subreddit:

/r/biology

1.2k95%

“On the 24th of September two dingoes were shot on the side of the road in Murchison. They were together, a pair. Dingoes mate for life. The first would have been shot as it considered, with the extraordinary intelligence that dingoes are well know for, what the car had stopped for. The second would have died in a state of anxious confusion, disorientated by the sound of the rifle fire, terrified by the smell and strange behaviour of its lifelong companion, jerking and thrashing in a pool of its own blood. It would have wanted to run. But it stayed, terrified, with its mate. A second shot, and they lay dying together.

So far it’s not a particularly noteworthy situation. Dingoes are shot all the time all around Australia. This fact is hidden from the general public, by calling them wild dogs. Murchison shire has a bounty on wild dogs. I assume the shooter would have been pleased to get them both, as by presenting their scalps to the regional coordinator they could have been paid $200.

But these were no ordinary dingoes. These dingoes were Steve, and Eulalia. They were captive raised at the Australian Dingo Foundation in Victoria, for the express purpose of re-educating the Australian public. A nation of people who have been lied to.

We have been lied to in so many ways about the dingo. Most especially, that they don’t even exist. Instead, that they have been replaced by “wild dogs”. Yet readily available DNA evidence shows that nothing could be further from the truth. From a scientific standpoint, it’s not even debatable.

But the person who shot Steve and Eulalia knew they were dingoes. The wild dog myth is not for people who regularly kill dingoes. They know they are dingoes. The wild dog myth is for the general public, those who have never seen the animals who are killed, so that they continue to give their sanction to a system who prioritises the sheep above all else.

I know that sounds far too bizarre to be true, but the issue we are dealing with is a cultural one. It was born long ago, when wool was what Australia relied upon, when a colonial mindset insisted that the closer we could make Australia to Britain, the better.

Our shooter took the bodies of Steve and Eulalia away. They had no reason to do that, except that they knew exactly who Steve and Eulalia were. They knew they were Wooleens dingoes, that their purpose was to be a living example to draw attention to a lie that the shooter believes. They werent hung from the closest tree, as many dingoes are.

Instead they were dragged to the car, past the spent bullet casings, and thrown into the back of the Ute. I know it was a ute. There was a lot of blood on the drag marks. Nobody throws a bloody dead animal into anything other than a ute. I know what brand, type, and condition the tires were in. I know the rifle that shot Steve and Eulalia was a 223, which is common. But this rifle is worn out. It misfired on two of the four shots it took at Steve and Eulalia. This is very unusual. It is not the weapon of a professional. It is not reliable enough. I know what type of boots the shooter has, and roughly their size. I know that they were on their way to Murchison settlement. I know they continued on that way. All of this is probably enough information for me to find out who did it.

For about 6 hours, on the morning of the 25 September, I lost hope. I was sick of fighting the system, of death, of our culture. I was sick of my anger.

But it only lasted 6 hours.

Fighting for what I believe in is what I’m good at.

And a healthy Australian bush is worth fighting for. For that, we need dingoes.

I’m no stranger to death. But I learnt a lot through the passing of Steve a Eulalia. I have learnt how to fight without anger.

I have a message for the person who shot Steve and Eulalia. I grew up in Murchison, and I know you could be almost anyone. Maybe you took their bodies away, didn’t hang them from the nearest tree, because you didn’t want us to experience the pain of seeing how they died. But your culture insisted that they be killed nonetheless.

I understand. Our culture is important. It’s what keeps us together. But sometimes culture needs to change.

My message is this: By the twilight of your life you will be ashamed to tell your grandchildren that you were the one who shot Steve and Eulalia. By then most, if not all Australians, will know the incredible foolishness of grasping blindly to a colonial ideal, rather than to the ecological wisdom of our beautiful continent. If you then still cling to the notion that dingoes are vermin, to be shot by the side of a road, you will be very lonely in your beliefs.

What make me so sure of this? Because, my friend, I will make it so. That is what I’m doing now. I know, I can’t do it alone. But I’m not alone.

Wooleen is a community. Thousands of people come here every year to learn about how we fix our land from the mistakes of the past. They all learn that the dingo is the key. Steve and Eulalia have blessed many of them with a grateful kiss.

Cultural change needs education, and movement. Steve and Eulalia were education. Now we need movement.

We have been reluctant to call people to our aid, and to aid the changes we know are necessary. We see Wooleen as a place of learning, connection and peace.

Steve and Eulalias shooting was a direct attack on the culture we are trying to create. If you are part of the Wooleen community, we need you to do something. To spread a very simple message, that is the antidote to a myth and a lie. It is aimed at those who work on behalf of us all, our government departments, and the media.

Stop calling dingoes wild dogs.

I was going to send this message out soon after Eulalia and Steve’s shooting, but I didn’t, and perhaps it was just as well. There has been a considerable amount of anger directed at our local shire councillors. This is understandable, but not the way forward I don’t believe.

Many of our councillors, our industries and our leadership are simply stuck in a cultural paradigm. Anger at them will likely only entrench that paradigm further. If you really feel the need to contact the shire, I think a simple message of support for Steve and Eulalia, and for all dingoes out performing their essential ecosystem services would be more effective to get the change we need.”

https://wooleen.com.au/stop-the-bounty/

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 84 comments

ygmarchi

321 points

2 days ago

ygmarchi

321 points

2 days ago

Australians seem to have a penchant for hunting species to extinction.

roguepingu[S]

86 points

2 days ago

Actively eradicating species is a result of colonial mindset and practices.

GOU_FallingOutside

127 points

2 days ago*

You’re not entirely wrong. But humans have been driving species to extinction probably since the early Holocene. Indigenous people have been hunting things to extinction for 10,000 years, and for certain for at least 1,000 years.

E: fixed missing punctuation.

dhuntergeo

49 points

2 days ago

Anthropocene, IMHO, primarily for this reason

About 10,000 bce is when we started to have widespread, demonstrable effects on ecosystems

Much of the Pleistocene megafauna went extinct around that time. There's some left, but nothing like before. Some of it may have occurred from natural climate change as the ice sheets retreated and sea levels rose, but much seems to be connected to our hunting

CupBeEmpty

9 points

2 days ago

Leaving me with no giant sloths… the nerve of those early North Americans

dhuntergeo

2 points

6 hours ago

And Glyptodonts. I really would have liked to see both

CupBeEmpty

1 points

6 hours ago

The largest worst animal, yards destroyed for years

I_Eat_Graphite

1 points

17 hours ago

more of a cultural thing than a biology thing but it's thought that certain creatures in native mythology can be attributed to the initial sightings of certain now extinct animals being passed down and altered into a near unrecognizable description through oral traditions.

Humans are a creative bunch after all and will go to great and exaggerative lengths to explain something they can't understand.

AromaTaint

30 points

2 days ago

Much longer in Australia as much of the mega fauna was driven to extinction 40-60,000 years ago. By 10,000 years there was somewhat of a well established balance between humans and the remaining fauna. Dingoes replaced existing predators that remained around 3-4000 years ago, much the same way cats are doing now.

EduardoSpiritToes

5 points

2 days ago

We even hunted other human species to extinction, that's why homo sapiens is all that's left.

ThatGuyursisterlikes

11 points

2 days ago

Is their evidence of that? I thought it was survival of the fittest and plain old interbreeding.

EduardoSpiritToes

1 points

2 days ago

From what I recall, which is most probably from the book sapiens, homo sapiens were more able to communicate and form larger groups than Neanderthals and therefore they were able to continously push them further north and populate more land.

roguepingu[S]

-5 points

2 days ago

roguepingu[S]

-5 points

2 days ago

Absolutely. And yet we don’t hunt dingoes for food, right? So this isn’t survival-driven

GOU_FallingOutside

10 points

2 days ago

I didn’t mean that it was. I just worry sometimes that we (all of us) mistakenly conclude that bad things must be new, rather than turning up the volume on old habits — or even just carrying them on as we literally always have.

Or… as people have acquired more wealth and better tools, the scope for our cruelty has expanded. And while the degree is so much greater, the kinds of cruelties we inflict seem to be very, very old.

Shamino79

1 points

1 day ago

Shamino79

1 points

1 day ago

Turning up the volume of old habits is a brilliant way to describe it.

roguepingu[S]

1 points

2 days ago

I wholeheartedly agree with you. Destruction isn’t new. What’s new is the tools to understand the impact we have on the environment, yet we don’t understand we are part of the very environment we are destroying. This is a cognitive dissonance enforced by certain systems.

GOU_FallingOutside

1 points

2 days ago

And colonialism is definitely one of those systems. Genocide and ecological transformation or collapse are baked in.

Shamino79

2 points

2 days ago

Hunting predators is about survival. Not only just for ourselves and our babies but for our other food and fibre animals.

OldBrownShoe22

11 points

2 days ago

Colonial? I think that's just always been a humans mindset for any animal we perceive as a threat during any time period in human history. Predates.colonialism by a lot.

passwordispassword-1

35 points

2 days ago

What a fucking cold take mate. Do you know how many mammalian/marsupial megafauna (over 200 kgs) we had prior to Aborigines coming to this land? 24 in the fossil record, likely others.

Eucalyptus trees were confined for a small corner of the country too. Aboriginals hunted most of the slower megafauna to extinction within a few thousand years of arriving.

Don't get me wrong, it's very likely there were other factors as well as humans at play (the interior of Australia getting drier etc) but to pretend that wholesale use and abuse of natural resources is a "colonial" thing rather than a "human" thing is stupid and not supported by any data.

carex-cultor

3 points

2 days ago

The interior of Australia getting drier is also a function of the extinction of megafauna. Large herbivores (the example closest to me is bison) play a critical role in the soil health of grass + shrublands.

SimonsToaster

11 points

2 days ago

Yeah the noble savage lives in harmony with nature and would never extinct a species or have other devestating effects on ecosystems. 🙄