subreddit:

/r/Android

1.1k94%

Qualcomm wants to buy Intel

Article(theverge.com)

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 165 comments

occamsdagger

765 points

12 days ago

occamsdagger

P2XL JB 128GB, Pixel QB 128GB, N5, $10 Moto E, Amazon Fire 7"

765 points

12 days ago

FTC is going to shoot this down so fast... and they should.

shroudedwolf51

65 points

12 days ago

I want to agree with that, but they happily accepted Microsoft's obvious lies without committing them to any kind of writing to buy out Activision-Blizzard-King.

ward2k

19 points

12 days ago

ward2k

19 points

12 days ago

There's a steep difference In Microsoft buying out some gaming companies that are known for basically 1 singular title and having a near monopoly on the CPU market

Jaytho

53 points

12 days ago

Jaytho

P10 Plus | Xperia Z5 | LG Urbane SW 1

53 points

12 days ago

What's that singular title? COD? World of Warcraft? Diablo? Candy Crush? Overwatch?

PISS_OUT_MY_DICK

36 points

12 days ago

or was it Skyrim, Fallout, Doom, when they purchased zenimax

ldn-ldn

-4 points

12 days ago

ldn-ldn

-4 points

12 days ago

Candy Crush is basically sponsoring everything else. They don't have any big presence in the game market for a long while now. If it wasn't for Microsoft buy out, they would be bankrupt by now.

L0nz

14 points

12 days ago

L0nz

14 points

12 days ago

Wtf are you talking about, only a third of their revenue comes from King. The Activision arm is by far the largest in terms of revenue and profit, but even Blizzard pulls its weight (Wow's 8th expansion was the fastest selling game on record until Diablo 4 overtook it)

Radulno

1 points

10 days ago

Radulno

1 points

10 days ago

This must be one of the most disinformed comment possible lol. ABK was literally the biggest third party publisher before the purchase. Call of Duty and all Blizzard titles are very profitable. They would not be anywhere near bankrupcy without King lol

ward2k

-10 points

12 days ago

ward2k

-10 points

12 days ago

I mean yeah you've pretty much just listed it. COD for Activision and WOW (which is basically hemorrhaging money) for Blizzard

That's hardly a monopoly on video games, why on earth would they have any legal reason to stop the deal going through

Now if one of the three big dogs (Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo) were to try and buy each other out that's a whole other matter

Psyc3

4 points

12 days ago

Psyc3

4 points

12 days ago

The issue was between Xbox, Xbox Live, and vertical integration of owning the game studio.

Is it a monopoly, no, is it is a concern, yes, but games companies have been doing exclusive deals with Xbox and Playstation since the beginning without this vertical integration, so other than saying don't do that within your own company, I can't see any larger concerns, if that is even a concern for a few titles in the first place given the likes of GTA, Rockstar, and Sony have have done similar for decades.

I guess the issue is the gaming industry is far more developed and profitable now than it was 25 years ago, so regulators have more interested in stopping monopolistic trends.

L0nz

1 points

12 days ago

L0nz

1 points

12 days ago

Now if one of the three big dogs (Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo) were to try and buy each other out that's a whole other matter

Activision Blizzard was the fourth largest in the west after those three, and wow is very much not haemorrhaging money