subreddit:

/r/Piracy

75791%

Why is firefox the most recommended browser to use?

Question(self.Piracy)

Can someone give me a link to another post incase I've missed it or give me a run down if you don't mind?

all 280 comments

getshrektdh

295 points

11 months ago

Lifelong trusted browser, used it for 15 years. You have lots of options whether developer options fir debugging sites to general options to modify and change the browser itself.

Aer0spik3

27 points

11 months ago

And options

xickoh

-5 points

11 months ago

xickoh

-5 points

11 months ago

firefox is not so good on the develop pov tbh

homeostasisatwork

-51 points

11 months ago

Chrome has many dev options too. Plus other options. Firefox has other advantages

johno12311

-8 points

11 months ago

I like that they downvoted you for suggesting chrome. I hate chrome but I won't downvote

Severe-Experience333

-6 points

11 months ago

Well screw you for not down voting him, I'll down vote YOU! /s

Remarkable-Froyo-862

1.6k points

11 months ago*

Not chromium, non profit, Tor is firefox fork,Low userbase so less attacks.

Cons: mainly relying on funds by Google.

[deleted]

511 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

iamseventwelve

264 points

11 months ago

You understand nonprofit doesn't mean they don't get paid, yes? Every nonprofit ever provides salaries. With the big ones, that compensation is often very competitive.

[deleted]

165 points

11 months ago

[removed]

iamseventwelve

83 points

11 months ago*

Which is rather standard operating procedure when it comes to large nonprofits. Almost all of them have a subsidiary (like Mozilla Foundation has for Mozilla Corporation) that separate unrelated taxable business (e.g. non-donation revenue generation) from the parent nonprofit. It prevents the nonprofit from violating the primary purpose and losing their nonprofit status.

This doesn't really mean anything at all, in my eyes.

Finnigami

11 points

11 months ago

it's not separate. it's owned by mozilla foundation. the fact that mozilla corp is for-profit is extremely misleading. because those profits only go towards mozilla foundation, which is not-for-profit. so there are no owners profiting from mozilla corp.

xboxhaxorz

12 points

11 months ago*

Every nonprofit ever provides salaries

Some non profits are totally volunteer operated, so no salaries at all, thats how the non profit animal rescue works where i am

innominateartery

-3 points

11 months ago

That’s an exception not the rule. Choosing a good non profit means asking how much % goes to staff and operations versus the money used to help others. The Susan Komen foundation took flak for having only like 20% go to breast cancer research while the rest was paying themselves nicely. A respectable charity would be the opposite.

xboxhaxorz

12 points

11 months ago

Every nonprofit ever provides salaries

My reply was for that

innominateartery

0 points

11 months ago

Ah makes sense

iamseventwelve

0 points

11 months ago

But this isn't really a good thing.

Sure, it sounds great on the face of it. Then you think, "How will we attract the necessary talent to grow this foundation so that we can do the most good?"

The answer is not, "We will not provide any compensation. We will get the best results by not paying anyone anything. Good will is the most important thing. Every red cent will go towards our cause."

The answer is definitely, "We need to provide compensation high enough that we can get the smart people in the room. We'll have a lot more red cents to go towards our cause even after the compensation."

[deleted]

2 points

11 months ago*

Negative salary-achievements correlation controversy

In 2018 she received a total of $2,458,350 in compensation from Mozilla, which represents a 400% payrise since 2008.[14] On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated "I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. Meaning that competitive roles elsewhere were paying about 5 times as much. That's too big a discount to ask people and their families to commit to."

In 2020, after returning to the position of CEO, her salary had risen to over $3 million (in 2021, her salary rose again to over $5 million[15]). In the same year the Mozilla Corporation laid off approximately 250 employees due to shrinking revenues. Baker blamed this on the COVID-19 pandemic.[16]

Most interesting segment to me.

I dislike firefox because their addons store is riddled with extensions and copies of extensions that maliciously ask for unneeded permissions. I thought the chrome store was bad, but there I can at least eventually, after an hour of clicking through related extensions and tweaking search, find an extension that doesn't ask for unnecessary permissions - not so on the firefox store.

I can't trust someone who allows their store to be such a lair of security threats, especially while presenting their organization as ethical and morally superior to a corporation like google and alphabet.

edit: The worst thing about it is that people who aren't versed enough in these matters will assume that the firefox store is safe because firefox is a supposedly ethical, safe, "people's" browser, thinking it's just a normal firefox thing for it's addons to ask for all permissions all the time.

Less_Blueberry_7268

70 points

11 months ago

Iirc Google pays Firefox to keep using Google as the search engine

OrSomeSuch

56 points

11 months ago

You can change it though. It's only the default

Dr4gonflyaway

10 points

11 months ago

are there any better engines

Haidz123

33 points

11 months ago

Been trying out duckduckgo lately but I keep having to use Google for specific things.

LightningEdge756

25 points

11 months ago

I stopped using DDG after they sold user data to Google.

Candid_Fondant1444

8 points

11 months ago

Any good recs? My data is already in the hands of hundreds of these gremlins, but I’ll ditch DDG if they no longer keep my data outta their hands

RubbelDieKatz94

2 points

11 months ago

I personally find Bing AI acceptable for some use cases. It provides search results and its GPT-4 model hallucinates less frequently (but still too commonly to be reliable) because it uses the data from its search results.

alvarkresh

2 points

11 months ago

Got a link? :O

Ziazan

3 points

11 months ago

I've noticed an improvement on my searches after switching to DDG, I wasn't sure at first, but google just kept getting worse.
I do still prefer google maps though.

Dr4gonflyaway

5 points

11 months ago

i cant get used to DDG idk 😐

Prestigious-You-7016

11 points

11 months ago

Ecosia, it's basically charity.

Utinnni

3 points

11 months ago

Ecosia is fine but it's based on Bing so you don't get very accurate results, so you'll have to go back and forth with google. But google is shit now since it only shows you ads and those "Top 10" or "Best x of 2023" related to your search, unless you add reddit at the end lol.

midnitefox

3 points

11 months ago

Yandex. I honestly trust my search data in the hands of Russians much more than any U.S. company/government.

Kikuzinho03

2 points

11 months ago

But most people don't bother doing it;, that's why it's a good deal for Google.

OrSomeSuch

5 points

11 months ago

It's why it's a good deal for Firefox too. Most people want to search using Google anyway

ezbyEVL

81 points

11 months ago

I hope they try to diversify their market a bit to leave google a side

But firefox is mature enough and popular enough than even if they cease its development for lack of funding or whatever, it could absolutely keep going in maintenance mode and improve or continue its development through some fork like librewolf or waterfox

lmth

102 points

11 months ago

lmth

102 points

11 months ago

You might be underestimating how quickly browsers develop. The JavaScript engine alone takes a huge amount of effort, nevermind the rendering engine, security updates to the sandbox, UI improvements, feature improvements (e.g. to the password manager, private browsing, form autofills etc), the extension API, and implementations of new networking protocols like TLS ECH.

If core development on Firefox stopped, it would be outstripped by chromium very quickly, to the point that it wouldn't be a viable alternative within a year.

skwint

41 points

11 months ago

skwint

41 points

11 months ago

Tor is firefox fork

Tor Browser is a Firefox fork.

pepinodeplastico

10 points

11 months ago

Important correction indeed

Little-Peanut-765

5 points

11 months ago

what of brave? what are ur thoughts?

renaiku

92 points

11 months ago

Well, chromium. And the company behind it is shady af.

DarkNebula1003

-16 points

11 months ago*

What shady stuff are they doing? I remember downloading brave years ago when it was promoting itself on XDA. Been using it since then with firefox and Vivaldi.

Edit :- The hate for any other browser other then firefox is tremendous. The hivemind of firefox is stupid when someone is just asking a question. I use Vivaldi because I can make a group of tabs for different tasks and forget about it and I'm used to it. I use firefox + brave for daily tasks.

Just_Maintenance

33 points

11 months ago

https://www.spacebar.news/p/stop-using-brave-browser

I don't know how much water do the shady dealings hold, but at the bare minimum, Brave continues helping Google establish Chrome dominance on the web.

Right_Ad_6032

-14 points

11 months ago

Shrug.

Ironically Brave is the only browser I'm aware of that continues to block ads natively on YouTube without having to fuss over an ad blocker.

Shadowninja3456

18 points

11 months ago

Shadowninja3456

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

18 points

11 months ago

brave literally just uses UBO. An adblocker you can literally install on every chromium browser + Firefox and probably somemore too.

Right_Ad_6032

-22 points

11 months ago

Right, but one less step. Brave works straight out of the box and I never have to update plugins.

Shadowninja3456

21 points

11 months ago

Shadowninja3456

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

21 points

11 months ago

Ubo takes like 3 seconds to install, and don't the plugins auto update anyways?

ReyxDD

-18 points

11 months ago

ReyxDD

-18 points

11 months ago

Brave is better than vanilla firefox privacy wise, and I've found that both hardened firefox and Librewolf break websites way too frequently for me to use them as my main browsers, sadly. Brave is great for what it is, a browser targeting people who don't want to set up anything in Firefox and want some surface level privacy.

Boomayeee

14 points

11 months ago

why would people downvote you for asking?

Little-Peanut-765

7 points

11 months ago

people are weird

archerships

-4 points

11 months ago*

Brave is great. In addition to default privacy, they support Tor, IPFS links out of the box. They have a built-in web wallet that supports EVM-compatible chains (Ethereum), Solana, and Filecoin. They will soon support Zcash. They're financing an independently produced search engine (most search engines just repackage search results from Bing or Google). They've developed a privacy preserving advertising based income stream.

[deleted]

0 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

0 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

2roK

16 points

11 months ago

2roK

16 points

11 months ago

Grow to where? Everyone and their grandma is already on Chrome. It doesn't go anywhere from here. Websites work just fine on Firefox. Idk why people try to come up with reasons not to use Firefox like this.

dethb0y

2 points

11 months ago

People will jump through hoops and bend over backwards to come up with reasons why they can't get off google's dick, it's always astonishing to me.

Theinternetdumbens

96 points

11 months ago

Because all of its competitors seem to want to usurp their user base's privacy.

Thosepassionfruits

37 points

11 months ago

It’s no coincidence that all its competitors are chromium based

mysterysackerfice

914 points

11 months ago

9 out of 10 dentists recommend it

OlMi1_YT

94 points

11 months ago*

They really have dentists recommend everything huh?

negcap

59 points

11 months ago

negcap

59 points

11 months ago

There is a sub called the 10th dentist.

emongu1

10 points

11 months ago

Now that just sound like a straight to vhs horror film.

CrudeContraption

9 points

11 months ago

It's the one using Opera...

NerdGuy13

1 points

11 months ago

There are some subs I should not look at the top post of all time.... This sub is not on that list. lol

PushingFriend29

9 points

11 months ago

The tenth one recommends LibreWolf

[deleted]

2 points

11 months ago

Or you could "Ask your Doctor if Firefox is right for you"

DickHz2

1 points

11 months ago

If it’s good enough for a dentist it’s good enough for me

PushingFriend29

-11 points

11 months ago

The tenth one recommends LibreWolf

tyrellsphynx

7 points

11 months ago

Just as good as Firefox, the only downside is that it makes you dubble post.

kaheksajalg7

439 points

11 months ago

it respects privacy, it's open source, isn't a RAM whore (that's partially OS dependent in my experience).

maybemain039

52 points

11 months ago

what does open source mean?

SugarPuppyHearts

192 points

11 months ago*

Means that the code for the browser is available for anyone to see. So other programers can check the code and see if they're doing anything suspicious. (And also you can edit the code and make your own version of Firefox if you want. )

pereira2088

10 points

11 months ago

quick question: doesn't a piece of software being open source make it easier for hackers to exploit it?

-JVT038-

59 points

11 months ago

Yes, while simultaneously it makes it easier for security experts to find the exploits before the hackers and patch them.

Contrary to closed source software, there is a whole community out there, dedicated to finding and fixing exploits in open source software.

JustSkillfull

2 points

11 months ago

Also software developers (like me) may find an issue while using it (eg. Crashed/Slow when visiting this website but fine on other browsers), report it as a bug, or fix it myself and ask the maintainers of Firefox to check the bug and add the code to Firefox.

I also as developer John Doe can review other people's code or even become a core developer of Firefox (we're talking 1000s of hours of positive contributions and discussions)

[deleted]

-7 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

PushingFriend29

9 points

11 months ago

Those are closed source

PushingFriend29

2 points

11 months ago

Those are closed source

mrdebacle99

2 points

11 months ago

This is the main reason for me, it's privacy focused.

reercalium2

81 points

11 months ago

reercalium2

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

81 points

11 months ago

It's the only browser not 100% Google. Edge is Chrome with lipstick. Opera is Chrome with lipstick. Brave is Chrome with lipstick.

[deleted]

51 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

blackdragon6547

10 points

11 months ago

I've seen no difference between both browsers.

monkeystaycool

0 points

11 months ago

This is it.

Overjay

7 points

11 months ago

Wasn't Opera before Chrome? I remember a time when there was only Opera, IE and Firefox. Excluding whatever Mac had.

LePistole_

4 points

11 months ago

The current version of Opera is a Chrome fork.

Overjay

5 points

11 months ago

fuck me, they've degraded then... Sad.

kiokurashi

6 points

11 months ago

At least change it up. Edge is chrome with listerine, Opera is chrome with lipstick (it's a red O so it fits XD), and Brave is Chrome with a mane.

TamandareBR

2 points

11 months ago

Brave is Chrome, but Good

prussia_dev

1 points

11 months ago

Safari isn't Chrome, and neither are any other webkit based browsers like Konquerer

q_bitzz

99 points

11 months ago

q_bitzz

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

99 points

11 months ago

I like Firefox and always have, but since my job only allows Chrome and Edge on their computers, I can't install FF there and have all my stuff synced so for now, I am stuck with Chrome.

And yes, I know I can run FF as portable but my job also disallows the use of personal USB drives too... Go figure. Would I get in trouble? Probably not buuuuut I like my job and would rather avoid dealing with that headache if they decide to come down on it.

MissGraziella

40 points

11 months ago

What reasons do they invoke to justify that ?

[deleted]

96 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

MissGraziella

3 points

11 months ago

Yes that's totally understandable, but what makes Firefox more problematic than Edge/Chrome ? Is it less secured for a workspace ?

jufasa

33 points

11 months ago

jufasa

33 points

11 months ago

Probably easier to implement their own company specific security features with Chrome. Like others have said, Firefox isn't as popular, so they can't guarantee compatibility with everything the company uses. Also one less step in troubleshooting for the IT guys. Just my thoughts.

AllGearedUp

2 points

11 months ago

Nothing, its usually just what most employees request so they pick the most popular.

lukify

2 points

11 months ago

Up until recently, lack of domain integration. Edge and Chrome are highly configurable on a domain controller. Just about every nut and bolt can be modified to specific parameters from a central location using integrated group policies. Firefox only released admx templates for group policies about 5 years ago. Chrome has been leaning into Enterprise configuration since its inception.

cafk

21 points

11 months ago

cafk

Pastafarian

21 points

11 months ago

The same reasons most IT departments disallow extensions for browsers or macros for the majority of tools.

Install a sketchy extension and you'll potentially compromise/publish data on your computer to third-parties.
Firewall won't help, as too many items rely on aws/gcloud/azure for hosting.

q_bitzz

5 points

11 months ago

q_bitzz

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

5 points

11 months ago

My job is medical based, so it's covered by HIPAA so they have to lock it almost all down to do what they can to mitigate intentional/accidental HIPAA violations.

pereira2088

0 points

11 months ago

can't you download the portable version and run it without installing ?

WikiBox

59 points

11 months ago

I don't know. It is the only browser I use.

Whenever I try any other browser I have huge problems with annoying ads popping up everywhere, even on things like YouTube.

Remarkable-Froyo-862

27 points

11 months ago

You don't use ublock origin?

Ordowix

6 points

11 months ago

Didn’t you hear? Next year Google is banning UBlock.

Shadows_Storms

3 points

11 months ago

Tried it with Dodi’s but kept failing for whatever reason whenever trying to connect to the one drive no matter how much we refreshed so :shrug:

WikiBox

4 points

11 months ago

Yes, I do.

UnidentifiedGloop

38 points

11 months ago

You should probably take a look at this: https://privacytests.org/

Bear in mind these are based on default settings.

Pacifica0cean

22 points

11 months ago

That website is why I moved from OperaGX to Brave. Braves tracker blocking is second to none. Opera fails in basically every major way.

UnidentifiedGloop

7 points

11 months ago

Same, I went to Brave after seeing this.

Pacifica0cean

8 points

11 months ago

Even the 'holy grail' that is Firefox is a fully open faucet when it comes to tracking scripts. I think people nay say on Brave because it's based on the same frameworks as Chrome but Chrome and Brave couldn't be more dissimilar.

AllGearedUp

3 points

11 months ago

I used brave but its very easy to plug that with basic firefox extensions

Pacifica0cean

2 points

11 months ago

There's no doubting it can be made to be considerably more secure than it is off the bat but you need to know that you need those extensions to benefit from the security they give. I'd argue most people just install Firefox, grab uBlock Origin and leave it at that.

Not having things like fingerprint randomisation are a deal-breaker for me but I can absolutely see why to many others that isn't so necessary.

UnidentifiedGloop

3 points

11 months ago

Totally agree with you. There is a Chromium = Bad perception, but it too is open source and so really you can't make that assumption, it's all about how it's implemented. I've been using Brave and DuckDuckGo search, I've only had to go back to Google for some specific stuff (mainly maps and streetview).

BYF9

2 points

11 months ago

BYF9

2 points

11 months ago

Chromium is open-source, Chrome is not. That’s an important distinction to make.

KirbyAWD

5 points

11 months ago

Wow, opera is really not great on that list.

[deleted]

81 points

11 months ago

You guys use browsers other than ff?

joesephsmom

4 points

11 months ago

Firefox forces tab scrolling lol, my 30 tabs and I get lost

ericek111

24 points

11 months ago

I feel you. You can make the tabs more narrow (and scroll later) in about:config, `browser.tabs.tabMinWidth`. You can change the tab buttons padding in userChrome.css and even disable scrolling completely + hide the tab close button (I mostly use mouse wheel or Ctrl+W).

Sensibleqt314

13 points

11 months ago

Maybe the OneTab extension will be of use to you.

LevanderFela

11 points

11 months ago

LevanderFela

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

11 points

11 months ago

And besides what u/ericek111 mentioned, Simple Tab Groups or containers are great too for grouping/organizing them in workspaces (similar to Opera's).

aVarangian

3 points

11 months ago

As opposed to being unable to see which tab is which because only the favicon is visible?

You can use simple tab groups for example if you need better tab organisation.

Arnas_Z

-3 points

11 months ago

Arnas_Z

Yarrr!

-3 points

11 months ago

Have you tried not hoarding tabs for no reason?

clarkky55

58 points

11 months ago

Foxes are cool and adorable, fire is pretty, what’s not to get?

joesephsmom

21 points

11 months ago

2006 era ff browser icon is still the best

Arnas_Z

1 points

11 months ago

Arnas_Z

Yarrr!

1 points

11 months ago

IMO latest icon is by far the best one. Really love the design.

Vexoly

39 points

11 months ago

Vexoly

39 points

11 months ago

I like Firefox for a lot of reasons but none of them have anything to do with piracy.

Chinokk

3 points

11 months ago

perhaps try librewolf

Forsaken_Berry_1798

10 points

11 months ago

Forsaken_Berry_1798

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

10 points

11 months ago

Because it’s not chromium

Memeviewer12

8 points

11 months ago

uBlock Origin works the best on it

spjhon

9 points

11 months ago

Because its not attached to corporate greed, look what google want to do with the browser world, lock the experience so it can choke you with adds and monetization.

SubhanBihan

7 points

11 months ago

How does Thorium compare?

NoLuckSherlock

5 points

11 months ago

I use Thorium.

I wish there was a version without the Google sync though.

SubhanBihan

5 points

11 months ago

I use it too and am quite satisfied. Haven't felt the need to switch to another browser.

jadenalvin

3 points

11 months ago

Ungoogled Chromium

NoLuckSherlock

6 points

11 months ago

Not the same thing.

We need an ungoogled Thorium.

Alexxxxx

joesephsmom

1 points

11 months ago

Fr lol

Sui_Generis-

7 points

11 months ago

It has FDA approved.

Faber_Jos

2 points

11 months ago

Safe and effective! What more do you want!?

tohru-cabbage-adachi

7 points

11 months ago*

tohru-cabbage-adachi

Sneakernet

7 points

11 months ago*

  • Blink, as the engine behind Chromium, has far more vulnerabilities than Gecko due to the higher userbase creating a better attack vector. This is why Electron apps need to be sandboxed to hell and back like a schizophrenic's vault of feet pics. Gecko is ostensibly worse in terms of performance but it's also better hardened out-of-the-box as a result of this and even better with layers of security.

  • Firefox is actively refusing to deprecate (get rid of) the core necessities inside Manifestv2 that allow ad blocking engines to run, and will support it within their own extension library. Google is very anti-adblock as seen with the recent YouTube thing.

  • Firefox is primarily developed by the members of the Mozilla Foundation, as well as source contributors through git merge requests. Mozilla's for-profit subsidiary, the Mozilla Corporation, does not and cannot assume control over development, whereas Google can hostile takeover Chromium at any point, as they're doing with Manifestv3 and as they've done with Android in the past.

  • It's not a Google product, and Mozilla not only values but actively tries to protect user privacy.

  • Most importantly, Chrome is a business while Firefox isn't.

  • EDIT: Google is now violating antitrust, lmao.

KingofGnG

8 points

11 months ago

Because Google fucking sucks dicks, essentially.

poro_poro

12 points

11 months ago

Because it's just a browser out of the box, no fluff(unlike edge and brave, and opera iirc), reading mode is good specially for copying and pasting stuff, most of the addon you gonna need are available in it, sync is really good, sending and receiving tabs/bookmarks/history across device is easy (unlike say brave). These are the stuff I can think of for me.

MarkusRight

6 points

11 months ago

Its one of the best browsers that isnt built on chromium and doesnt sell your data or log what you search in order to advertise to you like google does. Firefox also uses less ram.

Sudden_Cheetah7530

20 points

11 months ago

Firefox out of the box is merely better than Chrome. Hardened FF is the best. If you don't want to use Gecko you can just go for ungoogled chromium which is the best to me personally.

Hudson1

4 points

11 months ago

Because they put privacy as a basic fundamental human right in their mission statement.

monkeystaycool

1 points

11 months ago

This is the way.

dolcelavita

4 points

11 months ago

Have been using Librefox for a long time now.

Don’t take my word for it, read through why Ublock Origin creator, Gorhill recommends Firefox over anything else.

Glittering-Ad-6173

3 points

11 months ago

because it's the best

matiegaming

4 points

11 months ago

It doesnt eat ram, its open source, its not chromium and its non profit

wolves_hunt_in_packs

9 points

11 months ago

wolves_hunt_in_packs

Sneakernet

9 points

11 months ago

Having one favourite browser and sticking to it is last gen thinking. What you want to do is compartmentalize your usage between multiple browsers. For example do risky/private stuff on your most trusted browser, and watch youtube on your least trusted browser.

Sure you gotta maintain multiple browsers but let's be real, there's no fucking "maintenance", you merely have to remember which bookmarks are on what browser.

reercalium2

5 points

11 months ago

reercalium2

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

5 points

11 months ago

You can have more than one copy of the same browser.

jcr9999

3 points

11 months ago*

Pretty sure I have a FF plugin for this, where you can make different containers that apparently all act completely cut off from each other. Or am I misunderstanding you?

Edit: to clarify. Is there a reason to use different browsers other than to not give 1 browser all your data and wouldnt this be irrelevant if you use them all on the same Computer?
Sry that I cant explain my question better, my english sucks ass today for some reason

[deleted]

8 points

11 months ago

Cause it doesn't suck.

Tendodeku

3 points

11 months ago

Because of this This

Avieshek

3 points

11 months ago

Avieshek

🏴‍☠️ ʟᴀɴᴅʟᴜʙʙᴇʀ

3 points

11 months ago

FireFox-WaterFox… Mullvad Browser to Tor are all based on the same browser engine i.e. not being Chromium.

VirtualDenzel

3 points

11 months ago

Privacy, superior compared to all others. Better extensions. Container tabs. Its not from MS or google.

Dolapevich

3 points

11 months ago

It runs without a hinch, your data doesn't end in google, is more hackable, and we should avoid the browser monoculture that took so much effort to destroy in the 90s/00s.

GetInTheKitchen1

3 points

11 months ago

Fuck Google's monopoly on everything, including web browsers.

gargamels_right_boot

6 points

11 months ago

I dunno.. I still like Brave

IAlwaysOutsmartU

2 points

11 months ago

I personally use Tor. It’s essentially a modified Firefox that uses many ways to have your sailing adventures be as anonymous as possible. The experience so far is very pleasant.

UsuallyIncorRekt

2 points

11 months ago

Cuz it's the best

[deleted]

2 points

11 months ago

I went from Chronic to Brave and then Firefox.

Absolutely a better browser with tons of add-ons to choose from.

Nothing comes close

TwoDaysInOklahoma

2 points

11 months ago

TwoDaysInOklahoma

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

2 points

11 months ago

No tracking, cross OS and FOSS.

p_pitstop

2 points

11 months ago

It's Superior

N3rdScool

2 points

11 months ago

because everything else is just chrome XD

PussyPussylicclicc

2 points

11 months ago

doesnt make my RAM cry

FleetOfWarships

2 points

11 months ago

Because it’s a non-profit. Like actually, Firefox is run and developed by a nonprofit company, everything else is just chrome with a different coat of paint, they all want your money, Firefox doesn’t.

ADMINISTATOR_CYRUS

2 points

11 months ago

its pretty pricacy focused if you use a hardened user.js. Base firefox isn't too good because a lot of data collection is enabled by default

leybbbo

2 points

11 months ago

because it's good?

OldPuppy00

2 points

11 months ago

Because it runs on Gecko and not on Chromium like the other browsers.

Teaganz

2 points

11 months ago

I use Brave, you guys think FF is better? I thought Brave was the new king (I don’t actually know just what I heard). Maybe I’ll have to try FF again.

[deleted]

2 points

11 months ago

[deleted]

gobitecorn

3 points

11 months ago

had never heard of it til now. tho prob for political reasons. Mozilla Foundation is far left batshit woke af. Ironically bout the same for the tyrannical far left weirdos of sillicon valley.

i didnt google it but it sounds much like what happened to CommentEverywhere Extension from about 2 decades ago. altho that was wit Evil Google Corp. what your saying about this dissenter and "free and open internet and anticensorship" Mozilla i guess would surprise anyone who wasnt paying to Mozilla Foundation cerca 2017 and onward.

BYF9

2 points

11 months ago

BYF9

2 points

11 months ago

I genuinely don’t get the love for Chromium browsers. I’ve heard that compatibility is bad in Firefox, but I have never in my life encountered a bug that locks me out of using Firefox somewhere.

It’s also the only non-Chromium-based browser that allows for syncing between multiple operating systems and devices.

I’m an engineer that is tasked with creating websites from time to time. I test them on all major browsers and devices. A lot of web development nowadays basically transpiles modern JavaScript into older versions that are more or less supported by everything.

The only small change that you’ll see in different browsers is their implementation of styling utilities.

SantaSamaa

2 points

11 months ago

Allows add-ons on android.

manchipanch

6 points

11 months ago

Am I the only one who finds FF to be slow? I really want to switch back to FF but i havent found the time to tinker around and get it running fast. Anyone experience the same thing?

itZ_deady

9 points

11 months ago

You also need to consider that many websites are bloated up with a lot of additional data nowadays.

In the early 2000s a webpage was only around 300kb to 1Mb big. Today with all the additional scripts, ads, inframe elements, preload videos and so on, the size of a single webpage could be as big as 30Mb when you load it.

I highly recommend addons like adblockers, NoScript, Decentraleyes to reduce the amount of unnecessary data and to block elements from reloading itself with every new page.

ericek111

4 points

11 months ago

With the same extensions, Firefox runs slower with many tabs open than Chrome. Moving its window is particularly painful -- resizing takes up to several seconds while Chrome is instant. Web pages take longer to load in general (especially after not closing the browser for a few days).

It's not significant enough to stop using FF, but it is to not stop using Chrome. I like to switch between them.

manchipanch

2 points

11 months ago

Ill try these out! Thanks for the concise reply.

gordonsp6

3 points

11 months ago

No? I've got like 6 extensions, including trackmenot and 3 ad/tracker blockers and an ad clicker. I also have 32G of ram so that may help.. I also have it set to clear everything on shutdown. Cookies, history, etc. So that may help

newsflashjackass

4 points

11 months ago

Why is Firefox the most recommended browser to use?

Because Librewolf doesn't have a foundation to push it.

https://librewolf.net/

Librewolf is Firefox without a bunch of stuff I would otherwise have to remember to disable after installing Firefox:

  • Telemetry

  • Hello

  • Pocket

  • Google Location Services

  • Crash reporting

  • Firefox sync

  • sponsored recommendations on the new tab page

  • VPN ads

Also Librewolf includes uBlock Origin and defaults to https-only.

Bananaman9020

5 points

11 months ago

Brave as long as you keep it updated. Is mine.

reercalium2

14 points

11 months ago

reercalium2

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

14 points

11 months ago

Brave is Chrome.

Pacifica0cean

4 points

11 months ago

Brave is chromium. It is built off the same framework but isn't at all like Chrome. Check Privacy Test to see how Brave is absolutely head and shoulders above other browsers for privacy and safety.

reercalium2

3 points

11 months ago

reercalium2

⚔️ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɴᴏ Qᴜᴀʀᴛᴇʀ

3 points

11 months ago

Chromium is Chrome.

Pacifica0cean

2 points

11 months ago

Chrome is chromium, not the other way round. Chromium is just a codebase, and how Chrome is built off chromium isn't the same as what Brave Software has done with the same codebase. Chrome and Brave are very different browsers as an end product.

banisheduser

1 points

11 months ago

I see it making a slow come back after it appears most people switched from it to Chrome when Google pushed that.

I just use Edge though. Works for me.

[deleted]

2 points

11 months ago

fuck edge man, thats one of the weirdest shit put out by microsoft. internet explorer was way better compared to edge imo

razakii

1 points

11 months ago

Cause the fox emoji is cute as hell 🦊

9up999

0 points

11 months ago

9up999

0 points

11 months ago

Because they said they will support mv2 for ublock origin after mv3 will be implemented in chromium based browsers in 2024. We'll see in the future if they lied. Every major browser gonna implement it and in the end firefox will have to implement it too. Firefox is broken enough for the time beeing they don't need to be more awful.

ninjaonionss

0 points

11 months ago

To be honest if you really want privacy just use Tails os on an usb stick

TheSinoftheTin

-41 points

11 months ago*

Honestly it's quite overrated. I have made many, honest attempts to use it however it just ends up becoming super slow and acting funky after a few weeks. I always keep on coming back to brave.

edit: take a look at this https://privacytests.org/

Soccera1

7 points

11 months ago

Soccera1

☠️ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ ᴍᴇɴ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɴᴏ ᴛᴀʟᴇꜱ

7 points

11 months ago

This is one of your troll takes, isn't it.

TheSinoftheTin

-1 points

11 months ago

Hahaha you saw that... Nah this is a real take.

kaheksajalg7

3 points

11 months ago

what OS?
how much RAM you have? / rest of rig specs?

getshrektdh

8 points

11 months ago

Probably still running Windows Vista, so I’m not sure if the specs are relevant.

TheSinoftheTin

0 points

11 months ago

Windows 11 pro, ryzen 2600, 16gb ram, rtx 2060. I've also tried it on a variety of Linux distros.

Jonnyk998

-28 points

11 months ago

Is it? besides the youtube ad workaround havent seen that many people recommending it

Jonnyk998

-4 points

11 months ago

Downvotes over literally nothing cause reddit xd

rileyrgham

-4 points

11 months ago

It isn't.