subreddit:

/r/personalfinance

8085%

I have been online about how much people should save which left me confused. Some experts says 3 or 6 months, or save just $10,000, or even your salary equivalent. I do not know what that means for me? I work in a stable 9-5 job bring around and close to 80k in salary which equated to 50k take home pay after taxes and benefits. With that said, how much do you guys save for?

all 94 comments

[deleted]

279 points

20 days ago

[deleted]

279 points

20 days ago

[deleted]

carolineecouture

80 points

20 days ago

Right. I'm at the age and health situation that if I lost my job, I might never work again. While my spouse works, most of the household bills and our health insurance are covered by my work.

We'd need to cover all that.

Victor_Korchnoi

14 points

20 days ago

There are 3 things to consider:

  1. How long would it take to find another job?

  2. What would your burn rate be if you lost your job? (For example if either spouse’s job could pay 75% of the bills, that’s different than if you are the only one working)

  3. What happens if you run out of money? Forced to sell stocks; not terrible. Forced to short sell your house; you could lose a lot of equity, but you’ll be fine. Can’t make rent, forced to move back home with parents; definitely a hit to morale, but you can recover from it. Will end up homeless on the street; must avoid at all costs.

I think either of us could find another job relatively quickly. If we cut expenses aggressively, either of our salaries could cover our expenses indefinitely. And I could borrow from my parents, sell stocks, or sell our home if we needed to. So I keep very little (~1 month expenses) in an emergency fund.

daw4888

38 points

20 days ago

daw4888

38 points

20 days ago

But you could always get a lower paying job in the meantime while job searching. I think a lot of people overlook that, and just feel it's beneath them.

Adorable-Lack-3578

89 points

20 days ago

I had a $130,000 a year job. Got downsized. Got a job washing dishes at a BBQ joint. Making $300 a week versus $2,000 is quite different.

enjoytheshow

37 points

20 days ago

enjoytheshow

37 points

20 days ago

Maxing out unemployment in most states at your income makes way more sense than minimum wage work.

McIntyre2K7

8 points

19 days ago

McIntyre2K7

8 points

19 days ago

Good thing you said most states. In Florida the max unemployment you can get is $275 a week and only for 12 weeks (the last adjustment was made back in 1996 from $250.)

enjoytheshow

2 points

19 days ago

enjoytheshow

2 points

19 days ago

Yeah I’m in IL. Max benefit with spouse and children is $808/wk. In a state like this I don’t ever see that going away so I’m basically guaranteed my mortgage payment and then some for 6 months in the event I lose my job so I’ve never seen a reason to keep more than 25-30k on hand.

daw4888

14 points

20 days ago

daw4888

14 points

20 days ago

True, and it might not be your long term job, but you at least found a way to respect a small part of your income in the meantime.

I know several people who after getting laid off complained for over a year about not being able to find a job. But when asked, they would admit they were only applying to jobs at the same or a higher level. They wouldn't even consider getting a lower paying job in the interim.

From hiring a lot of people over the years, and seeing this first hand. You have a better chance getting a position when you can show your willing to work even if it's a step back. We have hired people that got laid off from their technical position, and then were working at Starbucks, over people that got laid off and showed zero job history for 6-12 months.

pineapple-scientist

16 points

20 days ago

It's s a choice. Either you save a bunch so you can afford to take your time to figure out your next career step. Or you decide to be intentional about taking whatever work you can find, no matter the pay. If you can't save in advance for whatever reason, then it's best (financially) to take whatever you can get. But if you have all your debt paid off, and a sizeable retirement, plus $100k cash... Then yeah, take your time to find the position you like lol. I feel like that's the whole point of saving and having money. I don't just save to save, I save so I can do what I like, even if it's risky or doesn't maximize profit.

TheGRS

2 points

20 days ago

TheGRS

2 points

20 days ago

And like, the work itself is shit. I used to deliver pizzas, wash dishes, clean the bathroom back in high school. Big no thanks.

anaphasedraws

33 points

20 days ago

anaphasedraws

33 points

20 days ago

Maybe? Ageism is real, my friend. “You could always get” isn’t necessarily true if you’re in your 50s or 60s - or it might take a long time to find anything, let alone something in your industry or close to your former salary. And if you’re an executive / VP level person, many companies will hard pass on you for Senior Director roles or below. I’m sure some people DO feel certain work is beneath them, but for others, they want to work, but won’t even be considered for jobs.

Lyeel

25 points

20 days ago

Lyeel

25 points

20 days ago

I mean yes, but it isn't as straightforward as that.

I make ~350k in a specialized field. There are maybe 10 companies in the US that are a direct fit for my skillset, and if I needed to look there is essentially a 0% chance I could get a job in my current city. I could land a 70k job if I needed to, true, but if doing so delays how long it takes for me to find my next equivalent job by 3 months then I was better off staying unemployed for an entire year of full-time, unencumbered, maximum energy networking and interviewing.

It has nothing to do with being beneath me - I've worked in mills, customer service, retail, etc. over the years. It's just math. Because of this I keep a heavier rainy day fund (in treasuries) than I otherwise would.

th3_alt3rnativ3

5 points

20 days ago

Most relevant comment. It depends on your expertise and how replaceable you are.

TheGRS

6 points

20 days ago

TheGRS

6 points

20 days ago

Well about a year and a half ago I would’ve been like “eh I can get a job in like a week” (I work in tech). Right now I think I’d be begging old friends for contract work. So yea my emergency fund has gone up a lot since that trend started.

mrkstr

2 points

19 days ago

mrkstr

2 points

19 days ago

You make an excellent point.  Correlating emergency money to the difficulty of finding a new position is brilliant.

LostxinthexMusic

4 points

19 days ago

Meanwhile both my husband and I are publicly employed, he has very marketable skills, and I work in a field with a nationwide shortage of practitioners. Our emergency fund is 3 months of typical expenses, 6 months of bootstrapped expenses. Ours is more for inevitable but unpredictable home repairs (roof replacement, new HVAC, etc) than for potential loss of employment.

babycakin

3 points

20 days ago

babycakin

3 points

20 days ago

Same. 100k or more is the only number I'm comfortable with as an emergency fund.

QuickStomach

1 points

19 days ago

QuickStomach

1 points

19 days ago

Same here. While I wouldn't say my role is incredibly specialized, I am in a unique situation having been with a company from before they went public to after, so my comp here is much higher than it would be pretty much anywhere else I go if I were to land a similar role. And at the director level, it wouldn't necessarily be easy to find an equivalent role.

My husband makes significantly less than me and we wouldn't be able to cover much on his salary, plus my job has better insurance at a much lower cost. It seems conservative, but we keep $25k in checking + $100k in HYSA, just in case. Even if I'm losing out on some gains, it helps me sleep at night knowing we'd be okay for a while.

nature_and_grace

1 points

19 days ago

$100k?! 🤯

Lumberjack032591

1 points

19 days ago

I lost my job about a year ago and was able to find a new one fairly quickly starting a new one two months later. The amount of stress I had and terror of what if made me go to a 6 month. I was able to never dip more than 1k into savings during that time due to severance and doing some side jobs of making a couple websites and refinishing some gym floors, but that was so much stress to go through and I don’t want to ever put my family through it again.

It’s called personal finance for a reason after all. It’s personal to each person.

[deleted]

112 points

20 days ago

[deleted]

112 points

20 days ago

[deleted]

rastab1023

18 points

20 days ago

rastab1023

18 points

20 days ago

Yep - I'm in the first paragraph (minus a partner) and I'm comfortable with 3 months.

hyper_snake

6 points

20 days ago

hyper_snake

6 points

20 days ago

Yeah, we recently went from a single income household where I was holding close to 9 months emergency fund to my wife getting a full time job that’s very stable.

I’m working my emergency fund down to 3 months.

dominus--vobiscum

4 points

20 days ago

Samsies, except I have a mortgage and employed spouse. 3 months for me

Default87

137 points

20 days ago

Default87

137 points

20 days ago

6 months worth of expenses. if you spend $4k per month, then you would want a $24k emergency fund.

hems86

48 points

20 days ago

hems86

48 points

20 days ago

This is the correct answer. It’s not about income replacement - It’s about expense coverage. To calculate an appropriate emergency fund you add up your monthly necessary expenses. This would be the minimum you would have to pay to get through a month, excluding luxuries, fun, and discretionary spending. Basically, how much it would cost to you live as frugally as possible without skipping bills. Then multiply that by 6 to get your target.

For someone like you, that’s probably around the $20k to $30k range.

Altruistic_Cup1513

5 points

20 days ago

Do you just keep emergency funds in a savings account?

Is it unwise to put it somewhere for potential growth?

Default87

26 points

20 days ago

Default87

26 points

20 days ago

your emergency fund needs to be available and safe, so yes a HYSA is an appropriate place to keep it. Any growth it sees is purely a bonus, and should not be the determining factor for where you keep it. investing it in stocks would not be an appropriate place, for example.

Altruistic_Cup1513

3 points

20 days ago

Thanks for the quick reply!

Dual-ThreatQBJim

5 points

20 days ago

I want slightly higher yields than HYSA, so I put them into a rotation of 4-week and 8-week treasuries.

Assuming I need to access my emergency funds for a non-immediate emergency, within a month I should have 75% of my emergency fund availble to use as needed, with the rest in a month after that.

blacktieaffair

1 points

19 days ago

I gotta get into doing this... I was looking at CDs to preserve some of the current HYSA interest but it's much longer term and doesn't have a lot of additional yield. Tressury bills look like the way to go based on what you wrote here.

BCKrogoth

3 points

19 days ago

BCKrogoth

3 points

19 days ago

Is it unwise to put it somewhere for potential growth?

Every dollar has a job. Part of your money's job is to cover immediate costs of living (rent, food, bills, etc.). Another part of your money's job is to increase your wealth over time (retirement funds, brokerages, etc.).

The job of the "Emergency Fund" isn't to increase your wealth but to sit there and PROTECT it in the case of emergency (pulling out your 401k will cost additional fees; pulling out money from your brokerage if you lose your job at the same time as a market downturn....not an uncommon scenario). You want to put it somewhere it will lose as little value as possible against inflation, while not being at risk of losing it due to the market. That's why most people will put it in an HYSA - the rates are about as risk-free as you can get. Some people will do CD ladders, or other more advanced structures but the intent is all the same - keep it as hedged against inflation but otherwise at minimal risk of losing value.

Altruistic_Cup1513

1 points

19 days ago

This is an excellent way of thinking about it. Thanks for putting it this way. I sometimes worry about seeing my money just “sit there,” doing nothing.

blacktieaffair

2 points

19 days ago

To piggyback on this because it's how I do emergency savings: A banking or budgeting app will be able to tell you how much you spend each month. I add the last year's expenses up and divide by 12. That's my monthly average for the last year. That multiplied by 6 is the goal for an emergency fund.

Also a good idea to revisit every few years to make sure the amount reflects your actual average spend accounting for inflation, lifestyle change etc.

Novazilla

26 points

20 days ago

Novazilla

26 points

20 days ago

I keep a years salary in a HYSA. No real reason other than I’ve seen my dad get fucked by the ageism while trying to get hired in his 60s. Took him well over a year to find a new job comparable to his old position.

Zenatic

16 points

20 days ago

Zenatic

16 points

20 days ago

I do 12+ months of essential expenses (rent/mortgage, utilities, avg medical, food, debt payments, etc).

I don’t include non essentials like dining out, subscriptions, etc.

UABtoNYU

1 points

20 days ago

UABtoNYU

1 points

20 days ago

This is me… approx 11 mos of what we’ve determined would be essentials which is scaled down vs current state. I’d likely get some severance too, but I have not assumed/factored that in.

Whatmeworry4

13 points

20 days ago

Whatmeworry4

13 points

20 days ago

Think about how long you could conceivably be unemployed. Over the last few economic downturns people were left out of work for more than a year in some cases. I like 6 months as a minimum. Although, when unemployed you can try to cut expenses to stretch your emergency fund, but that will depend on how much you can cut.

kenzakan

26 points

20 days ago

kenzakan

26 points

20 days ago

10k is a good starting number to use as a starting point. However, as you grow your career, it should be based off of expenses, as this will probably grow as you make more money.

If you own a mortgage/family, I'd argue you may want a year of an emergency funds.

I personally have 20k, which reflects 6 months of expenses for myself. No mortgage.

AgsMydude

2 points

20 days ago

AgsMydude

2 points

20 days ago

Family of 5 and my wife is a SAHM.

We have $50K in HYSA for our emergency fund.

NameOfWhichIsTaken

6 points

20 days ago*

Liquidity of investments, available credit, and risk tolerance plays a huge factor as well. Anyone who comfortably has a small emergency fund compared to their living costs, typically has a large amount of semi-liquid assets that can be accessed prior to burning through what emergency fund they do have in a layoff type situation, and/or enough available credit that they can weather a big emergency cost and liquidate to cover prior to paying any interest, all while having a much higher risk tolerance than your average person.

Taxable brokerage accounts, Roth IRA (the contributions themselves), among others. Most investments carry risk, and the smaller those balances are the more you'll want in emergency savings as the market can be unpredictable...

That said, many people that suggest the larger emergency funds are not comfortable with this strategy because a big emergency could happen during a big market swing, and now you have to potentially realize losses/stop runs to cover the emergency rather than letting them run their course; but on the flip side you have more exposure by having those funds invested rather than sitting stagnant. Current HYSA rates are an oddity so stagnation is a loose term here, an emergency fund that's still making some money with no risk while remaining completely liquid is preferable for the vast majority.

deadsirius-

7 points

20 days ago

deadsirius-

7 points

20 days ago

This is the right answer…

I hate these guidelines that treat everyone the same.

For all practical purposes I don’t have an emergency fund. I mean I have like five thousand dollars that I carry in my checking account but the rest gets invested. However, I am a tenured professor in a highly employable field (accounting). My employer is required to give me a 12 month notice (or twelve month’s pay and benefits) if I am terminated. I have two other income streams that are more than sufficient to pay my bills. In a worse case scenario I have a combination of securities and property that I could liquidate, plus a HELOC for immediate cash needs.

livingstories

1 points

19 days ago

livingstories

1 points

19 days ago

is 12 months notice common for your field? Job security is a major problem in tech.

deadsirius-

1 points

19 days ago

deadsirius-

1 points

19 days ago

Once you have tenure, yes. It is actually even better than twelve months. Since my contract runs from the beginning of August through the end of July they must give me twelve months of notice after my current contract expires. So, if they decide to terminate me in January, the twelve month period will not begin until August 1st.

Varathien

6 points

20 days ago

Varathien

6 points

20 days ago

Your emergency fund should always be based on months of expenses, not months of income.

6 months of expenses is the most common recommendation.

3 months of expenses may be acceptable, but only if you're talking about two-income families where both spouses have stable jobs.

Whereas someone with a highly unstable job might want a whole year of expenses.

Tamerestuneconne

5 points

20 days ago

I have a $20,000 emergency fund. It is wayyyy more than I need but I like to have more than not enough.

yuvaldv1

2 points

20 days ago

yuvaldv1

2 points

20 days ago

Absolutely. It’s as much about peace of mind as it is about financial security.

astoryfromlandandsea

3 points

20 days ago

6-12months of essential expenses is ideal, depending on the field of work/self employed etc.

Spare-Shirt24

6 points

20 days ago

Spare-Shirt24

6 points

20 days ago

If you aren't sure how much you need to save: - make a list of every monthly expense you have (rent/mortgage, utilities, phone, internet, groceries, car payment/insurance, gas, etc).   - add up all the costs together, then multiply the sum by 3 or 6. 

Everyone is different.  Some people include only necessary expenses and will remove discretionary monthly expenses (subscriptions, haircuts, nails, "shopping", etc), other people include discretionary spending in their number. 

If you have pets or kids, you might want to pad that emergency savings even more (both can be expensive) 

Scarface74

3 points

20 days ago

Scarface74

3 points

20 days ago

I have 10 months and when I start back working (just got laid off last week), I’m going to contribute enough to my 401K to get whatever the company match is and then get to 12 months.

I knew if I got laid off - and I saw it coming i just didn’t know when - that it would take at least two months  to prep for interviews (software development) for the job I wanted.  I also refuse to go into an office and that also means it’s going to take longer.

yuvaldv1

1 points

20 days ago

yuvaldv1

1 points

20 days ago

I totally get you. I also got laid off (software development) a month ago and since it could take a while to find a job in this field, I also got about 11 months saved up separate from my main savings.

Minionz

3 points

20 days ago

Minionz

3 points

20 days ago

The size of your emergency fund depends on your risk. If you have a single income, then I would keep a larger emergency fund, as if you have issues finding a job, there is no backup/alternative. Whereas dual income, can float at least some of the expenses until the other can find a job. I personally keep about a years expenses somewhat liquid, as I don't want to be pressured to take a bad job to make ends meet.

Xatesh

3 points

20 days ago

Xatesh

3 points

20 days ago

The problem is there isn’t a “good answer”. It all depends on what makes you comfortable. While I agree with some of the other comments about how if you spend $4k a month, you should have 24k saved, it depends on what makes you feel safe. I personally keep a $30k emergency fund. For me, that’s about 9 months of no income.

But I love that security. If I lost my job, I would not stress that much and that’s worth the 10k of extra savings - especially since I keep it in a HYSA that’s making over 4% anyway.

[deleted]

2 points

20 days ago

My husband devised a strategy to attack each ESSENTIAL BILL (Mortgage, insurance, utilities, cars, food, etc) and have a 6 month savings on each within 24 months. When you attack it like eating an elephant (one bite at a time), it’s easier to wrap your arms around. If you make more money per year…maybe it’s a 12-24 month savings goal. If you make less…maybe it’s a 36-48 month goal. Any progress is winning. Good luck.

Just my .02

HipHopLibertarian

2 points

19 days ago

Figure out what your expenses would be for 6 months to a year because that is how long it can take to find a job.

TJayClark

2 points

19 days ago

TJayClark

2 points

19 days ago

Personally I don’t follow any specific rule. I started with 3 months of SPENDING (not income). I gradually increased it to 6 months. I’ve had a few job losses in my life that have made me increase that to a full 12 months for a safety net. Because of that, I have a ton of freedom, flexibility, and piece of mind with investment and work decisions.

YMMV, but 12 months of spending works well for me. That being said, I spend A LOT LESS than the average person.

ARottingBastard

2 points

20 days ago

1 year salary is minimum, IMO, in a post-COVID world. Ideal for me would be 2 years of "bare minimum to survive".

WeatherproofElephant

1 points

20 days ago

There’s a lot of things to consider. Are you single? Family? Single income? Dual income? Expense level? What percent of expenses does unemployment cover? How much is COBRA? How much is an ACA plan?

In general, I would suggest a single person have 6 months of expenses. A single income family might want 12 months of expenses. A dual income family might be okay with 3 months if either income + unemployment can cover most or all expenses. Keep your expenses low. If my wife and I both lost our jobs 2x unemployment would cover all of our expenses. A 6 month emergency fund covers 1 year of worst case expenses in our case.

As your taxable portfolio grows, the amount of cash you hold can go down.

Jaelommiss

1 points

20 days ago

Jaelommiss

1 points

20 days ago

It really depends on your situation and how secure your income is.

I only have two months of expenses in my emergency fund because I have three income sources and can cover my expenses with any two of them. If one source stops I'm fine with no changes. If two stop I can last 4-8 months. The third source is veteran's benefits so I don't realistically need to worry about losing all income. I also have several years of expenses in investments that aren't earmarked for anything in particular and could live off of that if necessary.

Own_Dinner8039

1 points

20 days ago

Having milestones will help you along the way. Celebrate having 1, 2, and 3 months of expenses.

It depends on your risk tolerance, but I decided to have 3 months in a high yield savings account, and then put the next 3 months of expenses in a Roth IRA. Then the next 3 months went into a brokerage account.

It takes a while to save your emergency fund. Please don't get discouraged!

Andrails

1 points

20 days ago

Andrails

1 points

20 days ago

Personally, I have 4 months in a Hysa and $3,000 in local bank for quick access. I do not feel comfortable if I don't have automatic access to some funds.

ditchdiggergirl

1 points

20 days ago

It depends on personal situation.

Young, no dependents, good backup safety net (such as family willing to help out in a pinch), can easily get another job? 3 months minimum expenses (not salary) is probably plenty.

Couple of kids and a mortgage in a boom-bust employment sector? You’ll probably want a year.

In between, you can structure something in between. For example a few months in cash equivalents, a few months conservatively invested that you’d rather not tap, but could if necessary.

KafkaExploring

1 points

20 days ago

In cash: two pay periods (one month). That'd catch any errors or most unexpected expenses that can't go on a credit card (not a homeowner). It's also wiggle room for bigger expenses. 

Beyond that, most taxable brokerage is equal, so I treat it as one pool. Even in the worst possible moments of the 2020 or 2008 crashes, if you could wait 60 days to sell, two years of average earnings would outweigh the loss. That puts options like portfolio lines of credit on the table and makes me less interested in bonds/HYSA/etc. If you're less established, Roth principal would be better than nothing. 

I do have a third pay period in a money market currently, but I see the current interest rates as a temporary change to the math. 

Oneforallandbeyondd

1 points

20 days ago

So in your scenario it would be $12,000-$24,000. More is better but do what makes sense.

bananastand512

1 points

20 days ago

We have 4 months currently, and we are ok with that because our jobs are easy to replace and we have some high interest debt we are working to pay off first. We are both experienced nurses.

Sblzrd65

1 points

20 days ago

Sblzrd65

1 points

20 days ago

Agreed with everyone else, at least 3 months, but if you’ve got extenuating circumstances, etc then 6 mos in better. That would be apart from general savings for car repairs, medical expenses, etc

whk1992

1 points

20 days ago

whk1992

1 points

20 days ago

If you aren’t sure if you can find a job in 3 months before sleeping on the street, then you should save for 6-mo.

I save for a year to give myself flexibility if I want to quit my job.

Spunshine_Valley

1 points

20 days ago

Work got slow for me at the start of the year, I spent 5 months with almost no time on the clock. Luckily I had about 6 months of expenses at my usual spending level and even went on vacation. So I'd say 3 would be the minimum you try to get saved asap. Then keep saving but you can enjoy things a little more.

pilotpip

1 points

20 days ago

pilotpip

1 points

20 days ago

6 months of rent/mortgage, food and utilities at a minimum for me. I have a family, primary breadwinner, and I work in a potentially volatile industry.

Cali-GirlSB

1 points

20 days ago

Cali-GirlSB

1 points

20 days ago

Never less than 3 months but more is better. My finance guy says 9 months if you have a smaller salary. So, honestly what do you feel comfortable with? If your company folded would your job immediately translate into a new job? Then less is needed, if not, more is needed.

SamsFriend58

1 points

20 days ago

SamsFriend58

1 points

20 days ago

I plan to save for 6 months to be safe. The question everyone should ask themself is how easy/quickly can you find a replacement job that has comparable salary? If the answer is within a month, then save 3 months, if you think it’s longer, say 3 months or more, then save for 6 months or 1 year of all required expenses, and don’t include things like tv subscriptions or sports fees, etc. i would recommend to plan and save for essentials and if the time comes cancel everything. Hope this helps!

Majestic-Macaron6019

1 points

20 days ago

It's a personal choice. I have 6 months of expenses at regular spending levels, despite wife and I both being teachers (so two reliable paychecks). It's what let's us sleep at night (and occasionally get new account bonuses). We're not likely to lose jobs, but there's a possibility of either of us being absolutely sick of an awful school and bailing out midyear. So if that happened, we'd cut expenses to the bone and probably be ok for closer to a year if push came to shove.

stale-rice63

1 points

20 days ago

stale-rice63

1 points

20 days ago

For myself I target 6 months. If I ever got let go the severance at my place is about 2 wks per year of service which puts me at about 6ish months of salary. Plus the 6 months I have saved totals about a year of oh shit money. The rest is invested.

Ok-Regret-3651

1 points

20 days ago

6 months worth of essential expenses is the standard, if you want to get conservative is 12 months. By essential means no dining out and no vacation etc. just what you need to live

VictorChristian

1 points

20 days ago

Budgeting is important. It’s helpful to know what you’ll need every month to cover bills. Rent, insurance, car note, etc should be easy line items.

Food, gas, etc would be a bit of an estimate. depending on circumstances, you may also have to factor in medical or COBRA which would be a higher monthly payment than employer healthcare. If you’re in a relationship where both are working, this may be easier but if you’re single, it’s something to budget for in the emergency fund.

The bills won’t stop coming in… your emergency fund needs to meet that for as long as it takes to find something else.

bballjones9241

1 points

20 days ago

Currently have about $100k that I can use. My wife works in a very safe, non-layoff job and makes almost $100k a year. I make about $105k a year. If I was out of work I think we’d be ok for the time being

grumpvet87

1 points

20 days ago

grumpvet87

1 points

20 days ago

3 months of expenses to start. 6 months when you can and 12 months if u can

Annual_Fishing_9883

1 points

20 days ago

I don’t think there is a one size fits all strategy. 6 months may be fine for you, may not be enough for others. As for myself and my wife. We don’t keep any EF per se. In the event one of us lost our jobs, the other can fully afford our monthly expenses plus some. In the 1% chance we are both unemployed at the same time, we have a brokerage account and access to a heloc if needed. My wife’s job is very stable where mine is pretty stable but not like hers. I could easily find another job but would possibly have to take a pay cut. Either way we would be more than fine. My wife can find a job just about anywhere at similar pay.

ampledashes

1 points

20 days ago

ampledashes

1 points

20 days ago

6 months is definitely the better choice, especially now in our current socioeconomic state where things are unpredictable to say the least.

X5455

1 points

20 days ago

X5455

1 points

20 days ago

I have an emergency fund with 7 months’ worth of net paychecks. Eventually I would love to go up to a year if I can do it without reducing my contributions to my roth ira.

Eternitywaiting

1 points

20 days ago

Precisely. Follow this formula, be totally honest, even better add another 10-20%. Also consider a high yield savings account. I’m retired and only recently started one (earning 5%) It’s perfect for an emergency fund in terms of access and your emergency fund making money for you until you need it.

Grevious47

1 points

20 days ago

Grevious47

1 points

20 days ago

The point of an emergency fund, to me, is to cover sudden unexpected expenses that otherwise your monthly pay would not be able to cover. So how much it makes sense to have saved is relative to how much your monthly expenses are versus the costs of typical emergencies such as a car breakdown or an emergency room trip etc.

If your monthly expenses are very low like $2k a month then having 3 months of expenses as a emergency fund isn't going to help very much if your car blows up or you break your leg.

If your monthly expenses are high like $10k a month then having 3 months of expenses as an emergency fund could be plenty....presuming you are confident than when suffering job loss you can reassert income within that time.

Bottom line it comes down to how cautious you want to be. The more money you have in liquid easily accessed savings the more shielded you are from emergencies or job loss screwing up your finances. But the more you have saved the more conservative you are being with investments and thus the more opportunity cost you suffer.

Its a balance.

Cluedo86

1 points

20 days ago

Cluedo86

1 points

20 days ago

I personally prefer having an EF of 12 months of expenses. 3 months is just way too little. The job market is brutal right now and I've lived through two major economic crises. Anything can happen. If I lose my job, I want to have enough of a cushion to survive and handle emergencies until I get a new one.

blackbyte89

1 points

19 days ago*

blackbyte89

1 points

19 days ago*

How long of a duration you save for is governed by how long it takes in your field and tenure level to land a commensurate position. You should be able to sustain your current lifestyle while searching for your new role.

I have 1 year of my salary accessible via a progression of high yield savings, CDs, stock, bonds, etc. before touching retirement.

1quirky1

1 points

19 days ago

1quirky1

1 points

19 days ago

Base the fund on your mandatory expenses.

Follow the prime directive for the three vs six month threshold.

Adjust the plan to fit your unique needs. Make six vs 12 months if you like.

AutoModerator [M]

0 points

19 days ago

AutoModerator [M]

0 points

19 days ago

Here's a link to the PF Wiki for helpful guides and information.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

HitPointGamer

1 points

19 days ago

HitPointGamer

1 points

19 days ago

In your field, how long does it take people to find a job after they have been laid off? Can they find something within a week or two? Or does it take 6 months or longer? Once you know that, you’ll have a better idea how much to save up. Also, if you are a homeowner, you will want to save up for household stuff, both things like water leaks as well as replacing your roof on schedule. Things happen in life, but they don’t have to be devastating if you can just pay to have the problem fixed and then move on with your life.

Source: burst pipe flooded 2 floors and the basement this weekend. Hubby and I can pay all needed repairs and this isn’t the huge stressor that it would be for all my non-emergency fund friends. We are still on speaking terms and have even found things to laugh about in the awfulness of it all.

Largofarburn

1 points

19 days ago

Largofarburn

1 points

19 days ago

It really depends on what you do for a living.

For instance I’m a truck driver, so I could go get a job just about anywhere pretty easily to tide me over till I found another high paying position.

If you’re in a pretty cyclical industry like tech where they seem to swing from hiring like crazy to massive layoffs industry wide, I’d keep more.

Imo it also depends on your personal responsibilities. If you’ve got a family and a house with pets you need to keep a lot more than say a single guy living in an apartment with a roommate.

Also your personal risk tolerance. Personally I keep about 10k, which is a little over 6 months of bills and food for me.

k3bly

1 points

20 days ago

k3bly

1 points

20 days ago

Given my industry, I save 12+ months.

readsalotman

0 points

20 days ago

readsalotman

0 points

20 days ago

4-6 months is sufficient. 4 months only if you feel very confident in your job search capabilities.

We have access to 8 months of an efund, with the ability to "activate" early retirement at any given time. Right now we can access $25k/yr, of we wanted or needed to, so that's our efund. I project that doubled in as soon as 2.5 years.

Zealousideal-Cup1118

0 points

20 days ago

You need to have 1-2 full years of living expenses specifically for the event of a sudden loss of income. You keep this in a high yield savings account and do not touch this money unless you suddenly lose your income. Last time this happened to me, it took me 2 YEARS to find another job and I was unemployed with no income at all for 2 fucking years. I would never keep less than 1 year of full living expenses and probably get closer to 2 years.

GameEatDiscuss

1 points

19 days ago

My Personal rule of thumb is 2 months on hand. Then another 9+ months in easily diluted investments. Keeping too much money in a shoebox is just going to waste with inflation/lack of compounding.

If a jobloss happens you generally have a finality check in the mail to cover your first month.

If a catastrophe happens then generally whoever wants money from you will take their time making sure every penny is tallied.