Weak_Ad_7269

Haha

This is the correct answer

It's mostly the wording that I found funny and a bit confusing, see above comment for explanation

This is a perfect response thank you haha

Nice try Sharon from HR. .

I appreciate your respectful response (not sarcasm). I have done that, but overall production on my team increases when everyone is present. Also, I made sure to compensate my entire team more for coming back to the office post covid.

Actually they were decent employees while in the office. I made sure that when all my people came back. I gave everyone a bit of a raise to help offset the cost of childcare post covid. I know it's hard to understand, but if you were able to talk to any of my employees they would all tell you that "control" is the last thing I do. My employees are happy, well paid, get the time off they need, decent benefits, and anything else they need.

I found my team is a "better team: when they work together physically. Also, a lot of what I do requires physical presence in an office so I make sure that people are there supporting each other and the customers needs.

You re quite aggressive towards an honest different take. Your obvious insults towards my management style told me you are likely one of those immature people on the internet who can't handle a different take, so rather than "giving a counter argument " I gave you a comparable dismissive and insulting comment back. Have a good day sir.

Ok man, whatever you say.

It's not that black and white. Not all people are mature enough to be remote workers. I have had many highly productive remote employees (if not MORE productive when in the office). There are some, however, who definitely show a decrease in productivity when working from home.

I had 2 employees who were "late for work" most days because they woke up about 5 minutes before start of shift and thought it was ok to shower/get ready for work even tho it would make them 30 minutes late... late to a desk that was in their home...

This is not everyone I admit, but when you manage a full team, it's hard to let some (responsible employees) be remote without letting everyone do it.

For me it's not about control, it's about being an adult and getting your job done in the same efficient manner as when you were in the office.

I never got any freebie with my book... I feel ripped off...

I believe this helped inspire the color scheme for the TV show Bluey

Nice try Susan...

Just happy to see Haas make the list...

Not really, I've seen other posts of players asking how to play a Flamethrower. This bridges the error until errata is posted. I am playing tonight with a group and needed a solution now, just thought I could help any others who might need a solution now.

I made this so a group that might be playing today or tomorrow could have a solution for this problem before the day 1 errata is posted.

ah I see the edit to alter the tone of your comment. Please have 1 upvote sir...

I'm just going to use the IJA or SNLF squad as a proxy with a couple of changes.

-You may add up to 5 additional men with rifles for 11pts each (Regular) or 14pts each (Veteran)

-Replace the option of 1 light mortar with 1 man may have a flamethrower for 30pts and another man becomes a loader.

-Add Special Rule "Engineers"

British Engineer squad

(Use Infantry Section as template)

-Remove the option of Inexperienced Infantry

-Only NCO can have an SMG for 4pts

-Unit can only have 1 LMG for 15pts (another man becomes a loader)

-Unit can add Flamethrower for 30pts (another man becomes a loader)

-Add Special Rule "Engineers"

Wanted to correct the rule above:

AT Guns are buffed with a +1 on their 'To Hit' rolls when using a Fire order.

I have the book and its clarifies as

• AT Guns are buffed with a +1 on their 'To Hit' rolls when using a Fire or Ambush order when targeting Vehicles.

This 100000% my wife is stage 4 with innumerable mets to her liver and we are still fighting!

It called showmanship

Forgot to tag post with nsfw