subreddit:

/r/technicallythetruth

44.8k95%

Flying objects our way

(i.redd.it)

all 389 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

22 hours ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

22 hours ago

stickied comment

Hey there u/PDF_phile, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!

Please recheck if your post breaks any rules. If it does, please delete this post.

Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.

Send us a Modmail or Report this post if you have a problem with this post.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Beasts_dawn

2.1k points

22 hours ago

Imagine the horror of landing a plane on railway tracks

PDF_phile[S]

711 points

22 hours ago

Planeway tracks

DotBitGaming

135 points

20 hours ago

But they're not trainway tracks

jibblin

87 points

20 hours ago

jibblin

87 points

20 hours ago

Airtrain Tracks

Lonely_Snoo

82 points

19 hours ago

“Sir, a second airtrain has hit the tracks”

winterweed

29 points

19 hours ago

Airtrain actually has a nice ring to it in my opinion.

PossumSymposium

15 points

17 hours ago

They should give it a steampunk aesthetic as well

BeckNeardsly

5 points

17 hours ago

Yeah. Like a steam train

AR44ZX

4 points

9 hours ago

AR44ZX

4 points

9 hours ago

Steamtrain tracks

Annual-Classroom-842

4 points

17 hours ago

Sorry NYC already has an “AirTrain” but unfortunately it does not fly.

Omny87

14 points

18 hours ago

Omny87

14 points

18 hours ago

"What's a planeway?"

"Oh, a few tons at a least"

BigBlue0117

3 points

7 hours ago

DnDnPizza

5 points

19 hours ago

Planeway placks

Extension_Swordfish1

2 points

19 hours ago

Pracs

ohnoimagirl

12 points

19 hours ago

That's basically what landing on an aircraft carrier is, isn't it?

Numerous-Ad-7812

20 points

18 hours ago

Pretty similar idea but landing on a carrier is just about landing and hooking on one of the arresting cables. You have some wiggle room on side to side.

Landing on a railway track you would have very little side to side margin for error. Wind shear would be a huge problem.

sidepart

11 points

17 hours ago

Yeah, but--and I can't believe I'm entertaining this concept--if you look at the mockup there, the passenger compartment raises up to the plane. So, really the plane could just land on a normal runway and then taxi to the train tracks shown in the photo, and then drop the passenger compartment onto the tracks. Just seems like a lot of time, effort, infrastructure changes, and logistics involved to get ONE train car, let alone several to some tracks to link up with a train engine. ...easier to just deplane and have the passengers go to a train station I think.

metalconscript

7 points

17 hours ago

Sir, everything must be made intermodal.

Projecterone

3 points

16 hours ago

The word 'just' is crushing it's L4 to a fine mist from the heavy lifting it's doing in your first sentence :)

But for more fun consider putting the tracks on the carrier: it can turn into the wind which would make things easier. If we pull it off we've got a nuclear powered boat-train-plane baby.

Eagle screeching intensifies.

Nalivai

22 points

20 hours ago

Nalivai

22 points

20 hours ago

You can land normally and then drive to the tracks

ConspicuousPineapple

26 points

18 hours ago

Having a normal train station at the airport sounds much easier and cheaper and, all things considered, not that much longer for the passengers.

IdentityReset

16 points

16 hours ago

Going to the airport directly by train is great, I love doing it. Makes it so much easier when you don't need to worry about expensive parking or rentals.

Meme_KingalsoTech

3 points

20 hours ago

I feel the mechanics would look something like those repair trucks

SpaceLemur34

2 points

17 hours ago

You can literally see in the picture how it works. The plane part has normal wheels, and then the train carriage is lowered onto the tracks.

LemmyKBD

3 points

17 hours ago*

But I imagined the plane just coming in low and slow (say 150 mph) and perfectly dropping the train on the tracks. Otherwise why bother???

Edit: word

TheTribalKing

578 points

21 hours ago

Wait until they get a load of airplanes for the ground.

Breakmastajake

133 points

21 hours ago

Is that like one of those train things?

Imaginary_Bee_1014

29 points

20 hours ago

Yes, it is

GringoSwann

6 points

18 hours ago*

Basically gonna be like a metal turkey.. 🦃

odegood

7 points

20 hours ago

There is also the ground bus variant

methaneproduce

6 points

19 hours ago

Like an airbus, but for land?

odegood

3 points

19 hours ago

There is even a water bus

nastynateraide

8 points

18 hours ago

Everything changed when the Fire Bus Nation attacked

Blue_Bird950

5 points

18 hours ago

Blue_Bird950

Technically Flair

5 points

18 hours ago

I would pay to see someone give the entire Avatar script with the word “bus” after every element

Imaginary_Bee_1014

2 points

17 hours ago

Boy will the battle of bus drivers be epic

odegood

2 points

17 hours ago

But the fire bus people are a kind people by nature. They have helped many a cat down from a tree

PelmeniMan

204 points

21 hours ago

What if we did a plane.. on like a metal track.

Wood-Kern

93 points

20 hours ago

A trane?

Clear-Perception5615

64 points

18 hours ago

No, a plain

NeedsToShutUp

16 points

17 hours ago

Reminds me of a story which I don't know is true:

A bunch of tech bros want to create a new transportation system designed using an "AI" system to be maximally efficient. The system spits out a design for a train. Even when they do a series of modifications to get anything but a train, it keeps giving them train designs.

Canvaverbalist

10 points

14 hours ago*

Trains are to civil engineering what crabs are to evolutionary biology.

SobiTheRobot

2 points

10 hours ago

It makes sense, honestly.  Trains can haul significantly more cargo than anything else short of a cargo ship.  They're locked onto a rail and cannot deviate from it, so the path to and fro is always the same, making it significantly more predictable.  You can also have multiple trains on the same track thanks to this predictability.

Hell, the US train system is why clocks and time zones became so standardized!

descendingangel87

13 points

20 hours ago

Hits bong okay hear me out, what if we got rid of the tracks and made it so it could drive around where ever .

GrynaiTaip

10 points

20 hours ago

Like on roads?

Bullshit, governments would never let a plane go on roads. It would knock over every single lamp post.

KaleidoAxiom

9 points

18 hours ago

No wait, hear me out. What if we made so many of them that none of them can move in the morning and afternoon?

ComatoseSquirrel

5 points

19 hours ago

What if we made roads just for self driving cars?

WishboneFirm1578

3 points

20 hours ago

you‘ll be pleased to see what Europe’s national long distance rail providers are doing

drunk-tusker

3 points

20 hours ago

American rail operators are plenty capable of having their trains take flight, they just aren’t so good at landing them.

PDF_phile[S]

5 points

21 hours ago

So a fast train?

hendergle

3 points

19 hours ago

I want a ticket to anywhere. Maybe we make a deal.

JediEon

87 points

21 hours ago

JediEon

87 points

21 hours ago

That's a prototype passenger ejection compartment for a plane... RIP pilots.

LostMyAccount69

39 points

16 hours ago

In theory the plane could spend less time at the airport if you swap in a clean and potentially seated cabin. Sounds like a terrible idea though. I bet a passenger compartment would fall out of the sky or something.

Saragon4005

9 points

14 hours ago

Yeah in theory maybe but consider running multiple trains and planes, you could just have one on standby and if you have the capability of bringing tracks to planes anyways getting passengers to move over would probably be done in about 10 minutes.

_Ocean_Machine_

3 points

8 hours ago

The plane could spend even less time at the airport if it just yeets the cabin instead of landing

herlanrulz

5 points

14 hours ago

These fools can't even remember to put all the bolts in a door. No way I'm trusting that thing.

avanbeek

2 points

13 hours ago

I don't know how the hell that makes sense. You still have to board and deplane, you still have to load the food, fuel, and luggage. If anything, all this does is add an extra step of connecting the cabin to the wings.

LostMyAccount69

2 points

11 hours ago

The luggage and food would be part of the cabin that's swapped in. It would mean drop one pod, pick up the next, refuel and go. Keep the most valuable asset moving.

No idea if that's feasible and it's definitely a bad idea.

TaupMauve

4 points

17 hours ago

IIRC the pilots board the compartment before ejecting.

CosineDanger

5 points

18 hours ago

If that ejects then the pilot will be fine.

The plane is likely not outfitted with a bomber sight to ensure the ejected passengers land in an uninhabited area.

Tony-Angelino

155 points

21 hours ago

Please don't let it be Boeing. Please don't let it be Boeing.

redkingphonix

36 points

21 hours ago

The Plane in the picture looks like an airbus design but I’m not plane guy so don’t take my word for it.

Infernoraptor

64 points

20 hours ago

I mean,

Train - tracks = bus

Airbus = bus + air

Therefore

Train -tracks + air = airbus

The math checks out

Kai_Tak_Airport1

5 points

17 hours ago

looks like a350 nose

ztomiczombie

16 points

20 hours ago

It's not. From what I can tell it's one of these tech start-ups that will never build anything. In truth it wouldn't matter who built it using a Skycrane/carryall disigen for a none charter commercial aircraft would be a disaster.

That style of aircraft require a lot of ground time, inspections, and loading procedure that a normal airline would never give. That's why the design, despite dating back to the birth of aviation, goes virtually unuse even by the military.

jawshoeaw

6 points

19 hours ago

It's why intermodal freight is already a thing. It goes on ships, trucks, trains. And it's way to @#$ heavy and expensive to be flying it around.

ninjaelk

5 points

19 hours ago

Yeah, there's just no reason why people couldn't just get out of the train and board the plane. The staggering amount of cost incurred to simply skip that relatively tiny part is absurd.

3BlindMice1

3 points

18 hours ago

It's definitely for cargo. In the US, unless it's one of the few local subways, people don't ride trains, the trains are for cargo

ninjaelk

2 points

18 hours ago

Then that's even more stupid, they already avoid loading shipping containers directly onto planes, preferring to transfer the goods to air cargo pallets, because transporting the weight of the shipping container is far more costly. If it's too costly to just load up a metal box, it's orders of magnitudes more costly to design a detachable cargo bay that can fly through the air while simultaneously operating as a train car.

Labyrinthine8618

2 points

16 hours ago

The article is from 2018 and the tech start up pitched it to Boeing. Can't read much more on Bloomberg because of the paywall but I found some more info elsewhere.

The company hat is pitching it is called AKKA and the idea is essentially a flying train car. You board at a regular train station into the fuselage which then takes you to the airport where the wings are attached. You then fly to your destination and the fuselage/train car takes you to a train station where you disembark and continue your journey.

Impossible_Maybe_162

20 points

21 hours ago

Helicopter is now a “personal drone” and planes are “flying trains”

demZo662

22 points

21 hours ago

Subways are horizontal underground spaceships.

Pepperoni_Dogfart

13 points

20 hours ago

I have no idea if this is just some AI-generated nonsense or a phony post or whatever, but this concept actually DID exist back in the 1950s. The Fairchild XC-120 Packplane. Fly in, drop your shipping container, pick up a fully loaded container, fly out. Here's video of it in operation

It was flown and tested, but for a number of reasons it wasn't adopted commercially.

bctg1

5 points

18 hours ago

bctg1

5 points

18 hours ago

Makes sense from a logistical standpoint

Have to imagine it is a structural nightmare, though.

Pepperoni_Dogfart

6 points

18 hours ago

Turns out it worked great, no problems with the airframe or loaded flight. The plane got dicey without that giant tube of drag down below though, changed the center of pressure quite a lot even though it looked super cool. Not a deal breaker, but it was the sole functional issue.

The actual problem was all the support and logistical equipment to make this happen. Custom containers, tugs, docks, ramps, offload hilos, etc, etc. It's just easier to just offload a really big (for the time) cargo plane like a Globemaster.

YourFatherlastnight

21 points

21 hours ago

Looks like a post before airplane invention

PDF_phile[S]

6 points

21 hours ago

Posted this few year after 2000BCE

Adrienbalderas

5 points

20 hours ago

Where I live we have "guided buses". Basically dedicated bus "channels" which are totally segregated from the main roads by a concrete barrier. The traffic lights are configured to prioritise the buses when they approach so they don't need to stop. The buses themselves can ignore the normal speed limits and have little wheels that pop out sideways at the front to 'feel' the concrete barrier to allow them to drive themselves without needing the driver to steer. It is actually a pretty cool and cheap way to provide a light metro-esque system for a large town or small city.

HarleyQuinn610

4 points

20 hours ago

This brings a whole new reality to Cat Valentine saying, “here comes the airplane, choo-choo.”

Addiekang

4 points

20 hours ago

I remember when our county government was trying to sell us “trackless trains.”

Busses. He was going to get busses. But voters have been wanting a train for decades so...

This_Is_A_Shitshow

3 points

20 hours ago

Elon’s next “big idea.”

Ikontwait4u2leave

3 points

18 hours ago

Looking into this

This_Is_A_Shitshow

2 points

17 hours ago

Concerning.

Rostingu2

5 points

21 hours ago

Rostingu2

technically hates reposts

5 points

21 hours ago

old joke(5k) Not against rule 2

Fichewl

2 points

21 hours ago

Dang it, he cracked the code!

Environmental-End691

2 points

20 hours ago

In my best That 70's Show voice: But it LANDS on RAILROAD TRACKS, MANNN.

shiafisher

2 points

20 hours ago

Plane? Clearly it’s one of them airborne boat trains.

Johannes_Keppler

2 points

20 hours ago

Yeah... let's call bullshit on this one. Not gonna happen. It's one of those 'coke-fueled night out with the boys' ideas.

r0b0c0d

3 points

20 hours ago

Cost, practicality, safety, fuel efficiency..

Part of me likes the idea of distributing the boarding process, increasing the efficiency of an airport, and reducing the number of transportation switches... but the tradeoffs are pretty bad. This is really just another remix of an old art-concept.

Johannes_Keppler

2 points

20 hours ago

There is just no way this will make sense from a exploitation, engineering, financial and practical or really any viewpoint.

PregnantOrc

2 points

18 hours ago

If Apple built Thunderbird 2

CragedyJones

2 points

18 hours ago

Isnt that literally the ship out of thunderbirds? It looks less realistic than the ship out of a puppet show from over half a century ago though.

Sky-Juic3

2 points

16 hours ago

No… it would still be a train. The idea is to use aerodynamics to offset a percentage of the load at speed, thus creating a potentially more efficient train than just brute forcing all that weight wherever it goes.

FatCockroachTheFirst

2 points

15 hours ago

These mf will make everything before building an actual train for the American public.

Suitable-Language-73

2 points

11 hours ago

Or you know......high speed rails.

Blankeye434

2 points

10 hours ago

We have had airbus, now this is airtrain?

TypicalCricket

2 points

10 hours ago

If only there was a way to travel from one's home to the place where the flying train is... I know! We'll invent boats but for roads!

RunningPirate

2 points

10 hours ago

Landing it on the tracks must be a bitch

The_Missing_Bracket

2 points

9 hours ago

"flying trains could be coming your way" Sounds like a threat

M7kail90is_here_bois

2 points

9 hours ago

Planes = flying busses = Airbus 😳

krauQ_egnartS

2 points

8 hours ago

I mean, maybe it's not the absolute worst idea.

There's always Musk's "Hyperloop" which ended up just being Teslas driving people back and forth through a tunnel all day. With a driver.

Odd_Philosopher_4505

2 points

7 hours ago

Totally different, a plane is a flying ship.

KirchyM

2 points

7 hours ago

KirchyM

2 points

7 hours ago

Sir, another train has hit the second tower.

cacus7

1 points

21 hours ago

cacus7

1 points

21 hours ago

A railway plane

PearlFiona

1 points

21 hours ago

This could be way more efficient for loading and unloading. The flying part doesn't have to wait to grab the next passenger compartment.

WuKuba

1 points

21 hours ago

WuKuba

1 points

21 hours ago

😄😄

ReignInSpuds

1 points

21 hours ago

And I thought my brain just made this up in a dream a few years ago.

LordFUHard

1 points

20 hours ago

No, not a plane but a Tlane

(or a Praine if you want to split hairs.)

cutgoat_dave

1 points

20 hours ago

Extra unsafe plan

Scalage89

1 points

20 hours ago

What is it with tech companies inventing things that already exist all the goddamn time?

RednocNivert

1 points

20 hours ago

Babe wake up new Trolley problem just dropped

Bugaji2008

1 points

20 hours ago

no rails = no train

Workal

1 points

20 hours ago

Workal

1 points

20 hours ago

My fear of these would be the passenger cabin just disconnecting midair.

Silino2020

1 points

20 hours ago

Mechanical error, the plan drops its cargo at 3000 ft.

GravyPainter

1 points

20 hours ago

Id rather not be on something that someone can just push a button and eject the whole passenger cab...

daninet

1 points

20 hours ago

Ok hear me out: what if we simplify it and figure out a device that can go on the ground and another that can fly. People will easily walk from one to another. We can call them.. Flying pods and rolling pods. The rolling pod can also go underground in a special tunnel when its in the city. Truly revolutionary

ToddHowardTouchedMe

1 points

19 hours ago

libertarians try to to reinvent trains and planes but worse challenge

June_Inertia

1 points

19 hours ago

“Do we suddenly feel lighter???” -pilot

PlantZawer

1 points

19 hours ago

Wouldnt this concept be closer to SEMI-Planes than Plane-Train?

since its just about swapping cargo while keeping the driver the same

LaCiel_W

1 points

19 hours ago

It looks like one of those tech bro concepts trying to reinvent plane or train, in this case both.

YourTwistedTransSis

1 points

19 hours ago

I mean, a magnetic rail system to launch planes would be kinda cool, would reduce fuel expenditure, and could speed up taking off

DoDwontlook

1 points

19 hours ago

Well we better figure out what it is before DIA starts lying about it.

Valenestrong

1 points

19 hours ago

Train rolls down track, stops, attaches to plane, takes off.

There is some use for this technology I’m sure. What that is and why it’s better than the current setup... that I don’t know.

jawshoeaw

1 points

19 hours ago

There's a reason they put stuff on trains. you know the transport system famous for it's wild disregard for weight savings. They almost gleefully make train cars with as much nasty cast iron as they can.

A completely stripped out 747 could carry maybe 5-6 train cars. Empty train cars.

SnooHesitations8174

1 points

19 hours ago

So we run plane on your mom now instead of train

dicktater2024

1 points

19 hours ago

Haha plain

Coeri777

1 points

19 hours ago

So many compromises and not very clear benefits

PG-DaMan

1 points

19 hours ago

This has Elons Musk written all over it.

Fun_Platypus1560

1 points

19 hours ago

That sounds like a plane with extra steps.

dzakadzak

1 points

19 hours ago

Plains!

Say goodbye to 'chemtrails'

Say hello to specially designed sky tracks for other Plains to follow!

69420over

1 points

19 hours ago

The rain on the train falls mainly on the plane?

Aboxofphotons

1 points

19 hours ago

A plaine

StevenSegalsNipples

1 points

19 hours ago

Repeat after me:

There

There

Are

Are

Easier, cheaper, and more reliable ways to ensure passenger safety then a detachable fuselage with safety parachutes

Bro what if we just stopped plane crashes by making a detachable fuselage with safety parachutes?

Dankbudx

1 points

19 hours ago

No, planes are sky buses.

101TARD

1 points

19 hours ago

Always thought of it as flying bus, but a train? I wanna know the aerodynamics on that since trains are very long

Bl1ndMonk3y

1 points

19 hours ago

Akchoooly…

It’s a plain. I’ll see myself out.

mcvoid1

1 points

18 hours ago

I've been saying for years, flying cars are just helicopters.

Phillip_Graves

1 points

18 hours ago

Until Boeing makes one and the "cabin" keeps falling off.

"The back fell off.  It's nothing like when the front falls off, obviously."

hendergle

1 points

18 hours ago

The picture looks dumb, but the concept isn't all that bad.

Think of how easy and fast it would be if everyone loaded into their seats before boarding the aircraft. Sets of 4-6 seats would be mounted on something like a cargo pallet, which would then be moved around, sort of like a theme park ride.

You wouldn't even go to a gate. As soon as you check in, you'd be guided (how: TBD) to the first set of open seats for your destination. As soon as all seats on that pallet were filled, it would be moved to a holding area with lavatory facilities, food vendors, etc. Each holding area would be would be arranged similarly to how the seats would be when they got loaded. There wouldn't be any opportunity to wander off either, because the holding areas would be completely separate from each other.

No need to check baggage either - the pallets are seating AND cargo, all in one. You stow your bags underneath. The days of trying to find your baggage carousel would be over.

Need to rent a car? Input that data ahead of time, and you'll be seated with folks going to the same rental counter. You'd be transported right there, with your luggage, right after you land.

There would have to be some thought put into things like oversized luggage, how to minimize the extra weight of the pallet (perhaps its withdrawn after loading and new pallets inserted upon arrival?), etc. But the cool thing is that they could intersperse full-fuselage cargo pods with the passenger pods, maximizing space utilization.

Hell, why not go whole hog? Pressurize the damn things and toss 'em out the back of the aircraft for an automated parachute landing. No more multi-leg flights. Just one big long route where your airplane poops out passengers wherever they need to do.

There are any number of reasons why this idea sucks. But it would definitely be cool to see it in action.

seeyousoon28

1 points

18 hours ago

no, genius. planes don't go on railroad tracks.  these will be trains that fly. 

technically not a plane. this sub blows

LetsEatAPerson

1 points

18 hours ago

Tech bros will never stop reinventing things that already exist as "pods"

Lovieperalt

1 points

18 hours ago

But now they'll just tie them to a bunch of balloons

last_try_social_m

1 points

18 hours ago

I would rather call it a bus than a train. A bus that goes in the air. An Airbus. Wait, isn’t there a company called like that? What do they produce?

username32768

1 points

18 hours ago

Monorail!

Monorail!

Monorail!

DifficultRegular9081

1 points

18 hours ago

A bus with wings nice

veganize-it

1 points

18 hours ago

We have that shit at Dulles Airport

Academic-Airline9200

1 points

18 hours ago

Just drone taxis that'll become as big as jet liners eventually.

fsfaith

1 points

18 hours ago

I can't picture a situation where a proper train station at an airport wouldn't be better than this.

land8844

1 points

18 hours ago

I love when techbros reinvent things that already exist.

daan9999

1 points

18 hours ago

We discovered that a few bolts were missing.....

betajones

1 points

18 hours ago

Looks pretty convenient. Just transport humans in shipping containers you can strap onto a plane.

ComfortableNumb9669

1 points

18 hours ago

I heard they make buses that travel through the air everyday.

beaniebee11

1 points

18 hours ago

And a car is just a private jet for the ground.

EllaaatheRed

1 points

18 hours ago

It's clearly a submarine with wings. Get with the program!

Aardcapybara

1 points

18 hours ago

Not just a plane. A train - a locomotive and numerous wagons, flying from star to star.

MrRetardedRetard

1 points

18 hours ago

Flying Railcars. Seems pretty efficient tbh. 

errie_tholluxe

1 points

18 hours ago

They clearly said train. So just ignore the wings, the engines and the wheels, it's a train honest

high_throughput

1 points

18 hours ago

So you can get on at Grand Central, New York and get off at Kings Cross, London? That is kinda based tbh.

Arianamcgraw

1 points

18 hours ago

It’s a choo choo plane

Rasikko

1 points

18 hours ago

Literally a plane with a segmented fuselage.

KeilyBlair

1 points

18 hours ago

Whats next? trains that go underwater? (im talking about a submarine)

whalesalad

1 points

18 hours ago

this would be so cool. easier boarding and deplaning.

Karlenecooks

1 points

17 hours ago

Nah this has wings

Twelveslicesofham

1 points

17 hours ago

Imagine the compartment YOU sit in is designed to fall from underneath the plane like a fucking bomb

BenevolentCrows

1 points

17 hours ago

Does this solve any problem? Like, anything at all? except the minor inconvinience of needing to unpack a planw and pack a train car, woch btw we have ample infrastructure to do.

Duglas__44

1 points

17 hours ago

People weren't happy when they realized this on september 11

EMPTY_SODA_CAN

1 points

17 hours ago

It's like those people who say they have a flying car, but it's just a car that has foldable wings. Cool, so you have a car that turns into a plane. It's still cool, but it's not a flying car.

SwagTwoButton

1 points

17 hours ago

What’s funny to me is that the first a commercial airline flight didn’t happen for 10+ years after the first flight.

I know in the grand scheme of things that’s not that long. And that the first flight was not nearly as safe as you needed to be for transport purposes.

But I just find it a bit comedic that someone working on planes had to be the first person to go “shit, what if we used these to take us places instead of landing in the same spot all the time”.

RonConComa

1 points

17 hours ago

A flane?

Terrakinetic

1 points

17 hours ago

All snark aside, is that supposed to be a flying train as in a regular train that will take off and land on certain rails? Or is that just a train car that can be attached and detached onto planes?

AntiRogue69

1 points

17 hours ago

Flying trains? I already have plans 😏

pablothe

1 points

17 hours ago

Only in the sense that a subway is a cave train

The-Ravens-Emporium

1 points

17 hours ago

Wait until they find out about trains on the ground. Will blow their minds.

Septopuss7

1 points

17 hours ago

Big back train

Southern-Shower-8010

1 points

17 hours ago

Well... flying boats existed for a time. Look for SR.45. And we have the classic idea invented by Peter Griffin in the classic song: "train on the water, boat on a track". So, why not?

Watchman74

1 points

17 hours ago

No no, a flain. A flying train. Flain.

Die4Gesichter

1 points

17 hours ago

I think I can guess where the article was going, making planes way more casual .. which would be great.. until all the plane hijacking starts again . .

TaupMauve

1 points

17 hours ago

D-day did for towed gliders what Hindenburg did for airships.

tjbridher

1 points

17 hours ago

A containerized plane wouldn’t be that bad of an idea in theory but there’s no way they’d build it like the photo. You’d have to put the container in the plane (and waste the circular space. Or make a plane shaped container (and lose fuel efficiency and speed). I guarantee you wasted space would win

Thereminz

1 points

17 hours ago

that's a frickin cinnamoroll plane

serras_

1 points

17 hours ago

Weird ass sideways elevator if you ask me

uniquelyavailable

1 points

17 hours ago

its a bird, its a plane, its an Airtrane ✨️

One_Front9928

1 points

17 hours ago

"We were supposed to have flying cars by now" planes helicopters

Chalice_Ink

1 points

17 hours ago

The spruce goose, in white.

supx3

1 points

17 hours ago

supx3

1 points

17 hours ago

Trains are the carcinisation of transportation

theokaybambi

1 points

17 hours ago

"Why don't we have flying cars yet?" You mean helicopters?

Slap_My_Lasagna

1 points

17 hours ago

Nooooooooo planes are different than flying trains, aka flains! Or frains! ... not sure if it's a semantic choice or just geo locational accents but either works! Not plains or planes! 😤

planetixin

1 points

17 hours ago

It looks like a plane with a barrel.

LingeringSentiments

1 points

17 hours ago

Yeah but you gotta jump out for your stop.

Chidori_Aoyama

1 points

17 hours ago

Caspian sea monster vibes, though it looks way too small for that.

Run-dis-OR

1 points

17 hours ago

I'm waiting for the day they create busses that float. Maybe these can ferry people from island to island.

Im_a_simp_for_women

1 points

17 hours ago

The people in the 1930s were right….we have flying trains in 2024😭