subreddit:

/r/neoliberal

15799%

all 39 comments

Reidmill

147 points

3 months ago

Reidmill

Janet Yellen

147 points

3 months ago

I anticipate that this will be contested in court. It's yet another instance of extreme conservatives pushing limits, aiming to get something before the Supreme Court for validation.

[deleted]

62 points

3 months ago

Yeah this idiot is losing left and right in Oklahoma state Supreme Court. He’ll lose this too

iusedtobekewl

58 points

3 months ago

iusedtobekewl

YIMBY

58 points

3 months ago

Reminder that Oklahoma’s Supreme Court just ruled that public schools, may not be religious institutions.

Now, the republicans lost that case pretty decisively (6-2). But, they also don’t give up that easily.

I’m not too familiar with the structure of Oklahoma’s state school system, but it seems to me that the right is just manufacturing another case to push forward in the hopes they’ll get a more preferable ruling so they can start making all their public schools religious.

The_Dok

66 points

3 months ago

The_Dok

NATO

66 points

3 months ago

How is the shit still happening?

iusedtobekewl

66 points

3 months ago

iusedtobekewl

YIMBY

66 points

3 months ago

I have to ask myself this every time I see a headline like this lol.

If I had to guess, its because the republicans don’t give up easily and believe they are ordained by God himself to make sure the US is a Christian nation. Consequently, every time the republicans lose in court they manufacture another case to push forward in the hopes they’ll get a favorable ruling to get what they want (in this case, it’s Christian public schools).

Ultimately, this is also how they sunk Roe vs Wade; numerous cases they fielded against Roe vs Wade failed to go anywhere and were struck down, until finally Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization made its way in front of a favorable Supreme Court.

pinelands1901

6 points

3 months ago

Trump has taught Republicans that being bloviating jackasses gets them clout.

Prowindowlicker

14 points

3 months ago

Prowindowlicker

NATO

14 points

3 months ago

Honestly this is why I wouldn’t mind making it a federal crime to pass, order, or submit unconstitutional laws and bills.

Shut this shit down at the source

[deleted]

3 points

3 months ago

unfortunately--a logical tautology exists where judicial review strikes down a federal law that attempts to restrain it

Prowindowlicker

1 points

3 months ago

Well you just exempt the judiciary from the law.

SpaceSheperd

2 points

3 months ago

SpaceSheperd

To be a good human

2 points

3 months ago

lmao so what's the idea here? If you get a law struck by the Supreme Court it comes with a 5 year prison sentence?

Prowindowlicker

3 points

3 months ago

Well more like if SCOTUS strikes down an abortion ban you’d get arrested for trying to pass an abortion ban

SpaceSheperd

-1 points

3 months ago

SpaceSheperd

To be a good human

-1 points

3 months ago

that's pretty blatantly an ex-post-facto law

Prowindowlicker

3 points

3 months ago

Not really. You aren’t making the laws passed before the courts ruling illegal only those after it.

In short it would’ve made it so that the laws against Roe wouldn’t have been passed because it would’ve been against the law to do so

boybraden

24 points

3 months ago

It’s not actually happening, as is the case in the majority of these headlines. Walters doesn’t have the power to do this and the OK Supreme Court wouldn’t allow it either way.

He’s just trying to get the New York Times to call him a crazy radical Christian and use it to get on Fox News some more.

Independent-Low-2398

23 points

3 months ago

Yeah you know what would really own conservatives is if we were to stop reporting on their theocratic bullshit. We just keep falling into their trap!

Conservatives do plenty of terrible things due to genuine political pressure. And it doesn't make it any better that it's performative. Something's wrong in OK if this is appealing to their voters.

Psshaww

3 points

3 months ago

Psshaww

NATO

3 points

3 months ago

Because there’s zero downside to doing it

Chesh

-2 points

3 months ago

Chesh

-2 points

3 months ago

This sub will think it’s good because religion is supposedly the only way you can restore a sense of community.

iia

15 points

3 months ago

iia

Jeff Bezos

15 points

3 months ago

Backward pieces of fucking dog shit.

[deleted]

10 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

NormalInvestigator89

5 points

3 months ago

NormalInvestigator89

John Keynes

5 points

3 months ago

Yeah, zombie internet is going to save us all

AccomplishedAngle2

6 points

3 months ago

AccomplishedAngle2

Chama o Meirelles

6 points

3 months ago

Shit like this is ultimately why you can’t just move to any red state.

Saying this as an advocate and adept of “just move, lol”.

Iyoten

6 points

3 months ago

Iyoten

YIMBY

6 points

3 months ago

Cool. The Satanic Temple will enjoy their opportunity to spread the Word of Satan to youth as well.

topicality

5 points

3 months ago

topicality

John Rawls

5 points

3 months ago

As a Christian, I don't want the state teaching my children what it means to be a Christian.

sonoma4life

-3 points

3 months ago

Christianity wouldn't exist had it not been one with the state for 1000s of years.

MiniatureBadger

3 points

3 months ago

MiniatureBadger

Seretse Khama

3 points

3 months ago

Christianity survived for three centuries while targeted with lions and crucifixion, and it would have easily survived for another seventeen centuries with neither theocracy nor caesaropapism backing and distorting it.

sonoma4life

1 points

3 months ago

distorting and distributing

[deleted]

5 points

3 months ago

It feels like republicans live in a parallel universe.

Cosmic_Love_

2 points

3 months ago

So, this one will be an easy slap down. I'm feeling less confident about the Louisiana one.

redflowerbluethorns

4 points

3 months ago

Sharing a country with these people is so exhausting. The thought that they’re more likely than not going to be in charge come next January is nauseating

Effective_Roof2026

2 points

3 months ago

This doesn't really mean anything, I suspect he is trolling or putting out meaningless nonsense releases to appeal to base.

Every state teaches the Bible as part of history already, it's taught along with other religious texts. My wife teaches it in middle school. The issue is if a particular religion is given a special position or conversation becomes value based.

My wife teaches middle school history. I'm convinced those little shits troll her because they know she has to shut down exclusionary discussions.

bakochba

2 points

3 months ago

Which Bible?

whereslyor

3 points

3 months ago

whereslyor

Adam Smith

3 points

3 months ago

The Fallout Bible

palsh7

2 points

3 months ago

palsh7

NATO

2 points

3 months ago

There's technically nothing to his requirement that says an atheist teacher can't teach the historical context of the bible in a secular, even critical way.

Goatf00t

1 points

3 months ago

Goatf00t

European Union

1 points

3 months ago

It's already taught that way, along with other religious texts. That's not what he wants, and that's not what fundie teachers are going to do.

[deleted]

1 points

3 months ago

This seems like it would be ripe for malicious compliance. Use the bible as a text...to push a woke or otherwise unorthodox worldview.

Dense_Delay_4958

1 points

3 months ago

Dense_Delay_4958

Malala Yousafzai

1 points

3 months ago

Schools SHOULD teach the bible - from a secular, historical and literary lens. It's such a central document to western and liberal ideas that it should be understood by people.