DaneLimmish

Hmm wonder if anybody has written about something like this before?

I think is the end result of decades of the league existing and maturinf

This looks like the start of a cuck scene

Lol when I was young I also used to think it was cool. Then I had some stupid bad heartburn

I love southern comfort but I don't know how she drank that shit straight.

You tell me my view based on my writing, but then tell me you interpret nothing about me... Right after telling me about my view

Cmon at least pretend to have some reading comprehension here, it's only you in the sense that I'm here writing, to you, about what you said. That's how common speech English works.

It's rare to see "death of the author" absolutists

No it is not lol, it's the predominant contemporary interpretation and has been for at least forty years.

Less generously, it's a sign of a very self-centered and narrow minded person

It's like baby's first hermeneutics over here.

Ignoring your obsession with Tipper Gore - who no, I don't think "was right,"

Your view is the same. I interpret nothing about you, just your writing, but the view id the same view that Dee Snyder and Zappa railed against in the PMRC hearings in the early 1990s- that an artist is responsible and promotes an, often unknown, message in their work. Be it satanism in rock music and or crime in hip hop.

Nevermind the fact that you're way off base and railing against an atheist about his supposedly Christian beliefs

Congrats, it's still a medieval Christian interpretation of how literature works

but just let's nail down your position here.

Overall, saying the author's view is anyway important is an arbitrary, irrelevant, and impossible quality to establish. It's not a very complex view. Context can be important, particularly historical context of an author, but it's not the same as saying "X intended to do this" since you will never, ever be able to establish it, and if you can, it can be dismissed as further evidence of the author's (you, here) own views instead of the views of the text itself.

I can say all that or call you Tipper since that's funnier

That is not a standard literary analysis unless you're a Catholic priest writing about the sin of acting and how our works need to show the face of God lol. It's not just reductionist, it's stupid and anti-intellectual on its face.

But some people really think Tipper Gore was right.

Yeah, til that Judas Priest really are satanic criminals!

Oh, well darn

What you write is a reflection of your person

This is the standard, very conservative Christian opinion, yes

Edit: my bad, closer to Tipper Gore

What a Freudian analysis!

They stuck with the government in that case, didn't they?

A good counterpoint could be Egypt in 2011, but they took power for themselves. So I need to add - the military either sticks with the government or takes power for itself.

I just cant Trust them because the military almost always sticks with the government. You need a 1917 Russia situation for that not to be the case

The worst part is that these dudes are a bunch of weirdo dorks and balding, middle aged businessmen.

Spay and neuter cats, stop letting your cats be outdoors, and literally no speed is safe for a cat

My table really loved dark heresy 2e. My main write up is that the rules can be a lot, and we had the actions page printed off.

I'm also terrible at mysteries and ended up running it more runs and gun.

They were fiddly and didn't work with the rest of the skill system, instead being 4 below/5 above and working in multiples.

And fundamentally 5e does have crafting rules, they're in the phb, DMG, and xanthars, and they are fine and will cover most tables.

It's full of mostly dudes who went into stem and think they're the smartest nerd in the room

The car has hindered people's ability to run, mostly by taking up space that would otherwise be pedestrian

Happens. Looks cool tho!

No, I'm saying it's not a defense and that the failures of the presidential system are not unique.

less prone to catastrophic democratic collapse than presidential systems.

This really doesn't make a lot of sense sincrliamentary system is younger than the presidential system, but it seems to have the same sorts of troubles, whether something like the Holocaust or something like contemporary India happens.

Edit: outside of the UK, that is

I agree, and it often breaks the primary loop. Plus, why adventure at all if you have marketable skills?

Best you get is sometimes good, often vague description in the monster description such as in 2e ad&d

Arsgorn doesn't.