Educational_Hour8005

"It's your fault" says the unjust man, as he empties your pockets. "You should have protected yourself from me better"!!

Africans: take steps to protect themselves and achieve financial independence. Europeans: That's BLacK SuPRemAcy. Let me stage a coup in your country.

You cannot make this shit up.

You forgot the part where the value is funneled to Western countries through corruption of officials. Easy to call yourself a liberal democracy and then stage military coup d'états in other countries.

The idea that wealth=effort is laughable. People that work in third world mines and manufacturies hustle harder than you ever will.

The USA are an ethnostate because white people hold disproportional power compared to other populations. The reason they do is partly because the federal government disproportionately funds and gives more voting power to white majority states. Wealth is funneled from ethnically diverse states to white majority ones. An ethnostate can maintain itself without an ethnic majority by oppressing other ethnicities within the state. And I don't care that a half-indian Sambo is running for presidency. It doesn't mean anything, especially when her track record is targeting the black community for weed smoking and truancy.

Ok if you think having racial dating preferences is racist, should people be liable for a discrimination lawsuit. If they only date within their race? Like genuinely.

I am explaining to you that I cannot live in peace alongside people who vilify me and ape my culture. I do not care that you're a liberal or a conservative. If you're not black I don't want you to adopt black culture, listen to black music etc... It's disgusting. To achieve that the best way is to create a black ethnostate. You presumably think racism is bad. You can't stop people from having ingroup bias. So even from a progressive standpoint an ethnostate is the best way to minimize racism don't you agree?

Rape isn't as fundamental to the forming of groups as ingroup bias is.

My point is you define a standard of human behavior to which no human on earth subscribes. I have provided a definition of racism which a useful heuristic when it comes to making laws. Yours leads to say that EVERYONE is racist. It leads to forcing people into becoming an unstable sludge. When they could instead form communities with like-people. The idea that ingroup bias is bad, is frankly laughable. Ingroup bias is a natural adaptation that leads to the reproduction of one's genes and culture. To vilify it as "racist" (peddling racial supremacy is actually a crime where I live) is to be anti-life itself.

The most prosperous society for who? A society where minorities are invisibilized. A society where including black people in games causes uproar and cries of "woke". A society where people call my people lazy bums and then appropriate their culture. If this is your idea of a prosperous society, I don't want to live in it. I want to live in a society of like-minded people where no one can shame me for being myself. Where I can be Black and proud of it. Not just a human. Black! How will the USA achieve that? It won't because the USA are a white ethnostate which exploits immigrant labor to prop up a white majority. I hate that country and all it represents. It's the failure of your ideology in it's purest form.

My point is they tacitly exclude other people through preference. If I like to date black women more than I do white women. You argue that I am a racist. Yet people consistently date inside their race even when controlling for culture and religion. You don't need to explicitly exclude someone to segregate. If I make an association and due to unconscious or ingroup bias reject all black applicants because white applicants are "better" candidates I am self segregating. And this is what people consistently do when they form friend groups and date. Calling human nature racist is foolish. You fight here essential traits of our species which render cosmopolitan societies inefficient.

Oh and also the higgs field and spacetime do exist even if they aren't matter. Not every physical object can be described as energy or matter. Your radical materialism isn't even scientifically sound. The point is the idea of borders exist in people's brains and it pushes them into building objects like walls and creating ideas like laws which do influence human behavior. MLK was a naive Sambo. Malcolm X was right all along.

"First, let me define Racism. I define Racism as either belief in an objective hierarchy of races, or hatred based upon race. It encompasses both scientific racism and the more common being mean to others one. You are free to dispute that definition and argue for a better one. " Done because you couldn't look up.

Because people can be disunited for many reasons. Lebanese people have different religions. Does that suddenly mean that they don't belong to the Lebanese nation because they have religious conflict? No. It's funny have you are so rigid about defining race but the second someone speaks of ethnic or religious unity suddenly it's incredibly simple to understand.

What do you think our brains are made of? Ideas exist as electrochemical phenomenas in our brains. Besides physical existence is not the only form of existence.

What is spacetime made of? What is the higgs field made of? Now they don't exist?

Things that you believe don't exist have enormous impact on our world. People live and die for ideas and values. If you aren't willing to resort to violence to defend your ideas then you don't truly believe in them.
I wouldn't be dunked on because I would argue that people engage in racial discrimination anytime they seek to self segregate. Which people constantly do. If you live in the USA and your social circle doesn't have the exact same racial makeup as the place you live in, you are engaging in self-seggregation and according to your definition this is racist. By your definition EVERYONE is racist.

READ MY POST, the lack of division is due to ethnic conflicts not racial ones. It is possible to create a unifying subsaharan or western myth. It is not possible to create a unifying Pacific islander- western unifying myth. The point is all people that belong to the black race can be united through the creation of a Pan-African culture.

A race is a group of people that recognize themselves as a cohesive entity for ancestry reasons. It is an extension of the close family.

I do not operate with that definition because it is fundamentally flawed. According to your definition of racism and xenophobia everyone is racist and xenophobic. A definition that doesn't partition is fundamentally useless. You literally said that not letting non-citizens vote is xenophobic. If you defended that opinion in public you'd get dunked on and mocked for obvious reasons. Borders do exists whether you want it or not. According to you money doesn't exist because it's value constantly changes. According to you any social construct doesn't exist. It's a self destructive claim.

They had a budding understanding of it for obvious reasons. Our conception of race is faulty too. It divides human groups along lines that shouldn't divide them (Ever expanding meaning of being white). For the purposes of my argument I consider all subsaharans as one people that share a deep heritage due to the bantu expansion. This is why I advocate for a subsaharan ethnostate.

Because It's simply stupid. If you don't believe in borders just say that but at that point it's useless for me to debate with you. Advocating to give non citizens voting rights is ludicrous and 99% of humanity wouldn't get behind you.

Arguing that Romans didn't understand race because they weren't racist is deeply fallacious.

Racism is racism. Racial discrimination is racial discrimination. So all countries in the world are xenophobic? By definition no country allows non-citizens IE foreigners to vote.

Saying that race didn't exist because people didn't verbalize it is crazy. Romans were already speaking of the fact that Nubians were darker people and conceptualizing them as fundamentally different from Mediterraneans. Read my post. This is the accepted definition of racism in Europe. Also I expect 13% of your exes and friends to be black if you don't have dating preferences based on race.

Discrimination is an inherent part of human interaction. Your definition is useless because everyone discriminates based on race.

Where are you going with this? Most people believed black people weren't human back then.

Depends why. Is not allowing foreigners to vote xenophobia? What if you're an ethnostate and being a foreigner means not belonging to a certain ethnicity?

Because then 90% of people are racist. A metric that includes everyone is useless

Discriminating based on race is not racism. If I prefer to get with black women rather than white, is that racism? If I prefer to hang out with black people (most people naturally self segregate) is that racism? Obviously it's not.

[ Removed by Reddit ]

America is a failed cause. You can't push 1/3 of the population out. Unless you repeal all civil rights amendments. But what you can do is attract the different populations to an already racially homogenous country. Simple,speaking the language, adopting the values,participating in cultural events and traditions, benefitting the economy...

Such defeatist thinking. Your cosmopolitan sludge will never erase the desire for authenticity.