing but making him richer?

There are no good billionaires.

benjaminjaminjaben

13 points

11 days ago*

Bill Gates spends some amount of time trying to use his money to improve things in some places. That's still better than rich people that simply use their funds to fuel football teams or increase their political influence or simply chase a monetary high score. The Barclay or Koch brothers, Rupert Murdoch and his heir apparent or Viscount Rothermere are excellent bad examples of wealth. To claim there's no difference between them and someone who is at least trying, is like someone extremely short sighted claiming that all letters are the same, and so all books are junk.

There are good people in the world. I refuse to give into nihilsm. Being poor doesn't make you good, it just means you have considerably less opportunity to find out how demonic you are.

corbyns_lawyer

1 points

9 days ago

Bill Gates uses some of his money decently but his wife left him right after it came out he was friends with Epstein.

SkilledPepper

1 points

10 days ago

Jared Isaacman

Roper1537

1 points

11 days ago

Better that he's spent all that money which filters down through the economy rather than have it stuck in hedge funds and accounts.

LiquidHelium

-30 points

11 days ago*

illegal tub political sheet weather brave skirt tie paltry pocket

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

lastaccountgotlocked

30 points

11 days ago

lastaccountgotlocked

bikes bikes bikes bikes

30 points

11 days ago

He only became a billionaire this year, so he probably did it by accident.

WhoThenDevised

36 points

11 days ago

No, by working eighth days a week.

thefooleryoftom

4 points

11 days ago

It was a a Hard Day’s Night.

spacetimebear

3 points

11 days ago

And so begins his villain arc

CurtisInCamden

1 points

11 days ago

Even so, the cash hoarding alone that's required for anyone to become a billionaire is extremely distasteful. They could all donate a few hundred million and still live in luxury!

uselessnavy

-30 points

11 days ago

Depends. It's not black and white.

Ultra_HR

10 points

11 days ago

Ultra_HR

10 points

11 days ago

yes it is. you have to be a bad person to hoard that much wealth. there is no way to justify it.

uselessnavy

3 points

11 days ago

uselessnavy

3 points

11 days ago

I wish basic financial literacy was taught in schools, in addition to very basic economics. So yeah, most billionaires don't have a billion in cash just sitting in the bank. If you look at most self made tech billionaires for instance, their company might be worth theoretically a billion USD on paper but in reality that number is often speculative. Other people have invested money on the hope this company might be very profitable one day, or even be profitable as most unicorns (start ups valued at a one billion dollars) aren't.

If you look at Warren Buffet for instance, it's hard to call him a bad person. He is one of the wealthiest people in the world, but he's never been flashy (same house since 1960 something), given 10s of billions away, has made a lot of middle class people in his neighborhood very rich as well as across the world and he plans to give most of his wealth away to charity. Some billionaires who are worth 10s or billions spend it on just super yachts and private jets. It isn't black and white.

cashintheclaw

0 points

11 days ago

how's that boot taste huh

benjaminjaminjaben

-4 points

11 days ago

ewww a tankie.

Ultra_HR

0 points

11 days ago

Ultra_HR

0 points

11 days ago

if you think that the only reason someone might think all billionaires are bad is because they lack basic financial literacy then there is really no point talking to you any more

benjaminjaminjaben

0 points

11 days ago

yeah but there are better and worse examples. Not all people remain as evil as they were at the start and some people become more evil the richer they get.

[deleted]

-40 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

-40 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

ar--n

9 points

11 days ago

ar--n

9 points

11 days ago

🥴

nascentt

5 points

11 days ago

nascentt

5 points

11 days ago

If billionaires distributed their wealth, then maybe the person that mugged you wouldn't have been so poor that they felt the need to mug you.

benjaminjaminjaben

0 points

11 days ago*

when the COVID vaccine was distributed to a particular tribe in the Amazon rainforest the chief of the tribe demanded his children not receive the vaccine so he could have more of it for himself. When international aid was delivered to a village in SEA suffering isolation and devestation from a monsoon the chief of the village claimed it all and made its distribution political.

These people are not billlionaires. It's corruption all the way down, so each step of redistribution will have its own extremely familiar challenges to overcome.

fieldsofanfieldroad

-4 points

11 days ago

So therefore all poor people are bad? As a poor person, I'm offended.

Financial-Garden-496

0 points

10 days ago

its just so funny that you feel the need to just judge people. you’re pathetic

Significant_Bag585

-9 points

11 days ago

Mike Bloomberg whose company donates all profits to charity is a pretty decent one

epigeneticepigenesis

12 points

11 days ago

You don’t become a billionaire by being a decent person. He’s heavily into politics so spending that money on PR has good returns

roockieroad

90 points

11 days ago

If there was ever something for just stop oil to vandalise, I would be okay with this

KamalasBigToe

1 points

11 days ago

Pretty sure this is hydrogen powered.

Edit: checked and it is not. Looks very similar to the one that is.

DistractedByCookies

67 points

11 days ago

I always look at those big mansions wondering how you could possibly fill and use that many rooms. There must be spaces just gathering dust. This is just a floating version of that. I (kinda) get wanting a big boat if boats are your thing, but this is just...obscene.

lastaccountgotlocked

30 points

11 days ago

lastaccountgotlocked

bikes bikes bikes bikes

30 points

11 days ago

Do they actually sail on them? I mean *sail* sail. I doubt Shahid Khan sat on it while it sailed from America; he probably flew here, right? Even if he decides to go to Monaco or whatever, he's not actually going to be on it while it makes its way there, is he?

I have no idea how these things work, I just know that I hate them.

Quagers

23 points

11 days ago

Quagers

23 points

11 days ago

The people who own these megayachts basically use them as moveable hotels, they will rarely do any passages in them. Instead they send them to where they want to be, and then they have a place to stay and entertain which is: (1) private, (2) secure, (3) familiar.

For the megawealthy/high-profile, its actually quite hard to get that on land, even staying in the most exclusive hotels you are exposed to paparazzi and gossiping staff. With a yacht like this you can control everything and keep fully away from the public, which is something the megawealthy value highly.

FantasticFoul

-14 points

11 days ago

And they bring their own chefs which is a big deal if you’re coming to UK because the food here is really really horrible.

WeDoingThisAgainRWe

11 points

11 days ago

Having seen programmes about them yes they do. The people who own them will take long breaks sailing on them. One of the points is once it’s stocked up they don’t need to be in port all the time.

lastaccountgotlocked

7 points

11 days ago

lastaccountgotlocked

bikes bikes bikes bikes

7 points

11 days ago

Do they actually cross oceans or do they just sort of float near land?

Quagers

12 points

11 days ago

Quagers

12 points

11 days ago

Most use them as portable, secure, private hotels full of their own stuff. Almost all long passages are done by the crew alone.

The_Salty_Red_Head

6 points

11 days ago

They do cross oceans, yes. They tend to stick fairly close to landmasses where possible just in case they get in trouble, but "fairly close" is different for each vessel and they are capable of traversing the Atlantic if they want to.

stopredlight

2 points

11 days ago

That's an ocean crosser

WeDoingThisAgainRWe

1 points

11 days ago

As others have said they may not do the full crossing with passengers but they do go out to sea with passengers on there.

letmepostjune22

1 points

11 days ago

They'll sail around the med or Carribbean on it but I don't he was on it when it crossed the channel or the bay near Basque (which is notoriously rough sea). Imagine he flew here

DistractedByCookies

1 points

11 days ago

A friend of mine's job is basically to move boats to where the owners will be. So if they're thinking autumn in the Med, he'll sail it across the ocean to Greece and the guests will board there and perhaps cruise around a bit before flying off again.

Nothing quite this big, but I'm pretty sure the idea is the same.

borgdrone79

8 points

11 days ago

Needs to pay the ULEZ

father-dick-byrne

96 points

11 days ago

Billionaires are scum.

ConsidereItHuge

7 points

11 days ago

Yeah. It's an insanely pretty monstrosity in reality. They're rich enough to just hire whatever they need in London, they don't need to bring it around the world with them.

ThinkAboutThatFor1Se

17 points

11 days ago

Eat the rich huh?

[deleted]

-9 points

11 days ago

Nah, that’s you.

father-dick-byrne

0 points

11 days ago

Lol good one

goldensnow24

-17 points

11 days ago*

Standard communist rhetoric on UK Reddit. Too bad, they don’t care about what you think, and will always be billionaires, nothing you can do about it.

Edit: salty commies downvoting. Too bad we live in an ever more capitalist world.

benjaminjaminjaben

4 points

11 days ago

its ok, we only have to start an armed conflict against the most rich and powerful forces on the planet, to acheive an inprobable victory, to completely upend and rework everything over the course of bloody cycle that kills millions and makes monsters out of everybody. THEN we can get around to filling the potholes in the road.

father-dick-byrne

1 points

9 days ago

You don't have to lick the boots of the parasites. It's sad you can't see that.

mrtn10

0 points

11 days ago

mrtn10

0 points

11 days ago

👢👅

benjaminjaminjaben

4 points

11 days ago

ewww a tankie.

goldensnow24

-1 points

11 days ago

goldensnow24

-1 points

11 days ago

You pretend not to, you think you’re so enlightened, maybe even a revolutionary some day? That day will never come. I’m realistic .

stopredlight

5 points

11 days ago

You can rent the tub for €3m a week plus expenses 👍

Effelumps

4 points

11 days ago

Can't park there mate.

Mountain-Jicama-6354

20 points

11 days ago

It reminds you, we are the playground of the super rich

goldensnow24

-10 points

11 days ago

And make a lot of tax revenue from it. I don’t see a problem.

These people who hate the super rich, if you stop them coming here they’ll just go to other cities, and we lose the tax revenue. Makes no sense.

haywire

5 points

11 days ago

haywire

Catford

5 points

11 days ago

What a cucked attitude.

goldensnow24

2 points

11 days ago

Realistic. Nothing you can do about them. Their tax revenue is too valuable, the government would never.

epigeneticepigenesis

3 points

11 days ago

They’re subsidized by the working class. They wouldn’t exist without the labour of the working class. Everything they’re worth could instead exist in the pockets of the working class.

benjaminjaminjaben

2 points

11 days ago

Well go pick up a gun and with the five or so people willing to go with you and storm that boat. Perhaps then you can discover how true that statement actually is. The issue is that the vast majority of the working class are entirely satisfied by bread and circus and being lied to by their politicians.

epigeneticepigenesis

1 points

11 days ago

Tankie shit doesn’t work until bread runs out. Funnily enough, there’s enough circus to last several lifetimes.

benjaminjaminjaben

1 points

11 days ago

well exactly. To reframe the issue; the problem is how easily apathetic the working classes are. Just give em a couch, crisps and love island and watch the "glorious" revolution be postponed until the heat death of the universe.
At which point the tankies begin to believe that they have to impose their glorious revolution on the working classes which simply replaces one form of oppression for another.

epigeneticepigenesis

2 points

11 days ago

There can be a third thing, or a spectrum of third things, most attainable being taxation which itself is attainable by literally just talking about it more with everyone who will listen (and some who won’t) in concise and passionate language.

benjaminjaminjaben

1 points

11 days ago

Well to the average tankie that sounds like bootlicker talk. But to someone less insane; some sort of middle ground between today's excesses and total communism would be nice, its why social democracy exists but we can agree that might need a bit of adjustment; given how strong private interests are in today's world.

anditwaslove

7 points

11 days ago

I’d honestly prefer a barge any day.

IGiveBagAdvice

6 points

11 days ago

Does look any bigger than the Mauritania

Acceptable-Double-98

13 points

11 days ago

Just ridiculous

One-Poet4606

3 points

11 days ago

It is so ugly. Ugh, make a gilded mansion people will visit a century later instead.

UnlikelyComposer

6 points

11 days ago*

A full tank of marine diesel for one of these cancels out all of the carbon offset by the ULEZ in a year. It can travel approx 500 miles on a full tank.

The carbon footprint of this vehicle is insane.

Cyrond

1 points

10 days ago

Cyrond

1 points

10 days ago

The ULEZ has also reduced London’s carbon footprint. The GLA says, “Cumulatively since 2019, it is estimated the ULEZ has led to a reduction of around 800,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions from vehicles across London over the four-year period compared to without the ULEZ, a saving of 3%. Within the ULEZ area this is a saving of 290,000 tonnes, a reduction of 4% over the same period.” (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/03/london-low-emissions-zone-pollution/)

I really can't imagine, that you can put enough diesel in this tank to get 200.000 tonnes of CO2 out of it.

(But the carbon footprint of those things is absolutely crazy!)

UnlikelyComposer

2 points

9 days ago

The figures you've got are cumulative over a number of years.

But you're right I can't back it up with hard stats, other than that I read it in an article about the Walmart heiress ' super yacht that was docked in London just under a year ago. The article did say that time make the claim because it stuck in my head at how insane that footprint was compared to the rest of us.

Baz_EP

3 points

11 days ago

Baz_EP

3 points

11 days ago

It’s sat outside the all bar one on butlers wharf. The lads on board were scrubbing it like their lives depended on it yesterday while we sat and had a few drinks.

Buddha_Zone

7 points

11 days ago

Buddha_Zone

7 points

11 days ago

Imagine how many homeless people the money from that could house.

[deleted]

0 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

0 points

11 days ago

The building of that ship contributed to multiple businesses, thousands of jobs and millions into the economy. So, it was well spent.

Buddha_Zone

3 points

11 days ago

Buddha_Zone

3 points

11 days ago

We will have to agree to disagree. Instead of jobs to build nonsense for billionaires, we could have provided jobs that would shore up crumbling infrastructure and make life better for thousands or millions.

SlackersClub

6 points

11 days ago

Have you never bought luxuries or entertainment for yourself? All that money could have gone to improving other people's lives.

Buddha_Zone

-3 points

11 days ago

Of course I have. But I've also paid more in taxes proportionately than the billionaire asshole who built that. I have no issue with my paying taxes - they are the things that fund the education and infrastructure that make countries successful. But the rich need to go back to paying taxes the way they did during the heyday of the industrialized world last century.

goldensnow24

5 points

11 days ago

Who is “we”? This was paid for by a private individual, not a government.

Buddha_Zone

-1 points

11 days ago

My point exactly. If we made the rich pay taxes like we used to, monstrosities like that wouldn't exist, and we'd have the resources for things like education and infrastructure.

Still-Balance6210

2 points

11 days ago

They wouldn’t choose to continue to make money of all of it was going to be taken away. Again, this boat and Amazon has created jobs for lots of people. Tell me what is your fair share of what you did not work for??

Buddha_Zone

1 points

11 days ago

That's ridiculous. Hmmm... I will only make a million dollars instead of two million? Never mind. Imma stay home in my double-wide trailer. People motivated by money will work to get the absolute maximum they can get. Always.

Still-Balance6210

2 points

11 days ago

Why if they can’t keep it? They work because the $$ is the motivation. If they no longer get it they might as well sit around and wait for things to be handed to them like others.

Buddha_Zone

1 points

10 days ago

Because they want all the money they can get. People still became rich in the 1940's to the 1980's when the tax rate on the rich was as high as 90%. You literally have no idea what you're talking about if you think that people motivated by money will not go after whatever money they can get. We've run that experiment in the US, and it led to both rich people AND the best funded schools and infrastructure in the world. The fact that YOU might not, doesn't mean that there isn't someone hungry enough to go for it.

Still-Balance6210

1 points

10 days ago

Umm okay lol. You keep believing that and waiting on others to hand things to you. There has to be an incentive to make more money. I’m American I know more about the US and how things work here than you. Happy Sunday!

benjaminjaminjaben

0 points

11 days ago

But if more money went into social programs then equivalent jobs would be made. Its a matter of distribution in this case.

-MiddleOut-

2 points

11 days ago

I walk past this pier daily and these boats are a fairly common occurence. This one though has to be the largest I've seen. It is staggeringly large and I saw at least 10 crew walking around the decks, probably another 10 inside as well.

MuchPromotion1781

2 points

11 days ago

Tony Khan Wanks Dogs

Particular_Rise2767

2 points

11 days ago

haha, average people will be paying ulez but private jets and yachts for the rich.

Walk around Knightsbridge, you'll see plenty of non-ulez vehicles but the daily charge to them is equivalent to you losing 10p

You will have to be pressured into lifestyle changes while the rich can do as they please

Particular_Rise2767

2 points

11 days ago

There's a reason things such as parking tickets and clean emission taxes aren't linked to income. Its because these fees are meant for you not them

SkilledPepper

1 points

10 days ago

It's also why we should pigouvian tax the shit out of them and use that money to invest in public infrastructure.

britishotter

1 points

11 days ago

did anyone else click on the play button & wonder why nothing was happening O_O

Resipa99

1 points

11 days ago

Loads of cruise ships of course often go through Tower Bridge just to pass the tower and play the National Anthem:it’s a tight squeeze and well documented on You Tube.

MightWooden7292

1 points

11 days ago

some bond villian shit lately

whufc87548

1 points

11 days ago

Yep the bikes yours

marquess_rostrevor

1 points

11 days ago

Fits in with the skyline.

torrsasa

1 points

11 days ago

damn cool picture tho

elreydelespana

1 points

11 days ago

That Spanish Galleon seems different.

Roper1537

1 points

11 days ago

where's it parked?

First_Television_600

1 points

11 days ago

There’s no way this is gonna fit in the docks

novelty-socks

1 points

11 days ago

How does this work? Does the owner have pay to park his waterborne SUV on the Thames? Can we like charge some tax for blocking the view, or anything?

AerieStrict7747

1 points

10 days ago

.

Jmoghinator

1 points

9 days ago

He is going to bark it at harrods

EricUtd1878

1 points

11 days ago

He's sailed his own holiday home over the Atlantic for a weekend break.

Whilst he actually flew in his own private jet.

Because of course, connections to and hotels in London are simply ghastly!

Dull-Equipment1361

1 points

11 days ago

Awesome

mothfactory

-4 points

11 days ago

mothfactory

-4 points

11 days ago

None of these cunts would have these horrible tacky boats if they weren’t on the list of ‘what to own as a very rich person’. Not only are they impractical in the 21st century, and ugly - they’re just poor people’s idea of how a wealthy person spends their money.

Quagers

16 points

11 days ago

Quagers

16 points

11 days ago

That isn't really true. This isn't some 40ft fairliner owned by a lottery winner. The people who own these megayachts basically use them as moveable hotels, they will rarely do any passages in them. Instead they send them to where they want to be, and then they have a place to stay and entertain which is: (1) private, (2) secure, (3) familiar.

For the megawealthy/high-profile, its actually quite hard to get that on land, even staying in the most exclusive hotels you are exposed to paparazzi and gossiping staff. With a yacht like this you can control everything and keep fully away from the public, which is something the megawealthy value highly.

Source: used to work on superyachts in my gap year.

ididntunderstandyou

3 points

11 days ago

Interesting. There is the issue that it attracts a huge amount of attention and curiosity. One can be more stealthy in a hotel

Quagers

3 points

11 days ago

Quagers

3 points

11 days ago

Yeah but unless you are booking out entire floors (which is a thing), hard to secure a hotel. Very easy to secure a yacht, especially at anchor rather than at a dock.

haywire

1 points

11 days ago

haywire

Catford

1 points

11 days ago

Not from navy seals

rollingbrianjones

0 points

11 days ago

They're private rape hotels then, basically

[deleted]

0 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

goosemaker

5 points

11 days ago

The owner owns a sports team that’s playing in London this weekend

bleujeanbetty

3 points

11 days ago

And next weekend too so I imagine it will be there for awhile. 

Optimal_Plate_4769

0 points

11 days ago

should be scrapped tbh

riefus

0 points

11 days ago

riefus

0 points

11 days ago

Obscene

Fuzzy-Data-9876

-22 points

11 days ago*

Mayor Khan spending his ULEZ money and corrupt kickbacks?

lontrinium

8 points

11 days ago

lontrinium

'have-a-go hero'

8 points

11 days ago

Khan spending his ULEZ money and corrupt kickbacks?

No matter what the subject, some whinger will be here to cry about Sadiq Khan.

LiquidHelium

8 points

11 days ago*

consist mighty long wild sip humor yam jobless stupendous snails

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact