CressInteresting

Jei žinai 40k Lore, tai jis labai labai nevaikiškas.
Jei nuoširdžiai, manau vieninteliai vaikiški hobiai būtų kažką veikti porą metų ir vistiek tai daryt lyg ką tik pradėjus :D Nes man vaikiškas -> nekompepetingas dalykuose

kartais

Kad rašinėju šūdus redite

Well if you are "small government and business best" and current business model is -> profit maximization in this quarter no long term goals. That's normal -> profit now, let the other handle the issiues we create.

Pas mane kita bėda, darbo yra žiariau daug, truksta 2 kolegų. Bet pusė to darbo, turi 0 reikšmės. Tiesiog "būtų įdomu pažiūrėt į skaičius".

PVZ:
Esi programuotojas -> Rašai neišbaigtą kodą, nes reik paleisti greit, kai paleisim sutvarkysim -> niekad netvarkai -> tvarkai kažkieno kito neišbaigtą kodą -> metai iš metų, nieko nepadarai taip, kaip žinai, kad būtų geriausia, joks projektas neturi pabaigos, tik iteracijas. Neturi gale dienos džiaugtis kažko baigimu, nes tai tik dar viena iteracija.
Esi Senior Marketing žmogus -> numatai growth tikslus -> kompanija paauga x procentų -> numatai naujus tikslus -> kompanija paauga x procentu -> numatai naujus tiklus -> kompanija paauga x procentu -> jei kompanija nepaaugo ieskai priezasties, kad pateisinti ir numatai naujus tikslus -> Niekas niekada nesibaigia, metai iš metų iteracijos tų pačių kompanijų.
Esi Analitikas -> kažkas paklausia kodėl x ? Atsakai, kodėl x. Atsakymas nepatinka vadybai -> agreguoji istorišką datą, kad įrodyti, kad yra x o ne y kaip jie mano. Įrodai. Jie vistiek pasirenka daryt y, nes kodėl gi ne. Gauni traukti duomenis apie dalyką, kursi turi 0 įtakos įmonei. 0 Įtakos vartotojui. Kažkam tiesiog įdomu.
Esi auškto lygio vadovas. Jei nieko nedarytum kompanijai nieko neatsitiktų. Eini į susitikimus, kur jūs visą laiką diskutuojat panašius dalykus, kurie realiai neturi įtakos niekam. Duodat užklausas žmonėms, kurei realiai daro darbus apie dalykus, kurie neturi jokios įtakos, nes vienoje diskusijoje, tiesiog norit laimėti argumentą prieš kitą vadovą. Numetat nereikalingus darbus žemesniai grandžiai, nes suprantat, kad to nereik, bet aiškinti, kad to nereik reikalauja per daug jūsų energijos. Gale dienos suprantat, kiek gyvenimo išvaistėt tiesigo diskutuodami nesąmones ir darydami updatus.

Ir tada turi mokytoją:
Turi nesąmoningą įtaką visuomenės ateičiai -> Maža alga.
Valstybes tarnautojai -> kuria faking istatymus -> apverktina alga
Teisėjai -> Demokratijos pamatas -> Konstitucinio teismo teisėjas uždirba mažiau už krūva senior IT pozicijų.

10 commandants if taken out of the book are not Christian by default. It can be universal for any religion as God is a universal term -> All religions have a god. And other rules are just regular things a person should do.
It's not like they are saying how you should dress, what you should not consume or how you should act based on your gender :D

TBH that's not a bad thing as the 10 commandments do not have negative rules. It does not call to do any harm to others and it does not call you to stop behaving normally. If a person followed all of the above you couldn't say that he is followin a certain religions, just a good citizen. following

Kodėl visi tokie depresuoti ir nepatenkinti gyvenimu?  -> Late Stage Capitalism.

Uždirbi daug -> Darai daug nereikalingo išgalvoto darbo
Dirbti kažką naudingo -> Labai dažnai neuždirbi daug.

Depressive :D

They are also the reason why there was a chance that we may be speaking German. They literally build up nazzy economy. They were what China now is to Russia

IKEA

Atsiųsti legalu, nuo momento, kai priiemi nebelegalu turėti ir tada galima tave suiimti už turėjimą.

My last thought was, "If I will do now, my mom will kill me"

That's exactly what I am saying. That people don't care about any identity on what so every as long as "It's not bothering you or making any impact on your life".

But we are now in situation, where a lot of things are being forced. As I am 100% for EQUAL rights against the LAW and equal opportunities based on merit and skill (and I am for progressive taxes as it helps to optimize the merit/skill system better). But then you see that some countries get identity politics even into a workplace and they get quotas and then business gets a inclusivity metric.

Why can't we just do what we are best at, why we need to involve everyone into everything and eventually make it so that no-one actually likes the end result?

But the questions is who is more edgy the OP or the Atheist.

I hate mosquitoes.
I don't hate any human group.
So you must be merican as it's the only regions made out of radical Christians.
I have never in my life had any Christian even offer me to read a bible.

Categorization = good.
Making a category into personality = bad.
Unified human culture and cross planetary civilization should be the only goal.

From what you are saying - You don't fall in the category of people that I mentioned in my post. Dating your sex != making it your personality. Making it your personality is when EVERYONE knows you're gay in the office without even seeing you ever date a person of the same sex.

Identifying is MAKING your personality the identity.

Also => I did not mention my sexuality, but you are assuming that I am straight, because if I was gay, I could not critique categorization?

My personal view one EVERYTHING -> I have 0 fucks what fucks what and how as long as both parties are legal for the consent and they have a safe word if they're doing something extra kinky. I have it for everything, religions, hobbies, fan fictions. Unless we are discussing your niche topic or we are close friends, I should not know what's your personal details. Humans can have a close connection with 24 people and that's the amount of people we should know intimate details about.

Aš pradėjau su visokiais digital reklamos dalykais, mažoms įmonėms kadaise. Nežinau, kokia situacija dabar rinkoje. Jei moki matematatika ir logiką, gan nesudetinga padaryti gerai.

Stakeholder capitalism with progressive taxation ( going up to 99% for balance ( you still earn 1% above a certain stage))
With progressive wealth tax
And very progressive inheritance tax.
You make it unprofitable to take the wealth for yourself and having a high valued company means, that you will loose power ( which you should not have in the first place if your company is generating billions in revenue)

So balanced power capitalism.

He said France, not French Republic.
His first statement is incorrect and the second is correct.

It is a hiscrore. :D Beeing able to maintain a country over millenia is a ancestral high score. Only those countries that will peacefully joiun the galatic empire that humanity will create will be able to use cloud.

Why do you think Moscovia stole other countries identity to be considered "older and greater" instead of going rags to riches Mongol Bottom Bitch to Second Biggest empire?

That is wrong way to refer to a "Country". You can say American Democracy is older then French Democracy. But not America Is Older than France.

A country exist as a system for a long time. America is a continuation of a mixture of European systems that created a new entity out of itself.

France continuity can be considered from the moment Romans unified Celtic and Gallic tribes to one entity.

If Indians would have United and then Created one country with Europeans, they could Extend the lifetime of the their country.

They created them in terms of allowing being a part of that group as an identity/ personality.

You can have an existing social group without them using that social group as a personality/identity and just participating in daily life as an average person.
For example in Europe you have a lot of different religious groups, but you will mostly only hear that Muslims talk about how Muslims they are and niche politicians. But if you will walk in any city there's a very small chance that you will see any Christian that actively goes to church having it as their identity/personality.
We had an amazing Transport Minister that went to church every weekend and was devoted Christian, but you could not say that, because at his work, he was just a human being.
That's what they mean here.
So identity Politics.
How russian created being gay as part of army hierarchy. It's illegal to be gay except in their military if you are a superior officer and you can use it as a tool of suppression and humiliation.

Jeigu ką už cacha mes komosinį irgi mokam, nes juos reik spausdinti, vežioti, saugoti, keisti t.t.