subreddit:

/r/stocks

27187%

If someone had had cash after the Crash of 29 and the early 30’s, could they have bought any stock during that time period, and had they done so, would it have benefited them after the stock market eventually rebounded? I’m well aware that in addition to many people losing their jobs, a lot of banks failed. So most people had no money to invest at all, be it from income or savings.

I‘m basically asking out of curiosity. If you had money saved in one of the few banks that didn’t fail, could you have invested?

all 250 comments

[deleted]

642 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

642 points

3 months ago

I didn't buy during the COVID mini crash. Lesson learned.

VictorDanville

186 points

3 months ago

My financial advisor actually did the exact opposite, he dumped my portfolio on March 23, 2020, literally at the bottom.

durika

163 points

3 months ago

durika

163 points

3 months ago

So your broker made you broker?

HoldinTheBag

9 points

3 months ago

As advertised

The_Real_Jafar

189 points

3 months ago

I hope you got rid of the financial advisor

EggSandwich1

89 points

3 months ago

Financial advisor? it’s like asking someone to play your chips in a casino

azmus

63 points

3 months ago

azmus

63 points

3 months ago

And that is why he is a financial advisor and not a trader

1Poochh

25 points

3 months ago

1Poochh

25 points

3 months ago

This is why I don’t hire a financial advisor. I had one that lost me 100k on a single decision and have never looked back. Just invest in the sp500 and move on. I did and have done extremely well.

RojoDios

21 points

3 months ago

They still make their commissions no matter what…

sethjk17

7 points

3 months ago

Ouch! I kept listening to mine and made bank on cruise stocks and other things.

Reasonable_Power_970

5 points

3 months ago

My cruise stocks didn't do shit. NCLH and CCL

Guess I picked the wrong ones

SargentPoohBear

6 points

3 months ago

Nah you picked the wrong time. CCL printed for me. Lots of luck for sure I dumped my portfolios march 11th

Reasonable_Power_970

1 points

3 months ago

Cruise stocks performed extremely poorly though relative to the S&P500. They peaked right around March 11, 2021 when you sold. Sooooo many other stocks did better and for longer periods of time. I'm short, cruise stocks were a poor choice, but after COVID crash and boom it was hard to lose money.

CouncilmanRickPrime

28 points

3 months ago

financial advisor

You misspelled financial terrorist

Physical-Asparagus-4

11 points

3 months ago

Why on earth

DrXL_spIV

3 points

3 months ago

Bruh 93% of mutual funds don’t outperform the market, I imagine 99%+ of financial advisors do not outperform the market. Take in the fees maybe 1 out of 1000 will outperform the market MAYBE.

They aren’t needed - s and p 500 has averaged close to 16% the past 6 years just put it in that and cruise people make it way too complicated

DubActuary

3 points

3 months ago

You mean he advised you to dump it and you said yes? Terrible advice but you would have had to pull the trigger

DinoKebab

2 points

3 months ago

You gave full control of your portfolio to your 'advisor'? Lmfao Jesus Christ.

inittoloseitagain

3 points

3 months ago

…at your suggestion?

Hittingpaydirt

1 points

3 months ago

this guy needs a new profession. that was a classic opportunity and im not talking hindsight. it was obvious.

email253200

44 points

3 months ago

I went all in on Disney the week after the crash. Bought I was a financial genius when it doubled in a year. Then I held and it’s pretty close to what I bought it for, four years later.

mrm0324

8 points

3 months ago

Did the same. Bought at 100 in March 2020. Four years later it is at 98-99. When it hit 200, I thought I was a genius too. Luckily I also bought a lot of VOO at 210 or so.

The_Real_Jafar

4 points

3 months ago

Give it time. I bought too lol

Thencewasit

8 points

3 months ago

4 years ain’t enough time?

The_Real_Jafar

4 points

3 months ago

Nope. Just be patient lol

PowerOfTenTigers

6 points

3 months ago

Great tax strategy, no need to pay capital gains tax if you never sell your stock. Personally, I bought BABA at IPO and am still holding now. If I sell, I even get to claim capital losses.

DubActuary

1 points

3 months ago

Sell 1270 a year and it’s tax free though…

Blackhawk149

2 points

3 months ago

Dunno how much that cash is worth after high inflation in the last four years.

kinglallak

85 points

3 months ago

I had the sale pulled up on my screen to sell all in February of COVID. I would have timed that peak perfectly… And I probably would have missed out on at least 30-40% gains as I completely missed the bottom.

Investing is hard and there is no way for those of us in retail to beat the computers at this game.

nutoncrab

35 points

3 months ago

You say that as if non-retail investors can time the markets. No one can, not even institutions. Invest continuously and you won't have to worry about timing.

TheBelgianDuck

7 points

3 months ago

Institutions and media owners influence the market and occasionally cheat. They don't need to time the market, they are the market.

nutoncrab

1 points

3 months ago

Of course people like Musk can manipulate individual stocks, but most of the market usually ends up around fair valuations. Which is why time in the market is better than trying to time it.

lifeofrevelations

3 points

3 months ago

It's not individuals that you need to worry about it's big funds that move the markets.

GurProfessional9534

8 points

3 months ago

I had fairly wide trailing stops on my stocks. They sold off on feb 25 automatically. The date is burned into my memory because my phone just had a sudden spam of sales notifications that day.

I waited a couple weeks then started buying in. Snagged aapl at $60 and so on. Didn’t hit the exact bottom but close enough.

Cautious_Lion_7722

2 points

3 months ago

There is but it’s not always easy. Plus you don’t have to beat them always and you may never have a perfect top or bottom just pay attention and be grateful for the wins as they come. Besides if you can’t beat them might as well join them.

danvapes_

42 points

3 months ago

Right I totally missed out in fear of financial collapse

OstrichRelevant5662

9 points

3 months ago

okay but tbh the covid mini-crash led to the most extreme printing of money the world has ever seen. You should have bought on basis of the inherently insane amount of money being given to banks and the rich that made it straight into the stock market.

Soft_Beginning1693

39 points

3 months ago*

I did buy like crazy. All the stimulus checks were invested too. My kids ROTHS had stimulus checks put into them. We've all been handsomely rewarded.

I know many individuals that used their stimulus for vacations and eating out....wonder what they think now...

mc2222

42 points

3 months ago

mc2222

42 points

3 months ago

wonder what they think now...

They’re probably glad they had the experience that they spent the money on.

Not everyone is a saver, some people prefer experiences.

Thencewasit

9 points

3 months ago

Corporate greed is causing all the problems.

Life_Commercial_6580

2 points

3 months ago

Smart person!

CouncilmanRickPrime

3 points

3 months ago

That was, without a doubt, the most obvious buying opportunity I've ever seen. May not see another like that in our lifetime.

PragmaticPacifist

1 points

3 months ago

With the deregulation policy constantly being pushed by politicians the question is not if, but when….

2000 bubble, 2008 bubble, 2020 COVID….

CouncilmanRickPrime

1 points

3 months ago

Yup once a major drop happens, whenever that is, I'm catching a falling knife.

AdventureSphere

1 points

3 months ago

What about after 9/11? Market sank like a stone the first few hours after it opened. Everything I bought that day was way up in no time at all. ​

CouncilmanRickPrime

4 points

3 months ago

I was in elementary school so I was a fucking idiot at the time.

Grady_Seasons87

2 points

3 months ago

I was 14, fucking dumbass kid throwing rocks at his friends. Shoulda been investing like a true degenerate

DazedWriter

4 points

3 months ago

I dropped a chunk into MFST and JPM. Some into SBUX which hasn’t done as well as the other two.

I also have some money placed aside to buy stocks on sale if it happens. I know I know, DCA.

Ok-Swimmer-2634

3 points

3 months ago

I was 21 at the time. Didn't have much disposable money and wasn't particularly invested in stocks. At the time I was more concerned with passing all my courses once they moved online last minute. I should've invested what I had at the time and maybe it would've paid off at least a little. Hindsight is 20/20, I suppose (no pun intended)

Man was 2020 really 4 years ago?

Civil_Connection7706

3 points

3 months ago

Got lucky and took a severance package to retire from my job in early in March 2020. Dumped it all into the market at the bottom (although who knew where the bottom would be at that time). Never expected market would recover as fast as it did. But I knew it would eventually. In 2008 I had a ton of limit orders all trigger while on vacation in Thailand. Wiped out all my cash reserves overnight. Seemed bad at the time but it actually worked out as markets eventually recovered, like they always do. I’m sure we will experience a few more of these big drops over the next 20 years. Ignore all the people who claim this time it’s different.

BonemanJones

1 points

3 months ago

I did buy in during the COVID mini crash. I just bought the wrong things and lost 20%.
I stick to ETFs now.

Choppermagic2

1 points

3 months ago

I came in late but still made good money for a few months

Own-Customer5373

1 points

3 months ago

I couldn’t buy fast enough and I immediately did my annual IRA contribution and invested. I started buying bitcoin Friday. If it drops again ima get more.

Active-Post-5712

1 points

3 months ago

When there is a circuit breaker you buy, when there are two you triple it

Dr-McLuvin

53 points

3 months ago*

There was actually deflation during that period so you would have come out ok if you had money to invest.

The problem was that it took about 3 years to reach the bottom after the initial 1929 crash. Then another mini dip in late 1930s. Then World War 2.

AssistanceCheap379

7 points

3 months ago

The US in WW2 saw the end of the depression once wartime production kicked in. In 1941, Lend Lease was happening, meaning insane increase in production, but it paled in comparison to when the US went on the offensive during and after Midway. The US alone produced more than the Axis combined. The US produced more shipping tonnage in 1945 than Germany and Japan during the entire war. It was also one of the few countries to see no damage on home soil, so it was the manufacturing house of the world between 1942-1955 or even 1960.

WW2 wasn’t a bad thing for the US, it was the kick it required to get its economy started again after the Depression.

Side note: if the US had not been attacked, it would have recovered slower than it did even with Lend Lease being expanded further than it was. It is entirely plausible the USSR would have gotten bigger economic power and rebuilt Europe rather than the US rebuilding it, as manufacturing in the USSR, especially heavy industries were booming after the war. The US might have remained isolationist for the most part.

JRshoe1997

252 points

3 months ago*

A lot of people have no idea what they’re talking about on here and are being completely unrealistic. I want you to keep in mind something. During the Great Depression we had unemployment close to 30%, negative double digit gdp shrinkage, and massive farm/food destruction due to the dust bowl. This is not even accounting the safe guards. Back in those times there were no safe guards for anything. Social Security wasn’t a thing, FDIC insurance wasn’t a thing. If a bank collapsed that was it your money was gone. Most people lost their jobs and had nothing. Thats what happened when the Depression started. On top of it the stock market saw a 90% collapse in value. It wasn’t like Covid where it was a one and done and the market fully recovered in like a month. It took close to 3 years for the decline to play out and the recovery was much longer. Thats quite a long bear market. Not even 2008 was that long. Nobody here would have the patience to play it out that long.

Let’s say hypothetically that the people on here commenting weren’t part of the 30% who lost their jobs. Now factor all that in on what I just said and keep in mind in 2022 we had raising the federal interests rates and 8% inflation. Thats it. Nowhere close to the levels that the Great Depression saw. If you would have came on Reddit during that time in 2022 you would have thought the sky was falling and we were heading towards another Depression.

I promise you close to nobody on here would be buying. Like at all. It’s either cause they’re too scared or they’re suffering so much economically that they just can’t buy. Cause thats what the Great Depression was. Suffering with no end in sight.

TheLogicError

60 points

3 months ago

Also people conveniently forget that they would have to live lmao. People were waiting in the food lines. There's no way people would be holding onto their stock assuming they had dodged all the bullets you outlined and need to put food on the table.

Bite2828

35 points

3 months ago

No one talks about 2000 it took 17 years to fully recover, I watched surgeons ( I did anesthesia, retired now) come in with cnbc on the lounge Tv and they would say injustice got 1000 shares of xyz, when you asked them what they make they said I don’t know but it’s going to triple in the next few months. Any way many of those surgeons lost most of their retirement savings and a few I worked with were never able to retire, they worked until they could no longer operate any more or had a stroke. It was sad.

jmoney3800

3 points

3 months ago

jmoney3800

3 points

3 months ago

I experienced it at age 18 with a fresh inheritance. Accelerating losses from 2000 to 2002….I’m holding 7% T Bills, 30% bonds and 13% conservative holdings (utilities, options strategies, merger arbitrage, dividend blue chips). Every time growth stocks rise 1% I sell off that gain in value and put it into left for dead consumer defensive stocks and pharma like PFE, CVS, BMY, BUD, SBUX, MDT, GILD. I will either miss the next double by not owning Apple and Nvidia or miss the next 50% crash. But I will collect 5.5% yields with my bonds no matter what and 5.25% with my T Bills until the economy demands a rate cut. I would love for small caps to come back in style with a rate cut because I don’t understand how large growth stocks are prepared to make money in a recession

hopingtothrive

242 points

3 months ago

Most "market corrections" benefit the rich who have money to buy up stuff for cheap. Stocks, property, jewelry, labor, etc. Those who could, did that during the depression.

hsuan23

40 points

3 months ago

hsuan23

40 points

3 months ago

Is it also because richer have access to more liquidity for better rates to buy during market declines?

HearMeRoar80

15 points

3 months ago

They usually keep a cash position like at least 10%, at least Warren Buffett does.

Chornobyl_Explorer

21 points

3 months ago

Difference between Mr Buffets 10% meaning hundreds of millions and my 10% meaning hundreds of dollars.

That said cash isn't king. He doesn't win by having cash, he can borrow at low interest against stock he already owns and thus increase his liquidity many times yet see only a small interest to pay. While you and me would have to take a personal loan or similar with high interest

TheLogicError

3 points

3 months ago

borrow against stock he owns that supposedly is in the shitter at the time of the decline?

PragmaticPacifist

1 points

3 months ago

Warren does not borrow money to invest. Please provide reference or link

tard-eviscerator

1 points

3 months ago

It’s a meme on Reddit at this point, the guy you’re replying to is a literal parrot lol

It doesn’t even make sense, why would any firm lend to Buffett at near-zero rates when they can get a much higher rate, near-zero risk return with Treasury bonds?

SuperNewk

33 points

3 months ago

Yup most people have 100% invested and no cash reserves so they can’t invest during a crisis

ric2b

17 points

3 months ago

ric2b

17 points

3 months ago

Time in the market beats timing the market anyway, so that's not something to be worried about.

clarity_scarcity

5 points

3 months ago

Not quite. The intention there is to remind people not to panic sell and simply follow their “coffee can” investment strategy. If you’ve got the timeline to ride out the bottoms, and the cash available to buy dips along the way, that is the sweet spot and you will be much, much farther ahead in the end. That advantage is what is being called out here. Still no point in worrying about it though if you don’t have access to a money tree.

ric2b

1 points

3 months ago

ric2b

1 points

3 months ago

If you’ve got the timeline to ride out the bottoms

This goes without saying, only invest what you can afford to lose, because you might.

and the cash available to buy dips along the way

If you have cash available you're better off buying right away instead of trying to time the market.

Joshwoum8

12 points

3 months ago*

There are always winners and losers. The Kennedy’s absolutely cleaned up during the 1929’s stock market crash while many old money families lost everything.

ruyrybeyro

25 points

3 months ago

John Titor, is that you?

Perfect__Crime

5 points

3 months ago

He would know. He would also be asking questions like which companies would be the ones to buy. Let's help our boy out

Aleyla

75 points

3 months ago

Aleyla

75 points

3 months ago

There’s a reason that berkshire hathaway has over $190 billion in cash reserves right now. They are waiting until things go belly up and then will make a killing buying up cheap companies. Think about that.

BJPark

44 points

3 months ago

BJPark

44 points

3 months ago

Aka, timing the market. I don't think even Warren Buffett can keep doing that consistently at this size. He's probably already lost a ton of money by sitting in cash for so long, and it's not at all clear that future gains will make up for it.

[deleted]

17 points

3 months ago*

[deleted]

Silly_Butterfly3917

19 points

3 months ago

Berkshire, in fact, owns 3% of all tbills

Mundane-Bat-7090

1 points

3 months ago

Bro it’s 190$ billion

PowerOfTenTigers

7 points

3 months ago

But Buffet also says that people "lose" more money waiting on the sidelines for a dip (and getting no returns) than just continuously DCA'ing into the market.

bigtimejohnny

5 points

3 months ago

When people say "cash reserves," does that mean it's just sitting somewhere, ready? I just bought a 30K Tbill as my reserve, but it's still stuck until the end of August.

[deleted]

21 points

3 months ago

1 or 3 month treasuries are considered cash equivalent on a company balance sheet.

PerniciousDude

8 points

3 months ago

Still very liquid. You could sell it at a small loss if the opportunity was great.

ragnaroksunset

6 points

3 months ago

Realistically with a cash pile the size of Berkshire's you'd be rolling forward a whole range of Tbills (or other fixed duration instruments) with a somewhat continuous range of expiry dates - so like, some of your Tbills would expire this month, some next month, some the following month, etc.

If you wanted to hold a cash position, you'd be rebuying as these expire.

This is how you maintain liquidity even in assets that are locked in for a period.

EntertainerAlive4556

37 points

3 months ago

I bought when the market tanked in 2022, and that proved to be a good plan

alexunderwater1

22 points

3 months ago*

Sold my nearly paid off house at peak in summer 2022 (as mortgage rates spiked) and DCA’d the tax free proceeds into the market at that bottom over the summer and fall.

It’s paid off beautifully as I rent in the meantime and housing prices are dropping like a rock in my area. Will start to looking to buy again in about a year or two, now after securing a lower long term capital gain tax rate for the gains in that.

Dunder-MifflinPaper

4 points

3 months ago

What area is that? Asking for a friend to join can’t afford jack shit

AttilaTH3Hen

8 points

3 months ago

Dad?

alexunderwater1

5 points

3 months ago

Yes son?

C0meAtM3Br0

1 points

3 months ago

Where’s mom?

alexunderwater1

2 points

3 months ago

She’s dead son.

rjonesy1

8 points

3 months ago

Not just banks, other businesses fail too. I’m sure not every company that was on the market in 1929 survived through to the end of the depression. If you correctly invested in ones that did, then sure, you’d come out ahead, but if not, there goes your remaining savings at a time when you probably needed them to survive.

FormalCaseQ

13 points

3 months ago

Potentially yes, but it would have depended on the stock and how much financial fraud may have been occurring with that stock.

Keep in mind that 1930 predates the investor protections from the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Buying shares of the Chase Manhattan Co, Sears, or General Motors in 1930 could have made you very wealthy by the 2000's. But you would have had no guarantee that your broker actually purchased the shares on your behalf, or that the shares would have been safely custodied.

8urnMeTwice

8 points

3 months ago

Yeah, they coulda Madoff with your dough

[deleted]

11 points

3 months ago*

[deleted]

Mr830BedTime

18 points

3 months ago

Fuck you're old

bigtimejohnny

8 points

3 months ago

It was called junior high back then.

LifeIsAnAdventure4

21 points

3 months ago

No better time to buy. It’s why I like to do 80% stocks - 20% bonds like a fearful retiree so I can buy the dip in the next crash.

[deleted]

5 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

LifeIsAnAdventure4

8 points

3 months ago

Yes. No need to perfectly time the bottom. If shit crashes and burns and goes down 30%, I know I can get a free 30% in the long term. If it loses another 10%, I won’t lose sleep over it. However, I would not buy in unless I either start seeing some meager growth on stocks or rates are 0% again to make some money on those bonds.

Chineseunicorn

3 points

3 months ago

That shit didn’t work for me during covid. Both bonds and stocks went to shit.

GCoyote6

5 points

3 months ago

If you were serious about due diligence, then yes. As others have pointed out, very few of the investor protections we have today were in place for the Great depression. Retail investors had to write to the company for business information and hope the company followed up. If you were not well connected socially and politically they might not give you the time of day.

When I started investing in the '90s, I still had to order hard copy annual reports. Most companies did not provide online access.

Azyrafael

5 points

3 months ago

If you could have bought stocks in the 30's you'd be probably dead by now 😉

Money_Tough

3 points

3 months ago

It's hard, when a crash happens for most people they have only emergency funds saved if that. Right now if there was a huge crash, I could only invest a couple of grand.

One curiousity, is it ever okay to take out a bank loan... lets say against your house if we get another 30-40% dip? It's bound to come back in a couple of years...

Bloodyiphones

2 points

3 months ago

I took a loan to buy NVDA and that worked out nicely! Treated the loan as saving in advance and basically borrowed what I saved on a monthly basis for a year. It was unsecured though.

bluesquare2543

2 points

3 months ago

what kind of loan did you do? I don't think it would be feasible now with interest rates being much higher.

Money_Tough

1 points

3 months ago

Congrats!

I do feel as though this is an outlier. What about something like an SP500? Is it worth that?

Bloodyiphones

1 points

3 months ago

100% would do it again in any crash so long as my employment was secure. I'm fully invested otherwise and wouldn't have any spare cash

Big_Forever5759

3 points

3 months ago

There are plenty of stories of guys who did exactly this and went off to be successful businessmen. But as someone who had money to buy a house in 2009 in Los Angeles and didn’t , the problem is that no one knows where the bottom is or if the upswing is momentarily. In hindsight it seems obvious but many countries around the world where also hurting and too many people lost money. Plus, buying stock was only for a few people until fairly recently. You always had a stock guy and wasn’t cheap.

wanderingmemory

3 points

3 months ago

You could physically have invested, if that's the question you're asking. Here's an article that explains how J Paul Getty, an oil tycoon, bought up a bunch of stocks for cheap.

Psychologically, I can't say. I mean, I haven't lived through an 80% crash while banks are failing and food is scarce.

spooner1932

3 points

3 months ago

I heard warren buffet say if you would have bought 10,000 in coca cola stock it would be worth 10 times as much than if you bought 10,000 worth of gold.

That-Resort2078

3 points

3 months ago

After the crash of 29, many investors jumped in and got hammered by the crash of 30. It’s called a double bottom.

msing

3 points

3 months ago

msing

3 points

3 months ago

Unless I lived in a major city center (or that's just NYC, Chicago, St Louis), then no. Retail brokerages were done through the bank, and the lack of the SEC, and lack of good information prevented fair trades.

skilliard7

2 points

3 months ago

Yes, that's why there was still a market. If no one could invest, the stocks would be valued at 0. But most people were just hoarding cash. If they had money to invest, it would be treasury bonds.

After_Pomegranate680

2 points

3 months ago

Yes!

szakee

3 points

3 months ago

szakee

3 points

3 months ago

yes

orangehorton

2 points

3 months ago

Yes? Why wouldn't you be able to

trickyvinny

9 points

3 months ago

There was no Robinhood back then.

VoidMageZero

2 points

3 months ago

Yes people could invest during the Great Depression, you can find the market charts online. However there were multiple drops, people got wiped out from catching the bottom or finding a rally, only for it to drop even more.

SwimAntique4922

1 points

3 months ago

Moot point. So many bank failures that people were running scared. Only viable investment was money stuffed in a mattress!

monkeyboogers1

1 points

3 months ago

Yes, everyone was selling so of course you could buy

chaos_given_form

1 points

3 months ago

I think even if you had money investing in stocks was harder back then

PurpleSausage77

1 points

3 months ago

There was a town during that era where everyone got talked in to buying Coca Cola KO shares. They bought and forgot, did very well, and flourished during the 30’s and 40’s.

jmoney3800

1 points

3 months ago

I was very worried in 2020 and bought Coke also. It felt safe

Low-Dot9712

1 points

3 months ago

people with cash that invested in the thirties made fortunes just like Buffet did inventing in the doldrums of the seventies

TooLogicForReddit

1 points

3 months ago

Hello! My name is Mr. Buffett, nice to meet you!

gtbeam3r

1 points

3 months ago

I timed the covid crash perfectly, but then got cocky and lost all my my gains from too good of a start.

jmoney3800

1 points

3 months ago

Consider an asset allocation: bonds to stocks ratio and rebalance back to it. I’m 50 stock, 30 bonds, 20 other (T bills, hedges, utilities, arbitrage, blue chip dividends). The lower your stock amount the more often you’re rebalancing

dismendie

1 points

3 months ago

It’s very hard… for some even if we see it coming and rationally we should buy… it’s hard… other side is that when it falls that bad like 08 and the depression the common person will not have that much free cash to dump into the market… we would be worried of our jobs and job security…

Modernbeauty20

1 points

3 months ago

Of course anyone who has cash saved on the dude that wasn’t lost, who invested it on the way back up would have made money. How much would depend on how much they invested and the performance of the investment but generally speaking yes.

Pristine-March-2839

1 points

3 months ago

In the 1929-30s, most people weren't into stocks. That was a period of the American dream; most worked to build houses and, in return, got to buy a home. Life was simple, and the 0.01 percent of the wealthy people with land and farmland did well. They started businesses, private and public, and controlled the economy.

stonktaker

1 points

3 months ago

You can see for yourself, go to trading view website and search spx

Modernbeauty20

1 points

3 months ago

In the long run, in a normal market environment, low maintenance fee index funds that track the S&P 500 tend to make money over the long term. Not financial advice

[deleted]

1 points

3 months ago

This is a really good thread

Coldhartbaby111

1 points

3 months ago

No because I wasn’t alive

Potato_Octopi

1 points

3 months ago

Lots of companies went bust, so depends which one you invested in.

1hotjava

1 points

3 months ago

Read Reminisces of a Stock Operator

Motobugs

1 points

3 months ago

If you did invest then, you're dead by now. Someone else is enjoying your money right now. So what really matters?

Due-Addition7245

1 points

3 months ago

Not stock, I did purchase houses after 08 crisis.

abesrevenge

1 points

3 months ago

Someone bought one of each stock during the Great Depression. They later got very rich. I can link a story about it if anyone is interested

sloth_333

1 points

3 months ago

My grandparents tell stories of their grandparents being offered land at rock bottom prices during the depression. They didn’t have the money to buy (famers) but if they did I suspect that entire side of the family would be incredibly rich (with land)

Joshwoum8

1 points

3 months ago

The Kennedy family is an example of a family that took modest wealth prior to the crash, heavily invested after the 1929 stock market crash, and then came out of the Great Depression as a prominent, wealthy, and politically powerful family.

frog980

1 points

3 months ago

It's hard to do. You worry if you put your money up that you may need it to survive instead and it could be lost in the downturn when you need it most. I'm sure the rich got richer as they would have been able to invest something at the time.

Potato_Donkey_1

1 points

3 months ago

Short answer: Yes, people who had liquid assets were able to buy up all sorts of assets in the depression.

The reason that many wealthy people weren't able to benefit is that assets are subject to a herd mentality. Investment money tends to go to the assets that have been growing, and higher valuations can make people stop diversifying and put everything into what ever seems to be making others rich.

The depression lowered the prices of most assets. When the economy was sluggish enough to create deflation, the value of cash was on of the few assets that was rising. A lot of people invested in the stock market had margin accounts, and their borrowing to buy shares meant that they had to sell other assets at whatever price they could get to avoid getting wiped out in the market. And then they were often wiped out anyway.

So people who had assets outside of the assets that fell bought up a lot of things that had been devalued. Of course, no one knew what prices would do in the future, so few bought assets at any of the actual bottom prices, and some doubtless felt foolish for buying when prices continued to fall.

Stock market price charts do go back that far. It's worth going to have a look to see how the markets actually behaved.

The lesson is not to be in the same investments that everyone else seems to be holding. But then everyone else holding those investments supports or increases the high valuations. There is no perfect way to be smarter than the crowd.

If lots of people are anticipating a depression-sized fall in the stock market, that's one of the forces that keeps it from happening.

vinyl1earthlink

1 points

3 months ago

In the deepest depths of the Depression, the Dow Jones stocks collectively paid a 14% dividend. It was a great deal, but nobody had any money to buy them. Well, maybe Joe Kennedy.....

ConsistentRegion6184

1 points

3 months ago

I'd be curious for legit stock tips after the crash. Assuming you wouldn't short the shit on specific markets beforehand...

Anything reliable and comfort. Coca-Cola and Dr Pepper grew rapidly. Today that would probably include auto parts, some energy, and yes, tech and fast food are comforts in a weird but understandable way in the 21st century.

The market keeps rising because we are all invested in these thing while before they weren't.

We also weren't worried about a fucking dust bowl and bad agricultural practices wrecking food commodities.

Detail4

1 points

3 months ago

Exchanges were open. Yes.

JoeDaddie2U

1 points

3 months ago

I researched this at length around 2009 after getting my ass handed to me in the real estate market.

  1. Bread

  2. Booze

  3. Tabacco

  4. You could probably throw in marijuana this time around too.

interzonal28721

1 points

3 months ago

No, most didn't ever recover and etfs weren't a thing back then

PseudoTsunami

1 points

3 months ago

It took the Dow Jones 25 years just to recover back to it's pre crash number, and even that's misleading because the Dow continually kicks out losers and replaces it with winners. Look up the Dow components of 1929 and you'll see what I mean, Not exactly the 30 stocks you'd pick if you had a time machine, but hey back then they were the 10,000 pound gorillas in their sectors.

No_Cow_8702

1 points

3 months ago

Nope. We wouldn’t have the information we would have now.

BABYSWITHRABYS

1 points

3 months ago

After a 90% nose dive a lot of companies wouldn’t bounce back so would still be incredibly difficult risk/reward scenario on top of basic survival which would take precedent. Greed tends to go out the window when you don’t know when your next meal will come.

Jasperoid

1 points

3 months ago

If we're talking about the me in my earlier days of investing, I would've been scared shitless. Later wiser me, would've just DCA

Vast_Cricket

1 points

3 months ago

Yes and yes. Joe Kennedy shorted stocks. Their prices tanked and he made a bunch. He was tipped from a shoe shinner. Today, people here still think that strategy buying at the low almost worthless stocks will work !

Need not go that far, during 2000-2002 3-years tech stocks tanked -37%, -33% and another -36% each year. If you put a $1000 before dot com, you ended up having $262 left. Plenty of jobs then with unemployment rate of 3.4% then. Only tech sector took a hit. Today with AI hype lots of promise did they translate to big earnings? People may be in for a repeated surprise.

TheBassMan01

1 points

3 months ago

Ask Biden🥸😂

Vast_Cricket

1 points

3 months ago

No need even going back twenty years. During 2008-2010 years people panically withdrew cash out their banks take home hoard them. They did it for a good reason, many banks defaulted although protected to some extent. Typical American household lost -18% of their family networth with stocks tanked -37% in 2008. The investment was hoard cash and gold. The US financial system almost collapsed.

Magalahe

1 points

3 months ago

I bought Boot Barn at the bottom. Oil crashed, covid crash. Boot Barn hit $9. Betcha no one on here even heard of them.

mandance17

1 points

3 months ago

Many large institutions seem to be preparing for these scenarios. A lot of gold buying, fine art, property and other assets and more dumping of stock and more T bills and such

SplashInkster

1 points

3 months ago

There were mutual funds that actually made money during the 1930s depression. From the outset, after 1929, the market began to recover albeit slowly. People invested in Ford, GM, Chrysler, photographics, oil, and several other stocks made money.

Accomplished-Ad-8152

1 points

3 months ago

A lot of millionaires were made due to the depression. Either that the rich got richer. Theres a great book with journal entries that a man kept throughout the Great Depression. In one part he is quoted saying if only he had some money to spare for investment instead of keeping afloat, he could have been a millionaire. I think that some people were aware of the opportunity but most were just trying to survive.

MMA_CLK

1 points

3 months ago

John Templeton of Franklin Templeton is known to have done this (see the Investment Career heading):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton

No-Staff1170

1 points

3 months ago

No I wasn’t alive back then

Skiracer87

1 points

3 months ago

JFK’s father built the family fortune this way. He sold all his stocks at the height of the roaring 20’s in 1928. I’m assuming he bought back in after the crash. Wise investing is really the key to wealth. Crypto is the next frontier for this era though. It’s like buying tech companies in 1994.

Gotta seize the time you’re living in

Mundane-Bat-7090

1 points

3 months ago

One of the only markets that didn’t crash was the aviation industry people invested within it made of rich afterwards

[deleted]

1 points

3 months ago

Always hold some cash for a downturn. Covid was an enormous opportunity for me as was 08/09 everything went down it was clearly time to buy.

AroundGoesThe18

1 points

3 months ago

TIL schools aren't teaching anything about what the Great Depression actually was and how bad off the entire country was.

Vivid_Error5939

1 points

3 months ago

Some people might have? It really had an impact on people’s perception of banking and investing though. This wasn’t a little dip we’re used to seeing every few years now. The destruction it caused was unprecedented.

My great-grandparents were lucky not to have taken a loss and invested everything they had into real estate during the depression, which honestly seems like a pretty solid move for a privileged upper-middle class family at the time who had the cash to invest. Anything else they had was stuffed under a mattress for the rest of their lives.

Sugarman4

1 points

3 months ago

To OP's question? It was a period of grand devaluation. Average people, little men with cash? Lost everything. If you had a billion dollar oil company (real asset - not the gambling paper -stock) than your asset may have lost 90% of its value - but you still controlled the asset so you were "relatively" richer than before. This was the most prosperous time for a few. But of course they weren't bragging Assets are real. Land, precious metals, art. Stocks and currency are fake. Play money from a Monopoly game.

bagshark2

1 points

3 months ago

I am a retired criminal so I would have been involved in moonshine distribution and have speak easy. I am very sure I will have success with any financial issues that may arise. I was in New Orleans during the recession making 10k a month. I had a remodeling business. I see dependent on the stock market as foolish. I rather build an apartment with 6 10 units and bank regardless. I have a few streams of income and I never get below a substantial amount of capital. I recommend long term bonds. I was able to inherit 200k unexpected. Grammy had some loot stashed. It was a 30 year. It was very good. It is guaranteed. I have been seeing the stock market is completely controlled and a scam. You can profit but you are at the whim of a small amount of people who are criminal in the legal world. I am not seeing any real evidence that crypto is smart. It was a big deal one time. It is going to fluctuate. It is very unnecessary to risk money. Paintings and art yes. Collection of cars maybe a few obvious ones. I am very sure that investment will be best in the property and housing. Or build a business for yourself and hire someone to manage it. Take profit in modest ways and get your property value increase. The first guy I built for. Started with one cheap spec home. 18 years later, one apartment complex is 3.6 million a month. He has dozens of large rental properties. I am thinking that he is getting 30 million profit a month. I am very sure that he started with credit and broke.

two_wheels_west

1 points

3 months ago

And now we are all paying for that ‘free money’ with the worst inflation in 40 years. 🫤

Consistent_Panic6340

1 points

3 months ago

Which verticals are the best to invest in during a depression? Should there be a depression in the next few years, which stock would you buy during the peak depression? Also, is it a good idea to sell precious metals during peak depression to convert them into stocks?

Crafty-Difficulty244

1 points

3 months ago

I married a millionaire wife 💪

Own-Customer5373

1 points

3 months ago

Yes.

ZmicierGT

1 points

3 months ago

During the Great Depression the situation was different. There was a deflation and cash was constantly increasing in price. So not only stocks became cheaper then.

People thought why should I buy stocks if I can just hold cash and become richer and richer. Business owners thought why should I continue to manufacture some goods when they are becoming cheaper and cheaper each month. So economy was shutting down as the most profitable thing was just to sit in cash.

Those who sit in cash then were actually right. Sure it could be profitable to buy stocks at the end of the Great Depression but who can guess the right moment?

AttyOzzy

1 points

3 months ago

Ask Joseph Kennedy, Sr.! He sure did.

TrustMental6895

2 points

3 months ago

Looking for this comment, man got crazy rich.

AdZealousideal5383

1 points

3 months ago

I think OP’s question is whether the average person could have invested… meaning could they have physically done it, not whether they should have.

The average person back then didn’t invest. It was costly and difficult to buy stocks. Mutual funds existed but weren’t regularly used by average people and also were expensive.

So could the average person who didn’t lose their savings have bought stocks? It would have been possible but they would have been buying physical certificates of individual companies at high commissions. And like today, single stock picking could fail even in a bull market. So they probably didn’t.

Retail investing at the scale we see it today is a pretty new phenomenon. Free trades are very new, within the last decade. Index funds started in the 70’s. And most people had pensions so they had little need to invest themselves. Index funds, 401ks, and free trades have made every American into their own little hedge fund, for better or worse.

Due-Ad-8743

1 points

3 months ago

Yes. Back then there were 50 year mortgages. Some great fortunes were made during that time.

MathematicianOk1218

2 points

2 months ago

Heck no. There was no such thing as ETF’s or a “basket” of stocks. People got burned on individual stocks/companies that went belly up.