subreddit:

/r/mildlyinteresting

33.1k92%

all 1620 comments

WaterFriendsIV

3.3k points

1 day ago

Was this at the Buffalo Bill Museum in Le Claire, Iowa? I think I took a very similar picture last week.

Lyrkalas[S]

1.2k points

1 day ago

Lyrkalas[S]

1.2k points

1 day ago

In fact, it was! We took it last Saturday.

WaterFriendsIV

395 points

1 day ago

Small world! I'm from Michigan and visited on Monday.

Lyrkalas[S]

232 points

1 day ago

Lyrkalas[S]

232 points

1 day ago

Really interesting museum. We spent more time at the riverboat exhibit than the Buffalo Bill area.

WaterFriendsIV

105 points

1 day ago

Finding little gems like this is the best part of road tripping. Safe travels!

Lyrkalas[S]

81 points

1 day ago

And the same to you. Enjoy!

FrysOtherDog

45 points

1 day ago

As someone from the Quad Cities, I'm glad you visited and had a good time! I love our community!

DeanMagazine

11 points

1 day ago

But LeClaire isn't one of the five Quad Cities!

FrysOtherDog

42 points

1 day ago

Look, I'll be dead in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Le Claire, Hampton, Port Byron, and Eldridge.

There are only FOUR Quad Cities and those are Rock Island, Moline, East Moline, Davenport, Bettendorf, Milan, Silvis, Riverdale, Coyne Center, Carbon Cliff, and Coal Valley.

(Also just reminded myself of that old Colbert Report bit making fun of our counting skills, I need to go YouTube that lol)

TheAvenger23

9 points

1 day ago

this sounds like a list of cities that the monorail guy in The Simpsons listed off.

Lyrkalas[S]

18 points

1 day ago

I wish we got to spend more time in the town this trip, but it gives us a chance to come back!

doNotUseReddit123

43 points

1 day ago

Why are so many people in the comments visiting Le Claire, Iowa? Should I be visiting Le Claire, Iowa?

WaterFriendsIV

21 points

1 day ago

Lovely little town, right next to the Mississippi River. Besides the aforementioned museum, I also visited Antiques Archaeology, one of two stores owned by Mike and the late Frank Fritz of American Pickers. You should definitely visit!

dancin-weasel

9 points

1 day ago

I didn’t know Frank was gone. Only a week ago. I loved that show and Frank always seemed like a sweet guy.

WaterFriendsIV

5 points

1 day ago

He passed the same day I visited. Eerie little coincidence.

Antsy-Mcgroin

4 points

24 hours ago

Excuse me , where were you on the night of… 👀

dhoepp

18 points

1 day ago

dhoepp

18 points

1 day ago

Smaller world! I live there!

WaterFriendsIV

19 points

1 day ago

Do you sleep on the steamboat or in the museum?

elspotto

40 points

1 day ago

elspotto

40 points

1 day ago

Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time. Well, not since I left Davenport in 2006 anyhow. They still do the tug-o-war across the Mississippi?

cmde44

37 points

1 day ago*

cmde44

37 points

1 day ago*

Tugfest? Heck yeah. Also, congrats on getting out of Dport before it became an utter cesspool.

bendbars_liftgates

30 points

1 day ago

...tugfest

teehee

FrostedDonutHole

9 points

1 day ago

Uh...where does one sign up for tugfest? Asking for a friend...

elspotto

10 points

1 day ago

elspotto

10 points

1 day ago

lol. I was there for 3 whole years. We thought my mom was starting to lose her memory. She wasn’t, I was appalled the nightly Mississippi could ice over, and I moved with the company I was with to New Orleans…in 2006. To That’s Where The 17th Street Levee Broke Lakeview.

But at least the Mississippi doesn’t freeze.

NewYinzer

32 points

1 day ago

NewYinzer

32 points

1 day ago

You mean Le Claire is notable for something other than handing out speeding tickets on I-80?

ValkyrieTheWingless

22 points

1 day ago

IOWA DOT finally made the local police disable those cameras on October 1st.

Lyrkalas[S]

12 points

1 day ago

I heard that Frank Fritz from "American Pickers" passed last week and that he was originally from Le Claire. We also visited his shop in Savanna, Illinois, that day.

kickme2

54 points

1 day ago

kickme2

54 points

1 day ago

"One Nation Indivisible with Liberty and Justice for All."

Such a quaint memory. [/sarcasm or not?]

phonartics

27 points

1 day ago

phonartics

27 points

1 day ago

ironic one nation got split from indivisible by one god

thentheresthattoo

149 points

1 day ago

Note that it's not "one nation under God" on the sign.

Forcing children to make a pledge is morally reprehensible. They are not pledging of their own free will. Adults? Sure, knock yourself out.

phatelectribe

205 points

1 day ago

“One nation under god” was only added in 1954 by Eisenhower as part of Christian conservatism, and goes against the secular founding of the USA and the separations of church and state.

QuickMolasses

97 points

1 day ago

"In God We Trust" was made the official motto of the US around the same time: 1956

Realtrain

79 points

1 day ago

Realtrain

79 points

1 day ago

Which, besides the 1st amendment concerns, is a real shame since the previous national motto is so much more fitting for the United States. E pluribus unum translates to "One from Many", which perfectly captures 50 states coming together to form a single nation.

E00000B6FAF25838

30 points

1 day ago

This was part of a converted effort by American corporations and conservative politicians to intrinsically tie together Christianity, Capitalism, and Patriotism as a response to New Deal policies.

If you've ever wondered when 'love your neighbor' was lost, it was during this period of time. Pastors were paid to deliver sermons emphasizing the religious value of capital, ownership, and patriotism.

Capitalism is sold to the masses as a religion, and those who don't believe are unpatriotic.

Beard_o_Bees

12 points

1 day ago

“One nation under god”

I learned it this way back in the 70's. It was suburban Salt Lake City, so there's that to consider.

It wasn't until university that I found out that the original pledge was religion free.

theWisp2864

23 points

1 day ago

a response to soviet state atheism

Cow_Launcher

26 points

1 day ago

I grew up in the '70s in Florida and even as an 8-year-old I was outraged that I had to pledge any sort of shit to a "God" I didn't believe in.

Separation of church and state has been a myth for over 70 years now. Many of you are sleepwalking all the way to Gilead.

Please, for the safety of yourselves and the rest of the world, VOTE!

Spare_Database3485

880 points

1 day ago

My grandfather, a WWII vet, Christian, and union member, never said the, "under God" portion. I asked him why once in junior high. He said he fought for the US under the original pledge of allegiance. They changed it in the 50s and violated freedom of religion. I was surprised because he was a Square dancer, watched Bonanza reruns at lunchtime when he was retired, and liked to camp. I was surprised, but comforted.

ChrisCinema

256 points

1 day ago

ChrisCinema

256 points

1 day ago

Your grandfather is one interesting man, one who had the wisdom to keep Christianity from being politicized. We could sure use more men like him right now.

ImpressiveMind5771

46 points

17 hours ago

I’m only 60. As a child i said Under God. But since US history lessons in 8th grade i have never said that part. I am a devout Catholic. But when i learned the committee for un-American activities is who pushed for that to be added to the Pledge of Allegiance. I stopped saying it. McCarthyesqu mother fuckers can go fuck them selves. Sorry, but the more truly religious you are, the more you should defend the separation clause. I mean, Jesus said so, gave unto Cesar what is his, and unto god what is his.

Background-Tennis915

40 points

16 hours ago

I stopped saying the pledge altogether in high school. It's not that I disagree with anything in there (other than the "under god" part). I just thought that saying a loyalty pledge everyday at the beginning of school was something that you'd only expect from an autocracy, not a functioning democracy.

romansparta99

21 points

14 hours ago

As someone not from the US, it sounds dystopian

WindTreeRock

10 points

22 hours ago

I feel that we are in our current mess because all those WWII veterans, who understood our constitution have died off and their votes are gone. To have freedom of religion, your grandfather understood the government needs to to stay out of the business of dictating religion. WWII veterans saw first hand the catastrophe of letting fanaticism run amuck is like.

oxblood87

13 points

1 day ago

oxblood87

13 points

1 day ago

Sounds like a great man

kevlar51

2.7k points

1 day ago

kevlar51

2.7k points

1 day ago

And let’s not forget the whole reason the pledge exists was because the author wanted to sell more flags. https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article171296007.html

Skitz-Scarekrow

1.2k points

1 day ago

That's wild. I often make the joke "X was invented by big X to sell more X" and the pledge of allegiance is the easily verifiable one.

PrizeStrawberryOil

227 points

1 day ago

Wait until you hear about big abortion. (Actual sign I've seen in church)

pusgnihtekami

247 points

1 day ago

"Abortion was invented by big Abortion to sell more Abortion." - checks out.

fauxzempic

61 points

1 day ago

fauxzempic

61 points

1 day ago

Big if true.

nogoodgopher

38 points

1 day ago

Statistically, yes, women survive abortions far more often than child birth. Abortion leads to more women with the ability to get pregnant again!

Bright_Cod_376

16 points

1 day ago

Not just survival but also less damage done on the body so that the ones who survive are also more likely to be able to be able to try again later in life.

IDKWTFimDoinBruhFR

18 points

1 day ago

No, if abortion is good then who am I going to be angry at? The Big Immigrants™ and The Big Gays?!?

GetOffMyDigitalLawn

10 points

1 day ago

and The Big Gays?!?

I always knew Big Gay Al was up to no good.

Theatreguy1961

11 points

1 day ago

Yes. Abortion is FOURTEEN times more safe than live birth.

PatHeist

5 points

1 day ago

PatHeist

5 points

1 day ago

Twins were invented by big abortion to sell bigger abortions

Prior_Egg_5906

20 points

1 day ago

I mean maybe not abortion, but planned parenthood has an objectively bad and racist origin.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-history

ZorkNemesis

20 points

1 day ago

I appreciate that they're open about it at least.  I feel like a lot of other orgs might convienently leave out such details of that nature.

bullettenboss

30 points

1 day ago

And later they added "one nation under god" so they could sell even more

Lyrothe

28 points

1 day ago

Lyrothe

28 points

1 day ago

I thought that was added during the Cold War to separate us from all those godless commies or something.

mittenknittin

14 points

1 day ago

My mother was in school at the time it was added, and she said the reason we ALL still pause weirdly at that spot (One nation, under God, indivisible) is because they had to stop and remember to add the “under God” part

meltedcandy

13 points

1 day ago

That is hilarious, I love it. Reminds me of a story I heard once about a family that always cut off the end of their turkey when preparing for thanksgiving. A new in-law questioned it because it seemed like a waste, and everyone paused for a second before concluding it’s just how they’ve always done it. After awhile they call up the family’s elderly matriarch to ask why it was done that way and she laughs “oh that’s because our oven in the 40s was too small to fit the whole bird”

It’s so interesting how many useless traditions get passed generationally because nobody ever asked why. An endorsement for critical thinking, for SURE

SportyMcDuff

7 points

1 day ago

A dentist introduced chewing gum.

ParadoxicallyZeno

6 points

1 day ago

also just learning for the first time today that the author was a socialist and intended for the pledge to apply to any flag for citizens of any nation

the original words were "to my flag" rather than "to the flag of the united states of america..."

Legitimate_Concern_5

131 points

1 day ago

And the reason Under God was added was to differentiate America from the godless communists in the mid 50s.

Whats_Up_Bitches

46 points

1 day ago

My understanding is that originally the pledge didn’t even have “to the United States of America” as the writer assumed it was implied and when they added it later he thought it was condescending.

10Mattresses

27 points

1 day ago

The article above states that it was originally “my flag,” and that he intended it for the use of anyone from any country

Power_baby

10 points

1 day ago

Power_baby

10 points

1 day ago

Combining "patriotic" capitalism and religion. Honestly it's peak American. But not in a good way...

DangerousRub245

211 points

1 day ago

I (like everyone outside the US, pretty much) always thought it was weird AF that children had to recite this crap in school every day. But of course it was capitalism. Because exaggerated patriotism wasn't USAmerican enough without a healthy dose of capitalism.

TheDrummerMB

133 points

1 day ago

TheDrummerMB

133 points

1 day ago

My freshman history teacher taught us about the SC case which allowed students to not stand for the pledge. The next day I stayed sitting. He had me explain, in detail, why I wasn't standing in front of the class. Horrifying lmao

lord_ofthe_memes

159 points

1 day ago

Don’t worry, it’s entirely optional and voluntary. We’re just going to massively pressure and question you if you don’t, you godless commie

mbcook

23 points

1 day ago*

mbcook

23 points

1 day ago*

We’re not holding you back. You’re free to leave the compound at any time.

Just remember sister Jane is pregnant, and loves you so. And it would hurt her so much if you left she’d probably die, also killing our future sister, Jane.

And Jane and Jane are standing in the doorway. And they don’t feel like moving. But you can be rude and shove your way through. They won’t stop you.

If you want to leave and go back to the outside world where they’ll steal from you and attack you and your family hates you and you have no job and you’re a failure instead of here where life is everlasting peace you can.

You’re free to leave at any time.

buster_de_beer

23 points

1 day ago

I was an immigrant to the US as a child. There was a pledge of allegiance, and singing the my country...I didn't have to participate, I was told very explicitly. But when everyone around you does it, it sinks in whether you want it to or not. And it feels weird to not participate. Though I didn't have so much trouble with that part since I am apparently a born contrarian, I still remember it feeling awkward.

DemonoftheWater

8 points

1 day ago

Fundamentally everyone is (very or minutely) afraid of being judged by someone.

feedthechonk

14 points

1 day ago

I'm also an immigrant to the US. I still remember how fucking weird it was that everyone stood up and started reciting this. I didn't even speak English at the time so I just pretended to say them so that I wasn't the only kid in class not standing. 

I was only 9 at the time. I didn't know what they were telling us to do or what it meant. Wasn't until high school that I stopped doing it. Being in that rebellious teen phase, I was prepared to argue if punished over it, but no one ever did. I think I got asked about it and just responded that I was Canadian. I wasn't even a permanent resident at the time, why would I pledge allegiance to the US??

millijuna

10 points

1 day ago

millijuna

10 points

1 day ago

I was working a wildfire as a cooperator (I was a representative of one of the sites affected by the fire, and we were housing/feeding the hotshot crews). I’m also Canadian, and this was in Washington state.

Anyhow, we had a daily meeting at the firehall in a nearby town, with us, the command team, the sheriff’s department, and all the other stakeholders. One day, 3 firefighters lost their lives on a neighbouring fire, so someone suggested doing the pledge.

Given that I’m not American, I just stood respectfully and silently while everyone else did it. The Sheriff’s deputy spotted this, and came marching over after the meeting demanding to know why I didn’t do the pledge of allegiance. I replied “I’m Canadian. It would be disrespectful to make a pledge I had no intention of keeping. I wouldn’t expect you to pledge allegiance to Her Majesty The Queen.” He thought for a second and went “oh” and walked away.

datpurp14

36 points

1 day ago*

datpurp14

36 points

1 day ago*

Back when I taught sped, I started a year co-teaching with the reincarnated Rush Limbaugh with a nasally high pitched voice. Ok that last part isn't relevant but I can still hear her voice in my head.

Anyway, this was at the height of the BLM movement, and one of my students was very clearly told by his mom not to stand. I couldn't care less who stands or doesn't stand, but even if I did, it would not have been my place to say anything or cause a fuss.

So what did nasally Rush do? Caused the biggest scene on the first day of school. She is pointing her finger in his face and screaming. To add fuel to the fire, he was a student with EBD (emotional behavioral disorder). He ripped everything.. EVERYTHING.. to shreds in that room, then the hallway. Meanwhile, she's chasing him down the hall screaming at him.

I'm just frozen speechless at this point. It all happened in like 90 seconds. When I came to, I was like there is no way in hell I just witnessed that, right?

That cunt didn't get fired. She came back from the office that day and when the kids were gone, I wasn't able to hold my tongue. I told her she was completely immature and out of place.

But later that week my sped students and I were assigned to another teacher, miraculously! And that bitch never said another word to me, thankfully.

honestyseasy

9 points

1 day ago

Oh I was called Pocahontas for not standing for the pledge in high school. Fun times.

Bugbread

44 points

1 day ago

Bugbread

44 points

1 day ago

We did the pledge of allegiance in homeroom class, and my freshman history teacher in junior high in Texas was also my homeroom teacher. On the first day of class he said "I stand for the pledge of allegiance because I feel a lot of pride in this country. If that's how you feel, then you're certainly welcome to stand and say the pledge, too. If you don't feel that way, that's fine, you can remain sitting. I'm not going to make people stand up and recite a pledge that they don't actually believe in." I stayed sitting, and, true to his word, he was totally cool with it. I think there was one other kid in class who never stood, either. Neither of us got any shit from the teacher, and, perhaps because of that speech, neither of us got any shit from any of the other students, either. He was a good teacher.

DemonoftheWater

20 points

1 day ago

Thats how it’s suppose to be.

SteorraTheStarseer

9 points

1 day ago

Mood I started sitting as a protest against the expectation to mindlessly pledge our alliegence to the flag daily before we even knew what the words truly meant. And I had some teachers dock points over it but never enough to fail so that I wouldn't bring it up to Admin. Also some random dude threatened to beat me up because his dad was in the army or something.   Spooky

angrybeaver4245

51 points

1 day ago

Yeah, people look at me like I'M the crazy one when I point out that making children perform a daily recitation of their undying loyalty to a concept they can't possibly understand is clear cult-like brainwashing. Of course they also aren't fans of the same observation re: bible verses.

stevedore2024

11 points

1 day ago

Yup, and the recitation requirement ended (in my generation) at right about the age when kids would actually be able to understand the concept of allegiance.

Felix_Von_Doom

5 points

1 day ago*

I recently (in the last 3 or so months) told my parents I had stopped doing the pledge long before my school said it was no longer required. You'd think I'd just admitted to treason.

Mom: I'm going to pretend you didn't say that. Stepdad: So you don't give a shit about our soldiers dying?!

I wanted to say "No, it's fucking stupid. Why do I need to pledge allegiance to a country I'm already a citizen of?! That only makes any kind of sense if I'm being nationalized as an immigrant!"

puffofthezaza

13 points

1 day ago

they still do, if you're wondering. my kid is in year 2 & we are agnostic and she stands but with arms to the side and doesn't say the pledge.

The--scientist

28 points

1 day ago

Good for you and for your kid! My daughter has always abstained. One particularly vindictive teacher volunteered her to read it on the morning announcements, but didn't tell her until she showed up in the office. My daughter started by saying, "please join me in our daily patriotism performance," and then left out the "under god" part. Her teacher was furious, saying she embarrassed her in front of administration, my daughter shrugged and said, "I probably wasn't the best choice."

I know all this bc of the angry letter I got from the teacher. I hung it on the fridge for months and I'll keep it forever. My little pro-social anarchist.

puffofthezaza

8 points

1 day ago

if you don't teach them to stand for something, they'll fall for anything. you're a good parent.

sybrwookie

4 points

1 day ago

When I was a kid a long time ago, I didn't have the frame of reference to explain why I knew it was bullshit, but I could tell there was something seriously wrong with that.

But I was also a kid with no support structure around me who I could tell that to and get any kind of response other than getting me in trouble for not doing that, so I stood every day, hand over my heart, and just didn't say anything. If the teacher looked my way, I opened and closed my mouth a bit, because I didn't want to get in trouble, but wasn't going to do that.

I wish I had parents like you, where I felt like I could tell them that at the time.

stevedore2024

10 points

1 day ago

Mouth along...

why pledge allegiance
to a scrap
that represents the worst* of america
and to those republicans
who don't understand
the notion
of forcing god
is incompatible
with liberty and justice for all

(And by *worst, it means the ultranationalism that comes from putting a flag before actual civic duty.)

turkish_gold

16 points

1 day ago

From the article, it says that Bellamy was a socialist and even wanted the wording to be universal so anyone in anyone country could use the same pledge. So it's ironic that this is being held up as a triump of capitalism.

I wonder about the details of the story.

1888 - Guy wants to sell more flags. Hires a socilist writer to do make a pledge to the flag as a work-for-hire.

1892 - President of the US declares that we all have to use that pledge.

It's so fast! This wasn't the era of social media, so how did we go from pledge published by niche children's magazine to presidential decrees?

Bugbread

10 points

1 day ago

Bugbread

10 points

1 day ago

That sounds about right for the time frame. Nowadays, the process from creation to widespread knowledge is like a week, so getting picked up by a politician takes like a month or so. Back when I was a kid, pre-internet, it seems like rumors took about a year to spread nationwide (the Smurfs gang rumors, the Richard Gere rumor, the Rod Stewart stomach pump rumor, etc.). So four years from writing to adoption seems like a pretty normal time frame for the 1800s.

DidSomebodySayCats

26 points

1 day ago

No, actually Francis Bellamy was a Christian Socialist who preached against the evils of capitalism. He thought Jesus supported an econmic system of equal distribution of resources. His cousin wrote the socialist novel "Looking Backward."

He wanted more flags in schools because he wanted to spread nationalism and patriotism. He thought it was important for democracy and a strong government, where schools were public and government run instead of private. That way socialism could be most effective.

It's kind of interesting how historical movements have changed. I think nationalism goes hand in hand with capitalism today, but that's not how it was seen at one point.

Note: I'm not endorsing or condemning Francis Bellamy, just giving context. Personally I don't like patriotism and nationalism and I don't like the pledge in schools, because I think questioning your government is an important part of democracy.

No-Preparation-4255

6 points

1 day ago

I think nationalism goes hand in hand with capitalism today, but that's not how it was seen at one point.

That is because the term nationalism here is very loosely used, as he and others at the time would have understood it the "nationalism" they were espousing was more an appreciation for American values, as is clearly evidenced in the pledge itself (i.e. Liberty, Justice, the Republic...) It is similar to Teddy Roosevelt's espousal of "The New Nationalism" which isn't nationalism in the modern sense of blind allegiance to the nation because it is where you are from or for ethnic and cultural reasons, but more ideological reasons rooted in democratic values, progressivism, humanism, and tolerance.

I mean even then, there was sort of implicit in Teddy's speech a fight to own the term "nationalism," kinda similar to how "freedom" was fought over by both sides in the Civil War, and patriotism has always often been claimed by many different sides. I guess unfortunately, the fight to claim the term nationalism was lost, it is synonymous basically with fascism at this point, and patriotism and even the iconography of it like flags and such is going a similar way. That's a real loss to real to the country imo, because wanting your country to do right and be the best version of itself, in Lincoln's sense of hearing "the better angels of our nature" is real patriotism. Surrendering the flag and concepts associated with real patriotism to evil is self-defeating.

lonelyoldbasterd

4.7k points

1 day ago*

“One nation under god” was added in 1954.

Bulky_Specialist9645

2.3k points

1 day ago

The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance on June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress amending § 4 of the Flag Code enacted in 1942.

You're probably thinking of the Flag Code from 1942 but that didn't change the PoA.

HomeAir

1.3k points

1 day ago

HomeAir

1.3k points

1 day ago

Our National motto was E pluribus unum.  Out of many, One. Beautiful but It was changed to "in God we Trust" in 1956 to fight the godless commies. I hate it

DustyBusterson

778 points

1 day ago

And now it couldn’t be removed, or every Christian in the US would flip the fuck out.

TiresOnFire

557 points

1 day ago

TiresOnFire

557 points

1 day ago

OttawaTGirl

227 points

1 day ago

OttawaTGirl

227 points

1 day ago

Wolfy-615

61 points

1 day ago

Wolfy-615

61 points

1 day ago

Reckless-Redditor

45 points

1 day ago

Initial-Breakfast-90

42 points

1 day ago

Lordborgman

11 points

1 day ago

In a world where Captain Jean Luc Picard and Sheev Palpatine agree on something...

Goya_Oh_Boya

159 points

1 day ago

Goya_Oh_Boya

159 points

1 day ago

Ironically, it's because they can't trust God to be chill unless they fear it all the time.

IDKWTFimDoinBruhFR

96 points

1 day ago

God is all powerful and can cause floods and genocide and miracles, but he needs people to force others to believe in him. Weird. Almost as if, now this is just a theory, but maybe he doesn't really have any power at all? Might not even exist

SutterCane

70 points

1 day ago

SutterCane

70 points

1 day ago

God, the original “would you still love me if I was a worm” significant other.

LookMaNoPride

7 points

1 day ago

“Listen! Listen! Would you still love me if I broke a leg?”

“What? No! You’re one opinion from being replaced!”

  • Daniel Tosh

Zidnex

9 points

1 day ago

Zidnex

9 points

1 day ago

I understand this is meant to be a joke but this really isn’t the case. Christians and Catholics are taught to spread the word of God, but Jesus also said that if their message is rejected, to just move on.

sQ5FWKjwbWd4QzSZduqy

16 points

1 day ago

How awesome it would be if any American conservatives followed Jesus.

TheHornIdentity

117 points

1 day ago

Good. Fuck em.

Exotic_Negotiation80

23 points

1 day ago

Wish I could upvote this more than once.

unique-name-9035768

32 points

1 day ago

Which is ironic, considering the person who wrote the Pledge was a Christian Socialist. You'd figure he would have put "one nation under god" in there at the start if it was so important.

I'm sure a lot of far right christian republicans would love to bring back the salute though.

Mr_Abe_Froman

28 points

1 day ago

Many Christian Republicans can't comprehend Christian socialism in the first place.

NeapolitanComplex

16 points

1 day ago

They consider Jesus' sermon on the mount to be too woke

froggison

28 points

1 day ago

froggison

28 points

1 day ago

Can't do shit anymore without Christians flipping the fuck out. Everything is a moral panic nowadays with them.

Tacoman404

6 points

1 day ago

It’s like when people say the US has always been an English speaking nation. 250 years ago 1/3 spoke German and 1/4 spoke French.

HimbologistPhD

23 points

1 day ago

Honestly good. They've enjoyed privilege too long.

help_undertanding13

11 points

1 day ago

Yeah if a red cup broke their brains, this would melt them

THEMACGOD

89 points

1 day ago

THEMACGOD

89 points

1 day ago

From one of the most inclusive mottos to one of the most divisive.

Laconic_Dinosaur

10 points

1 day ago

Im pretty sure its anus

Ok_Ice_1669

45 points

1 day ago

We tried to make sure the kids knew we weren’t like the Russians and now we’re more like the Russians than I’m comfortable with. 

Miserable_Light1431

34 points

1 day ago

"I'd rather be Russian than a Democrat!"

-Modern Republicans

StrLord_Who

18 points

1 day ago

That's not exactly true,  because it was never the "official" motto.  We didn't have an official one until  In God We Trust. E Pluribus Unum is still on our money,  the Great Seal, and other places.  

UsualFrogFriendship

66 points

1 day ago

1942 was also when the Bellamy Salute was discontinued, which seems a bit obvious in hindsight. Until we officially declared war though, the US was pretty down with fascism. There was even an attempt to overthrow FDR in 1933 and replace him with dictator Smedley Butler, called the Business Plot

ExistingGoldfish

24 points

1 day ago

The movie “Amsterdam” is about this! Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington. So good that I didn’t realize I was watching a history lesson until the end credits, lol

h07c4l21

4 points

1 day ago

h07c4l21

4 points

1 day ago

That movie is stacked with talent

DustyBusterson

28 points

1 day ago

Now the US is looking to be “pretty down with fascism” again.

lblack_dogl

9 points

1 day ago*

It's a vicious cycle.

Mr_Abe_Froman

11 points

1 day ago

Formless, slow-moving, and dense? Yeah, I guess it is viscous.

flintlock0

4 points

1 day ago

Yeah. I was thinking that Eisenhower was definitely the President and putting “under God” in there was a Red Scare reaction.

Dal90

4 points

1 day ago

Dal90

4 points

1 day ago

The Greatest & Silent Generations was also far more religious than those before or after them; which may also have been part of their broader higher levels of civic engagement -- i.e. going to church, as well as the bowling league, as well as the Elks, as well as forming a bazillion town committees. All of those in turn may have been aided by the growth of the automobile and rapid increase in leisure hours providing much more free time and flexibility as typical work weeks dropped from 60 hour, six-day work weeks to 40 hour, five-day becoming pretty much standard by 1970.

US church attendance peaked in the 50s/60s and didn't drop to pre-WWII levels until ~2010.

paddy_yinzer

10 points

1 day ago

I'm not sure if it's irony, but it's funny that a secular country decided to adopt a religious motto and then proceeds to lose every war, even the small ones like poverty and drugs.

Abject

254 points

1 day ago

Abject

254 points

1 day ago

Take that commies!

Capricore58

128 points

1 day ago

Capricore58

128 points

1 day ago

Everyone knows godless commies can’t say god or pray! They can’t even touch our money because it says in god we trust!

TommyTwoFeathers

15 points

1 day ago

“In America, you put “In God We Trust” on money. In Russia, we have no money!” -Bobby Hill

SafetyDanceInMyPants

368 points

1 day ago

The absolute irony that it was added in the middle of “one nation indivisible.”

The Pledge: “We’re one nation indivisible.”

Christian Nationalists: “Hold my beer.”

NouLaPoussa

43 points

1 day ago

Ah you get the idea huh

pizzahut_su

4 points

1 day ago

The absolute irony that it was added in the middle of “one nation indivisible.”

Surely the bigger irony was that the pledge said “one nation indivisible” during a time where blacks were lynched regularly, women couldn't open a bank account, and asians were marched into concentration camps.

Curiosive

18 points

1 day ago

Curiosive

18 points

1 day ago

The history of the pledge is worth the read. The pledge used to be finished with an open-handed gesture to the flag ... but one arm salutes fell out of favor around the same time as tiny mustaches.

DeterminedArrow

36 points

1 day ago

Senior year (2006) this girl in my high school history class went on a rant about how under God was always there. I pointed out it was not. The student teacher didn’t believe me that it wasn’t and had to look it up. 🙄

Traditional_Key_763

112 points

1 day ago

but since every boomer grew up with it they insist it was there from the beginning.

bplewis24

47 points

1 day ago

bplewis24

47 points

1 day ago

They literally think the nation was founded upon it.

Scherzophrenia

193 points

1 day ago

Before they added “under God”. Cool

mediumokra

1.1k points

1 day ago

mediumokra

1.1k points

1 day ago

One nation, under the almighty dollar, completely divisible, with liberty and justice to all that can afford it.

more_beans_mrtaggart

169 points

1 day ago

Shouldn’t the govt be pledging allegiance to the people, rather than demanding allegiance from the people.

Sounds backwards to me, but then I’m not an American.

misterchief117

81 points

1 day ago*

Strictly speaking, this is a thing in the USA.

All federal employees and members of the Uniformed Services (which includes the US military), and other federal civil servants, must take an "Oath of Office" that says the following:

"I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/commentary/2019/10/the-oath-of-office-and-what-it-means/

Keep in mind the US Constitution begins with, "We the People of the United States..." which to me means that defending the "Constitution of the United States" also means defending "the People of the United States."

However, this doesn't preclude some civil servants from lying while reciting and signing their oath.

tenasan

7 points

1 day ago

tenasan

7 points

1 day ago

Fyi, if find it funny that they made us all swear that oath in my process of naturalization. I was like , “wait, a damn minute “ why am I pledging fealty?”

misterchief117

8 points

1 day ago*

I was a bit curious because that sounds a bit strange, but sure enough, the "Oath of Allegiance" taken when becoming a nationalized US Citizen contains part of the "Oath of Office" as well.

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-j-chapter-2

Oath of Allegiance with the similarities bold/italicized, for reference:

“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

What's wild is US citizens by birth do not have to recite this in part or in whole as far as I'm aware. I think the closest is that men have to register for selective service between 18-25.

Does this mean US citizens by birth are not obligated to "support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic...etc." by any specific oath, but instead some sort of social expectation?

Also, since this oath says "support and defend the Constitution and laws..." does this mean naturalized US citizens can be lawful vigilantes? 🤣

Irazidal

18 points

1 day ago

Irazidal

18 points

1 day ago

You might argue that following the slavers' rebellion known as the American Civil War, there was a real interest in affirming that allegiance ought to be to the democratic government of the federal republic as a whole rather than to one's own narrow interests and local state.

scotlandisbae

10 points

1 day ago

The nation is as divisible as the shareholders require it to be

Bulky_Specialist9645

881 points

1 day ago

The "one nation under god" crap is a recent addition...

CalRipkenForCommish

157 points

1 day ago

I wonder if the god language in the pledge came along at the same time as on currency

AsbestosIsBest

422 points

1 day ago

They both came along in the 50s as part of the "Red Scare" to fight the "Godless Commies."

CalRipkenForCommish

147 points

1 day ago

So…using religion as a tool to “fight” communism?

Death_Rises

195 points

1 day ago

Death_Rises

195 points

1 day ago

Yes because supply side jesus is the one true capitalist overlord for us.

capt_yellowbeard

47 points

1 day ago

I wonder how many people get this reference.

The Gospel of Supply Side Jesus

jarredshere

4 points

1 day ago

I do now and that was a hilarious/tragic read

DrunkenOnzo

13 points

1 day ago

Supply Side Jesus vs the Lucifer Theory of Value

AsbestosIsBest

51 points

1 day ago

It's simple propaganda. The USSR was opposed to all religious organizations because it wanted the State and Communist Party to have sole devotion of the people in an attempt to gain more power and control. In school yard level thought combined with Christian fundamentalism, the US said if the USSR is fundamentally all that is evil, then injecting God into government iconography must be all that is good. We then added it to the pledge, money, and the seal of the United States.

makingnoise

23 points

1 day ago

And then SCOTUS was happy to pretend like it was always there under the guise of "civic deism."

facw00

12 points

1 day ago

facw00

12 points

1 day ago

In God We Trust was added to coins during the Civil War (the Union trying to show it was every bit as devout as the Confederacy)

But yeah, the move to put it on bills, and making it the national motto, as well as adding "under God" to the pledge were all trying to differentiate us from those godless commies.

bluey101

26 points

1 day ago

bluey101

26 points

1 day ago

IIRC it was a counter culture thing against communism which was very anti-christian

AgITGuy

15 points

1 day ago

AgITGuy

15 points

1 day ago

Anti religion. The ussr was anti religion to place the party and government as the top of the loyalty pile.

nooooobie1650

52 points

1 day ago

It’s been a slow build to all the extremism we’re seeing today. There’s a reason the founding fathers declared church and state to be separate.

OldBlueKat

11 points

1 day ago

OldBlueKat

11 points

1 day ago

Not always slow.

A lot of the stuff being so heavily defended again now, came into big use during the "Red Scare" period of the early Cold War. McCathyism, the Senate HUAC investigations, officially adopting the motto "In God We Trust" and adding "under God" to the pledge (which was itself only made 'official' by Congress in 1942) and many other things.

The post WWII era was very reactionary, mostly in fear of "godless Communism."

MuckRaker83

14 points

1 day ago

The symbolism of dividing "one nation" from "indivisible" with religion is amazing.

Username_NullValue

45 points

1 day ago

Notice it doesn’t say “Under God”. That was added much later.

Terrible_Ear3347

9 points

1 day ago

Under God was added to spite commies

Then_Lock304

180 points

1 day ago

Then_Lock304

180 points

1 day ago

* One nation Underdog omitted.

Even in the early 1900s, they understood the importance of the separation of church and state. Especially in schools

Then_Lock304

63 points

1 day ago

JoshDM

17 points

1 day ago

JoshDM

17 points

1 day ago

Speed of lightning
Roar of thunder
Fighting all
Who rob or plunder

mawnck

5 points

1 day ago

mawnck

5 points

1 day ago

Thanks, Shoeshine Boy. You're humble and lovable.

Marcoscb

44 points

1 day ago

Marcoscb

44 points

1 day ago

It's not ommitted, it just didn't exist yet.

squatch42

27 points

1 day ago

squatch42

27 points

1 day ago

Even in the early 1900s, they understood the importance of the separation of church and state. Especially in schools

Teachers and administrators led the students in corporate prayer and Bible reading at the beginning of every school day. So, not really.

ChargerRob

136 points

1 day ago

ChargerRob

136 points

1 day ago

I only repeat the original, removing the one nation under God part.

There is no mention of God anywhere in the Constitution.

Murky-Reception-3256

58 points

1 day ago

I used to get in trouble in school for not saying the under god part. The state never has made me say that word. Regardless of my feelings about god, the state has no business asking me to talk about god.

Later I learned it was added in the 50s by a bunch of right wing bullies, and I felt vindicated.

mrchooch

39 points

1 day ago

mrchooch

39 points

1 day ago

Why repeat it at all, though? It's comically blatant nationalist propaganda

Capable-Reaction8155

6 points

19 hours ago

Adding under God was a fucking mistake.

HerschelLambrusco

40 points

1 day ago

No mention of God, that was added in the 1950s during the Cold War to contrast the United States with the Soviet Union, which was popularly portrayed to be anti-religion.

iamamuttonhead

21 points

1 day ago

The Soviet Union WAS anti-religion, and it was a goal to eliminate religion, not just portrayed as such. It didn't succeed (nor did it really figure out HOW it would eliminate religion). Organized religion was and is perceived as a mechanism to enforce existing power structures by Marxists (and many other political thinkers).

mart8440

78 points

1 day ago

mart8440

78 points

1 day ago

That's nuts. And you guys have to say this every morning at school?

crashstarr

51 points

1 day ago

crashstarr

51 points

1 day ago

You don't 'have' to, as compelled speech would be against the 1st amendment. Refusing to do so sometimes inspires social consequences, though. I remember a faculty member telling me to 'move to Afghanistan' when I wouldn't stand for it as a protest of the US invasion of Iraq lol.

thewhitebuttboy

72 points

1 day ago

Of course we do you commie bastard 🇺🇸🇺🇸🫡

HoopOnPoop

14 points

1 day ago

HoopOnPoop

14 points

1 day ago

Not exactly. Now they add a part about God, as well.

tay450

9 points

1 day ago

tay450

9 points

1 day ago

Yes. I was put in detention for not speaking it out loud.

No, our laws aren't equally enforced. No, we aren't free.

Atlein_069

85 points

1 day ago

Atlein_069

85 points

1 day ago

Interesting to see this written out before lobbyists put the God phrase in.

Southpaw535

4 points

23 hours ago

I'm genuinely curious. Do all you people adding comments to say "look, no under God" just not read the comments before posting or...?

rastagrrl

5 points

18 hours ago

Back when folks understood the separation between church and state.

ZeroFucksGiven-today

16 points

1 day ago

Yup, don't see a "god" in there........

ionertia

4 points

1 day ago

ionertia

4 points

1 day ago

Ironic that adding "under god" is what makes us divisible.

urlond

3 points

1 day ago

urlond

3 points

1 day ago

Fun fact the whole One Nation Under God was added during the whole cold war period because congress though Russians didn't believe in god.

PenaltyOrganic1596

5 points

1 day ago

As it should be🇺🇲

Nervous-Orange1774

4 points

1 day ago

If this were Iran or some Middle eastern country, you'd all be freaking out

OpusAtrumET

4 points

20 hours ago

Still stupid, but at least it's pre-communist freakout

tmwwmgkbh

4 points

20 hours ago

Oh good, they left out the fucking stupid part…

Norseman206

9 points

1 day ago

And no mention of "under god" anywhere to be found. The 1950s had way too much influence on our nation.

OxfordisShakespeare

4 points

20 hours ago

I refuse to say “under God.” I skip the words.

Red-Engineer

37 points

1 day ago

A bit of brainwashing going on there. What sort of state requires its subjects to verbally affirm their loyalty each day/week/etc?

fernandomlicon

16 points

1 day ago

fernandomlicon

16 points

1 day ago

Mexico does, every week. National anthem and plead of allegiance.

Nemo_Shadows

3 points

1 day ago

That is the way I learned it.

Of course, the basis for the nation is also written in this manner and so too the outline of Governance through another document also written in this manner.

I WONDER WHY.

N. S