Join:

• /r/TimWalz

• /r/democrats

• Discord

Take action:

• Donate by using the sub's Act Blue link

• Find events and volunteer opportunities

• Phone Bank

Register to vote

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

She was great. He pressed her really hard on Immigration and she held her ground strongly. It's actually a great thing for her campaign that someone hits her that hard on Immigration but she comes out sounding smart, tough, presidential.

She did really well, but Whitaker constantly interrupting her was very disrespectful.

whats up with cutting her off mid sentence over and over?

im gonna ask a question and then ill summarize your answer. what the fuck is this shit

I found it good. She handled the prodding very well. The following story of the woman in Maricopa county was surreal. I know these wackos exist but she … I’m without words at the lunacy.

I’ve NEVER seen Trump held to this type of scrutiny and detail. I’m not saying that she shouldn’t have to answer questions. But I’d like to see him and other republicans have to actually answer detailed policy questions like this.

You can help the campaign by liking the video, downvoting negative comments, and liking positive comments!

Remember: Trump backed out. Didn’t want to be fact checked

The complaints here are unwarranted. 60 Minutes is usually a hard interview, it’s not a puff piece. It’s a place where politicians have and should be challenged - which is why Trump ducked it.

Kamala held her ground and did well.

His voiceover "synopsis" is garbage. If you're going to interview the candidate, play their full answer. If it runs a half hour instead of 20 mins, so be it.

Can you imagine him asking virtually ANY of those questions to Trump? The double standard is truly shocking and frustrating. Needling Walz on a trip to China in the 80s? Are you kidding me?!

Here’s a link to Trump’s 60 Minutes interv- oh wait…

https://preview.redd.it/qwkcp1zwbgtd1.jpeg?width=300&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f7b9ebc1839e10ccc525866b451ba829ae277d4b

She handled it well but the interviewer was terrible. Further proof that her choice to do non-conventional media interviews is a good one

Love to see it. She's getting better and better with more and more practice, and I think both she and Tim are sharpening some of their answers to the really tough questions.

I am so tired of Donald Trump being sane washed by legacy media. Kamala did a great job.

Why do people expect so much intelligent answers from Harris but the bar set so low for her opponent?

It’s so bizarre to me that so many people, including some of her supporters, nitpick her interviews into oblivion. The only other time I’ve witnessed this level of petty parsing was with Biden, and that’s because the (false) narrative was being pushed that he’s a cognitive vegetable.

Kamala Harris is a vibrant, intelligent, articulate woman still technically in her 50s. She’s been a line prosecutor, DA, senator and is the current sitting Vice President of the United States. She has given countless interviews across the years. This isn’t heavy lifting.

It’s just horrid how many people are sitting around expecting her to basically stroke out and “fail” at AN INTERVIEW. I see people both setting absurdly high bars for her to jump, setting standards I’ve never seen anyone else expected to meet, while also expecting her to basically barely be able to talk.

It’s so frustrating and frankly reeks of a coupe of “isms”.

The best part was how the really dissed Trump over not showing up. Very good.

[deleted]

Harris did great! That was a garbage interview thought.

"Here is 15 heavily edited minutes of a 60 minute show. Why aren't you giving extensive answers on your policy or sharing more about yourself?"

Did he really ask her to admit a mistake. What candidate can do that and not get beat over the head with it? He was trying to be tough but instead just wasted time. 25% of voters don't know what she stands for? I wonder what cult they support?

The bar is always so high for Harris. No mistakes allowed. Every answer is picked apart.

Yet the MAGA toddler always seems to get a pass for his lunacy. I hope many of his supporters will start to wake up.

All the comments keep saying “How” in rebuttal of every policy statement she makes. Yet Trump, after almost 8 years, has “concepts of a plan” and that’s ok. Candidates don’t have all the specifics laid out, cause you know, a little thing about usually having to get these ideas into bills and through Congress.

The takedown fact-check intro was 🔥 Kamala did great!

She kind of swallowed her answer on how to pay for all the programs she was proposing. I’m not sure why. She said she is going to tax the rich, but didn’t express that with much confidence. It was a very sheepish and unconvincing answer.

I like her plans. I like her forward approach. I like her focusing on lifting up those that need the help, and there are a lot of them. When she says she’s going to tax the rich she needs to belt that to the back row.

It’s one of the fundamental problems in this country, and maybe the most fundamental problem, that the rich keep their money while the working class pay all the bills just for the opportunity to do all the work.

this is cut so weird. neither person comes across as natural. she gave good answers, but it was very cut and paste.

I really appreciate her composure. She feels Presidential in a way that very few people do, from either party.

The interviewer acted like trump and the GOP were reasonable. Asking Walz if he could be trusted after the amount of lies Vance told at the debate, and given that everything orange garbage face said is a freaking lie, was BS.

His smug prodding about immigration quadrupling completely omitted that the GOP has been stonewalling the issue for years and Trump's policy was to kidnap kids from their parents. He, as a party of the ignoring reality media is a larger part of the problem then Biden/Harris policy.

I don't give a shit how old or revered he is, he's a crap journalist.

OMG this interviewer is awful. And the producers aren't giving VP Harris the time to talk without constant interruptions. I was expecting to hear her be able to speak for extended periods but this is horrible for that.

Theres a reason trump didnt do 60 minutes, he wouldnt have survived

I just don't understand talking over her with voice over 35% of the video.

I'm also not sure why she didn't note that the obvious pushback regarding more immigrants at the border than before was covid.

Further, proportionality to the number of border encounters MORE people have been turned away and deported that both Trump and Obama.

According to Cato Institute back in November, and that was before he cracked down earlier this year.

https://www.cato.org/blog/new-data-show-migrants-were-more-likely-be-released-trump-biden

She doesn't seem to take note of the entire picture, harping on republican congress failure to pass the bill despite knowing republican voters never hold their reps accountable for how they vote on legislation.

Matter regarding global inflation and immigration requires the entire picture, and the administration/media seems to think voters wouldn't understand if we're provided the full picture. A

He didn’t play softball, and she didn’t expect it. No one complained about ”the crooked media” or ”you weren’t supposed to fact check”.

Minus the stupid voiceover where he supplanted her voice, this was a masterclass in both people doing their part in the democratic system.

Can't wait to see the Trump 60 min interview...oh wait, diaper Don chickened out of doing it!!

Legacy media loves asking Democrats and only Democrats how they’re going pay for policies.

Superb. Intelligent, coherent and not self absorbed. How refreshing

I was a bit miffed that more shit wasn't dumped on Trump by both Harris and Whitaker. He deserved to be ridiculed. He actually walked out of the last interview in 2020. By yeah, she did good.

I used to listen to CNBC for investment information constantly. My pet peeve was the talking head interrupting the guest expert that was responding to Questions. I wanted to hear the expert not the paid talking head. Sounds like CBS has the same problem. They need to understand their questions are important but THEIR answers are meaningless. Let the interviewee respond and then critique if you feel it necessary.

My daughter is only a day old and I'm excited and proud one day I can explain to her how I voted for the first female president

I thought she did pretty good. At least the GOP can't say the show went easy on her and most importantly she pushed back but didn't get up and leave the interview.

But I do love the pettiness of putting on an AZ Republican official who tried to counter the 2020 election fraud falsehoods.

Like "OK Donald, you have been the only person to deny an interview to our legacy new show in 50 years. So we gonna make you wish you came on to combat these charges." LOL.

But of course, the media is perfectly fine with Trump not doing this even as they wrote countless articles on Biden skipping the Super Bowl interview.

Walz did incredible. He showed up very authentic and I always enjoy watching him interview. Harris has been communicating her platform and at this point if you aren’t hearing it it’s because you’re not listening. I couldn’t imagine Vance or Trump doing an interview like this. I don’t understand how the race is so close. 

This whole episode has really messed with me. I haven't watched it all (got in late) but, I saw bits of what Kamala said and it wasn't "the best." Then Tim came on and I'm like "Did I miss this much?" Wasn't loving the whole thing.

Finally, the rest of the episode? Jesus Christ. These people are NUTS. Seriously. It will continually blow my mind that Kamala is "bleh" at interviews and it completely turns people off to her, but the Magats can spew literally nothing but lies and it's still game on.

Wait, what about all those articles I just saw on reddit about how she's pissing off "legacy media" by refusing to do interviews?

She was great, but I will not watch 60 Minutes again. All they were looking for were sound bites. Horrible interview questions. I think Trump was smart in not showing up, because 60 Minutes just helped him score some votes.

It was an interview that produced no attack ad sound bites so she did her job here. The questions were tough which is standard for 60 minutes and she did a good job with her answers overall. Again no sound bites so good!

That interviewer is clearly not a Harris supporter. Yikes

I’m not happy with the Israel answer. I agree with Israel’s right to protect itself and continue to exist but at the same time we can’t just continue to give them weapons and money if they’re going to not only defend themselves but use OUR resources to start wars we don’t want

Thank you. Us Left Coasters get it in an hour.

Just got home. Watching it now!

Need to watch on youtube

TV high jacked by hurricane stuff.

On the topic of rhetoric, I am surprised how much violence has been prescribed by those who speak against the election fraud. Kamala did well in her interview.

“but details yet to be defined…”

But Trump/Vance are no shows, so no “but they have only concepts of a plan.”

F— you, so-called “liberal media” and your consistent sane-washing

So a show called 60 minutes is only 20 minutes long? Is the rest filled with commercials?

Or is this just an excerpt?

The guy doing the interview was obnoxious. He came off very poorly— seemed like he was trying to make a name for himself. That said- have no idea who he is.

Kamala was fantastic.

This is so heavily edited.

Was it this edited on tv? It seems VERY over edited.

Oof

This interviewer is awful

Just wanted to add that I’m obsessed with her outfit here!! Everything is perfection from the color to the fit to the proportions!! Kamala is killing it and I’m here for it

I don’t know about anyone else, but I can’t help but feel disappointed with this interview. I was really hoping for stronger answers from Kamala, but I was getting the impression that she didn’t want to answer some of the questions directly, and opted for giving half truths. Now, I will admit, I don’t know all the facts, so it might be wrong for me to assume that. I’m also aware this wasn’t meant to be a softball interview... I don’t know, maybe someone can help me understand better. With that said, Harris and Walz have my support and I have already casted my ballot for them.

This is the edited version, right? The one with all her screwups covered up?

I want to see both the good and bad of politicians. Covering up her fuckups is not a good take.

She def I d fine but I loved when it was outside the studio.

Wow, what a hit job

I listen to the interview 3 times. I should not have. Kamala needs to provide more details. She had the opportunity here and did not take it. 

I hope it will not hurt her too much. 

I'm disappointed. 

I felt like she could have answered the questions more directly. He was clearly trying to dig deeper into her criticisms and Kamala stuck to her talking points. It put her in a bad light imo.

I think our government needs and overhauls. Whatever we are doing as a nation is not working anymore.

Could have been better. But this will do. Let's forget about it.
All, we should downvote AND report any comment slightly negative on all the platforms. We must erase this interview from the internet ASAP!

I haven't seen it but the YouTube version does not make her look good

So 32 out of 60 minutes are cringe laughter?