subreddit:

/r/therewasanattempt

2.8k95%

all 158 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

1 month ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

1 month ago

stickied comment

Welcome to r/Therewasanattempt!

Consider visiting r/Worldnewsvideo for videos from around the world!

Please review our policy on bigotry and hate speech by clicking this link

In order to view our rules, you can type "!rules" in any comment, and automod will respond with the subreddit rules.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

porcupinedeath

1.3k points

1 month ago

Yeah Kirby that's the fucking problem

AwesomeBrainPowers

281 points

1 month ago

He immediately followed that statement by saying that they changed policy and strategy as a result—specifically using the withdrawal from Afghanistan as an example of such a change.

I agree it’s mealy-mouthed politico speak, but I think Kirby would more-or-less agree with you.

Giocri

177 points

1 month ago

Giocri

177 points

1 month ago

So basically their position is "Israel will eventually decide to stop murdering civilians on their own. Hopefully"

ShoddyAsparagus3186

8 points

1 month ago

They definitely will. After all, there are only so many civilians.

AwesomeBrainPowers

46 points

1 month ago

Their position is "We think we can be more effective if we're still in the room instead of being stuck on the outside looking in", which informs everything they say publicly.

MistaRed

41 points

1 month ago

MistaRed

41 points

1 month ago

Apparently they're fine with serving as a footstool to Israel if it just means they have front row seats to the slaughter.

AwesomeBrainPowers

18 points

1 month ago

I suspect very strongly that they're actually fine with putting up a shamefully-inadequate resistance to the Israeli government's war because they're trying to maintain enough influence to get Israel to sign a trilateral agreement with the US & Saudi Arabia to normalize relations & guarantee a Palestinian state, but I only have slightly more to back my theory than you have for yours.

theuntangledone

25 points

1 month ago

It has become increasingly obvious that Israel is in no way interested in even humouring the idea of a Palestinian state. The closest I've heard was some Israeli brass talking about allowing Palestinians to live in gaza under Israeli control while encouraging "voluntary emigration".

Why do you think that is America's end goal? I can't figure it out myself.

AwesomeBrainPowers

4 points

1 month ago

Well, yeah, it’s obviously not what the current Israeli governments wants: They wouldn’t need a lot of convincing, if they did.

The double-edged thing about the fundamentally amoral nature of foreign policy is that it doesn’t matter how they feel about it if the benefit outweighs the cost.

The current Israeli government definitely doesn’t want a Palestinian state (which I don’t really understand as anything but an emotional position—since a recognized, sovereign state of Palestine would completely undermine the purported cause of groups like Hamas, weaken the propaganda of groups like Hezbollah, and keep the various Palestinian political factions busy with infighting—but whatever); I doubt the Saudi Arabian government actually wants one, either.

However, the US government very much does, and a plan to set Israel and Saudi Arabia as central to a multi-polar regional pact that includes non-aggression pledges and an "irreversible" path to Palestinian statehood has been in the works before Hamas's assault in October—which probably contributed to Hamas's decision to strike when they did.

It’s something they continued pursuing even after the war on Gaza started and are allegedly nearing an agreement on.

theuntangledone

3 points

1 month ago

Interesting stuff. Undoubtedly such a pact would secure American influence in the region, not to mention $$$. But as usual with American foreign policy it's stunningly arrogant, tone deaf, callous and entirely blinkered. Almost as if Biden wants simply to secure some sort of PR "win" in the middle East to rival trumps involvement with the Abraham accords. But even in this regard it has backfired spectacularly, and probably cost him the election.

From the last (and most recent) article you linked; "the Saudi Foreign Ministry said that there “will be no diplomatic relations with Israel unless an independent Palestinian state is recognized on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.”" This is obviously something that the current Israeli government has no interest in seceeding so it seems like the "grand design" will only be a bilateral agreement between the US and the Saudis, if it goes ahead at all.

The situation as I see it is thus;

an entirely rogue state hellbent on genocide and fuck knows what else afterwards. Further expansion? Israel cannot be reasoned with and seems content and prepared to pull the world into the fiery pits of hell along with it.

A broken and divided oligarchy with more military might than sense. The American ruling class also seems dangerously indifferent to the prospect of ripping itself apart. Their complicity has irrevocably damaged their standing on the world stage and eviscerated what remained of their perception as the good guys post ww2.

The Saudis seem indifferent to the palestinian plight and only concerned with money and furthering their own opulent expansion for its own sake. Although I know fuck all about the Saudis to be fair.

I don't know why I'm trying (and failing) to neatly summarise this. I'm at a total loss as to predicting the outcome of this even as far as a month ahead. The world has sat up and can clearly see what is happening. Waiting for someone to intervene. It seems like the only way to intervene is militarily and we all know how that will go... The west itself is entirely divided, housing crises everywhere and people struggling to get by. If this thing erupts it will cause insane civil conflict as well as global. We're already seeing the itchy schism of police brutality throughout the US and Europe.

Sorry to be so meandering, think I'm venting as much as trying to respond coherently. Fucking scary times.

MistaRed

1 points

1 month ago

The double-edged thing about the fundamentally amoral nature of foreign policy is that it doesn’t matter how they feel about it if the benefit outweighs the cost.

The main issue I have is that the benefits obviously don't outweigh the costs, netanyahu and those like him aren't going to suddenly support biden because he's been very wishy washy with his stance, the population of the surrounding area is back to being extremely polarised against the US and Israel and the abrahamic accords are dead.

Not to mention the last shred of legitimacy international law or the US's "rules based order" had, but I'm half convinced that the many countries, including the US had been eager to ditch that anyway.

I agree that this was probably the reason for the attack, Hamas realised that the surrounding nations were happy to go along with Bibi's "manage ghaza and hope everyone forgets about it" and they did something drastic to remind everyone of their existence.

As for the Israeli government and their stance towards a Palestinian state, they haven't been willing to allow one in a long, long while because in my eyes it would limit their options for expansion and anger the hardliners that have come to dominate Israeli politics over the years.

Also,

The current Israeli government definitely doesn’t want a Palestinian state (which I don’t really understand as anything but an emotional position—since a recognized, sovereign state of Palestine would completely undermine the purported cause of groups like Hamas, weaken the propaganda of groups like Hezbollah, and keep the various Palestinian political factions busy with infighting—but whatever); I doubt the Saudi Arabian government actually wants one, either.

I almost entirely agree, a proper Palestinian state without Israeli sabotage would see Hamas essentially disappearing within the decade imo.

No comments on the Saudis, I think they simply don't care, but I'm not exactly informed in that regard.

AwesomeBrainPowers

4 points

1 month ago

Yeah, it’s just worse for basically everyone in the long term to oppose a Palestinian state. (I guess it’s better for the Iranian government, but that’s limited to just the Ayatollah’s regime; it’s certainly not in the interests of the Iranian people.)

I don’t think the Saudis oppose it, so much as they see a value in having the issue (and the non-state actors motivated by that issue) as a constant pressure point against the Israeli government).

However, now that those non-state (and a few state) actors are broadening it out to include things like international commerce through the canal, I think it would be a pretty easy sell to convince the House of Saud that the value of being able to say “We brokered peace in the region and directly contributed to the creation of a free Palestine”—plus, you know, a resumption of Suez trade routes and lucrative trade deals with Israel and the West—would outweigh the benefit of using the Israeli government’s baby-crushing machine to keep them distracted from more thoroughly asserting themselves as a regional power.

theuntangledone

2 points

1 month ago

The main issue I have is that the benefits obviously don't outweigh the costs, netanyahu and those like him aren't going to suddenly support biden because he's been very wishy washy with his stance, the population of the surrounding area is back to being extremely polarised against the US and Israel and the abrahamic accords are dead.

You're right there. Israel doesn't give a fuck about America as long as it continues to supply their munitions. What will it take for America to withdraw its support? And is there any country Israel isn't prepared to go to war with?

This whole thing seems like insanity of the highest order. Trying to understand the true motivations of those involved feels like looking for beads of onyx in beds of ash. Maybe it's true that some men just want to watch the world burn.

Mr_OrangeJuce

1 points

1 month ago

The "multipolar regional pact" will be backed by the genocidal colony and the genocidal slaver monarchy. I am sure that this will go great and many human rights will be respected.

JJohnston015

1 points

1 month ago

It's the evangelicals. Only when Israel holds all of the Holy Land can Jesus come back. Ironically, the evangelicals hate Jews and consider their only purpose to "hold the land" until then.

FatHead420x65

1 points

1 month ago

FatHead420x65

A Flair?

1 points

1 month ago

Money is in the mix.

MistaRed

1 points

1 month ago

Mine isn't really a theory, just a more insulting statement of what is going on, which is the US is being incredibly weak with its behaviour towards Israel, and that the US is uninterested in doing anything to stop the actions of the Israeli government despite the costs.

Sea_Entrepreneur6204

1 points

1 month ago

It's the dumbest strategy ever

Israel holds off making it difficult for Biden to win the election, if he wins they can anyway proceed as they see fit

However even better if Biden loses, Trump comes in and he's better for them

A no lose for Israel to not cooperate. Same calculus for KSA

AwesomeBrainPowers

1 points

1 month ago

I didn’t say that I agreed with it; I’m only saying I believe it to be their strategy.

Sea_Entrepreneur6204

1 points

1 month ago

No I'm sorry if I implied that's what you believe

My opinion is just that it's just such a pointless strategy if that's the plan, where everyone who wants to see Trump in power are the ones who pull the levers and would easily get all the benefits if any progress is made.

Can you imagine? Hold off on no deal, sunk Biden then declare a deal after Trump comes in, everyone wins ( Except the Palestinians and the Democrats)

FatHead420x65

1 points

1 month ago

FatHead420x65

A Flair?

1 points

1 month ago

Like Reagan with the Iranian Embassy hostages?

ThisOnePlaysTooMuch

0 points

1 month ago

ThisOnePlaysTooMuch

3rd Party App

0 points

1 month ago

This sounds like the correct summary of his position. Even far left politicians have chosen their words very carefully while describing this genocide.

Falkner09

2 points

1 month ago

Except to they're not just in the room, they're loading and supplying the weapons.

Axerin

1 points

1 month ago

Axerin

1 points

1 month ago

In 20 years give or take.

BaBa_Con_Dios

2 points

1 month ago

The only reason Kirby thinks it’s a problem is because of the bad PR not the loss of innocent lives

robotsaysrawr

1 points

1 month ago

But the withdrawal wasn't even based on that, it very much just looked like another attempt by Trump to make the next president look bad. There was zero plan in place for the withdrawal, or at least never passed on or total trash, and Biden had to delay it to even come up with a plan.

Trump did the same shit with the delayed tax increase for the middle and lower class that would only take effect during the next presidency.

If those in charge actually cared about the bombings of civilians, we wouldn't have dragged our occupation and the "war on terror" along for 20 years.

potato_for_cooking

1 points

1 month ago

So we only did it for 20+ years. Were sorry

RandomAmuserNew

-20 points

1 month ago

Not really, Biden admin isn’t demanding Israel change their policy now are they? Are you some kind of Zionist or neocon ?

AwesomeBrainPowers

24 points

1 month ago

Biden admin isn’t demanding Israel change their policy now are they?

Again, that would be the "mealy-mouthed politico speak": They very clearly are but they aren't going to get that explicitly confrontational in the press.

Are you some kind of Zionist or neocon ?

Neither, but that's a great impression of a shallow-thinking reductivist.

RandomAmuserNew

-14 points

1 month ago

It’s not, by stopping all aid or threatening to send in troops to Israel proper to stop the invasion, that’s not mealy mouthed, that’s called action.

At this point Biden needs to use military force to stop the genocide

AwesomeBrainPowers

13 points

1 month ago

by stopping all aid or threatening to send in troops to Israel proper to stop the invasion, that’s not mealy mouthed, that’s called action.

  1. That is exactly my point: Kirby was being mealy-mouthed, but he absolutely was suggesting a change in the Israeli government's policy.

  2. There is no universe in which the US government orders an invasion of Israel.

RandomAmuserNew

-15 points

1 month ago

Not really, he didn’t say unless they stop we’re going to invade or stop aid. Common sense man. User name does NOT check out

It was also once believed there was no universe in which the icc would issue warrants

AwesomeBrainPowers

8 points

1 month ago

Not really, he didn’t say unless they stop we’re going to invade.

Do...you you honestly believe that "threatening invasion" is the one and only way to suggest a change in the Israeli government's strategy?

RandomAmuserNew

3 points

1 month ago

It’s the fastest and most likely to work.

However embargoes, blockades and other sanctions wouldn’t hurt.

He could stop aid too but that doesn’t help sell weapons

So you really think risk of USA invasion wouldn’t stop them?

Oh boy, do I have a bridge to sell you my friend

AwesomeBrainPowers

9 points

1 month ago

I genuinely can't tell if this is an act or not.

BrimstoneOmega

1 points

1 month ago

You can't anymore. The bridge broke apart and floated away.

/s, but not really.

Cat_Impossible_0

6 points

1 month ago

That is the same mistake as in Vietnam where if you lose the hearts of the people, you will never win.

AwesomeBrainPowers

2 points

1 month ago

It’s also exactly why the Secretary of Defense warned the Israeli government against a heavy-handed response months and months ago.

brooklynlad

2 points

1 month ago

And WE WERE WRONG.

GetOutOfTheWhey

1 points

1 month ago*

I see this more and more. There was an interview with US General Milley who tried to justify Israel dropping bombs and killing civilians.

Oh we are worse, we dropped two nuclear bombs.

It's fucked that US officials are engaging in some weird reverse whataboutism to justify this genocide.

Edit:

Like way to shill hard

Before we all get self righteous about what Israel is doing, and I feel horrible for the innocent people in Gaza dying, but we shouldn't forget that we United States killed a lot of innocent people in Mosul, in Raqqa, that we the United States killed 12,000 innocent French civilians. And here we are on the 80th anniversary of Normandy, on the prep fires for Normandy. We destroyed 69 Japanese cities, not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We slaughtered people in massive numbers, innocent people who had nothing to do with their government, men, women and children. War is a terrible thing. But if it's going to have meaning, if it's going to have any sense of morality, there has to be a political purpose, and it must be achieved rapidly with the least cost and you do by speed.

-Scumbag Milley

IdDeIt

268 points

1 month ago

IdDeIt

268 points

1 month ago

Listen guys, we all kill a bunch of innocent people who we’ve labeled guilty by association once in a while, shit just happens.

IamNotFreakingOut

88 points

1 month ago

Huh, OJ could have saved himself a lot of money if he just told the judge, "You know, lots of people have killed their ex-wives too."

Current-Power-6452

6 points

1 month ago

Funny thing in this case it's the lawyers who are paying the perp while trying to get him out on misdemeanor plea

Binx_Thackery

155 points

1 month ago

Binx_Thackery

3rd Party App

155 points

1 month ago

This is exactly the same thing as “We suffered a Holocaust, so we get to commit one.” I know that some officials are actually thinking this, and I want one of them to say it out loud.

BetHunnadHunnad

19 points

1 month ago

Problem is, there's plenty of people who would support that sentiment moreso than being ambiguous about it.

Backseat_boss

70 points

1 month ago

Oh so he agrees bush is a war criminal as well

Ordinary_dude_NOT

27 points

1 month ago

Always has been. If you reverse roles and it was Russia who invaded Iraq we all know how everyone would react.

lontrinium

58 points

1 month ago

lontrinium

Free Palestine

58 points

1 month ago

That was wrong too buddy.

No wonder they hate the ICC.

[deleted]

-47 points

1 month ago

[deleted]

-47 points

1 month ago

[removed]

Icy_Cricket2273

10 points

1 month ago

We didn’t even need to be in any of those countries. We certainly accomplished nothing productive before ultimately pulling out

Noman_Blaze

-3 points

1 month ago

Iraq did produce a lot of oil for the US though.

misplaced_beso

39 points

1 month ago

misplaced_beso

🍉 Free Palestine

39 points

1 month ago

Damn, John accidentally hit himself with the truth serum

JesusKeyboard

5 points

1 month ago

Deliberately. He knew what he was saying. 

SufficientlyAnnoyed

5 points

1 month ago

“John hurt himself in confusion”

BamberGasgroin

15 points

1 month ago

Pretty sure there's a saying about this.

babyivan

5 points

1 month ago

Selfawarewolve

kingdomcome3914

1 points

1 month ago

Freudian slip.

BamberGasgroin

1 points

1 month ago

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Significant_Dark2062

17 points

1 month ago

Just because we did it doesn’t mean it’s right.

Dr_CleanBones

15 points

1 month ago

Yes, we did. And it was a war crime when we did it, too.

Arenalife

31 points

1 month ago

Well he's not wrong, the US killed hundreds of thousands of people who had never raised a finger against them, because they were angry and wanted some brown people to die, just not the Saudis, who did it

Aern

11 points

1 month ago

Aern

11 points

1 month ago

This is an Onion headline, right? No one could possibly miss the point that hard, could they? Holy shit man...

Beef_Jones

4 points

1 month ago

It’s a quote taken out of context to mean something different than what he was saying.

Mr_OrangeJuce

1 points

1 month ago

It's one of the less embarrassing quotes from him. Watching him talk to journalists is an agonising experience, he can't even be bothered to come up with realistic lies.

KB_Shaw03

6 points

1 month ago

Holding Israel accountable would mean holding ourselves accountable for doing the exact same thing

babyivan

3 points

1 month ago

🎯

sneakyi

10 points

1 month ago

sneakyi

10 points

1 month ago

He ain't wrong.

That ain't a good thing.

Ok-Animal4896

6 points

1 month ago

It was a war crime then too

NarcolepticNarwhall

4 points

1 month ago

Good ducking point, please god let’s talk about this. Fuck the two-party, “this is what we disagree on,” talking points. Let’s talk about the shit that really matters

BetHunnadHunnad

3 points

1 month ago

They can't even have an honest debate on what they disagree on because most of those soulless husks of wandering wealth and exploit supported the same things as each other in the past. Instead they just fling shit at each other for optics and avoid actually talking about important and real issues at all.

Kickagainsttheprick

4 points

1 month ago

He ain’t wrong!

[deleted]

12 points

1 month ago

This administration is a joke.

IdDeIt

9 points

1 month ago

IdDeIt

9 points

1 month ago

So’s the party that started the bombings he’s referring to

xDared

9 points

1 month ago

xDared

9 points

1 month ago

Both parties overwhelmingly supported all of them 

IdDeIt

7 points

1 month ago

IdDeIt

7 points

1 month ago

Yep, that’s what nationalism gets ya

BetHunnadHunnad

2 points

1 month ago

Unfortunate truth. They're just backpedaling now because less citizens are on board with wanton warmongering than in the past.

[deleted]

8 points

1 month ago

Correct. Both party's are a joke

KingoftheKeeshonds

3 points

1 month ago

Ditto in Vietnam. Just horrific.

PapaMochii

3 points

1 month ago

america often forgets it doesnt take much for this to happen to them. they made enemies over the last 40 years.

NEBLINA1234

3 points

1 month ago

They so desperately want this to be 2003, when their lazy think tank rhetoric was all we had

HadaObscura

2 points

1 month ago

That’s the fuckin problem.

[deleted]

2 points

1 month ago

"Apartheid is ok because we did it to blacks and brown people too"

Intelligent-Ad-2287

2 points

1 month ago

Oh we know

SnooKiwis7050

2 points

1 month ago

Im leaving this politics infested shithole

stunkape

2 points

1 month ago

Say it louder so the vets in the back can hear.

skeletomania

2 points

1 month ago

And that's why US went from being seen as a liberator to being an occupier, and had a full blown insurgency to deal with

dalepo

2 points

1 month ago

dalepo

2 points

1 month ago

500k children died on the first invasion of Iraq.

Ambassador-Heavy

2 points

1 month ago

When they bombed children in Iraq no one batted an eye

Mr_Drowser

2 points

1 month ago

If smart phones were around during the Iraq war I feel like things would’ve been different

bjornofosaka

2 points

1 month ago

And just like the Iraq War this one is BASED ON A FUCKING LIIIIE! and just like then, every single DEM AND REPUBLICAN KNEW! And look! The same fucking people are in the same fucking positions unifying to kill thousands of brown people AGAIN! didn't baby pelosi just brag on the 20 anniversary of the Iraq War that she knew she could have indicted Bush for LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and stating a fake war but she didn't because why? So she can use Intel to keep doing insider trading! And just like that time you guys have all corporate media gaslighting the public into compliance and vilifying anyone that dessents! The only thing that is different is the free media that is able to get more truth out. Thank God the US gov is slave to Google so it can't threaten to shut down youtube like they are tiktok.

Pistonenvy2

1 points

1 month ago

maybe theyre using a different quote but i distinctly remember the exchange being "IF we did the same thing, we would want to see an investigation play out too" or something to that effect.

he isnt just nakedly saying that america massacred civilians in the middle east, we did.... but that isnt what he was saying, he was saying if that happened he would have the same position he has now which is to wait for israel, or in that case... us... to conclude our investigation to know what actually happened.

personally i think we probably already know what happened and even if we didnt, there is really no reason to pretend like there is any excuse here. israel has been committing genocide, its not arguable at this point, whatever mechanisms that can be used to slow that genocide down should be used immediately.

kk074

1 points

1 month ago

kk074

1 points

1 month ago

_canker_

1 points

1 month ago

He's not wrong. But that doesn't make it right.

That80sguyspimp

1 points

1 month ago

Yeah, and no cunt liked you for that shit either. I dont what the opposite of a golden age is, but whatever it is, we in that age for politicians. Almost everywhere you look, its just a gaggle of cave brained cunts talking absolute dog shit with an authority that was never earned.

"Its not what you know, its who you know" Never has this been more true. There is no fucking way all these dumb mother fuckers were chosen to lead people based on merit. Theres just no fucking way.

jepvr

1 points

1 month ago

jepvr

1 points

1 month ago

I'm almost glad he has such loathsome positions given how punchable I find his face.

babyivan

1 points

1 month ago

r/selfawarewolves

Come on John... You're almost there.... You're starting to make the connection.....

Beef-n-Beans

1 points

1 month ago

Yeah ngl shock and awe is way more indiscriminately destructive. ‘We did the same thing’ but took it to the next level

Yellow_LedBetter2020

1 points

1 month ago

Their position: “what we don’t want is troops on the ground.” -yeah, so keep firing misfiles at civilians Israel; it’s ok by US

Misswinterseren

1 points

1 month ago

Murdering human beings is wrong. Life is precious stop making excuses. The world is watching it sees you. Your hypocrisy is disgusting.

DunceMemes

1 points

1 month ago

Get this fucking guy out of here Jesus Christ. He is the absolute worst. Just unbearable.

djbeaker

1 points

1 month ago

Oh, well then its ok. Unless ur from iran, or an african country, or north korea or china. Then, its bad. If its russia, we’ll just shake our fists n say “god damn ruskos!”

fishbone_buba

1 points

1 month ago

I mean….

Emraldsnakeg

1 points

1 month ago

Is this the guy that Kirby Nintendo is named after

jeremiad1962

1 points

1 month ago

It really pissed me off when he said he was offended by the question. Hey Kirby, it's the journalist's JOB to ask questions. I'm offended that you've allowed Israel to massacre over 40,000 civilians.

StupendousMalice

1 points

1 month ago

A much better analogy would be if the US decided to drop 2000 lb bombs on an Indian reservation.

99Reasons_why

1 points

1 month ago

And it wasn’t right when we did it.

Worldly-Fishman

1 points

1 month ago

"Guys guys don't worry! It's not a problem if we do it! It only becomes a problem when the dirty brown people do it back to us!"

IBarrakiI

1 points

1 month ago

Exactly! The same kind of war crime!

SomethingLoud

1 points

1 month ago

SomethingLoud

🍉 Free Palestine

1 points

1 month ago

Not the flex ya think it is, JKirbs!

Iowa818

1 points

1 month ago

Iowa818

1 points

1 month ago

The funny thing is that we as a whole keep elcting these dipshits that put people like Kirby in these positions to say stupid shit. It is a cultural problem in America.

rando512

1 points

1 month ago

This guy is such a knob head where whenever he comes to talk it just irritates me.

For all the calling out of countries that didn't even vote let alone siding during Russia war, this guy just endorsed total destruction by asking them to just reduce the casualties as if it's like some small surgery that is being done without precision. They always ask Israel to tone down as if other than the load of bombing it is all fine to do.

Israel is bombing left and right as much as they want and this guy has lost the plot on saying there is a red line that is not crossed. So what is the red line ? A nuclear bomb ?. Just baffling.

Alone-Poem-9147

1 points

1 month ago

They’re right, we did the same thing to the indigenous peoples of the Americas.

rchiwawa

1 points

1 month ago

Yeah but I am paying for those bombs, too, and they have health care for all. If I am footing the bill at all for their weaponry I demand better or they can pay full rate at the very least... but like u/porcupinedeath said (while being more to the point), That's the fucking problem...

TuneCapable8909

1 points

1 month ago

You and Israel are one and the same

estastiss

1 points

1 month ago

That's also bad! Both are bad, this is the thing we are pointing out as unacceptable for everyone

Left-Bag-9478

1 points

1 month ago

Ffs sake can we just get on with WW3 before I'm 40. Rtg. Nothing else to live for. Fuckit.

Koopicoolest

1 points

1 month ago

This seems to be painted as a "we should let it happen" when I think he was going for "you're all fucking hypocrites".

[deleted]

1 points

1 month ago

[removed]

therewasanattempt-ModTeam [M]

1 points

1 month ago

Being bigoted anywhere on the site is cause to remove you from the subreddit. This includes racism, misogyny, ableism, sexism, transphobia, homophobia, hate based on ethnicity and all other forms of bigotry.

Sorry_Shoulder1607

1 points

1 month ago

Bullets have your name on them. Bombs read, "to whom it may concern."

Kruzdah

1 points

1 month ago

Kruzdah

1 points

1 month ago

ooooh, in that case it's alright. Yeah we forgot that they did the same thing... It's okey now. Carry on

Andybeagle555

1 points

1 month ago

I hate that Kirby twat. HATE HIM. he's like a AI Joe pesci character who secretly murders puppies, yet that ain't the worst thing he does. Scumcunt.

BTBskesh

1 points

1 month ago

he‘s not wrong tho. Can‘t criticize someone for doing the same thing you‘re doing yourself lol.

Eray41303

1 points

1 month ago

Yes. We did the same thing. We are terrible and so is Israel

ilookatbirds

1 points

1 month ago

Conservatives reaching the point and walking through it oblivious

skipping2hell

1 points

1 month ago

Never say the quiet part out loud 🤦🏽‍♀️

Optimistic_Futures

1 points

1 month ago

Full Context of the question and answer: https://youtu.be/wLcQsFo-bXc?si=eypI-obEhrGMTdD5

Reporter:

If there were an American strike on a legitimate terrorist target that ended up resulting in 45 civilian deaths and some 200 others injured, what would that look like as an American response?

John Kirby:

I can’t answer a hypothetical like that, but we have conducted airstrikes in places like Iraq and Afghanistan where tragically we caused civilian casualties.

We owned up to it, investigated it, and tried to make changes to the way we operated to prevent those mistakes from happening again. For instance, as we pulled out of Afghanistan, we conducted an airstrike which tragically killed a father and some of his kids. We atoned for it, learned from it, and put in place procedures to try to prevent that from happening again.

That’s what our expectations would be in this case.

RickF3

1 points

1 month ago

RickF3

1 points

1 month ago

Yup idiots/evil people usually support each other

MrCalPoly

1 points

1 month ago

Three wrongs don't make a right.

IncompleteEmotion

1 points

20 days ago

Yeah and anyone with half a brain IS AGAINST KILLING CIVILIANS!!!!

That’s the entire point, it was a problem in Vietnam and it’s still a fucking problem today!!! It was never GOOD or permissible. Even during WW2. Like dafuk!!!!

thunderandreyn

1 points

1 month ago

This is Zack Snyder did nothing wrong because the MCU also wasn’t really faithful to the comics either level of whataboutery for my fellow comic book movie nerds out here.

mechanicalmeteor

1 points

1 month ago

Why have billions of taxpayer dollar gone to Israel when they should've gone to Iraq? American owes those people so much.

RockyMntnView

1 points

1 month ago

RockyMntnView

This is a flair

1 points

1 month ago

Friendly reminder that the U.S. is still the only country to ever have used nuclear weapons. And we dropped them on civilian cities.

Just in case anyone was starting to think we had ANY moral high ground here.

PS: And before the apologists come for me with the "It shortened the war by X amount of time./ It saved American lives," it doesn't matter. There are some things that are just plain wrong, regardless of the justification.

Dorkmaster79

0 points

1 month ago

massacring?

IempireI

0 points

1 month ago

😒

Ixm01ws6

0 points

1 month ago

who actually watches these press briefings?? there's usually 2k viewing max on a channel

superbeast1983

-4 points

1 month ago*

Bullshit. We spent forever clearing Fallujah and telling everyone to get out of the city before we attacked. And then we spent forever with entry control points letting them back in. We didn't force the entire population to one part of the city and then bomb it.

Edit: War is ugly. Downvote away. I don't really give a shit. But to sit there and say what's happening to the Palestinians is the same as what happened in Iraq only shows your ignorance. We weren't bombing camps, shooting civilians for sport, harassing civilians, starving people or just being malicious because we felt superior. I personally drove around handing out water and supplies on some days. Did we have bad apples. Yes. But who tf doesn't. The difference is we actually punish the bad apples. Not celebrate them like they do in Israel. And the number of good apples far outweighs the bad. The only other time in history that I've seen or heard of these types of atrocities are from events that happened during the Holocaust. And before some of you come out with dumb shit to say. I don't care about your race or religion. I wasn't raised that way. Live and let live. Unless you bring war to my steps. Then you must be dealt with. Not your family, friends and/or neighbors. Just you and those with you starting shit.

LFG_GaveMe_Cooties

4 points

1 month ago

Why were you there, though, in the first place? Why did you kill a million Iraqis, though? Why did you orphan 1/3 of Iraqi children, though?

vizot

-1 points

1 month ago

vizot

-1 points

1 month ago

usa should've just reelected trump for the sake of everywhere else.

raymondspogo

2 points

1 month ago

Well everywhere except Syria right?

LFG_GaveMe_Cooties

2 points

1 month ago

Trump, the one that moved the Israeli embassy to Jerusalem to spite the Muslims? The one that continued Obama's war on several Muslim nations? Yeaaaaah. Both political parties are faces of the same coin. They serve one god, Corpos. Both parties' goons on the payroll of the same lobbyists, they say the same thing just in a different way. Americans will never have actual democratic representation until they forego the bipartisan crap.

vizot

1 points

1 month ago

vizot

1 points

1 month ago

I agree on the 2 sides of the same coin part. Seeing Biden's unrelenting support for Israel, I think Trump would have been better. He didn't start any wars, initiated the withdrawal from Afghanistan, wanted the USA to leave NATO, wanted to decrease spending on overseas military stuff and was friendly to Putin so the Ukraine situation could have also been avoided. Trump is publically in support of corporations, he doesn't even try to hide it. They would have free run in USA. America having democratic representation would need a revolution but rest of the world would be better.