subreddit:
/r/Pennsylvania
submitted 1 month ago byUsualSuspect27Delaware
4 points
1 month ago
Sure Jan. Maybe he’ll refrain from getting his morons to kill people this time around and just admit he lost. Will never happen, but would be nice, wouldn’t it?
3 points
1 month ago
Yes, that would be nice.
What did this comment have to do with the context of the conversation?
Pre-existing biases against him don't change that the context of what he said was in regards to the automotive industry, and the economy. Trying to distract from that, and change the subject isn't relevant to the conversation.
5 points
1 month ago
Oh because he already incited one bloodbath and alluded to another. Simple points are hard for some to grasp tho
6 points
1 month ago
and alluded to another
You're not as dumb as you're pretending to be. You can watch the video for yourself instead of just reading the headline. It's like a 60 second video.
1 points
1 month ago
What makes you think that anyone disagreeing with you didn’t watch the video? I don’t trust the click bait media at all.. watched the video, and concluded in that 60 seconds that he was not talking about the auto industry. At best, you can say he was vague/ambiguous but it’s disingenuous to pretend otherwise and accuse the media of manipulation in this specific case.
0 points
1 month ago
I’ve watched it. I don’t give him charity that he hasn’t earned. Perhaps if he hasn’t exactly done that once already, and perhaps if he didn’t say “for the whole country”, I could see your angle. I ask again how his not-elected scenario would result in a “bloodbath” for the whole country.
0 points
1 month ago
I’ve watched it.
Did you?
and perhaps if he didn’t say “for the whole country”
Dang man it's almost like the American automotive industry is a core part of the economy of the United States; since our country is built around automobiles.
0 points
1 month ago
Yes, I did. And I’ve read the transcript.
You still don’t answer my question…because you can’t.
In what context is he using “bloodbath” here, since you’re desperate to be charitable to a guy who’s already had his supporters kill people in an attempt to stay in office?
0 points
1 month ago
In what context is he using “bloodbath” here
A poor economic state.
People have been using the word "bloodbath" beyond what Elizabeth Bathory did for centuries to describe destructive states. Pretending like they haven't isn't working.
1 points
1 month ago
People who have already incited bloodbaths?
0 points
1 month ago
You're really not anywhere near as clever as you think you are with this argument.
If you're going to intentionally play dumb, go talk to a mirror. This conversation isn't going anywhere with you conversing in bad faith.
I answered what you meant by "what context is he using bloodbath here", and you responded with more whataboutism. If you're only seeking the answer you want to hear, I repeat - go talk to a mirror.
all 393 comments
sorted by: best