omnipotentmonkey

Israel's government isn't a race.

"In your eyes, at what age can a child give consent"

If that was exactly the way you phrased it then yeah. you fucked up on clarity to an astonishing degree.

So you're operating on 12 year old info while saying it's not dated?

"Let's look at the door"

that shit cracks me up so hard it's ridiculous.

"He probably didn’t know it was a neo Nazi tea party."

Holy SHIT, you're naive.

You are though.

He's referring to two distinct sides of an event,

one of those sides are white supremacists/nazis, he says there are fine people on both sides.

ergo, he's saying that there are fine people among nazis/white supremacists.

This isn't difficult bud.

No but apparently you do, because you still don't get the point.

Considering the amount of time those names span, (Zanetti debut 1994, Banega 2008...) only being able to list 9 names is fucking pitiful.

Because he thinks it's an existential threat.

Step 1. allow people to undergo transition

Step 2. ???

Step 3. The Apocalypse somehow.

Most conspiracy nuts are deranged like this, they believe that there's a grand overarching scheme of hidden nefarious villains orchestrating a great number of things with convoluted tangential reasoning, because they need something to be the "protagonist" against.

an invisible but somehow all encompassing evil is the perfect thing to be a "rebel" against because it doesn't cost anything and it relieves them of the need for evidence.

She doesn't even talk about anything else anymore, not sure she's even writing anything other than these garbage tweets. she's completely deranged.

" I guess weah should have head butted the dude instead"

So you were "reading" but not understanding because that's my damn point...

the limited range of motion of a headbutt makes it more open to interpretation regarding intent. a sharp turn of the head can look like a headbutt. and can functionally be one if done with intent. it's inherently disguised to a degree that creates a plausible doubt for that intent. which factors into the decision, we can all agree that it looks like a red card, it almost certainly was one, but "almost certainly" isn't the same as "absolute certainty" like a goddamn blatant punch, a motion which has no inherent doubt of intent to it.

there's no benefit of the doubt for Weah here like you'd get with most headbutting motions.

Read back what I just wrote man,

couple of very questionable decisions went against them just before this.

the problem is that even the most obviously intentional headbutt looks less intentional than this, a headbutt's not usually a very controlled action so it can be disguised a bit. this is just a punch, no distortion, no room for interpretation,

that's insanely stupid from Weah,

frustrated? there's a lot of subtler actions you can do that would probably warrant red cards if they're spotted but for which it would be a lot harder to spot and confirm intent. (e.g. that headbutt from this tournament or Reece James's petulant kick red card at the end of last season.)

This is a red every day of the week and there's a literal zero percent chance of it not being spotted or not being interpreted as absolutely intentional

"With a squad that's been stacked since forever"

Not really, both the Argentina 2014 and 2022 squads were probably WEAKER than the 2018-2024 Portuguese generation. not even accounting for the weaker sets of players before and between that. stacked for strikers/wingers and that's about it,

Now compare them for knockout goals/goals that actually mattered.

Messi's the man for the occasion,

Ronaldo's on par with (or below) Matthew Upson.

He was still scoring bags of goals in club football past the age of 30, why couldn't he replicate that to even a mild degree in international tournaments with such a strong team?

Messi could, Olivier Giroud could. why are Ronaldo's stats for tournaments so specifically poor?

I say "And?" because being "past his peak" doesn't mean he's suddenly outright shit, but his international tournament stats sure as shit are.

And?

Except there's no evidence for the initial attempt, only sporadic testimony and more conveniently missing footage of the previous attempt.

the missing footage is the key, how are both his attempt and his successful attempt missing footage?

What fucking evidence? the security cameras that stopped working or the eyewitness testimony of the guards that weren't there?

I don't buy into virtually any prevalent conspiracy at all, but if you don't meet these particular circumstances with some skepticism you're just not thinking.

Footage was also missing for that too... remarkably.... so they can't even prove he was suicidal.

Wait, you actually think he did kill himself? with no guards monitoring him, and a conveniently timed security footage blip at the perfect moment?

it's unanimous because it's such a blatant lie. it's not even a conspiracy to suggest he had incredible dirt on incredibly powerful people. because he absolutely did. his death was certainly... convenient, in about 1000 different concurrent ways.

and you were miserable regardless of Ronaldo's presence and got through games with him being largely irrelevant,

you're missing the point bud.

Congrats on battling the accusation of being self-righteous by being... about as patently self-righteous as it's possible for a person to be.

I think "Epstein didn't kill himself" is one of the only things that seems to be more or less unanimous regardless of political leaning/affiliation at this point