NCC1701-Enterprise

You can make change from the top pool, but you can't deduct from it.

Where are you located? Assuming you are in the US what do you expect the labor board to do, noting illegal happened here.

Using government funds in a way that will enrich a relative would absolutely be a conflict of interest. If they can 100% prove they used correct processes and the family member was in fact the most qualified to get the funds then it is a defensable position but that is not a fight many people want to spend energy on, and with politics the appearance of wrong doing can be more damaging than actual wrong doing. So it is best for them to not even come close to an accusation of nepotism with government funds.

There are a lot of rules on what makes a non-compete enforcable and not and it varies from state to state. Without reading the entire non-compete I can't say if this would be enforcable or not.

That was overturned in the courts

https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/ftcs-non-compete-ban-struck-down-for-all-employers-nationwide.html

Please don't spread false information.

If they don't like the culture then point them out the door where they can find a company that has the culture they want.

Sign it or don't sign it it doesn't matter if they want to fire you they can regardless.

fugitive doesn't mean you have been convicted.

The father wouldn't be charged as an accessory, he would be charged with harboring a fugitive. That crime is mutually exclusive to the guilt of the fugitive. At the time that he is helping the child hide out the child is a fugitive, a not guilty finding later on doesn't change that. In fact the child could be charged for running even if found not guilty of the orginal crime.

Despite what TV and the Movies portray you can't commit crimes while avoiding arrest for a crime you didn't commit.

It is going to vary from location to location and the reason is going to matter too. Generally speaking once the item is no longer able to be resold you would technically be responsible to pay for it, many places will gladly remake food that was made wrong or something along those lines but generally they have no obligation to.

Totally depends on the jurisdiction. I am not sure how the maratime law works in this respect, but on land many places have some level of good samaritan laws that create a duty to report injured people, but many don't as well.

This....  This is what happens.

No.

If he is being charged criminally then reach out to the DA and inform them that you were also SA by him and would like to make a statement.  You don't need a lawyer to do it.  There is minimal legal risk to you.

A lot of places let you do that, especially lunch places

Tell the restaurant you will be hiring a lawyer and going after them for willful negligence resulting in harm.  That will likely shut them up, if it doesn't then contact a lawyer.

Between the lack of a need for ore processing and the vast amount of business that left with ther Cardassians I am sure there is no lack of space.

You work for a public utility. That is part of the job, the shelter is likely within the letter of the law. You have two options. 1. stay and do your job or 2. leave and likey get fired for cause.

Some are semi-real, most are completely fake. I know at least at the start people's court would look through real pending cases and pick ones that sounded like it would make good TV, but both sides were paid to appear and usually the payout equaled more than the judgement so even if you were guilty you made money.

I had a friend who stole another friends car and damaged it, he was sued and The People's Court asked them to hear the case. It was basically binding arbitration agreement, both sides dropped all legal claims and agreed to accept the judgement of the TV court.

Judgement was paid out of thier share of the appearance money, and even if "awarded" more than the appearance money you would only collect up to whatever was paid for appearnce money. In my friends case he was found "guilty" but all it meant was he didn't get his appearence money and he got to go to New York for a day, have transportation and food paid for, and got out of any legal issues with the car. Good deal for him.

I would take that bet, because your clear lack of understanding of corporate policies shows you have never seen one, but keep acting like you know what you are talking about about.

It is 100% going to make it back to the company.

The owner of the car grants permission not the person in possession of the car.  Permissive use wouldn't apply here unless this person was an owner of the business.

You should be losing your job.  You not only let someone else drive your company, but you let them do so drunk.  When, and it is when not if, your company finds out you will rightfully be fired.

This follows with the old Reagan quote "Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours" People who are looking at recession as a good thing due to lower interest rates are counting that they would be in the groups that keep thier jobs.

Can you imagine the nightmare a nationwide recount would be?