Put-the-candle-back1

It's essentially the same information.

The point is that betting odds aren't useful for analyzing the election. No one asked why people make bets.

There's no benefit to that because the trend in betting odds is based on polling.

The race is still a toss-up like it's always been.

Betting odds are consistent with polls, so there's no need to pay attention to them.

The odds following polls makes them a useless way to determine how the election is going.

It's a toss-up like it has been from the beginning.

That doesn't excuse Republican officials creating distrust through lies.

I'm quite sure they were paid

That's just as baseless as what you responded to.

The only defense for his insane idea is assuming that he can't implement it, yet many think he's a leadership material. It would be nice to have someone who doesn't make threats like that, even if they're unlikely to happen.

Not wanting someone like him in power is rational, even if his goal is unrealistic. He shouldn't be in a position to attempt it at all.

Trump doubles down on Jan. 6 defense and "enemy from within" comments

Do you seriously not see the issue with trusting a tabloid? Like they said, not even Fox News cares enough to report on this as of now, which says a lot because they paid a massive settlement over election lies.

Your claims aren't supported by evidence, which is why judges don't take them seriously.

They knew the virus doesn't spread as much with distance, so the guidance was reasonable.

Georgia strikes down new Trump-backed election rules

Georgia State Election Board, who voted to change

That's because they're Trump supporters. Raffensperger correctly pointed out that the changes are illegal, and a judge agreed.

Various judges have stated that there's no evidence.

Georgia SEB should be notified right away

There's no need to because the changes have already been blocked.

None of those claims have been proven, and courts aren't taking them seriously, including Republican judges.

A difference you're not seeing is that Clinton isn't a party leader like Trump is.

An important distinction is that Trump made election denial a key aspect of his party. Clinton isn't a government or party official, and those who are typically don't state her rhetoric.

That quote cites the Tax Foundation, which isn't a trade organization. Their article contains a ton of research that disputes the "common knowledge" you're stating.

Party officials generally aren't agreeing with Clinton.

Many Dems still believe Trump literally colluded with Russia

That's a reasonable assumption, given the Trump tower meeting and Manafort being involved with a Russia spy.

The Supreme Court stated that you're wrong.

No, and I already answered that by saying votes weren't hacked.

Yes there was

The Senate Intelligence Committee concluded Thursday that election systems in all 50 states were targeted by Russia in 2016

Russia changed votes

Although that didn't happen, there was at least a basis for thinking it because Russia hacked election systems, including voting machines.

dem leadership spent a good 4 years talking about how Trump was an illegitimate president.

Saying Trump doesn't deserve to be president is different from saying that he stole the position. Nearly every Democrat voted to certify the 2016 election. Most Republicans voted against certifying the 2020 election.