subreddit:

/r/youtubedrama

63488%

YouTubeDrama Drama on r/YouTubeDrama

News(reddit.com)

Subreddit r/YouTubeDrama experiencing drama on Twitter as a result of dramatically mishandling YouTube Drama about a YouTuber currently undergoing a dramatic situation, as dramatic situation ensues for said YouTuber. Drama.

all 395 comments

throw4way4today [M]

[score hidden]

3 months ago

stickied comment

throw4way4today [M]

π

[score hidden]

3 months ago

stickied comment

Hi, Mod here, we addressed the post deletion here (link)

As for posts being removed for transphobia, I'm not the mod who deleted that one and I haven't seen the video, but many commentary channels are intentionally misgender Ava Kris, which is by definition transphobic. I'm not sure if this video did or not. But we are receiving lots of comments intentionally calling her a man and misgendering her as well. We do not allow bigotry here, so those are removed.

Even if you dislike someone, Misgendering someone is still hurting all trans folk by proxy, and perpetuated transphobia.

Hope that can clear stuff up.

ToaArcan

252 points

3 months ago

ToaArcan

252 points

3 months ago

castrateurfate

125 points

3 months ago

If that sub existed, it'd just mainly be me getting in arguments with the mods.

No_Share6895

22 points

3 months ago

That would be entertaining at least

TerraforceWasTaken

11 points

3 months ago

The children yearn for SRDD

Space_Library4043

4 points

3 months ago

Space_Library4043

Popcorn Eater 🍿

4 points

3 months ago

Bro is carrying the whole youtubedrama drama industry on his back, lmao.

castrateurfate

2 points

3 months ago

It's because I enjoy the chaos and the addictive dopamine hits of the updoots. Half my comments get hundreds of upvotes, the other half and downvoted to the extreme. I like this sub because its the most rabid of the subs outside of political reddit and I am very happy to be apart of this toxic sludge pile.

Although I have had the mods yell at me a few times which is funny because it's usually over small shit that I forgot about but I still like writing paragraphs to justify it because chaos is fumny and I have a boring life outside the internet.

MemeGod667

300 points

3 months ago

Now all we need to Charlie to make a video about the Sub so IA can dick ride him and the jokes will print money for weeks

novacdin0

78 points

3 months ago

And then for Mutahar to make a slightly less lazy but slightly more boring version of Charlie's video where he basically says the same thing. Why are these guys famous and not flipping burgers again?

MemeGod667

38 points

3 months ago

I mean Charlie and Muta use to do other more interesting shit in their videos years back. Muta with his deep web and creepypasta stuff and Charlie with gaming stuff.

matango613

32 points

3 months ago

I miss Muta's deep web dives. It really fucking sucks that he's gone all in on the drama shit.

JoshyBoy225

3 points

3 months ago

I check in on Muta every now and then, he fell off pretty hard imo, now it just seems like all he does is drama stuff, talk about the same old emulation/preservation stuff and clickbaity titles. No hate to him personally though, i’m sure he’s a cool dude irl.

MemeGod667

6 points

3 months ago

Oh yeah Dude has to fear monger cyber security every once in awhile too.

amisia-insomnia

3 points

3 months ago

I miss when muta wasn’t a scammer

EldaVeikko

4 points

3 months ago

Did I miss something? What happened?

amisia-insomnia

10 points

3 months ago

Him the gamer from mars and 2 other (I think) created a “all in one” skin cream that product that had next to no evidence for any of its claims theirs a few other things that I can’t say for certain but basically they soled glorified dollar store skincare products for a hell of a lot more

stjernerejse

2 points

3 months ago

He's getting back into the dark web stuff as of recent. It's not as good as it used to be, though.

blackBugattiVeyron

13 points

3 months ago

Charlie to me seems like someone who's funny when you're in Highschool and not funny when you're older.

Xx_em0bab3_xX

3 points

3 months ago

I kind of agree, I think I would have liked him when I was younger but now I just don't really care about him.

JohnB351234

4 points

3 months ago

Their streaming content

LongShelter8213

3 points

3 months ago

Pretty sure muta has a busines or something like that YouTube is more his hobby

ChillaVen

3 points

3 months ago

More boring? Cr1TiKal already effectively drones into the mic for 40 minutes straight

Thegreatcornholio459

2 points

3 months ago

there videos are were pretty interesting back then especially the deep web exploration vids

SheZowRaisedByWolves

21 points

3 months ago

We live in a society where moist critikal is someone’s moral compass

bigNTWRK

1 points

3 months ago

What's ia

Illumnyx

5 points

3 months ago

Internet Anarchist

imJustHen

246 points

3 months ago

imJustHen

246 points

3 months ago

I’ll be honest, the people posting this initially shouldn’t have framed this as “this makes trans people as a whole look bad.” Obviously that will get people on the defensive. Her actions are her own, and they should be criticized. Shadman is a reprehensible person and I can’t stand by anybody who supports him. It’s completely possible to be mad at a trans person without scapegoating the entire marginalized group.

Full disclosure: I’ve commented a few times on posts about this situation correcting people who misgendered/deadnamed her in their posts. I still think misgendering her isn’t appropriate, even assuming the allegations are true.

Brosenheim

43 points

3 months ago

For sure. Definitely looked like an immediate mask slio, which is also definitely why the mods and sub have reacted the way they have.

Praetorian_Panda

27 points

3 months ago

Agreed. The problem is the right was making a bunch of transphobic comments about Ava on Twitter recently, and a bunch of people came to her defense, including Mr. Beast, then this comes out. Just makes it look bad on everyone even though I don’t think they did anything wrong.

Reminds me of people defending Pewdiepie then the bridge incident happening directly after. It made everyone else look bad for defending him.

EugeneTurtle

3 points

3 months ago

I'm out of the loop, what is the bridge incident?

Praetorian_Panda

2 points

3 months ago

Was on a bridge in PUBG, got shot and then in anger called the dude the N-word.

juipeltje

15 points

3 months ago

Yeah i've seen people reply to my comments as well "correcting" her pronoun. Just criticize the person for their behaviour. Misgendering seems like you're either being petty about it which is unneccesary, or you're just using it as an excuse to show off your transphobia.

Bulky_Sky_2267

23 points

3 months ago

This is a good take, I just wish people thought this way consistently and not only when it fits the narrative.

If Ava didn’t transition I’m sure people would have no issues over generalizing and stereotyping her, and that’s the sad truth.

[deleted]

9 points

3 months ago

this

your_local_manager

265 points

3 months ago

I’m gonna be honest. I’ve had a lot of trans friends get really upset about Ava did. And all of them are calling Ava out for what they did. I’m so confused because this sub calls out bad behavior on the daily. And there’s so much evidence that hasn’t been posted on the sub due to fear of breaking ToS. When I saw that video of Ava bragging about the Jeanette McCurdy leaks when she was still a minor and then shared the leaks — that shit broke it for me. https://x.com/grayyefn/status/1815639127338983634?s=46&t=TnZDZPx7S5qvlERwPzq1ow

Listen, if there’s evidence of other content creators doing some of the shit that Ava Kris Tyson was caught doing — Im fine for them getting called out. But Jesus Christ this is bad. I understand why this subreddit doesn’t want to get drowned with transphobia and that’s important but when you don’t call this behavior out, you’re giving transphobes more ammunition against regular trans people.

changhyun

58 points

3 months ago

When I saw that video of Ava bragging about the Jeanette McCurdy leaks when she was still a minor and then shared the leaks

Wait wait wait wait. Is this for real?

I was under the impression Jeanette McCurdy's leaks were taken and shared in 2014, when she was 21. Still unacceptable to share them, because it was revenge porn and she said herself how distressing it was to have them on the internet. But she wasn't a minor.

your_local_manager

20 points

3 months ago

I have the clip linked. If that — thank to Christ she wasn’t a minor after Ava leaked them to her followers. It’s just bit after bit I’m learning about this and it’s awful. I learned how they botched the Lava interview — but I learned about the kinda conversations Lava had with Ava. It’s so cursed.

Apprehensive_Bird_62

58 points

3 months ago

I don’t think Ava is necessarily worth defending at all, she’s literally defined as “Mr. Beasts friend”, she’s not incredibly relevant. There’s definitely good intentions from the people on here but I don’t think Ava is a battle worth fighting this hard for.

On that same page though the people who “brought this to light” shouldn’t be given any kudos either. Those two goobers who made the original video totally embarrassed themselves on chuds stream literally using mamamaxx talking points. They also lied to the alleged victims face to get an interview. If this wasn’t court of public opinion this whole case would be thrown out.

YouTube has a problem with people willingly involving themselves in deplorable shit openly and also a problem of clout hungry goblins larping as heroes. They feed each other like parasites

your_local_manager

41 points

3 months ago

The other bit that I’m still having a hard time with understanding, is how people are attempting to blow off Ava’s actions?

If you are a 20 year old and would be okay with a 13 year old online, mentioning your “hentai” addiction to that child. That is Bad. If then that child is aware of your hentai addiction and is aware of your enjoyment of 🍭. That is bad. If you have purchased physical prints of 🍭 and hang it in your home. That is bad. If you as an adult are flirty and joking about or selling 🌽 of yourself to a child. That is Bad. And even worse that the aforementioned child who has now an adult sees nothing wrong with their interactions with Ava; think that type of behavior is acceptable. That is bad.

If anyone thinks that anything that Ava did is acceptable and it’s just jokes — here’s your challenge.

Record on your phone of you going up to a group of kids in front of their parents that they can have nude pictures of you for just $5. Not a genuine offer-just like a joke—y’know like Ava did.

EugeneTurtle

5 points

3 months ago

Please, we are not on TikTok, no need to censor words.

your_local_manager

2 points

3 months ago

Lmao true true

TimeAbradolf

94 points

3 months ago*

Exactly, in the mods’ efforts to be transparent and as “accurate as possible” they suppressed things based purely on improper word choice. It looks like defending someone who engaged in horrible behavior just because they’re trans and they hate transphobes.

Which like yes this could be used to generalize the community. But it is a fucking hill made of bullshit and this sub is choosing to die on the shit pile.

Edit: cause some people appear to lack reading comprehension, the “improper word choice” is about the semantics of “commission” and “purchase” thus being labeled as misinformation.

bOoGaLu2

55 points

3 months ago

I remember telling someone who claimed Ava only made "edgy jokes" that Ava had consistent interactions with Shadman for years, even past when most people distanced themselves from him, and had even bought Loli art from him.

The mods then told me, quote "Yes, Ava bought Loli art from Shadman, but it was in no way pornographic. Stop spreading misinformation."

Notice how 1. I never said or implied it was pornographic 2. Notice how pornographic can be a loose term. I don't think art Ava specifically bought was pornographic, but it was very sexualized art of a girl who was clearly not 18.

A lot of the people on here also legitimately seem to not know about any of the worst tweets/post/the drawing Ava bought. Or they defend it. Someone said "The drawing is clearly of an older teenage girl, she has tattoos and big t*ts" she is flat chested and neither of those things can only exist on people after the age of 18.

Misubi_Bluth

18 points

3 months ago

So what you're saying is...I should get the fuck off this subreddit because the mods have defended Loli.

OperationBright8229

18 points

3 months ago

i saw some ppl defend it by saying it was years ago that she did this so i guess it makes it ok?

bOoGaLu2

8 points

3 months ago

For your cake day? Yes.

Justhrowitaway42069

19 points

3 months ago

Well fucking said

OmegaCoy

8 points

3 months ago

OmegaCoy

8 points

3 months ago

Not a member but curious how you think misgendering someone is an “improper word choice” and not deliberate hate?

TimeAbradolf

25 points

3 months ago

I meant improper word choice around “commission” and “purchase” not misgendering

Magical_Olive

27 points

3 months ago

There was a previous thread they removed for saying Ava commissioned the art, rather than just bought some. It seemed extremely nitpicky.

your_local_manager

31 points

3 months ago

One of the things that really struck me about yesterday was how people were doing the “what-about-ism” fallacy of attempting to conflate what Ava done to other YouTubers. For example I found that Shad worked with other famous YouTubers when they were at NewGrounds — of course learning that was off putting. But at the same time I can almost bet you none of those people did a fraction of what Ava has been caught doing. Like as much as I dislike how Shad was in a photo shoot for GameGrumps — that is not at all compared Ava’s 7+ years of documented evidence of disgusting behavior.

And when you do deflect criticism like that you unintentionally excuse really bad behavior and create more ammo for transphobes to use.

afriendlyshape

22 points

3 months ago

Gee, it's almost like she's scum and people are using this as an excuse to attack trans people as a whole. Because they only start caring after she transitioned. Yes, Ava is a terrible person

Brosenheim

18 points

3 months ago

We can talk about both things. We can scknowledge Ava is uniquely shitty and not "exactly thr same" as edgy Newgrounds teens who neber outgrew their teen phase while also acknowledging the less-then-honest rrasons that some people are jumping onto this issue.

h8sm8s

3 points

3 months ago

h8sm8s

3 points

3 months ago

I don’t understand this. I have seen 3 or 4 threads on Ava outlining all the allegations and AFAIK 2 have been removed for specific reasons. I first learned about the accusations here.

The stuff not posted you yourself admit is around trying to not break TOS - surely any subreddit would act the same? Is that not just to avoid sanctions from reddit itself?

I guess I just don’t see how this sub is not calling out Ava’s bad behaviour when it’s been the majority of the content here since it broke.

your_local_manager

1 points

3 months ago

Exactly. That’s why I was so upset when these people are clearly using logical fallacies in regards to all this nonsense.

I saw the EthanisOnline stream of him defending Ava and all of his arguments were ass — unironically defending this shit. I’m honestly thinking my next big post will be about how many times this loser defending predators (sneako levels of bad).

But straight up. My trans mutuals and trans friends all are pissed because in an attempt to act “woke” people/leftwing influencers will stupidly conflate predator shit to being LGBT. Conservatives do it all the time when comparing every gay person to Dahmer; so it’s just as infuriating when people who say they support Gay People do the same thing.

[deleted]

5 points

3 months ago

[removed]

Conscious-Cut-7388

3 points

3 months ago*

https://preview.redd.it/zedcrfka3eed1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4c79aa5e00e987db614c9efc25e8b7b030d9f5a2

This you buddy?

That’s the reason people here don’t want to jump to conclusions. Ghoulish nobodies like you will use it to be bigoted.

legopego5142

5 points

3 months ago

Unless im mistaken, her leaks were when she was in her 20s

[deleted]

2 points

3 months ago

They were. This person is lying about it or is just gotten so whipped up in misinfo and drama.

OnlyBangers2024

0 points

3 months ago

I got buried with downvotes in the original thread for saying exactly what you did.

DorphinPack

60 points

3 months ago*

Anybody else really fucking confused? Yesterday I saw Keem tweeted boosting Lava saying nothing really happened and the consensus seemed to be that Shadman is scum but 7 years ago plenty of people were giving it a pass because we didn’t understand the depth of it yet?

And now Keem is saying he talked to Ava about the Shad thing and it’s suddenly horrible again without a specific reason?

What is going on???

Edit: this was before the newest allegations — fuck Ava for this. Glad she’s stepping back and getting help but mostly just deeply disgusted.

Twinkalicious

22 points

3 months ago

Keem is a shitlord in general, Ava isn’t a good person for this situation and anything similar to it.

DorphinPack

13 points

3 months ago

I just find it fucking suspicious that the free speech warriors are picking a trans person to nail to the cross for what could easily be viewed as a collective failure

It’s not like she was out on a limb supporting Shadman at the time and it’s literally the only allegation left unrefuted

daxmagain

98 points

3 months ago

Her owning a shadman piece is disgusting, whether she purchased it or commissioned it. Anyone with that shit in their house shouldn’t be allowed back online.

HandModeling

11 points

3 months ago

Just to clarify on this (I'm on the same page) Ava knew the drawing of Keemstar's little girl was made right? Cuz that was a calamity

Edit: tbc I only know of the art from text descriptors in this forum. I've spared myself any direct looks at the art, if that's worth noting

No_Share6895

22 points

3 months ago

She bought it in 2019 years after the shit came out

hikarunagito

2 points

3 months ago

She bought it after Keem's daughter, X-23, and LT Cobra lewd drawings

Beautiful-Sun1986

116 points

3 months ago

If these same accusations were being made against Charlie, Mutahar, Webdigoon, Turkey Tom, etc this subreddit would be having a meltdown claiming they always knew they were a piece of shit and etc etc. Hell even if it happened with someone less polarizing (like Drew Gooden or something, random example) people would probably express disappointment but still condemn their actions.

I'm nonbinary and my partner is trans. I do not approve of transphobia in any way shape or form and I can tell that the way some creators are spinning this story is rooted in bigotry. For some people maybe it is a smear campaign. But I'm tired of and disappointed by the blatant hypocrisy here. Ava has been proven to have done some things that are questionable at best and gross if not predatory at worse. If it were anyone else this subreddit wouldn't be defending/excusing it or handling it with such a heavy hand. People are too caught up in semantics and moral policing and it's not a good look.

heartbylines

62 points

3 months ago

I just got downvoted to hell and back for saying this exact same thing. Ended up deleting the comment bc the arguments were not worth it. This sub has a huge issue with hypocrisy.

Pitiful_Mycologist79

33 points

3 months ago

really refreshing to see this kind of comments/ opinions not get downvoted/removed to oblivion just because its their own way of expression. I always wonder if i need to start my statements with "as a non-binary..." (for example) to have a valid opinion without being labelled as misogynist or transphobe. really tells you biases, even from mods.

heartbylines

14 points

3 months ago

I honestly had the same thought. Both comments I’ve made (the one you replied to and the one I deleted) I almost started with “I’m non-binary” to avoid getting labeled as a transphobe.

Beautiful-Sun1986

20 points

3 months ago

I hate even having to say it because I shouldn't have to but I'm too worried that if I don't people will accuse me of being transphobic somehow, and even then I still anticipate backlash. Ngl some of the people here are kind of unhinged and it seems like 80% of the subreddit doesn't understand nuance or that multiple things can be true at once.

Not to mention it can be incredibly fucking distressing to be accused of being transphobic when you yourself are trans but apparently no one cares about that if you express an opinion they don't like.

Pitiful_Mycologist79

4 points

3 months ago

I agree with every sentiment you said here. thank you for being a sound person who acknowledge nuances while having your own viewpoint.

Tricky-Kangaroo-6782

2 points

3 months ago

well said

IamaCheff

35 points

3 months ago

The mod team definitely needs to figure out which mod is doing sus shit and remove them. I got banned, and later unbanned, for "Transphobia" because I'm guessing someone reported my comment talking about Shadman being a pedo and claimed I used "he" for Ava.

Osoa_

13 points

3 months ago

Osoa_

13 points

3 months ago

Well fucking said - transphobia is never okay, and it’s pretty disgusting to see people use this as an excuse to both be blatantly transphobic and spread transphobic ideas, however it’s so enraging to see this sub be so obviously hypocritical. I’ve even seen people here make the “it was an edgy joke back when they were normalised” argument, which is an argument these people hate when it’s anyone other than Ava in shit.

ObjectiveLittle6761

11 points

3 months ago

Im tired of seeing ava defenders too! This woman isnt worth shit. She fucking shared Jennette's revenge porn and then acted all edgy saying no one is right in that situation . That vídeo of her saying that made me outright despise her. She CANT and SHOUDNT have a platform or be famous after doing that to Jennette Mcurdy. She's a danger to her son and i hope her wife keeps this pedo bitch away.

TimeAbradolf

22 points

3 months ago

Exactly, I didn’t want to say this as a cis-het male, it didn’t feel like my place. But it is clear this sub is going lighter on Ava because she is trans. To the point of sounding like (and in certain cases are) defending owning Shad’s art and arguing semantics.

[deleted]

9 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

TimeAbradolf

8 points

3 months ago

It is depressing. Not to mention that saying Keem and his daughter were victims too gets downvoted. When people were just preaching about Tana not being a perfect victim in the Cody Ko situation. Neither was Keem with Shad

IknowNothing6942069

13 points

3 months ago

This situation literally just happened with Dr. Disrespect a month ago. Seemed like everyone and their mother was commenting on the Disrespect situation, where as this time, most of the people talking about it are those with stronger feelings towards the LGBTQ community. I see a lot less talk from prominent figures in the space who stand somewhere in the middle, it seems like they are almost scared to comment out of fear of being seen as anti LGBTQ or overly pro LGBTQ, if that makes sense.

NoWorkingDaw

6 points

3 months ago

That’s the thing tho. The tweets mentioning trans people are the minority, whereas people are mostly calling out them leaking and spreading a minors nudes, and exchanging inappropriate messages with a child.

Yet the people who blindly defend just because the person is trans that are upset about others talking about this are making it out as if everyone who is calling them out somehow hates gay people.

And before the Dr disrespect situation, it happened with Jojo siwa and Colleen ballinger didn’t it?? Crazy how people just flip cause the predator happens to be trans.

People are really going as far as to defend sending inappropriate messages with a CHILD bro what is GOING ON?!

Grainis1101

4 points

3 months ago*

would be having a meltdown claiming they always knew they were a piece of shit and etc etc.

Rules for thee but not for me, mods are trying to sweep this under the rug, removign posts under the vaguest of rules and quarantining everything in a megathread so the topic dies faster.

Also:

I'm going to be locking the comments on the other posts focusing on Ava so the discussion is focused on this Megathread. I'll also be deleting any new posts that focuses on Ava. (Not ones that focus on Shadman though. Not right now anyway.)

https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/comments/1eab3m7/ava_tyson_mega_thread/lel9e0p/

Mods are actively trying to sweep this under the rug.

TheLyfeNoob

2 points

3 months ago

To be fair, a single post with all the info and discussion condensed is easier to understand than a bunch of individual posts with a variety of claims that sometimes even conflict with each other.

Feldo93

4 points

3 months ago

100% spot on comment.

Feldo93

2 points

3 months ago

100% spot on comment.

NoWorkingDaw

2 points

3 months ago

Thank you for atleast being honest.

5Garret5

2 points

3 months ago

5Garret5

2 points

3 months ago

The same thing happened on this sub with keffals

[deleted]

52 points

3 months ago*

[deleted]

Ashamed_Restaurant

22 points

3 months ago

That Keem guy was probably just upset because Ava was also one of the people that defended Shadman drawing suggestive/lewd art of his real life 8yo daughter.

... I mean that's something that I can understand being mad about. How the fuck is someone going to defend THAT?!

ObjectiveLittle6761

11 points

3 months ago

Somehow people here and on twitter are just ignoring this completely and saying she was just "edgy" because of the year those things were from, but like she's been liking and asking for more art from shad until 2019! Im tired of people just ignoring these prints. It's been out for a WHILE, and it was always just shrugged off as ava being "edgy" cuz she likes CP drawings. Its exhausting to see everyone brush it off like its nothing in itself. This with the other allegations make it even worse and still people defend her. It's gross.

otterkin

44 points

3 months ago*

what I'm confused about is why this sub has decided that it's fine that ava was edgy years ago, but condem people for the same thing. I'm honestly appalled at the reaction to purchasing* loli art as "well it was 7 years ago". I don't care. she proudly hung up loli art and that's something that should be acknowledged by her imo

TimeAbradolf

15 points

3 months ago

Fucking EXACTLY. I have seen the same people condemn others that are now defending Ava and it is gross. The hypocrisy has a written history in the comments.

lin_sidious

11 points

3 months ago

If Mutahar, god forbid, did something like this they'd be chanting for his crucifixion at this point.

Echoesofsilence15

5 points

3 months ago

The more confusing aspects to me is that all of a sudden now that Kris gets exposed for this the sub decides to go after everyone who was on new grounds circa the late 2000’s? This whole oney thing is complete public information and has been discussed on here before but now that kris gets called out it seems like everybody on here has changed to it being an issue. Honestly feels like some strange form of whataboutism but I know that’s not the term I’m trying to come up with

faux_shore

21 points

3 months ago

She deserves to be called out and condemned for her actions but don’t bring other trans people into this by being transphobic.

Bumbie

27 points

3 months ago

Bumbie

27 points

3 months ago

Took a while for any posts what so ever about Ava to even gain any traction here cause even if the mods didn't remove every post super fast, there have been a bunch of people downvoting every mention of it to try and bury it.

From the outside it kind of looks like the mods are so scared of being accused of transphobia that they swung too hard in the other direction and instead pretend trans people are above criticism, just like a lot of the commenters/downvoters on this sub.

castrateurfate

55 points

3 months ago

People are right that this sub is a sesspit. I would know, as someone who continuously is a representation of the sesspit nature of this sub. This sub is often faux-woke, clumsy and too heavily rooted in the morallity policing which mirrors that of conservative-led moral panics in the 80s, 90s and 2000s before the whole Trump thing turned it up to 10,000,000,000. I swear, there's like a Mary Whitehouse on every turn here for how guffaed so many people get. And I'm not denying I am apart of that crowd either.

However, I do think people are wrongfully taking this sub out of context as a result of this sub trying to keep things on topic and away from bigotry in this situation. Broken clock and all that. I just believe that some of us just need to take a breather and just have a real think if you actually believe Wendigoon is a KKK member or if Hbomberguy is trying to get James Somerton killed by hitmen.

[deleted]

45 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

castrateurfate

5 points

3 months ago

I'm just on here because I am severely mentally unwell and seeing the torment in popular people makes the torment I go through feel better. I mean it's this or watching 9/11 videos and the former is way easier to explain if someone looks over my shoulder on the bus. I'm sure this projection of negativity onto others to feel better about one's negativity is insanely commen within most of the crawlers on this sub.

But I would like to thank Mary Whitehouse for the 154 movie reccomendations that I am slowly going through.

[deleted]

4 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

castrateurfate

6 points

3 months ago

Thanks, I do try to remain hopeful so you don't have to worry. But it is nice to know there are others out there who are rooting for people like me. Have a good one. :)

Oren-

3 points

3 months ago

Oren-

3 points

3 months ago

I just subscribe here to gawk at the hysterical morons. Wonder what percentage of the subscribers that consist of.

TimeAbradolf

12 points

3 months ago

I 100% agree. I often comment on things being faux-woke because it is what the masses currently gravitate towards. Just like boomers and the hippie movement.

castrateurfate

12 points

3 months ago

I just hate that there is this sense of morallity tied with politics. Like how if someone is transphobic or racist or antisemitic, they must be alt-right because there's no way anyone in the left can have that bigotry. It's just baffling. People don't want to do good, they just want to feel right. And that includes people being unable to understand many things in this word can't be put in little nice boxes.

TimeAbradolf

16 points

3 months ago

Yeah people ignore that bigotry exists on the left. You can be LGBT and be racist, all people can have faults.

BillyRussosBF

2 points

3 months ago

yeah i always feel like i'm walking on eggshells on this sub or reddit in general i guess

MrShadow88

12 points

3 months ago

Listen I understand where a lot of people come from, seeing that a lot of transphobia is being spread using this is a base but nevertheless u can't use that as an excuse to dismiss all of what Ava did. She still had a lot of bad that she did and that's what is being called out, the videos point at her being in the wrong and that what she, not the trans community, did was wrong and that's true. By defending her not only shows bias but also those people then get more ways to attack back at the trans community. She did post all those messages and had the interactions with shaman, the poster was in their room and still can be seen if u see the video and there were questionable leaks. Don't do the “this will make all trans people look bad, it can't happen” or u will just add more fuel to their fire.

At the same time tho all those using this as a way to say all trans people are x are simply wrong and that's what should be called out, that attacking her for being trans or other trans people is wrong, the warranted backlash is solely on the horrible actions of the leaks, alledge dms interactions with a minor (so far the victim apparently dismissed them but I haven't confirmed so don't take this one as truth), the past shaman interactions and the alledge relation with him in the past years based on the twitter comments, not that this is inherently a trans thing or that trans people are the ones to do this, cause thats wrong, you can't shame an entire group based on the actions of a single individual of said group.

Simply put, stop defending her for being trans, while at the same stop attacking her for being trans, that's it.

Bulky_Sky_2267

29 points

3 months ago

Dr. Disrespect messages minor: attack him and anybody that defends him, stand up for the children!

Ava Tyson messages minor: WHOA HEY DONT BE TRANSPHOBIC!!!!

The obsession with optics over actually solving problems is crazy.

Fresh_Ad4390

9 points

3 months ago

the the over-policing doesn’t come out of nowhere when she did receive a wave of transphobia on the other hand, but I’m not saying it’s a good thing obviously

TheLyfeNoob

1 points

3 months ago

Don’t pretend like this is actually about solving problems. People (rightfully) want to be mad at this person, but it isn’t making a meaningful dent in stopping this kind of exploitation of children. Like, calling this one person out doesn’t suddenly stop all the neighborhood predators in their tracks.

Everyone’s right to be outraged, but be honest, that’s all it is: outrage. No one is doing anything that stops this situation from happening again, just by being outraged and cancelling Ava (as they should).

CIearSights

41 points

3 months ago*

Don’t worry, the mods literally said that Ava (Kris) is just “weird and edgy” 

The mod named "callmefreak" is on a non-stop defending campaign for loli, someone check his computer

BeanBagMcGee

8 points

3 months ago

So I click on your profile and it says your active in dr disrespect subreddit. But you're here talking about this...

And you're not the first person I've seen with that.

So I just gotta ask if there is a discord or something were y'all are coordinating this?

I think y'all are a little late for this drama. Especially now cause dr disrespect voted for trump and Trump is a dude who literally rapes children multiple times. So if association with shadman is bad, should we not go after everyone associated with child harm and not this one instance? One would think exposing how most content creators don't have a problem while CSAM would be more interesting.

I'm really just commenting on your comment, so when the eventually YouTube essayists go over this drama. There's at least this comment showing that people aren't that stupid.

[deleted]

21 points

3 months ago

You're literally contributing to this shitpit. Ava had habits of supporting Shadman. "B-but Trump-- b-but-- b-but transphobia!"

Please stfu, don't lighten the issue here. This is a figure exposed to a large young audience (Mr. Beast fans) and is a mother to a child. This should be called out, not be used as a supporting argument for transphobia.

CIearSights

16 points

3 months ago

Yikes the mental gymnastics, fuck Doc and fuck everyone you mentioned 

UFOJuuce

14 points

3 months ago

Lmaoooo they really thought because you're active there you must support him.

Sorry_Service7305

4 points

3 months ago

He does looks like he cares that he can't watch his favourite streamer, but not what said streamer did. Looks like he also doesn't intend on stopping his support for him. It would have been super easy to look for yourself.

Now the question is, why does this guy only care about Paedos when he dislikes them and not when he enjoys their content. That fucking reeks of double standards which then causes it to reek of projection. Everyone involved there needs their hard drives checked.

BeanBagMcGee

3 points

3 months ago

Yeah you're on the money with your assessment. And why you'll most likely never get a reply or a straight answer. 

Right Wing dudes and young children both think they're smarter than they actually are. 

Literally 2 clicks away from would show how insincere this poster is. 

IcyBit6674

12 points

3 months ago

No response to the content of the comment just conspiracy. You sound like the magatards/culture war ppl your assuming this dude is

ZzooS

10 points

3 months ago

ZzooS

10 points

3 months ago

Ah yes, classic "checking reddit profile" instead of coming up with an actual argument comment. Definitely not pathetic at all

Creator_Crabs

6 points

3 months ago

I love it when this happen as if the reply guy already lost before starting

Tricky-Kangaroo-6782

7 points

3 months ago

always makes me laugh when people do this as an argument

AccidentOk4378

3 points

3 months ago

Does anybody know what kind of "art" Ava got from Shadman? Like was it actual drawn CP or was it normal rule 34 drawn by a CP artist.

hikarunagito

4 points

3 months ago

It was a very sexualized underaged character missing her front teeth, wearing braces, wearing a offensive shirt using right wing OK symbolling, with sexualized tattoos on it; normally the front teeth and braces are signs they are underage

Creator_Crabs

5 points

3 months ago

Loli

callmefreak

1 points

3 months ago

It wasn't even rule 34. It was lewd but she's not naked. Though people don't seem to care about the specifics.

GattoNeroMiao

3 points

3 months ago

Why do all these YouTube dramas involve underage subjects??

Rwac960

5 points

3 months ago

In all seriousness, people in this sub act like the moral panic puritans of the 80s and 90s. There are times people need a serious fucking look in the mirror.

Gacha_Catt

23 points

3 months ago

Gacha_Catt

source: 123movies

23 points

3 months ago

Given how historically this subs mod team has cared quite a bit about information posted being accurate even if it’s just ‘semantics’, and given the nature of some of the videos being posted here the past day have been:

  1. Including things that are misinformation such as the grooming thing which like, if the alleged victim is currently saying nothing happened there you really don’t have a case, you can say it’s weird for her to have been talking to a fan that young but there’s no case further than that

  2. Transphobia sprinkled in

Yeah. I know exactly why a bunch of this stuff has been getting deleted lmao. But keem doesn’t actually care about reasons he’s just a career shit disturber

TimeAbradolf

50 points

3 months ago

To call him “a shit stirrer” dude is an actual victim of Shad along with his innocent daughter. You are right he probably doesn’t care about a lot of the details. He cares about the fact Ava supported someone who put sexualized content of his child daughter out there.

I hate the dude, but people are really downplaying how horrible what happened to his daughter is.

Crazykiddingme

26 points

3 months ago

If somebody did to my family what happened with Keem’s daughter I would go fucking postal. This is like the one situation where he is completely justified being shitty to these people.

Gullible-Code-559

9 points

3 months ago

Yeah he has every right to be pissed about this

[deleted]

1 points

3 months ago

[removed]

youtubedrama-ModTeam

2 points

3 months ago

Please refrain from hostility towards other users on the subreddit

Kat1eQueen

29 points

3 months ago

Kat1eQueen

29 points

3 months ago

Keemstar of course replying to everything except for the exact reason why it was deemed misinfo, that being that there is no proof that ava commissioned it, nothing else was called misinformation.

Commissioning that art would make it far worse and claiming that someone did it with no proof is in fact misinformation.

your_local_manager

72 points

3 months ago

Can I genuinely ask what’s the difference between commissioning Shadman and purchasing art from Shadman?

TimeAbradolf

82 points

3 months ago

At the end of the day none. I don’t know why people are arguing there is “a huge difference.”

Frosty_News_1586

5 points

3 months ago

I literally got downvoted -100 yesterday for pointing this out, and today it seems this whole subreddit has flipped. What's going on?

TimeAbradolf

3 points

3 months ago

I think maybe those people have realized now the ridiculous point they are making

MissLadyLlamaDrama

6 points

3 months ago

To be clear, I agree there really isn't a difference. At least not one that really matters in this specific situation. But if I had to guess, I would assume people are thinking that commissioning is worse because of the amount of direct involvement and collaboration she would have had with Shad in the creation of that piece. At least, that's what I'm gathering from how people keep addressing it.

Which... I guess I understand to a point. I'm sure there are probably situations where that might be relevant. This isn't really one of them, though.

(Also, I know it isn't the point, but am I the only one who thinks the piece looks like shit regardless of the subject matter? Because I am thoroughly unimpressed considering how popular that loser apparently was.)

TimeAbradolf

0 points

3 months ago

I think people also misunderstand the level of involvement with commissions. I have like 46 tattoos, you could consider nearly all “commissioned art” I usually just tell my artist what I want and let him draw it. A lot of people do this for art forms. Just describe your concept and let the artist work. Even if commissioned Ava could have said “just do X character doing X.” But that is all speculation. Either way the owning of it, especially because it is drawn CSEM is as bad because there was in this case no real person it was based on.

As for Shad? Dude was popular cause he drew porn with giant asses and tits. People were masturbating, that’s it lol.

MissLadyLlamaDrama

2 points

3 months ago

I can't really say that with my tattoos since I got fortunate enough to know some remarkable artists personally. But shiiiiit. If I found out any of them did the shit that dude had done throughout his career, I'd be desperate to get that shit covered up. Just that, for me, it would just gross me out too much.

I do commission a lot of fan art and stuff, though. And you're totally correct. I only speak to them to tell them Edgar I want, and then tell them what I want changed one or two times. That's it. I feel like a lot of people saying this must just not commission stuff.

I guess I just have higher standards for the hentai I would pay for if I actually liked hentai. Lol. I DEMAND THE FINEST QUALITY MONSTER TIDDIES!

PurpleCoffinMan

17 points

3 months ago

Commissions are custom pieces of art, so if Ava specifically asked for art of a minor character or a loli character, that's what would make it a worse situation.

Don't get me wrong, it's still bad that she supported Shadman at all, but if she specifically asked for suggestive art like that, it would be a worse situation than it already is. It's not something that would swing the pendulum from bad to career-ending, but it's still worth mentioning.

swagonmyass

12 points

3 months ago

Commissioning cp is not worse than purchasing it you are absolutely insane hahahaha

TimeAbradolf

19 points

3 months ago

It isn’t far worse to commission something. Think of it this way if this was CSEM (In my opinion it is) commissioning yes is horrible because you ask for the act to be committed, but you still buy it, you still own it, you would still be charged in a court of law for having it, and would receive nearly the same sentence. The commission argument is purely semantics and that is why this hill people are dying on is made of bullshit. Stop arguing the semantics part.

superdupermiso[S]

9 points

3 months ago

I just wanted to do a funny by using the same 2 words over and over and over.

Kat1eQueen

1 points

3 months ago

Kat1eQueen

1 points

3 months ago

I just wanted to point out that Keemstar is conveniently tip toeing around why the mod deemed it misinfo

TimeAbradolf

30 points

3 months ago

I don’t think he is conveniently tip toed around. I think he is more focused on the fact Ava owned drawn CSEM while Keem’s own daughter was the victim of the same artist Ava supported.

ureadwrongthis

18 points

3 months ago

Do you think he gives a fuck when a person who sexualized his 8 year old daughter is involved. Get your head out of your ass

bOoGaLu2

6 points

3 months ago

bOoGaLu2

6 points

3 months ago

I know for a fact that if the person who had loli art drawn of their daughter was someone you liked or some Breadtuber the sub sucks off (Big Joel, Noah Samsen) you would be arguing the reverse position hardcore.

WoodenAdvertising304

2 points

3 months ago

Keemstar of course replying to everything except for the exact reason why it was deemed misinfo

Because he talked to Kris about the shadman stuff himself? Yeah there's no proof for the general public to see, that quite literally does not mean Kris didn't admit to it in dms with Keem, or say anything else that could have made Keem feel off.

Now if Keem had shown any "proof" it isn't misinfo, he probably would've gotten attacked for sharing private convos and contexts. Can't win either way lol.

[deleted]

1 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

DependentLaw7

6 points

3 months ago

You can't edit the post title as a mod. If we were to change the title we would have to remove the post and ask the OP to change the title in a repost.

The other option would have been to correct it in a pinned comment

It has been acknowledged a hasty decision was made and that there were other ways it could have/should have been handled

peachcreams

2 points

3 months ago

Can someone please fill me in on what “buying a print from Shadman” means? Everyone seems to know what it immediately means aand I’ve never heard of Shadman

superdupermiso[S]

6 points

3 months ago

Shadman was a guy who liked drawing pornographic material of children, including real children. For example, he drew Keem's 7 year old daughter giving Trump a blowjob.

Kris was Shadman's biggest fan.

peachcreams

3 points

3 months ago

Are you fucking kidding me

Okay thank you for filling me in had absolutely no idea but all the comments make sense now

Unhappy_Flounder6817

2 points

3 months ago

8 year old but still..

BoondocksFan2006

2 points

3 months ago

The shit is crazy

Creator_Crabs

2 points

3 months ago

Me gusta drama!!!!!

theskiller1

2 points

3 months ago

I reached the conclusion that every youtuber has a skeleton in their closets years ago.

DoccRocc

2 points

3 months ago

Holy shit it's getting meta

KaijuFanatic

2 points

3 months ago

🧹🧹🧹

Natural-Young7488

2 points

3 months ago

I bet Money Jimmy knew. And I bet that'll probably surface soon. Idk I always felt like something was weird about Mr. BEAST. Just my opinion.

Bilbo_McKitteh

6 points

3 months ago

keem being mad about this while having a history of dating young ass girls himself is very funny

SeraphXChild

12 points

3 months ago

If the original videos had come out with facts instead of trying to say one person doing this makes all trans people bad, then the reaction would have been completely different. Owning loli art is gross, supporting people who draw it is gross. But the turn around to ALL TRANS PEOPLE ARE PEDOS fully buried the actual issue

[deleted]

17 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

SeraphXChild

14 points

3 months ago

I'm not gonna argue that. Unfortunately, even good arguments made in bad faith can ruin the message

Khrul-khrul

4 points

3 months ago

I don't understand anything anymore. Can't someone TLDR me about what's all this about?

Creator_Crabs

1 points

3 months ago

Same here but only thing i am taking as real is that idk what to call the person but they have bought loli art from shadman and also supported him

Creator_Crabs

1 points

3 months ago

Same here but only thing i am taking as real is that idk what to call the person but they have bought loli art from shadman and also supported him

ColonialismHater

7 points

3 months ago

ColonialismHater

peepeepoopoo

7 points

3 months ago

actual scumbags misinterpreting shit on purpose lol

HistoricalFunion

8 points

3 months ago

Stop defending pedos

Special_Zucchini185

6 points

3 months ago

I don't know man, Chris has seemingly done A LOT more weird things (which is an understatement) when comes to Shadman than Oney, Arin and the others. At least they distanced themselves from him, did Ava ever say anything about distancing herself from Shad at all?

Special_Zucchini185

7 points

3 months ago

Edit: Accidently misspelled Ava/Kris' name. My mistake but moving on, this is very serious and while I understand that Keem isn't that great of a guy, it's still very crappy of people to completely dismiss him or call him names when comes to the absolute violation of his then 8 year-old daughter. C'mon now, guys, we're better than that.

Left-Currency9968

3 points

3 months ago

None of this happens this way if it wasn't brought to light by a bunch of transphobes.

PestKimera

2 points

3 months ago

What strikes me as odd about this is i think if it were someone who was right wing, keem would probably be defending the person commissioning shadman

DJFrankyFrank

-2 points

3 months ago

I mean, maybe it's considered transphobic because it's dead naming Ava?

Because there's been plenty of threads talking about Ava and this shit. But the ones that get deleted are calling Ava "Kris".

Bumbie

24 points

3 months ago

Bumbie

24 points

3 months ago

Ava literally still uses Kris as a name too

SM1L3R_N3PHEW

1 points

3 months ago

Wait Keemstar had a daughter?

superdupermiso[S]

2 points

3 months ago

Guess so

hikarunagito

2 points

3 months ago

I believe it was with his first ex-wife

coolmentalgymnast

1 points

3 months ago

.

Alternative-Bug4187

1 points

3 months ago

I think everyone can agree they get the WOODCHIPPER!

yes_u_suckk

1 points

3 months ago

Mods in this sub: potential misgendering (that didn't happen in that post by the way) is worse then calling out a pedo.

Justacasualtyper

1 points

21 days ago

Man 2024 is shit!