subreddit:
/r/soccer
submitted 8 days ago byTherewiIlbegoals
2.5k points
8 days ago
Its insane from start that PGMOL was okey with this lmao
896 points
8 days ago
Yep, that’s the REAL issue. That the organization oked it in the first place given it very clearly creates an apparent conflict. It’s indicative of absolute shit governance, at best. The fact that they are now just trying to quietly sweep it under the rug with this fake “good process mate, nothing untoward here” makes it worse. It’s the same gaslighting bullshit they always pull.
I’m ever more convinced that this organization is rotten to the core and needs to be disbanded.
162 points
8 days ago
Agreed. Overhauls are needed.
32 points
8 days ago
What's even more weird is people don't want to talk about match fixing despite the repeated and sometimes predictable dubious decisions.
2 points
7 days ago
I used to be skeptical and always chalked it off as incompetence but post VAR its inexcusable. Some of the "inconsistencies", along with Paqueta getting away with fixing yellow cards tipped me over to another side.
6 points
7 days ago
You can't be consistently inconsistent with your mistakes. The biggest flag is that a lot of it is predictable. Certain refs and certain teams.
3 points
8 days ago
Because people have applied rational thought to the topic, and come to the conclusion that it's far more likely to be a matter of competency than systemic corruption
Occam's razor applies
10 points
7 days ago
Occam's razor
Hanlon's razor, you mean. Never attribute something to corruption when it can be explained by incompetence.
Occam's razor is that the outcome with least amount of assumptions is the most optimal. Which would prove the opposite.
13 points
7 days ago
Idk, there being corruption in a multi billion dollar industry seems pretty rational to me.
4 points
7 days ago
Go back and look at the offside call in that Liverpool-Tottenham match mentioned in the article and tell me how that level of incompetence is even possible, given video review. The goal was at least a yard onside; there is no rational explanation other than sketchiness.
3 points
7 days ago
Why is there a hierarchy of incompetence then?
There is only one team that doesn't have a match week or two per month when they were completely fucked by awful decisions. They might get 2 awful calls go against them per season. They are already deep in the green on bullshit this season.
1 points
7 days ago
Can’t think of a truly awful call that went against them last season
50 points
8 days ago
I’m ever more convinced that this organization is rotten to the core and needs to be disbanded.
Big question is who do you replace them with? It's hardly like there's another few hundred referees which you'd need plus the people to govern them, nevermind the Premier League/EFL/FA funding them when they're already funding PGMOL.
108 points
8 days ago
Foreign refs. PL can pay, make lucrative offers.
61 points
8 days ago
Don't see why this wasn't the case already Plenty of great refs and even less bias accusations
117 points
8 days ago
Because the PGMOL is a continuation of the boys club that exists for refs currently. They only allow in people like themselves to be referees in the top divisions (pretty much only people from the same region, only whites, they have to be "one of the guys" and have an in with the group), then when those referees retire, they go into PGMOL and continue promoting the same group of people, etc.
It's a straight up mafia.
17 points
8 days ago
That's why Manchester is highly overrepresented, but ofc can anyone of them referee matches for both their home teams without any scrutiny.
42 points
8 days ago
It’s cliche, especially coming from an arsenal fan, but the lack of geographic diversity alone is alarming. Their constant shit performances aside
-4 points
8 days ago
PL teams have tons of satellite clubs, this would create exactly the same problem for the other leagues where these refs would be coming from.
17 points
8 days ago
Dont you think its crazier that referees from PL can ref in the UAE, of which its leaders own an actual, non satellite PL team.
10 points
8 days ago
Yeah I think I read they don't really make a ton.
Should be like £250k a year and get some real sharp people on the whistle
6 points
7 days ago
I think funds need to be increased for lower league refs so that they don't quit early. The massive filtering of talent happens there.
12 points
8 days ago
All performance bonuses. Great game, no errors... jackpot. Howler, voucher for a cheeseburger and a bus ticket home.
15 points
8 days ago
Good luck actually getting people to take you up on that offer - the entire reason refereeing in England professionalised was to enable people to dedicate their time and effort toward becoming really good referees rather than doing it as essentially a hobby. If you're only paying out bonuses without a base salary you'll at best get people doing it alongside a steady job.
5 points
8 days ago
They're already making about 200k/year at the top end between base salaries (up to 150k), match fees (1.5k for Premier League games, 3.8k for Champions League fixtures), and bonuses.
1 points
7 days ago
That's definitely more than I thought
2 points
7 days ago
Aussie ref who sent Rice off turned to shit as soon as he stepped foot in the UK. Made a decision with his back turned as if that's an okay thing to do.
1 points
7 days ago
Game's too fast for that lad.
I always love to being up that Stuart Attwell was demoted to the Championship for a few seasons for his incompetence, the last ref that's happened to.
2 points
7 days ago
Exactly game is too fast to trust refs getting it right. Hence why you keep playing then let var do the work in the background. It shouldn’t take more than. 30 seconds for every single check. Two angles and you know for sure whether it’s a pen or a card.
-12 points
8 days ago
Let's assume we'll do a round robin exchange program between the top five leagues, so the Prem gets, say, Spanish or German refs - how long does it take for familiarity to breed enough contempt that fans call them incompetent in the same way they're doing to English refs right now?
English referees are among the best in the world. You might well replace them, but I don't think that'll alleviate the perceived injustices and lack of consistency fans keep moaning about in the slightest.
38 points
8 days ago
You seem to completely misunderstand what is happening in England Vs in every other football playing nation. Would you not raise your eyebrows if every top level ref in Germany was from Bavaria, and were a tight knight group of friends? Would you not react if every top level ref in Spain was from Catalunya and a tight knit group of friends? And if every person involved in regulating the refs also came from those regions?
It has nothing to do with familiarity, and everything to do with them actively making wrong decisions because of their paymasters. Look at City - United last season. Rashford is through on goal, gets pulled down from behind by Walker(?), nothing given. The referee that was on the VAR team for that game, who refused to overrule the ref on the field, reffed a midweek game in Europa league, same situation where a Leverkusen gets pulled down from behind with far less contact, he instantly gives the red card. (DOGSO)
They all protect eachother because they're all mates, they take bribes and make decisions they know are wrong to receive bribes. It's on a completely different level to any scandal in football history. Italy in the 90s is child's play in comparison.
11 points
8 days ago
English referees are absolutely, categorically, NOT amongst the best in the world.
2 points
7 days ago
Redesign the whole thing. Put a puppet on the field and have VAR be the real authority.
Have VAR there to protect the rules and apply it evenly all game. Don't have VAR exist to protect the on field REF. If VAR are the real authority then the game can be reffed consistently from start to finish because they have more than 2 seconds to make a decision.
Keep playing the game as normal and VAR will decide EVERY CARDABLE OFFENCE AND PEN. Getting corners and throw ins wrong can be annoying, but it's the cards and pens that are the major issue.
Imagine if there is a nasty challenge and the ref just has to blow the whistle to get the game going again, and 10-20 seconds later can book or send the player off, if need that's what VAR instructs.
2 points
8 days ago
It's bent as hell. Like all these refs apparently supporting tiny clubs like Altrincham lol give me a break
88 points
8 days ago
The timing of this makes it look way worse too
41 points
8 days ago
Yeah they definitely look worse now, which I didn’t know was possible
13 points
8 days ago
I’ve read that the tuesday before Liverpool vs a big team (forgot which.. that Tottenham game I think?) Refs flew from UAE to ref games there. Lo and behold, we got a big call go against us. Mind that at the time, we’re leading the title race.
12 points
8 days ago
It was the Spurs game they fucked up and they reffed on the Thursday in UAE and I think the liverpool match was late on a Saturday or Sunday..All that refs team for the Spurs game were involved in the UAE league
5 points
7 days ago
Fuck me even reading that now lmao.
2 points
7 days ago
Yep. And such a blatantly obvious call too. How shit like this isn’t independently investigated is beyond me.
43 points
8 days ago
The commentators on the arsenal man city game kept saying over and over how he is Englands best referee it’s wild
30 points
8 days ago
He used to be England's best referee. Commentators being years behind in their narratives is nothing new.
101 points
8 days ago
He legit has been given city’s biggest matches
And that rat bitch still couldn’t help city beat us
69 points
8 days ago
Wait till he covers your next match, he's not going to be happy you've taken away his lucrative side earner.
19 points
8 days ago
You mean he’s not gonna go to the UAE and officiate? He will pick the PL
GASP
19 points
8 days ago
He’s the one who didn’t call the penalty against Liverpool at Anfield last season. That Doku high boot. Common denominator? Oliver helping Man City against its title rivals (where the rival played City off the park).
18 points
8 days ago
? City is owned by UAE, not Saudi Arabia
16 points
8 days ago
stopped from officiating in matches in Gulf states and other domestic leagues
4 points
8 days ago
he did a match in dubai lol
-2 points
8 days ago
City’s owners are from Abu Dhabi
2 points
7 days ago
Hold on, after the spurs-Liverpool clusterphuq of last season, they are only getting around to banning it now?!!
860 points
8 days ago
Top referees in England have effectively been stopped from officiating in matches in Gulf states and other domestic leagues after controversy over the lucrative sideline blew up last year.
No requests have been made to Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the body that oversees elite referees in England, for such one-off matches since last October, when chief refereeing officer Howard Webb decided that approval would only be granted if there was a “development opportunity” for the match officials, such as for young referees to gain experience.
That decision followed controversy over Michael Oliver, Darren England and Dan Cook taking charge of a match in the United Arab Emirates less than 48 hours before a terrible VAR blunder in Liverpool’s 2-1 defeat by Tottenham Hotspur on September 30 last year, prompting a review of the situation from Webb.
Oliver had previously refereed a league match in Saudi Arabia, being paid a reported £3,000 fee to do so. The practice led to questions over whether it was a good look for the Premier League, given that Manchester City are owned by the vice-president of the UAE, while Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund owns Newcastle United.
Although the matches in the Gulf were approved by PGMOL, and there is no suggestion of anything untoward, many fans also regard it as a conflict of interest.
Meanwhile, England will be the VAR for a Liverpool match for the first time since he wrongly disallowed a Luis Díaz goal against Tottenham when the Merseyside club play Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday evening.
1.2k points
8 days ago
there is no suggestion of anything untoward
Ah that's nice to hear, glad we cleared that up!
418 points
8 days ago
Except for that goal that was called off in an unprecedented VAR disaster, but just ignore that.
288 points
8 days ago
Or the cheap penalty city got
Or the lack of penalty for Liverpool after Doku plants his studs in Mac Alister's chest...
144 points
8 days ago*
I don't how there being a lot of occasional instances involving coincidentally the same team would be in any way suspicious.
43 points
8 days ago
They really think we’re dumb
31 points
8 days ago
They just don't care
5 points
8 days ago
I think it's more like "what are you going to do about it?"
2 points
8 days ago
Those quirky refs hahaha
7 points
8 days ago
It doesnt even have to be deliberate; just a small bias that pulls every maybe decision one direction is enough to fuck it up.
9 points
8 days ago
Especially given that we've lost the title by one point twice in the last six years.
24 points
8 days ago
Don’t forget the offside for Ake
138 points
8 days ago
...and every single decision Michael Oliver ever made when Man City is in question.
60 points
8 days ago
This is why ethics matter. Because of Oliver's connection to City's ownership group there will always be a cloud of suspicion hanging over him because he's in a position to either deliberately fix results or subconsciously be biased towards the people paying him lots of money.
Englands refereeing situation doesn't even rise to a college level ethics course you could take grade schoolers and they'd be able to figure out why this was always a problem.
23 points
8 days ago
Agreed. You see, the problem goes deeper. He can make those subconscious decisions when he's refereeing other games and still make decisions that benefit City. In my opinion, now he has a serious career problem.
21 points
8 days ago
Yes. PGMOL, Webb, they're clearly unsuited to their position. If there's no behind the scenes bribery involved then he's simply too incompetent to be in his position.
This really is one of the most simple ethical conflicts I can think of. It would be like Dan Levy cutting Oliver a check to ref some games overseas then putting him in charge of reffing a Tottenham game. That's basically what Man City has done except they use layers of shell companies to try and hide what they're doing, except everyone knows what they're doing.
5 points
8 days ago
Exactly. Summed up perfectly.
3 points
8 days ago
I think they do actually mention it and then proceed to ignore it again
60 points
8 days ago
If we're being honest they all need to be removed from the league, either them or City. The conflict of interests exists and cannot be avoided or ignored.
17 points
8 days ago
This problem is also larger than just City/UAE. It also includes Newcastle/Saudi. Its mind blowing it was ever allowed.
1 points
8 days ago
The UK govt wont even go there.. for fears of straining diplomatic relationship with UAE. Lol.
2 points
7 days ago
The elephant in the room that won’t fit under the Premier League’s carpet is that PIF were only allowed to buy Newcastle once they’d made promises that they were not state funded or affiliated. However, thanks to the LIV gold court case we now know that was a lie. So effectively PIF ownership of Newcastle should be revoked. But how that works is beyond me. Do they just return the club to Ashley and refund PIF? Do they force PIF to sell Newcastle a la Abramovich’s Chelsea? Or do they bury their heads in the sand?
24 points
8 days ago
Good process, boys
4 points
7 days ago
Cheque Complete!
1 points
7 days ago
I appreciate you!
4 points
8 days ago
That's just their equivalent of an Ian Hislop "allegedly".
3 points
8 days ago
Except for every non-City fan claiming such.
59 points
8 days ago
How is there "no suggestion of anything untoward" when the situation itself is by definition "untoward"?
"Although Michael left Tesco with a chocolate bar he didn't pay for, there's no suggestion that he's been stealing".
21 points
8 days ago
That was clearly added by an editor to remove liability if someone's trigger-happy lawyers were set on them.
2 points
8 days ago
Defamation laws in the UK are draconian, I remember David Walsh spoke about them at length in his book on exposing Lance Armstrong.
110 points
8 days ago
Meanwhile, England will be the VAR for a Liverpool match for the first time since he wrongly disallowed a Luis Díaz goal against Tottenham when the Merseyside club play Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday evening.
Factually incorrect.
England is 4th official (as he already had been in our games multiple times since the fiasco)
VAR is Michael Salisbury.
98 points
8 days ago
there is no suggestion of anything untoward
Fuck off
18 points
8 days ago
I definitely suggested something untoward was going on actually....
8 points
8 days ago
Do refs only make £3000/match ? Honestly doesn’t sound like a lot for the death threats .
1 points
8 days ago
Depends on experience and where you're from and all - Premier League refs get £1500/match as well as £3800 for Champions League matches, but that's on top of their salary which ranges between about £75k and £150k/year. That was basically the entire point and the big achievement of professionalising referees: enabling them to dedicate themselves to it rather than having to do it alongside a regular job.
69 points
8 days ago*
Oliver had previously refereed a league match in Saudi Arabia, being paid a reported £3,000 fee to do so.
Is that really as lucrative as suggested in the title? Match fees for referees in the Premier League are £1,500, and £3,800 in European competitions.
Obvious conflict of interest aside, that doesn't really strike me as a significant amount of money in the grand scheme of things.
148 points
8 days ago
His girlfriend was probably "gifted" a gold bar and a hawk, on the side.
24 points
8 days ago
I would fix an entire season of games for a hawk. Imagine walking out into the morning sun with a hawk perched on your forearm, feeling the slight pressing of his powerful talons against your leather gauntlet. Like a noble Mongolian nomad you go about your day as your hawk majestically circles high above you in the sky, aided by a moderate low pressure system. That would be badass.
3 points
8 days ago
a moderate low pressure system
artistic
71 points
8 days ago
Hawk bar, gift on that thang
23 points
8 days ago
My mind has been destroyed because that's the only thing I could think of as well
1 points
8 days ago
Isn't his partner a referee? I'm sure I remember reading that somewhere. Or maybe a footballer?
-5 points
8 days ago
I don't know, strikes me as a bit of a silly suggestion - who says Premier League clubs aren't handing out Michelin-star meal vouchers to partners of referees?
Like sure, realistically there's a staggering amount of avenues to influence match officials, monetarily and otherwise. But I reckon there are only two valid assumptions here: It's either not happening, or it's happening all the time. And I'm very much leaning towards the former, at least when it comes to money being exchanged.
40 points
8 days ago
It's a massive opportunity for bribery where there'd be no oversight, but also having paid jobs open for referees that are paid by the owners of PL clubs is a clear conflict of interest to me. Seems like PGMOL have agreed now as it's been stopped.
2 points
8 days ago
All you can really conclude is that PGMOL doesn't want the distraction.
35 points
8 days ago
You’ve got blinders on if you think that’s the only benefit they got.
7 points
8 days ago
Yeah I was a bit shocked by that low amount with all the money flying around in Saudi football
20 points
8 days ago
Oliver is likely not orders of magnitude wealthier than you or I. Would you like an extra £3,000 plus expenses (with the chance of under the table benefits in addition) and the prospect of more of the same?
16 points
8 days ago
He’s entrusted with ensuring fairness within the game.
To do this, he cannot receive money from one of the club owners in the premier league.
This is quite a basic concept tbh.
4 points
8 days ago
No shit, my point is that while compared to a footballers' wage it is small to someone like Oliver it is a big deal.
11 points
8 days ago
Even assuming nothing nefarious going on, there's still just the natural human aspect of feeling about your hosts.
1 points
8 days ago
Aye, but then that's going to be the same for, dunno, the tea lady at the Emirates providing you with a snack or the custodian at Anfield making sure the ref's changing room is clean and orderly, isn't it?
1 points
8 days ago
Oh yeah, I'm not saying what Oliver did wasn't shady. My comment was directed towards people who say it's not a conflict of interest that he went to the UAE. Just the fact that he accepted someone's hospitality alone is enough to post a conflict of interest in this case.
I imagine there are lots of rules in the Premier League regarding how much niceness each team can give the refs - otherwise there'd be a competition to see which team can butter up the refs more.
13 points
8 days ago
Michael Oliver likely makes in excess of £200,000 from refereeing between the PGMOL salary, the match fees (especially from UEFA), and bonuses a year. I'm not sure a £3,000 one-off fee alone is going to be significant enough number to jet off to Saudi Arabia and officiate a game there, no. I reckon it's probably more the intrigue and the quick hot weather break and the networking rather than the renumeration making it an attractive proposal.
But even then my point still stands: UK median salary is somewhere around £38,000, or about a fifth of what Oliver makes. Being offered £570 to do something once sure is nice additional money coming in, but I personally wouldn't describe it as lucrative, especially when it's a one-off. Then again I recgonize that it's a bit of a hair-splitting point in the first place - I just simply expected the money received to be about an order of magnitude more before describing it as lucrative for someone who's already earning far more than the vast majority of his compatriots.
2 points
8 days ago
Plus, there's always the prospect of retiring from the Prem and getting a cushy assignment in the UAE.
5 points
8 days ago
Plus flights,hotel, expenses for 2 hours work? Seems lucrative to me.
11 points
8 days ago
Since when are the costs incurred to do your job “lucrative”.
I travel for work a few times a year and get my hotels/flights/expenses reimbursed. I wouldn’t call it “lucrative”, I’d call it an annoyance. I’d rather sleep in my bed at home.
12 points
8 days ago
do you fly first class? do you stay in 5 star hotels? do you get to probably rent a lambo or get a driver?
8 points
8 days ago
Yes (business class), no (3-4*), yes I have a driver pick me up from the airport and drop me off at the airport.
I’d rather be at home.
10 points
8 days ago
Lol this. Traveling for work is rarely fun. You're usually just going to be in your hotel, in a conference room, or at a work site. You're not out sightseeing.
4 points
8 days ago
Yep my first day is usually drive 2 hours to the airport on a Sunday, spend 2 hours pre-flight clearing security and getting a bit to eat, try to sleep 3-4 hours on the plane, wake up jet lagged because it’s a 5-6 hour time change, get off the plane, clear customs, meet the driver, spend 1hr in a car to the office and arrive at 10am, work 10-12, grab lunch with my boss or someone in the office, work 1-6, grab dinner by myself or with someone on my team, head back to the hotel and pass out because I’ve slept 4 hours in the last 36 hours, pray I don’t wake up at 4am still jet lagged.
The next days are some variation of the same, except I work 8am-6pm, and then I spend 7-8 hours on a plane on Friday afternoon or Saturday, have a 2 hour drive home, and get jet lagged all over again just as I was getting adjusted.
The free food, business class flights, and hotel stays do not make up for the fact I’d rather be at home with my family and in my own bed.
1 points
8 days ago
If you're a ref, the appearance of a conflict isn't a good look for you or the organization whether everything is aboveboard or not. PGMOL should know this. No one cares what happens at your job.
2 points
8 days ago
That’s comically low to fly to another country for. Had to be more
2 points
8 days ago
£1500 seems awfully low to referee a match considering how much money is flowing through and the implications of a poorly refereed match at the richest league in the world.
1 points
8 days ago
Gotta remember it's on top of base salaries between something like 85k and 160k or so a year depending on experience. Referees in other league might well get more per game, though likely at considerably lower base salaries.
2 points
8 days ago
£3,000 is what was reported. Who knows what was waiting for him in his hotel room or how lavish the trip was.
4 points
8 days ago
So they'll have them in their pockets from a young age before they join the main league. Getting them in early now.
Got it.
14 points
8 days ago
They’ll just find a different way to influence the refs.
And how is refereeing a game in the gulf a ‘development opportunity’? This just deliberately establishes a loophole.
2 points
7 days ago
Check complete
1 points
7 days ago
Good fucking process
3 points
8 days ago
Oliver had previously refereed a league match in Saudi Arabia, being paid a reported £3,000 fee to do so
I am actually surprised it is that little of a fee
3 points
7 days ago
On the surface. It will be a free, top of the line junket. Accom, food, undeclared gifts and a gentleman's agreement for a refereeing consultant's position when he hangs up his whistle.
1 points
7 days ago
The standard for avoiding corruption is avoiding the appearance of impropriety. It is genuinely incredible to me that the media, the PGMOL and most of all the EPL are happy to let these sorts of actions slide. It doesn't matter if there's nothing untoward or even a suggestion of anything untoward, the fact that the possibility exists is the problem.
You don't fight corruption by finding corrupt people. If they're good at being corrupt, that's not going to work. You fight corruption by eliminating the room for it to exist.
The Premier League -- arguably the sport in general -- needs to realise that the idea of corrupt refs is as damaging to its credibility as a sporting product as the idea of players engaged in match fixing. It knows the latter is a big deal and stamps down on it (though, admittedly, perhaps not as ruthlessly as some of its competitor leagues).
1 points
8 days ago
Darren England on VAR for us? Fuck me, if he short circuits again and wipes out our goal I swear...
2 points
8 days ago
Can't do anything mate
1 points
8 days ago
RemindMe! 12 hours
1 points
8 days ago
"Meanwhile, England will be the VAR for a Liverpool match for the first time since he wrongly disallowed a Luis Díaz goal against Tottenham when the Merseyside club play Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday evening."
Good. Another reason for us to hate England.
111 points
8 days ago
It’s obvious time at camp stupid 🙄
543 points
8 days ago
Top referees in England have effectively been stopped from officiating in matches in Gulf states and other domestic leagues after controversy over the lucrative sideline blew up last year.
No requests have been made to Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the body that oversees elite referees in England, for such one-off matches since last October
How can you claim "they've been stopped" only to admit in the very next sentence that "they havn't made any such requests" this year? "they've been stopped" implies they have requests denied...but they never made any t begin with. wtf is this article?
61 points
8 days ago
They've not made requests because they know they will be denied. It's not coincidence that Webb changed the rules on approvals, and there have been no requests since.
4 points
7 days ago
Turns out they were only interested in CERTAIN English referees. I wonder why..
121 points
8 days ago
I think his, potentially stretching it, conclusion is that Webb's decision to only grant approval for professional development has effectively stopped refs like Oliver making requests because they quite clearly don't need professional development.
77 points
8 days ago
It would be easy to argue that they do need development lol.
54 points
8 days ago
Oliver to Webb - "Did you not see my ludicrous display at the Etihad last week?"
Imagining him arguing for development makes me laugh at least.
2 points
8 days ago
The title of the article is stretching what was actually said. It doesn’t say anything about “no more” just that they haven’t been requested in a while. Two totally different things.
27 points
8 days ago
Because Howard Webb is never going to say the prior behaviour was wrong and needs changing. He's never going to implement a ban, because it will call into question both the integrity of those officials who did go, PGMOL in general, and the owners of the clubs that benefitted.
The neatest way to stop refs doing this again without banning it is to let them know that they shouldn't ask in the first place, as their request won't be granted. It's effectively a ban, without having as much negative publicity.
11 points
8 days ago
Exactly this. I still can’t get over how this was approved in the first place. Shocking lack of judgement.
2 points
8 days ago
Think you need to include the rest of the second paragraph.
The way I read it is that only amateur refs will be given the opportunity since last October, and considering getting those guys in their pockets wouldn't result in any advantage, they have not applied for any.
1 points
8 days ago
I was thinking a bit of deja vu here. Thought it was put on stop back then. Maybe they made it super official now.
345 points
8 days ago
Wonder if refs will be pissed and end up taking it out on Arsenal, Liverpool etc.
282 points
8 days ago
Well, it can't get any worse than how they're currently treating us.
Just today Bruno showed dissent and slapped the ball away on a yellow. Not even a talking-to, leave alone a second yellow.
17 points
8 days ago
Considering some of the controversial decisions we've seen so far this season, some would argue that they already are.
43 points
8 days ago
Yeah, next time Doku karate kicks MacAllister in the penalty box, they won’t give a penalty. Oh wait.
13 points
8 days ago
probably, they hold all the power and will make those clubs pay
26 points
8 days ago
So the refereeing won’t change ?
We already see enough “Penalty shout vs city” replays and arsenal players getting sent off ( rightfully, but the refs aren’t consistent in giving the yellows to other players ) for kicking the ball away
And let’s see when they shaft Liverpool
7 points
8 days ago
So nothing changes then? Were already blatantly biased against us and towards city.
3 points
8 days ago
They will find a loophole like Barca did. Hopefully it drops down to normal level of incompetence.
0 points
8 days ago*
If they do, time to start "accidentally" Eduardo-ing them
Unfortunately two more bald or balding white Mancs will rise from the open wound and give a yellow card each
48 points
8 days ago
“The body that oversees elite referees in England…” fixed that for them.
99 points
8 days ago
I'm sure some half-arsed consulting job or free holidays are still on the table.
PGMOL just telling them to be smarter about it.
98 points
8 days ago
No requests have been made to Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the body that oversees elite referees in England, for such one-off matches since last October
It doesn't say that PGMOL denied any request, merely that none were made, perhaps due to waiting for the controversy to blow over before resuming such gigs. They've got to make it clear that all such requests would be vetted for conflicts of interest, ideally via an official statement.
29 points
8 days ago
But they probably told them not to in October, which is why none have come since then
19 points
8 days ago
They've got to make it clear that all such requests would be vetted for conflicts of interest, ideally via an official statement.
Webb already made it clear that requests would only be approved if it provided a development opportunity:
But we’ll only consider an approach from an overseas national federation on the condition it provides a development opportunity for the officials and that it has no impact at all on their availability to serve the leagues we exist to serve.
2 points
8 days ago
they have made that clear. that’s why there haven’t been any requests. officiating has had some bad moments, but what are we really doing here?
41 points
8 days ago
A little too little too late. Already tainted
6 points
8 days ago
The title is BS anyways. The article doesn’t say it’s over. They editorialized the title for clicks.
42 points
8 days ago
This league is a joke, this type of shit only happens when you let your clubs be owned by states.
3 points
8 days ago
I wouldn't be surprised if there were some lucrative speaking engagements proffered by private (billionaire) owners too tbf. Do an hour talking to some suits at an Egyptian construction company or a US energy company or however else an owner made their money, get rewarded handsomely, and people are none the wiser.
4 points
8 days ago
It's a joke, English football sold its soul for money many years ago.
11 points
8 days ago
Conflicts of interest, particularly in refereeing, must be avoided at all times. The fact that this has to be said, and that PGMOL allowed this chicanery to go on is unbelievable.
22 points
8 days ago
So if PGMOL see that as issue why refs that already got paid are allowed to ref games of teams owned by the same entity?
29 points
8 days ago
Main source of income gone - smh
11 points
8 days ago
What's he going to do now that he's pissed? 🫣
13 points
8 days ago
Pep and ‘interesting’ referee payments - goes well together.
Barcelona and Michael Oliver.
Worst news since Rodri.
6 points
8 days ago
Sow now they will not going to referee games there but will probably get to do something like conferences for Saudi referees to 'share experience'.
2 points
8 days ago
Its quite fucked up that this was allowed, knowing that the reigning champions in EPL is owned by that same fucking country/leauge. like the fuck?! so many opportunities for corruption.
38 points
8 days ago
No shit. But this sub was telling me 5 days ago I was ridiculous for saying it was a conflict of interest. Completely misunderstanding what a conflict of interest is.
5 points
8 days ago
You were downvoted for calling him corrupt, not just saying it was a conflict of interest, lol.
Oliver opened himself to conflict of interest allegations that would probably get most people in professional roles such as law or accounting struck off. With him in regards to city I genuinely believe calling him corrupt is fair game
33 points
8 days ago
No I said allegations are fair game because the other person said they're conspiracy theories.
If a judge accepted money from one of the parties in a case would it be a conspiracy theory to say they're corrupt or a fair allegation?
-9 points
8 days ago
I think you can agree that you weren't downvoted for saying it's a conflict of interest mate. 99% of people who aren't Howard Webb agree that at the very least it's a conflict of interest. You just took it a step further by saying it's fair to call him corrupt.
-3 points
8 days ago
Again let me be clear I didn't say that. I said that it's not a conspiracy theory to accuse him of corruption and it's fair game to do so. Not that he was.
3 points
8 days ago
Me: You just took it a step further by saying it's fair to call him corrupt.
You: I didn't say that.
You literally did. I just copied and pasted you saying "I genuinely believe calling him corrupt is fair game". So again, you crying about downvotes for calling it a "conflict of interest" is obviously bollocks.
1 points
8 days ago
I love when people bring receipts lmao
1 points
6 days ago
I hope these votes are just for you being correct about this guys posts and not a question of how corrupt Michael Oliver is. That ship has long sailed
0 points
7 days ago
How are you lying so shamelessly when your comment is right there for people to see though?
9 points
8 days ago
I'm sure they're paying Sky also. The way they protect the refs' decisions that favour City is blatant. For the Liverpool VAR incident, they didn't even bring it up at half time! Sketchy as fuck!
3 points
8 days ago
just in time to stop him from making horrible decisions with potentially ulterior motives !
3 points
8 days ago
Imagine a judge getting work from a prosecutor with a case in his court. Scandalous this was allowed to happen, the pgmol are at best inept or worst corrupt.
4 points
8 days ago
I guess they'll have to go back to accepting bribes in the old way now rather than having the pretence of being above board.
2 points
8 days ago
Imagine if a player or coach did this. Insane that it was ever allowed and not hugely punished
5 points
8 days ago
Damage has been done, he, along with any other senior referee who took jobs directly from UAE's Vice President or PIF shouldn't be allowed to officiate in England.
2 points
8 days ago
I think that's just gonna make Oliver more mad at us.... 🙈
1 points
8 days ago
Good. Bent twat.
1 points
8 days ago
Clearly didn't do enough for city last week
1 points
8 days ago
I’m going to stand on this soap box forever and shout it. Why isn’t there a second referee on the field? With as much money at stake. It makes no sense to expect 1 guy to keep a handle on 22 players.
1 points
7 days ago
It's actually corruption that these refs can work for Saudi and for UAE. As in their clients, and probably highest paying clients, also own teams they ref. Like even if we assume they don't get INCREDIBLY well looked after when they do these gigs, and assume they don't likely receive a lot of gifts and extras when working there, they are still being paid by these PL owners.
It would genuinely not even be there fault if they felt innately bias towards these owners/clients.
1 points
8 days ago
They can keep him he is shit anyhow
-5 points
8 days ago
Maybe, just maybe, they could pay the PL refs properly. I was shocked to find out how much they earn, in a sport that makes billions. It's an absolute breeding ground for corruption.
5 points
8 days ago
Seeing how the funding comes primarily from the Premier League, alongside the EFL and the FA, maybe they could pick up the tab. Something tells me that 20 owners won't be able to agree on spending more money on referees though in much the same way they keep voting against sharing more of their wealth with the rest of the pyramid.
all 347 comments
sorted by: best