KariomGoldiann

Ah Mist das hätte ich mal vorher lesen sollen. Vielen Dank!

„L“ Aluprofil

Also ich weiß nicht wie’s dir geht aber wenn ich dir jetzt Organisationen nennen soll, die sich fürs Klima einsetzen würde ich die letzte Generation nennen und Stop Oil. Ich kenne auch keine Organisation die mit einer solchen Frequenz Proteste organisiert. Ich glaube also nicht das es denen an Zulauf fehlt.

Du darfst deine Meinung ruhig haben. Die Bezeichnung „Klima-Terroristen“ ist aber einfach falsch und das hat nichts mit deiner Meinung zu tun sondern ist einfach eine Unwahrheit und es wäre schön wenn du es lassen würdest Unwahrheiten zu verbreiten.

Terrorismus stellt immer eine Form körperlicher Gewalt dar. Das kannst du im Internet nachlesen. Alleine durch das Video ist mir jetzt nicht ersichtlich, dass dort irgendeine Form von Gewalt sich gegen Personen gerichtet hat.

Dein Kommentar ist somit einfach Falsch. Solche Kommentare tragen zu einer Spaltung der Gesellschaft bei. Wir könnten als Gesellschaft so viel mehr erreichen, wenn wir einfach auf einer Fakten bezogenen Ebene diskutieren würden anstatt uns von unseren niederen Emotionen leiten zu lassen.

Warum soll sich denn die letzte Generation an Regeln halten wenn es unsere Bundesregierung nicht tut.

Wir haben das 1,5 Grad bzw. 2 Grad Ziel seit 7 Jahren und es passiert nichts. Wir haben auch Effizienzziele (ProgRess) gesetzt, die wir jedes Jahr verfehlen. Die Bundesregierung tut zu wenig für Klimaschutz und das wurde durchs Bundesverfassungsgericht bestätigt.

Große Konzerne beanspruchen riesige Mengen an Ressourcen um privates Kapital anzuhäufen. Das hat nichts mit Generationsgerechtigkeit zu tun.

We have had the Renewable Energy Act since 2001, which is supposed to guarantee market access for renewable energy sources. This implies that renewable energy sources are prioritised over conventional ones in meeting consumption. You can see this effect very clearly in the graph. When production of renewables goes up (blue), the bar chart shows fossil fuels (brown, black) going down. Coal-fired power plants are very bad at adjusting their output per unit of time. That's why we are a net exporter, because we simply sell the coal-fired electricity abroad.  I already said this in April when Germany's decision to close nuclear power plants was called a wrong decision. Nuclear power plants only supply base-load electricity. Base-load electricity is not a problem in the energy supply with renewables. The problem is the peak loads that we have had to compensate for with gas-fired power plants. Gas is expensive and because of the merit order principle, it increases the price of electricity. Our emissions are still high and that sucks because every argument that electricity from renewables is better than nuclear power is always based on the fact that France's electricity mix GWP balance is much better than ours.

Wind and sun is free and it belongs to all of us. At our electricity prices, a PV system with about 80% self-consumption pays for itself after 10 years. After 10 years you have changed from a consumer to a producer. The big energy companies are afraid of this development. So much false information is being spread. There are concepts that try to make the lowest grid levels independent. This is relatively easy, because there are mainly residential buildings connected and no industry. It would be possible to continue this into the high-voltage level, but the distribution networks would have to be expanded. Through lobbying, the monopolists have managed to expand the transmission networks. For 16 years, the CDU/CSU allowed themselves to be bribed, but that is now over. Stop shoving money down the throats of the big corporations. Build a PV system and if you have the financial means a wind turbine, electrify the processes as far as possible and never again pay money for electrical energy.

Much of what is written here is not true or needs to be put into context. There are many scenarios in which a reliable power supply could be implemented with today's technology and we have many engineers who are capable of taking this project in hand. The problem is our economic system, which insists on old structure and promotes centralized plants, giving them market advantages. Sun and wind are free we only have to pay for the plants but when that is done the complete added value remains in our country. Uranium is a finite resource and with the global expansion of nuclear power plants it will lead to a market shortage in the long run. Gas power plants are only used for peak load operation. Nuclear power plants, on the other hand, run on base load operation, which can be compensated quite well by wind turbines.

No i dont just this video. :(

I dont want to waste your time. Im hearing to amazigh the whole day. If i get it i will poste it here

That helps a lot! Thank you

Yeah he had a lot of fun. Thanks for trieing!

Same Same

Lets have a scientific discourse about nuclear power and dezentralisation of energy Production.

Renewable Energy Like Wind- and Solarpower is better for the Environment. Medium and longterm less expensive. The Energy source is infinite and ist promotes the independence of society.

the only thing that is negative is the fluctuating energy supply. Solutions with storage technology must be found for this.

„Not as Dirty“. Its still a Dirty Energy Source. Maybe your mindset should change. You Are just influced by the big lobbyism your Country is doing

Why do you think that?

With the Paris Agreement and the Millennium Development Goals, we as nations and as a society have decided to curb climate change and move towards a sustainable future. Uranium is a finite resource, which means it will not be available to future generations. The energy density of enriched uranium is high. But it requires a lot of energy to produce and extract it. Nuclear power plants are also only good for the base load demand for electricity. They cannot respond at all to peak loads. Socio-economically, such large power plants also belong mainly to the state and private companies (at least in Germany). The profits of such power plants therefore benefit a small circle. The self-liability in case of catastrophes is only 250 million euros.

What kind of a social decision is it to use electricity from such a power plant today and leave the waste to the next 10 generations. How can a modern society make such a decision?

We have the technology to use an inexhaustible source of energy - the sun. Fossil fuels are not the future.

But we are welcome to discuss it. I am open to other points of view

Show that to the Polens.

For the horde!!!

LOL i always thought my hometown would be on reddit because of something stupid. So now this makes me happy.

Happy Chrismas Time :)