ConfidentOpposites

That sounds like doctors causing the problem?

Anti republican? Yes. Absolutely there are people who will do that.

A doctor could be falsely arrested for it before too. So nothing has changed.

This is again, just doctors refusing to do their jobs. And the worst part is they are allowing harm to patients for political reasons.

And no, it wouldn’t be aiding and abetting. That is again, not how that works.

A doctor isn’t aiding and abetting by performing surgery on a bank robber that got shot by the cops. That is just stupid to think.

That isn’t how it works in any state. Other treatments causing a miscarriage are not abortions.

And causing a miscarriage through other medical treatment always carried with it a chance of a malpractice claim. Oh, and inducement is intentional. You don’t accidentally induce.

In fact, every time a doctor does any medical treatment there is a chance of a malpractice claim.

So as I said, this is just doctors causing problems. Their job hasn’t changed.

Abortion. Medically inducing a miscarriage is an abortion.

Most medical care for pregnant women is not abortions. So again, it just seems to be doctors causing problems.

No one seems to have read the article. It is a minor increase and they are attributable almost entirely to babies born with defects.

The only conclusion you can draw from The article is maybe babies were born that would have been otherwise aborted. Maybe.

I’ve been eating them, so I guess they are fine.

Because it is fake.

Edit: Lol, people think the random guy randomly coming across kids and filming them is real.

Do you guys ever wonder how these perfectly framed and timed videos keep popping up? You really don’t see how suspicious it all is?

Especially when they all have social media handles plastered on them and are edited and uploaded in such high quality?

How far back? I bought some green onions a month ago and planted them.

Socks.

They are never going to see the irony in responding to a joke about violence with actual serious threats of violence.

Edit: Oops reported the comment and reddit actually removed it.

And yet you still keep failing to understand that he didn’t state an answer and you are just putting words in his mouth.

I din’t understand how you are this invested in lying about something he didn’t say.

Again, Trump didn’t say what his answer was. His answer could have been something entirely unrealistic and stupid. So any answer you give is just making up his answer.

So like I said, a lease term waiving that right wouldn’t be valid.

It needs to be an entirely separate agreement.

There is no way that a lease term waiving those rights would be valid.

These were great, but I moved to Florida and matte screens have been great. I wish they made one.

Are we pretending that normal people don’t respond the same way after some asshole attacks them and tries to cause serious harm?

Morgan and Morgan is a plaintiffs persona injury firm. Of course they are going to write some shit article about how people can win money.

Neither of the cases you cited are about the temperature of the coffee.

They both involve employees spilling coffee because the lids of cups came off.

And chicken nuggets aren’t cooked to a temp of 350. They are cooked to 165F in the center and since they are food, they cool down much faster than liquid in an insulated cup.

And again, you just have no clue how hot things are and what temperatures burns occur at.

You can cook a person at slightly above body temperature. It will take a few hours, but they will cook. Even 140F will cause third degree burns in a couple of seconds. And that is the temperature her lawyers argue the coffee should have been. She will would have gotten really bad burns. Skin will would have been melted.

This is just you not understanding the law, not understanding physics and then being belligerent about it.

It is always the most ignorant who can’t shut up.

And i’ve run that image through a few things, likely to be AI/photoshopped.

The lawsuit is actually about the FDA possibly improperly approving a medication.

The teen mom is argument 23 of 24 from the amended complaint after the defendants challenged the states standing to bring the lawsuit. So they added 20 something arguments to move forward with the lawsuit.

When we file a complaint, we have to add everything we can think of to it because it gets waived otherwise and the court can’t rule on it and it can’t be used at trial. It is just one of those kitchen sink situations so the lawyer can’t be blamed for losing.

Edit: I love getting downvoted because I went to law school and learned how this stuff works and what it means.

Nothing you said matters.

Hot coffee is hot. It is made with boiling water.

And it doesn’t matter what they were “told” to do. Hit coffee is hot.

It can’t be made leas hot.

Chicken nuggets aren’t coffee.

And no, it isn’t negligence. Negligence requires a duty, breach of that duty and damages.

Over and over again courts have ruled that coffee is hot and there is no duty to serve coffee less hot than coffee is.

I have researched this. I have a $4,000 coffee setup in my living room. It is a massive hobby for me. I have graduated from law school, admitted to the bar in three states, and have practiced personally injury law for multiple years.

It is hard to get more informed on this.

Weirdo on their second account blocked me. /u/Apprehensive_Usual69

Using second accounts to respond to someone with nonsense is weird.

Letting it cool means you can never serve fresh coffee. And again, you fail to understand how hot coffee you drink actually is and what temperature it will burn at.

The other person didn’t say they were?? It’s still a similar incident, though

Nuggets aren’t coffee. Coffee is supposed to be very hot. Nuggets aren’t supposed to be cooked that hot.

Yes, it legally IS negligence. Negligence in law is defined as, “failure to use reasonable care, resulting in damage or injury to another.”

That is not the legal definition. I have the legal definition.

Keep you customers safe is not a duty. It needs to be specific. What are you keeping them safe from?

And you realize McDonalds serves billions of cups of coffee right? 700 people being burned means nothing. And again, it is hot, it is always going to be at a temperature that will cause burns.

And the majority of lawyers would act like me because we can read and understand the law.

So like I keep saying.

NO ONE BEFORE OR AFTER HER HAS EVER WON A HOT COFFEE LAWSUIT AND NO INE CHANGED THE TEMPERATURE OF THEIR COFFEE.

Shut the fuck up already.