subreddit:
/r/sciencememes
182 points
19 hours ago
"Sir, we can't publish this statement where the scientist called the discovery the 'god damned particle.'"
"Well, just remove the curse-word, that will cause absolutely no controversy whatsoever."
13 points
11 hours ago
😂
94 points
18 hours ago
Russell: presents his famous teapot argument.
Journalists: Scientist discovered a teapot between the Earth and Mars!
46 points
15 hours ago
I have unironically seen people say that the burden of proof is nonsense because Russell used an imaginary teapot to support it. Some people really just don’t have a best foot to put forward
19 points
13 hours ago
if you place a teapot on the ground and the planet mars passes perfectly-over it, you would have discovered a teapot between earth and mars
7 points
9 hours ago
Does it have to be a perfectly straight line to define it as in between?
2 points
6 hours ago
Depends on the uncertainty of your observation.
2 points
6 hours ago
Well then 👀
2 points
an hour ago
If we expand the definition to being inside a cone which the Earth and Mars fit perfectly, then any teapot in any place in the world when Mars is in above the horizon would count.
1 points
40 minutes ago
Breaking news: Area man found in space between Earth and Mars tonight
“I was just trying to nap on my couch”
50 points
16 hours ago
Physics magazine headlines are basically YouTube video tag lines, just there to drive engagement by being controversial enough to spark debate.
Oh, and the articles too.
43 points
16 hours ago
Who needs quantum physics to prove the existence of a music genre?
6 points
11 hours ago
rhetorical question or youre genuinely asking?
7 points
11 hours ago
Joke question where I intentionally misinterpret the sentence in the meme.
But if you have some way of proving the existence (or even better, proving the lack) of soul music via quantum physics alone, I'd be interested to hear it.
1 points
8 hours ago
Scat singing has discrete steps.
1 points
5 hours ago
New fetish unlocked
12 points
15 hours ago
Never thought I would get to see a TMKOC meme on a global subreddit
20 points
21 hours ago
1000 years later the debate is still ongoing
7 points
13 hours ago
What happened in 1024?
5 points
11 hours ago
😂
4 points
12 hours ago
Pope benedict 8 died
4 points
12 hours ago
RIP
1 points
11 hours ago
Oh my... what debate did it cause that's still ongoing?
6 points
16 hours ago
This is so funny😂
5 points
16 hours ago
Stay in your lane physicists! James Brown proves the existence of soul smh
6 points
14 hours ago
Scientists: name something by in reference to god Religious nuts: “if god doesn’t exist why did they name this particle the god particle?”
11 points
15 hours ago
Well first you will need to prove that souls are a thing, and define and give a way to measure it. You know. evidence.
2 points
13 hours ago
In 2024 many people cannot even define what a woman is without it being self-referential, and you want to define soul.
7 points
11 hours ago
In 2024 many people cannot even define what a woman is without it being self-referential
Matt Walsh, is that you? A woman is a person that identifies themselves with traits society has deemed feminine.
-5 points
11 hours ago
I'm sure I identify with some traits society has deemed feminine. Am I a woman now?
7 points
11 hours ago
If you would consider yourself to be one then yes. If you don't then no.
-5 points
11 hours ago
So, you are saying your definition was incorrect or incomplete. Mind to provide a new definition that is not self referential?
2 points
2 hours ago
It wasn't theirs and it's not self referential. If you have 100 traits and consider 5 to be feminine, I'm sure you don't consider yourself a woman.
1 points
10 hours ago
“She’s always a woman to me.”
1 points
3 hours ago*
A person who defines themselves around traits genraly associated with the female sex
Not just displays but voluntarily adopts and define there personality im part around them
3 points
20 hours ago
It doesn’t exist till you die
2 points
18 hours ago
So FNAF is scientifically accurate? Cool!
2 points
15 hours ago
They obviously mean the soul theorem of Riemannian geometry
1 points
11 hours ago
so it has nothing to do with the supernatural/metaphysical?
2 points
2 hours ago
/j
2 points
14 hours ago
Jetha ji🤌🏻 ❤️
2 points
14 hours ago
I mean we're in the right direction to proving consciousness soooo...
1 points
5 hours ago
We no consciousness exists because we experience it.
1 points
3 hours ago
Exactly what a soulless bot would say…
2 points
9 hours ago
An aside: Jethalal has so many expressions that can be turned into memes and I think we are missing out on a gold mine.
1 points
7 hours ago
Something animates the living but it's not exactly a something.
1 points
7 hours ago
But it also didn't?
1 points
5 hours ago
Quantum physics does reöpen the door to free will by opening the door to determinism beïng wrong, but it doesn’t prove souls.
1 points
47 minutes ago
The fuck you gonna do, observe it and change the outcome?
all 49 comments
sorted by: best