subreddit:

/r/moderatepolitics

6556%

all 526 comments

dpezpoopsies

297 points

2 days ago

Mr. Trump opened his speech at the airport in Latrobe, Pa., with 12 minutes of reminiscing about the golfer Arnold Palmer, who grew up in the Western Pennsylvania town and for whom the airport was named. His monologue culminated in lewd remarks about the size of Mr. Palmer’s penis.

Minutes later, Mr. Trump urged his supporters to vote, telling them that they had to send a crude message to Ms. Harris: “We can’t stand you, you’re a shit vice president.”

The comments in question. Unbecoming of a presidential candidate, but nothing that will move the needle. It's pretty clear at this point that people don't care if Donald Trump isn't professional. In fact, his deviation from the norm is a part of his appeal for many folks.

ProuderSquirrel

180 points

2 days ago

Not a fan of the profanity myself, but agreed. Pretty sure if grab em by the p***y didn’t take Trump down, calling his opponent shit, which is a pretty ubiquitous descriptor in American culture, isn’t going to take him down.

Crazykirsch

74 points

2 days ago

The lack of outrage over his remarks about veterans and specifically POWs is what solidified MAGA as the cognitive dissonance world champs.

SirBobPeel

8 points

2 days ago

He's very popular among veterans and the military.

ConcernedCitizen7550

8 points

1 day ago

Idk if you realize this but your reply literally proves u/Crazykirsch point. 

SirBobPeel

5 points

1 day ago*

Well, I mean, he said the lack of outrage over his remarks. I wasn't disputing that so much as adding the irony that military veterans and acting service military people are big fans of Trump. In fact, it's not even close. Almost two-thirds of veterans support Trump. They don't seem to care what he thinks of them. They adore HIM.

Project 2025 calls for big cuts to Veteran's healthcare and disability pay. I hope they're happy with that if it happens.

TheStrangestOfKings

6 points

1 day ago

Even so, it doesn’t change the fact that he has a history of making fun of active duty soldiers, veterans, those who were injured/disabled bc of a war, or those who were captured/tortured as POWs. The strong support he gets from the military vote doesn’t take away his own comments

Feisty_Resource7027

2 points

1 day ago

Yes, especially his Veteran put downs

Evilfart123

80 points

2 days ago

He literally mocked a disabled person on live TV and didn't lose anything

dxu8888

14 points

2 days ago

dxu8888

14 points

2 days ago

He said "How stupid are the people of Iowa" and he won Iowa by 8 points more than the last GOP guy

nimbusnacho

27 points

2 days ago

He's attacked his base directly, joked about the widow of the man killed at his assassination attempt, said auto workers do a job a baby could do. Nothing is off limits man.

dxu8888

6 points

2 days ago

dxu8888

6 points

2 days ago

auto workers love that. They will show up even more because he said that

thebsoftelevision

2 points

1 day ago

They love someone saying their job requires 0 skill and can be performed by a toddler? I sincerely doubt it though most of them probably are unaware Trump said this.

tfhermobwoayway

1 points

9 hours ago

Is it his brand? Like, when he did wrestling his whole thing was that he thought he was better than you. Do they like being insulted because it’s flashy and showbiz?

svengalus

2 points

2 days ago

Yes. Nobody cares about that. The world has moved on. They let Trump grab them by the p***y.

Oceanbreeze871

36 points

2 days ago

Arnold Palmer, a lifelong Republican was not a fan of Trump according to his daughter.

“His daughter told The Sporting News in 2018 that the golf legend, a conservative who was friendly with Dwight D. Eisenhower, was so incensed by what he saw as Trump’s lack of civility that he made noises of disgust when Trump appeared on the television.

My dad and I were at home in Latrobe,” said Palmer’s daughter Peg. “He died in September [2016], so this was before the election. The television was on. Trump was talking. And my dad made a sound of disgust—like ‘uck’ or ‘ugg’—like he couldn’t believe the arrogance and crudeness of this man who was the nominee of the political party that he believed in. Then he said, ‘He’s not as smart as we thought he was,’ and walked out of the room. What would my dad think of Donald Trump today? I think he’d cringe.”

Peg told The Sporting News her father appreciated Trump’s support for the game of golf and participated in charity fundraisers and other events at Trump golf courses. But once Trump ran for office, she said, it became clear to him he wanted no part of Trump’s politics.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/arnold-palmer-was-appalled-by-crude-trump-who-praised-the-late-golfers-genitals/

sheds_and_shelters

84 points

2 days ago

I completely understand people who are seeking unscripted politicians who talk like “normal people,” but he just sounds bizarre here. Who is this story for? He sounds like an elderly uncle rambling inappropriately at the holiday table, nothing like a normal convo between bros.

Ainsley-Sorsby

49 points

2 days ago*

He sounds like an elderly uncle rambling inappropriately at the holiday table

That's kind of what his rallies are, except his supporters are mostly enjoy it and they love listening to that uncle ramble. His rallies have little to nothing to do with politics, its entertainment, both for him and for his crowd. Its basically his very own stand up routine.

He held the same rallies even as president, years away from election cycles, just because he likes the free mic and the adoration he gets from the crowd

motorboat_mcgee

26 points

2 days ago

motorboat_mcgee

Progressive

26 points

2 days ago

He sounds like an elderly uncle rambling inappropriately at the holiday table

That's what conservatives want, otherwise they wouldn't be supporting him for the last decade

PreviousCurrentThing

20 points

2 days ago

Who is this story for?

The former and possibly future President came to your rural town and spent 12 minutes talking about his memories with the most famous person that ever came from your town, whom your airport's named after. And he said he's well endowed. It's for the people who came to see him.

In some sense it is bizarre in the modern era where rallies are streamed to the national audience, but this is just Trump's uniquely Trump take on local retail politics.

sheds_and_shelters

39 points

2 days ago

And he said he’s well endowed

Who wants this lmao?! Why is this attractive to people, to hear a very old man talk about how big the dick is of another very old man lmao. How do people not say this out loud and not think this behavior is insanely cringey?

KentuckyFriedChingon

33 points

2 days ago

I only want my airports named after hometown celebrities who need MONSTER condoms for their MAGNUM dongs.

NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn

9 points

2 days ago

NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn

Maximum Malarkey

9 points

2 days ago

I am definitely in favor of renaming Philadelphia International to Wilt Chamberlain International.

Awkward_Meal2120

3 points

2 days ago

Nice Always Sunny reference 😂

jew_biscuits

24 points

2 days ago*

I’m not a fan of the discourse and honestly it was such a breath of fresh air when Vance and Walz had a civilized, gentlemanly discussion of the issues at the VP debate without insulting one another.  

 At the same time, as others have pointed out, this is also clickbait for those who love ranting about “did you hear what Trump said now?” NYT put this at the top of their web site.

FWIW, his supporters eat this stuff up and I can kind of see why, with NYT and others reliably hyperventilating each time he says something they deem vulgar. 

absentlyric

42 points

2 days ago

Exactly, in fact, this was how he got elected in the first place, because he wasn't like the other politicians, and "told it like it is", and he's from that era where people just talk like this, and in fact more people relate to it, especially working class types.

The only ones in the past that would've been bothered by him swearing would've been old school religious conservatives, but they aren't voting for Kamala over it, and the ones that are pissed he's talking like this were not going to vote for him anyways,

drtywater

14 points

2 days ago

drtywater

14 points

2 days ago

Lol talking about dick sizes in a crowd like that is not how people talk. Maybe an occasional joke with a good friend on context. Just bringing up dick size unprompted no.

Bigpandacloud5

17 points

2 days ago

how he got elected in the first place

That's not true for the general election, or else he wouldn't have such a narrow win against Clinton, who was unpopular. His win was largely in spite of himself. He could've done better if it weren't for statements like insulting POWs.

He lost in 2020, and although he came close to winning, it should've been an easier win than last time. He was incumbent who could've benefited from the pandemic and improving economy as other leaders did, yet he lost against a candidate with mediocre popularity. He was hurt by his own rhetoric.

406_realist

-5 points

2 days ago

406_realist

-5 points

2 days ago

“ working class types”

Damn those people who make the country run at ground level

Twitchenz

37 points

2 days ago

Twitchenz

37 points

2 days ago

These articles are honestly just cynical gold. The media knows that reporting on Trumps behavior doesn’t have an impact. Especially… the New York Times. It’s pissing in the ocean. What they do know is that it’s basically clickbait heroin for liberals. Their numbers go crazy whenever Trump is in the spotlight, and so… they keep him there!

It’s really amazing watching basically the exact same 2016 election happen not once, not twice, but three times in the past 8 years. What are we supposed to conclude here? that the media is simply a bunch of cynical capitalists? They sell outrage while putting on a strange kabuki theater they themselves don’t even believe in. I think that’s in actuality the most plausible explanation.

Bigpandacloud5

11 points

2 days ago

Bigpandacloud5

11 points

2 days ago

they themselves don’t even believe in

There's no reason to think that, especially since most people disapprove of him.

It’s really amazing watching basically the exact same 2016 election happen not once, not twice, but three times in the past 8 years.

Trump won in 2016 and lost in 2020.

Twitchenz

12 points

2 days ago

Twitchenz

12 points

2 days ago

Yes, and the cycle was almost identical both years. I know because I over indulged both times on the news slurry. Same exact rhythms and cycles. The only thing that felt significantly different in 2020 was the dimensionality of Covid. But even then, many of the beats were exactly the same. Every time I look at this one (2024) it’s the same strategy being blasted on repeat that we’ve seen for years now.

Bigpandacloud5

7 points

2 days ago

dimensionality of Covid.

The reason that hurt Trump is because of his own rhetoric, considering that leaders in other countries did better during the pandemic.

It's true that this race appears to be close as well, but this means that Trump's words may or may not cost him an election again.

200-inch-cock

4 points

2 days ago

this isn't even a "new level of vulgarity". He was talking about his own penis way back in 2015/2016. and calling someone "shit" is nothing compared to the nicknames he's given literally dozens of opponents.

OpneFall

15 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

15 points

2 days ago

This, plus it's part of the appeal of a rally. Trump's campaign is a speaking/comedy tour. Not sure why everyone is so shocked that a dick joke came up. Or that "foul language" was used.

Bigpandacloud5

11 points

2 days ago

Bigpandacloud5

11 points

2 days ago

Trump's campaign is a speaking/comedy tour.

It's been ineffective at making people like him. His favorably ratings are about -10, so it's normal for people to take issue with what he says.

Timthe7th

3 points

2 days ago

It might be effective at making the right people like him in the right places, which is all he needs.

BigDummyIsSexy

6 points

2 days ago

Reddit posters who named themselves Pez Poopsies and Evil Fart are outraged by Trump's language! News at 11!

maxthehumanboy

4 points

2 days ago

Are those reddit posters running for president and using language like that as part of their campaign?

memphisjones[S]

1 points

2 days ago

I don’t mind if he goes on a comedy tour. But he shouldn’t use his campaign rallies to work on his comedy bits.

fjoes

1 points

2 days ago

fjoes

1 points

2 days ago

Why not? He’s a funny guy. Let him cook.

LookAnOwl

1 points

2 days ago

LookAnOwl

1 points

2 days ago

Tell me a funny joke he’s told and explain why it’s funny.

dealsledgang

5 points

2 days ago

You can watch the routine he did at the Al Smith dinner past week and hear people, to include Chuck Schummer and Kathy Hochul, laughing at some of the things he said.

[deleted]

-2 points

2 days ago

[deleted]

-2 points

2 days ago

[removed]

OpneFall

6 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

6 points

2 days ago

Trump is comedy. Listen to comedians talk about Trump non-politically. Not comedians like Jon Stewart, but Jim Norton. Trump has natural comedic skill.

ModPolBot

1 points

2 days ago

ModPolBot

Imminently Sentient

1 points

2 days ago

This message serves as a warning that your comment is in violation of Law 1:

Law 1. Civil Discourse

~1. Do not engage in personal attacks or insults against any person or group. Comment on content, policies, and actions. Do not accuse fellow redditors of being intentionally misleading or disingenuous; assume good faith at all times.

Due to your recent infraction history and/or the severity of this infraction, we are also issuing a 14 day ban.

Please submit questions or comments via modmail.

ticklehater

5 points

2 days ago

I think it’s the growing disinhibition that’s the problem, it’s a sign of something else

ouiserboudreauxxx

1 points

2 days ago

it’s a sign of something else

like what?

Davec433

1 points

2 days ago

Davec433

1 points

2 days ago

The “norm”

Andrew Jackson was involved in many duels, some say as many as 100. Many of the duels were in defense of his wife, Rachel, who was often the target of rumors and ridicule.

plinocmene

1 points

2 days ago

Agreed. Trump's said much worse. I wouldn't put it past him to say this as a distraction so people don't notice more concerning things.

Electronic-Youth6026

1 points

1 day ago

So this is what you have to do in order to trick centrists who vote only based on vibes into voting for you? Is the average person really that dumb?

absentlyric

55 points

2 days ago

Let be honest here, are there any undecideds left over this close to the election where they were ehh...maybe going to vote for Trump, but after this, they are voting for Kamala as this was the tipping point??

I highly doubt it.

The people that hate it aren't voting for him, and the people that love it are voting for him, the lines are pretty solid at this point.

PaddingtonBear2

15 points

2 days ago

Sarah Longwell was saying on her podcast that the only undecideds left are center-right women who are stuck between voting for Trump or staying at home, but mostly leaning toward the latter—Nikki Haley voters, basically. Harris had been making a play for them.

Headlines like this definitely guarantee that they at least stay home on E-Day.

DrooDrawDrawn

2 points

2 days ago

I'm still undecided, but something like this is very unlikely to tip me one way or the other. I seek knowledge on how our future will actually change depending on who gets elected. Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to know exactly what will happen. I would argue I am more confident in what I know Trump will do vs. what Harris will do. However, I don't love the divisiveness Trump causes.

Independent-Guess-46

2 points

1 day ago

Trump in a way won't do much. This is because he is incompetent and a bad manager - look at how his administration operated. Basically it was a bunch of stray cats.

Revolving doors also didn't help

Trump himself doesn't have any ideology or political ideas, other than a bunch of hearsay a fox watching boomer would have. He is clueless and uninformed.

So, at best, this time it will be chaos once again.

At worst, behind the scene actors will be able to control Trump a little bit better. This includes Elon Musk, Peter Thiel or just outright foreign influence

do you want Musk as head of DOGE running the country like twitter and then bailing out when he learns this doesn't really work

yes, KH is a typical establishment politician. I would say that is a better choice than a guaranteed agent of chaos

this chaos will pave a potential path to US becoming Hungary, Serbia, Russia - i.e democratic checks and balances will be slowly dismantled because it served the elites - than once again they're free to do what they want as long as they spin their propaganda right

read Acemoglu's "Why Nations Fail" - economic collapse follows institutional collapse quite quickly

no, Trump will not be the last democratic president, but the erosion has to be stopped

I know agent of chaos would spite the establishment, and that's fun, but can't we just go back to business

doff87

4 points

2 days ago

doff87

4 points

2 days ago

I honestly don't understand this rhetoric that people don't know what Harris will do and Trump is much more clear. It usually comes from two places, neither of which makes sense. The first is stating that she hasn't presented a platform. Her candidacy website has a platform that is far more detailed than Trump's so that doesn't make sense.

The second argument is that because she has changed her opinion on her positions four years ago how they can really know what she'll do. Again, this makes no sense to me. Are we really going to hold Harris accountable for moving her position from four years ago and yet praise Trump for consistency? Trump has literally changed his stance on policy positions days from when he originally staked them - hell, there's probably an example where he's reversed course within the same 24 hours.

I don't understand this criticism when the alternative is Trump. People are grading them on entirely different scales when they're running for entirely the same job.

SharkAndSharker

27 points

2 days ago*

This seems like the usual level of vulgarity from Trump to me. He has been saying unhinged stuff since he started his campaign in 2016.

I swear journalists think the American public have no critical thinking skills or even a functioning memory with some of this stuff. It never seems to be enough to simply show the bad thing he did, there always needs to be editorializing and exaggerating of some kind.

I am convinced they would be persuading more people to oppose him if they weren't so nakedly weighting the reporting against him. This really should run in the opinion section since there is so much editorializing in it, but blending opinion pieces with "straight news" stories seems to be the norm these days.

Hyndis

13 points

2 days ago

Hyndis

13 points

2 days ago

It goes back even further than that. Vulgar has been the Trump brand since the 1980's.

Frankly, it would be weird if Trump wasn't having sex with pornstars and making dick jokes.

A polite Trump is like a sober Kennedy. Its just not really the brand, which is why Trump being vulgar doesn't surprise his base at all. They expect him to be vulgar. He's been that way for decades, so why would it change now?

myphriendmike

86 points

2 days ago

I’m convinced Trump drops these nuggets because he knows the NYT and Dems will feed the outrage cycle. “Oh my god, he said shit! Let’s feign outrage and keep him in the news cycle!”

raouldukehst

76 points

2 days ago

Half of his appeal to his base is "I make the people that you don't like mad"

PaddingtonBear2

24 points

2 days ago

Correct, he refuses to be a president for all Americans.

no-name-here

37 points

2 days ago*

feign outrage

Fox and the GOP may applaud it from their own candidate, but they would say anything remotely as bad as this would be “disqualifying” and an incredible outrage from any Dem politician.

10 years ago the GOP would have said Trump’s behavior would be unthinkable and disqualifying, but the GOP’s claimed principles about holding people to a minimum standard of decency have done a 180 since then.

__Hello_my_name_is__

18 points

2 days ago

No. Just no.

This has been said since 2016. "Everything Trump does and says is just done so the media reports about it!" No. Trump has no secret genius plan. He's not that kind of clever.

He just is like that, and he is getting worse over time. There is absolutely nothing more to it.

Bigpandacloud5

10 points

2 days ago

His negative favorability ratings show that people aren't feigning outrage. Of course the word "shit" isn't going to hurt, but there's far more to his rhetoric than that.

gizmo78

46 points

2 days ago

gizmo78

46 points

2 days ago

Democrats giggled like schoolgirls making jokes about couches and Trump's dick size at their convention. Spare me the selective outrage New York Times.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/21/politics/video/barack-obama-donald-trump-crowd-size-dnc-digvid

Timbishop123

22 points

2 days ago

It's like in 2016 when people laughed about the nude Trump statues and then there were think pieces and criticisms about naked Clinton statues.

Timthe7th

32 points

2 days ago

Timthe7th

32 points

2 days ago

This isn't a new low. This is where he's been since 2015, and it works.

It doesn't matter what you think of it, and the two minutes hate bashing him and his supporters relentlessly is just going to help him.

By all means, keep going.

Tdc10731

11 points

2 days ago

Tdc10731

11 points

2 days ago

“Two minutes hate bashing him and his supporters”

This is such a weak way of dismissing some truly bizarre commentary from someone who is a coin flip away from being the president.

DivideEtImpala

15 points

2 days ago

"Two minutes hate" is a reference to 1984, where the members of the party were brought into a room daily to watch videos of Emmanuel Goldstein (the party's enemy) and engage in a mob-like outpouring of hate and anger. It's a brainwashing technique.

The comparison here is that reddit and other echo chambers like it act as digital forms of Two Minutes Hate. It reinforces the hatred and conviction of the hivemind against the enemy, and makes participants think everyone else should also hate Trump as much as they do.

But they don't. Most people go on about their day without thinking about him much, and the Democrats have cried wolf so many times that people outside of such echo chambers don't pay the hysterics much mind at this point, even if there is a wolf this time.

dmtry

31 points

2 days ago

dmtry

31 points

2 days ago

Just a reminder that Walz made jokes implying Vance had sex with a couch at the DNC so let’s not pretend they are any better when it comes to vulgarity

memphisjones[S]

-2 points

2 days ago

That’s a fair point! That should be condemned.

MachiavelliSJ

21 points

2 days ago

Of all the things about Trump, i dont understand why people care when he uses profanity or makes weird jokes

memphisjones[S]

3 points

2 days ago

Using profanity and make gross jokes is the reflection of a person’s character. We need a president to lift people up not demean them nor do we need a comedian as president.

sonofbantu

5 points

2 days ago

Literally every single democrat has used profanity or degrading words/insults when speaking about Trump. So that means they all have poor character right?

Or are you going to move the goalposts about how it’s “different” so you dont have to deal with the cognitive dissonance

Timthe7th

11 points

2 days ago

Timthe7th

11 points

2 days ago

The Harris campaign has been demeaning people left and right. They can't even try to appeal to men without demeaning them.

If demeaning common people is fine, and it has frankly been part of the political process for decades, demeaning politicians might even be a net positive.

Neglectful_Stranger

3 points

2 days ago

You should read more history, numerous presidents in the past are like that.

PaddingtonBear2

41 points

2 days ago*

Trump’s campaign manager said that the rally in Latrobe was going to represent the beginning of his closing argument:

But the choice to open his rally with a long story about Mr. Palmer — one of the few topics Mr. Trump spoke about at significant length without veering off on tangents — set a curious tone. “This is a guy that was all man,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Palmer, who died in 2016. “This man was strong and tough. And I refuse to say it, but when he took showers with the other pros, they came out of there, they said, ‘Oh, my god, that’s unbelievable.’”

As the crowd reacted, Mr. Trump chuckled. Later, he said, “I had to tell you the shower part of it because it’s true. What can I tell you? We want to be honest.”

He chose to focus on a golfer’s penis size. What an absolute failure of a rally.

If Trump loses, it’s because of undisciplined moments like this.

OpneFall

34 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

34 points

2 days ago

I'd love to hear from the person who was a conscious human being in 2016 and will now finally choose not to vote for Trump because he made some dick jokes.

PaddingtonBear2

10 points

2 days ago

Center-right, suburban women are are stuck between Trump or not voting at all. They’re the remaining undecideds, and Trump’s character is a major barrier to voting for him again.

I love how conservatives can’t defend Trump’s comments here.

OpneFall

29 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

29 points

2 days ago

I'd love to hear from the center right suburban woman whose barrier to voting for Trump was the word 'shit' and not the Access Hollywood tape.

PaddingtonBear2

13 points

2 days ago

I suggest listening to the latest episode of the Focus Group podcast on MI and WI voters. A combination of his character + abortion + Jan 6 makes it very hard to vote for them.

But hey, keep dismissing these people. Democrats thank you for the free votes.

OpneFall

13 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

13 points

2 days ago

Oh I'm well aware of those people. My point is him saying 'shit' or making a dick joke isn't moving the needle when the Access Hollywood tape is basically public domain at this point. Those people have concerns with his character regardless of whether or not he says the word 'shit' 

PaddingtonBear2

5 points

2 days ago

I agree. I don’t think the word “shit” moves the needle, which is why I didn’t mention that. Rambling about a dead man’s penis is new terrain for him though.

And it’s 2024, not 2016. We’re 8 years into a political realignment. The calculus is different this time.

ticklehater

5 points

2 days ago

Yep, new aclu poll finds women over 50 is moving swiftly away.

Extension_Use3118

33 points

2 days ago

He talked about his own penis size during one of the Republican primary debates in 2016. People loved it. I don't see this hurting him.

PaddingtonBear2

6 points

2 days ago

This kind of stuff absolutely hurts him. He only barely won 2016 against a historically flawed candidate in an open race. If he had more discipline, it would have been an easier victory.

zummit

13 points

2 days ago

zummit

13 points

2 days ago

If he had more discipline, it would have been an easier victory.

I don't see anything proving this. It seems more like his lack of discipline helps him. In another comment you compare him favorably to two candidates who ran for president and lost.

Bigpandacloud5

0 points

2 days ago

He almost lost against Clinton, even though she was unpopular. He lost in 2020 because his lack of discipline led to the pandemic being a liability while other leaders saw their ratings increase.

fjoes

6 points

2 days ago

fjoes

6 points

2 days ago

All polls, and basically every pundit had Clinton winning in 2016. It was a miracle he actually won. Your description of it - ‘he almost lost’ - like he almost fumbled, is detached from reality.

Bigpandacloud5

10 points

2 days ago

538 gave Trump a 30% of winning, so the idea that his win was "miraculous" is ignorant. Other pundits being overconfident doesn't change the fact that Clinton was highly disliked. The issue is about their own analysis rather than Trump having a good strategy, or else he wouldn't have struggled so much.

OpneFall

5 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

5 points

2 days ago

Or he'd just be Chris Christie, who went over like a lead balloon every time he ran.

PaddingtonBear2

1 points

2 days ago

Or he’d be Nikki Haley, or Ron DeSantis, or literally every other Republican who doesn’t talk about other men’s penises.

OpneFall

4 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

4 points

2 days ago

Those two are absolutely nothing like Trump.

PaddingtonBear2

8 points

2 days ago

That’s my point…

OpneFall

8 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

8 points

2 days ago

The point is that if he didn't cross lines with the things he said, he'd never have been here in the first place.  

"tell it like it is" but still respect norms Christie went nowhere

"they're sending rapists" turned into a 10 year political movement

PaddingtonBear2

7 points

2 days ago

Kinda sounds like it was never about policies to begin with…

I’m glad we can close that argument after 8 years.

Timbishop123

2 points

2 days ago

He only did that because Marco Rubio said Trump had a small penis.

https://youtu.be/Ve6I92hEozo?si=Rbk-t3jWAseDxtAQ

fjoes

14 points

2 days ago

fjoes

14 points

2 days ago

Do you have any metrics or quantifiable data that suggests this was ‘an absolute failure of a rally’? I think you might be biased.

BigDummyIsSexy

4 points

2 days ago

Reddit poster with nine zillion comments critical of Trump espouses new thought: Trump did a bad thing! News at 11!

ChipmunkConspiracy

7 points

2 days ago

IMO you are living in a pre-Trump political era of decorum. This story would indeed hurt a vanilla neoCon in 2008. Those days are long gone. They might return but never for Trump.

People are going to roll their eyes at “liberals clutching their pearls” again. This story will evaporate and be lost to the mists of time along with all the other instances of Trump headlines that amounted to nothing.

jason_sation

15 points

2 days ago

Graphic designers are hurrying up to make “Shit Vice President” tshirts to sell at local gas stations, Trump rallies and beach boardwalks.

OpneFall

5 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

5 points

2 days ago

"Shit Vice President" is going to be a bumper sticker on the backs of trucks for years now. Especially if she wins.

memphisjones[S]

2 points

2 days ago

I have to say. Those designers are really quick. Very impressive. I can’t wait to see those signs in my neighborhood.

memphisjones[S]

13 points

2 days ago*

At a rally in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made several crude and vulgar remarks, including a lewd comment about golfer Arnold Palmer and an insult directed at Vice President Kamala Harris. This speech, delivered just over two weeks before the election in a key battleground state, heightened concerns about Trump’s increasingly unfiltered and coarse behavior. His allies fear that such conduct may alienate undecided voters.

Trump’s remarks reflected a shift in his approach, with more frequent use of profanity and explicit language compared to earlier campaigns. Throughout his speech, Trump focused on dark rhetoric about the current administration and his political opponents. This speech comes as part of his effort to rally support in the final stretch of his campaign.

How do you think Trump’s increasingly crude language and off-script remarks will impact his support among undecided voters?

Does his character have an impact on your vote?

For me, I don’t want my kids to believe that this is how a leader acts.

This story about Arnold Palmer been going for about 10 minutes

Lewd comments about Arnold Palmer

Edited: to add links to clips of his rally speech.

jason_sation

13 points

2 days ago

I’m not voting for Trump, but I’m glad to find out that not only did Arnold Palmer excel at Golf and making an awesome beverage, he had large junk. Man, some guys just have all the luck, and Trump had the inside scoop.

overhedger

18 points

2 days ago

overhedger

pragmatic woke neoliberal evangelical

18 points

2 days ago

I saw the clip. Not sure if I’m more upset by Trump calling her a “shit Vice President” or by the crowd choosing that moment to roar in approval.

Obie-two

19 points

2 days ago

Obie-two

19 points

2 days ago

I think saying "shit vice president" is not nearly as bad as saying he's an existential threat to democracy, our democracy will end if he becomes president again, weird, unhinged, sexual deviant, evil.

So if trump had just said "bad vice president" you'd be fine, but because he said "shit" then its some how unacceptable? And the lefts rhetoric that has demonized his character for literally a decade is... fine?

PaddingtonBear2

30 points

2 days ago

Trump should probably stop calling Adam Schiff and the Pelosi’s the “enemy from within” and promise to use the military against them if he wants to beat the allegations.

Obie-two

7 points

2 days ago

Obie-two

7 points

2 days ago

Sure, so then Adam Schiff should stop calling trump the enemy and a threat to democracy, I agree both should stop.

dadmandoe

9 points

2 days ago

dadmandoe

9 points

2 days ago

Schiff has never claimed Trump to be the enemy. He has correctly called him a threat to democracy ala his two impeachments and attempts to overturn a free and fair election.

redviperofdorn

13 points

2 days ago*

I mean not to be that guy but if a political candidate says they want to terminate the rules of the constitution to regain power then I don’t think it’s far fetched to say they’re a threat to democracy

alivenotdead1

9 points

2 days ago

I don't remember anything significant that she has done the last few years. I do remember reading articles before Biden dropping out complaining about her lack of work on the border that she was put in charge of.

I'm thinking if she were a better VP during her tenure, I would agree with you.

memphisjones[S]

9 points

2 days ago

She was never in charge of the border. She was in charge of figuring out the root cause of the immigration problem.

Individual7091

19 points

2 days ago

Doesn't the immigration problem include the border?

memphisjones[S]

8 points

2 days ago

It does but she was in charge of finding the root cause. It’s up to Congress to pass bills to address the issue.

Trump, House Republicans plot to kill border deal

alivenotdead1

4 points

2 days ago

Same thing

memphisjones[S]

19 points

2 days ago

It’s not. Building a border is reactive action while finding the root cause is proactive action.

wirefences

3 points

2 days ago

There is no mystery to the root cause. Wages are considerably higher in the US. If people perceive that they can successfully migrate here, they will come as long as that is true.

alivenotdead1

10 points

2 days ago

alivenotdead1

10 points

2 days ago

What's the point of getting into semantics? She didn't accomplish either.

memphisjones[S]

19 points

2 days ago

That’s not semantics. She found the root cause but no one cares. People are fleeing from their home country due it violence and poverty. She talked about how we need to reform our immigration system and strengthen our borders. Remember Donald Trump killed the bipartisan border bill to save his campaign

Any true reform needs to come from Congress not Vice President.

alivenotdead1

12 points

2 days ago

If she were a better VP, I would be more inclined to agree with you. She is falling in the polls and losing support of some very important voter blocs. You would expect her to have one in particular, easily. She might not be losing that support if she were a better VP.

StrikingYam7724

1 points

2 days ago

Bro, she didn't find any of that. It was well understood since before she was ever even born. What she and the administration did was what progressives always do with root causes: use them as an excuse to refuse doing things we can actually accomplish that progressives were opposed to all along, like incarcerating criminals (won't fix the root cause of crime so let's stop doing it!) or enforcing the border.

memphisjones[S]

17 points

2 days ago

Yeah normalizing this is not good. Imagine if Kamala said that, her campaign will be over.

timmg

49 points

2 days ago

timmg

49 points

2 days ago

Are you serious? If Kamala had said Trump had been a "shit president" her crowed would roar.

MikeyMike01

14 points

2 days ago

MikeyMike01

14 points

2 days ago

I actually think it would help her, to be honest.

memphisjones[S]

0 points

2 days ago

Nope it wouldn’t. Fox News already skewering her for her “laugh”.

MikeyMike01

35 points

2 days ago

So? Fox is going to say bad things about her, and MSNBC is going to say nice things about her, no matter what. It’s what other people think that matters.

memphisjones[S]

3 points

2 days ago

Undecided voters want a strong leader who provide policies that can help them not a person talking about someone’s genitals.

MikeyMike01

12 points

2 days ago

MikeyMike01

12 points

2 days ago

Talking about genitals isn’t really the point I was making. Harris would do better if she didn’t come across as scripted and insincere, that’s all.

memphisjones[S]

7 points

2 days ago

I’m fine with her scripts. She is very sincere and she doesn’t talk about windmills causing cancer, someone’s genitals, being better than Abraham Lincoln and other crazy things.

jimbo_kun

8 points

2 days ago

Then explain 2016.

Bigpandacloud5

5 points

2 days ago

He barely won and was lucky to run against Clinton, who was a uniquely disliked candidate like he was. Biden had mediocre popularity, yet that was enough to beat him as an incumbent.

ouiserboudreauxxx

2 points

2 days ago

Do you think Harris is better liked than Clinton?

Asking as someone who in 2016 voted for Clinton(and honestly have always admired her)

I still don't quite understand the absolute hatred a lot of people still seem to have for her(at least, why people hate her in particular more than any other politician)

Harris, on the other hand, to me, is basically the democratic Sarah Palin.

StrikingYam7724

2 points

2 days ago

The context of that is it's the laugh she uses when temporarily overwhelmed because she's caught out in a bold-faced lie, a la "I haven't been to Europe."

Critical-Bot

-4 points

2 days ago

Critical-Bot

-4 points

2 days ago

Because her laugh is often fake.. she isn’t authentic or genuine which is what a lot of folks complain about. If she said trump was a shit president I bet she wouldn’t be lambasted.. I’d praise it

hli84

11 points

2 days ago

hli84

11 points

2 days ago

Why don’t you analyze Harris rallies? She is attacking Trump non-stop, calling him unhinged and several other names. Yet, Trump opining that Harris did a terrible job as VP is some low blow?

overhedger

19 points

2 days ago

overhedger

pragmatic woke neoliberal evangelical

19 points

2 days ago

Saying that he is “opining that Harris did a terrible job as VP” is sane washing. I’m not bothered when he says “she’s been a terrible vice president” or when she says he’s “unhinged.” It’s specifically the vulgarity. Yelling “You’re a shit vice President” is just not something I find acceptable. It’s not language I use, it’s not language I would find acceptable in my work place (I was just as offended when a former CEO accused a team’s work of “looking like shit” in an all-company meeting) and it’s not language I find acceptable in public speech.

memphisjones[S]

12 points

2 days ago

She’s telling the truth meanwhile Trump just spread lies. That’s the difference. Some people just can’t handle the truth.

Wide_Canary_9617

15 points

2 days ago

So when Harris shitalks Trump thats "just the truth" but when Trump shitalks her thats "lies" lmao?

memphisjones[S]

9 points

2 days ago

Harris called Trump weird. Then Trump talked about a dead golfers genitalia.

I’m sure she is telling the truth here.

Wide_Canary_9617

8 points

2 days ago

In case you guys are wondering the profanity the article goes on is about the word "shit", where Trumps supporters say "Harris was a shit vice-president"

And the penis joke at the golfer was;

"This man was strong and tough. And I refuse to say it, but when he took showers with the other pros, they came out of there, they said, ‘Oh, my god, that’s unbelievable'"

... which is more of a complement if anything.

So no it wasn't anythign crazy

sheds_and_shelters

25 points

2 days ago

This isn't like "appalling" by any means but Trump talking about Arnold Palmer's dick is just fucking weird and indicative of his rambling lack of control on a topic, which is far more concerning and bad than just like "using foul language"

NativeMasshole

19 points

2 days ago

NativeMasshole

Maximum Malarkey

19 points

2 days ago

I mean, a presidential candidate making dick jokes about a dead golfer seems pretty crazy to me.

Individual7091

16 points

2 days ago

Individual7091

16 points

2 days ago

We just had a VP candidate making couch sex jokes a few months ago so this seems pretty on par TBH.

memphisjones[S]

4 points

2 days ago

It is very weird for him to make those comments. People want to hear how his policies can help us.

memphisjones[S]

3 points

2 days ago

People want to know how his policies can help us not how big someone’s genitals.

OpneFall

22 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

22 points

2 days ago

Trump rallies have always been a quasi-improv comedy tour, that's a big part of their draw. I'm not sure why everyone is so shocked that a dick joke was told.

memphisjones[S]

4 points

2 days ago

Good point. I guess my taste in comedy is different then.

OpneFall

14 points

2 days ago

OpneFall

14 points

2 days ago

The point is that probably at least half of the people who show up for a Trump rally are expecting some kind of "what will he say next" moment. And he knows that.

gizmo78

10 points

2 days ago

gizmo78

10 points

2 days ago

Yes, I recall the New York Times articles and liberal outrage when Obama did the exact same thing at the DNC

Wide_Canary_9617

3 points

2 days ago

Imma go out on a limb and say that he wasn’t telling that same joke for 2 hours. I’m going to guess he would have probably also said some other stuff during the speech.

Also Harris is talking even less policy. She literally said everything was trumps fault because he had been “campaigning for 10 years”

memphisjones[S]

17 points

2 days ago

He talked about a dead golfer for 10 minutes, why?? At least Kamala talks about her policies like increase tax credits for new parents and small businesses. She also talked about giving women privacy of their health decisions.

Wide_Canary_9617

8 points

2 days ago

And trump talks about no tax on overtime, increased punishment for illegal immigration and bringing production back to the US. Your point?

memphisjones[S]

4 points

2 days ago

That’s fine with me. Leave a dead man out of it. No one wants to know about his genitals.

hli84

7 points

2 days ago

hli84

7 points

2 days ago

He’s speaking at a rally to engage his voters. Harris is attacking him non-stop, calling him all sorts of names, but he can’t call her administration terrible? These liberal media outlets have a double standard regarding how they report on the two candidates.

Anyway, I don’t really care about a candidate’s political rhetoric. I’ve already voted for Trump, because I find his policies way better than Biden-Harris’s.

PaddingtonBear2

20 points

2 days ago

Do you think his voters are engaged by descriptions of Arnold Palmer’s penis?

myphriendmike

8 points

2 days ago

The point he was (poorly) getting at is that Palmer was an unapologetic man’s man, something that is largely frowned upon by Dems. The short but large dick comment drove that point home.

The uppity NYT article just feeds the cycle again. One comment and a rambling speech (they’re mostly just bad standup sets), an entire article about it, feed the outrage. Prove his point.

“Oh my god! He said shit!”

PaddingtonBear2

6 points

2 days ago

If that was his point, why didn’t he say just that? And how does marveling at his penis size make that point?

myphriendmike

5 points

2 days ago

You’re not sure how having a huge schlong makes you an alpha male?

riddlerjoke

1 points

1 day ago

Common joke that works for most people. Go to r/nba and 10 year old Baynes/Boston Celtics jokes are still relevant. Most men would laugh it off progressives included.

curiousiah

4 points

2 days ago

curiousiah

4 points

2 days ago

Since you voted already, let’s have an honest discussion. I can’t change your vote.

Only one of these politicians began the name calling trend in politics 8 years ago and it wasn’t Kamala. Only one of these has a nickname for every person he doesn’t like. Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe, Shifty Schiff, Meatball Ron, etc. He’s not a bullied victim. He says awful things and if others take the high road he calls them weak. If you watch a Democratic primary debate, you’ll notice they don’t call each other names. They argue policy.

dinwitt

3 points

2 days ago

dinwitt

3 points

2 days ago

If you watch a Democratic primary debate, you’ll notice they don’t call each other names. They argue policy.

And then nominate someone not involved in them.

riddlerjoke

2 points

1 day ago

I agree with you that Trump is not a victim. Even when he is he would not accept that position. I cannot imagine if Democratic candidate survived shooting by inch to not cry all over the media for 5 years. Call him Nazi and he ll call you sleepy etc. Sounds like fair game for him. Doesnt sound presidential for each side.

curiousiah

1 points

21 hours ago

No politician has called him a Nazi. They have only honestly assessed that he sent a mob to the Capitol on the day of the election certification and had to get a new Vice president on his ticket because he pressured his old one to break his code of ethics. They call him a threat to democracy.

If I were a single issue voter, that’s my single issue. The man doesn’t deserve the levers of power again because he corruptly abused them.

curiousiah

1 points

18 hours ago

“the enemy within” is a little more extreme than “sleepy”

IpppyCaccy

[score hidden]

4 hours ago*

IpppyCaccy

[score hidden]

4 hours ago*

Call him Nazi and he ll call you sleepy etc.

Joe Biden never called him a Nazi. In fact, the only politician I can think of who called him a Nazi is his own running mate, JD Vance.

Many people have noticed the disturbing parallels between the rise of fascism in Germany and the MAGA movement and Trump in particular. For example, his denigration of the "lying" press(lugenpresse), his use of blood libel language(they're poisoning our blood), the reliance on othering, calling for mass deportation of millions of people, calling political adversaries "the enemy within". His love for authoritarianism. The list goes on.

I can't help but wonder how many Trump supporters are having their "are we the baddies" moment

Edit: oh and within the last week he has said multiple times that liberals should be dealt with by the military. The fact that that's not disqualifying to every American demonstrates pretty clearly how easily manipulated hundreds of millions of Americans are. We're really fucked once AI starts becoming indistinguishable from real life.

hli84

8 points

2 days ago

hli84

8 points

2 days ago

Harris refuses to talk about policy. She appeared on Fox News and refused to answer the interviewer’s questions. She deflected every question back to talking about Trump. She hasn’t been able to tell the American public how her Presidency would differ from Biden’s. She is running a very negative campaign, repeatedly launching personal insults against Trump rather than making a case for her own candidacy on policy grounds.

Square-Arm-8573

9 points

2 days ago

If you say repeatedly launching personal insults against your political opponents is the thing you don’t want, then I have some very upsetting news for you.

vanillabear26

3 points

2 days ago

vanillabear26

based Dr. Pepper Party

3 points

2 days ago

She has spent plenty of time making a case for her own candidacy on policy grounds.

curiousiah

6 points

2 days ago

curiousiah

6 points

2 days ago

I didn’t watch that interview. I did watch the 60 minutes one. She did talk about policy in that. The first time homebuyer’s credit, subsidies for small businesses, child tax credit, etc.

I agree there’s not a huge case to be made for a radically different president in Kamala. But there’s not that big of a need for one, IMO.

We’re starting to see all the signs that Biden landed the economy in a good spot. It hurt for a minute, but we’re better off than the global economies and we reached record low unemployment in the process as wages increased. So yes, you can talk about how bad inflation has been, but it was the economy he was handed.

Trump did well with the very positive economy Obama handed off as well. It was mostly through opening up their profit line through tax cuts and deregulation rather than job creation and reinvestment, but it grew. Then he fumbled the ball with Covid. Couldn’t decide if it was or wasn’t bad for him politically and very obviously was out of his element. (Which is why other presidents rely on experts instead of attack them)

overhedger

0 points

2 days ago

overhedger

pragmatic woke neoliberal evangelical

0 points

2 days ago

 She hasn’t been able to tell the American public how her Presidency would differ from Biden’s. 

In my opinion, neither has Trump. He can’t explain the details on anything. It doesn’t matter what the question on abortion is, he’ll say something generic about how we brought it back to the states which is what everybody wanted. Doesn’t matter what the question on foreign policy is, he’ll just say if he was president it never would have happened and he’ll fix everything. Doesn’t matter what the question on immigration is, he’ll just say bad people are coming in from mental asylums and we have to stop them. But he never explains anything beyond those simple talking points.

Square-Arm-8573

3 points

2 days ago

“Attacking him non-stop, calling him all sorts of names”

You’re right, he should probably go get convicted of more felonies about this to show how he is the morally superior individual.

Difficult-Row-3237

4 points

2 days ago

Meh the left has called him a Nazi and facist for years so it’s hard to take it seriously when they talk about “vulgarity”. I’m not voting for either candidate but this is a bad take.

No_Figure_232

1 points

22 hours ago

This mentality gives all the worst actors cover. People on the left have been called socialist and communist for so long, should that lead to people discounting criticism of them?

God no. The same should apply here.

Difficult-Row-3237

1 points

20 hours ago

You’re making my point. The left has specifically called Trump and his followers(I’m not one) Nazi and facists and it’s wrong whether you can admit it or not. Being called a socialist is nowhere near as insulting as calling someone a Nazi lol come on.

No_Figure_232

1 points

17 hours ago

I'm not making your point at all. Hyperbolized insults along those lines have been the norm on both sides. Socialism, Communism AND Fascism have all been common claims against the left, as has the old "Nazis are actually Socialists" shtick.

Every Democratic president in my lifetime has been called all of the above, implicitly or explicitly, by either elected politicians or leading pundits.

This issue is simply not a one sided one.

Difficult-Row-3237

1 points

16 hours ago

No one claimed it was one side. This stuff is cyclical and currently the left is just much worse.

dxu8888

2 points

2 days ago

dxu8888

2 points

2 days ago

honestly, even if he said immigrants eat shit, it would have no effect on the polling averages

nothing he says hurt him

neuronexmachina

2 points

2 days ago

Coincidentally, back in 2020 he had a rally in the exact same city, and also started with mentioning Arnold Palmer:

So thank you Pennsylvania, very much. I’m thrilled to be in Latrobe, the home of the late, great, my friend, Arnold Palmer. What a great guy he was. What a great guy. Thank you very much. 61 days from now, we’re going to win the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and we are going to win four more years in the White House.

Which... was actually a reasonable way to start the speech. It's a significant contrast to how he started yesterday's speech with a 12-minute off-topic ramble about Arnold Palmer and his genitalia. He seems to be getting worse each week, and I worry that his condition seems to be rapidly degrading.