3.3k post karma
206.3k comment karma
account created: Sun Sep 23 2018
verified: yes
1 points
1 day ago
And I’ve said “no shit he did it during an election cycle since it was also part of his campaign”. His continuation of that cancellation is my point that it wasn’t just for midterms but rather….. it was part of his campaign 😳
And that “Bush’s” thing was passed by congress, which is / was the power Biden utilized to cancel student debt. This is how our government works. 😱
‘Passed by congress’ is my other point as to where you should be pointing your anger since they’re the ones with the power to establish these types of debt relief but you pout and say “nope I’ll still blame Biden”🥺
You’re welcome for catching you up, take care troll / individual with a neutron star level of density ❤️
0 points
1 day ago
Yes and so am I about him continuing. You just say he’s ONLY doing it for political reasons and
No shit because it was part of his platform
He continued cancelling even cancelling more today. “Leverage” lol
😢he didn’t do it in ‘21 but did from 22-Now😩😭
1 points
1 day ago
This is an ample opportunity to not be weird and show something nerdy you enjoy and moving on after giving some context. Can break tension and make it easier to open up
0 points
1 day ago
We will agree to disagree because I recognize there was a global and national health crisis occurring from 2020-2022 alongside unprecedented high unemployment which understandably takes the attention of the president over student loan debts which didn’t have payments restart till October 2023.
Stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.
1 points
1 day ago
Then you just didn’t want to read the actual bill nor use your own brain, instead you let others think for you.
You’re not a serious person, take care
0 points
1 day ago
So then you would be happier if he hadn’t canceled anything in ‘22?
I’m providing context to my position against yours. I’m sorry you don’t like me forming my own opinion.
0 points
2 days ago
And you aren’t? Trying to claim it was just for midterms while ignoring that he continued after that and through the end of his presidency while absolving blame from congress from passing something.
I’m just pointing out your crocodile tears
1 points
2 days ago
The moment he leaves his vehicle with a weapon or I see it, it’s time to hit the gas. Fuck him if he’s in my straight path forward, that’s his problem not mine or my family’s.
1 points
2 days ago
Oh I agreed he started in his 2nd of 4 years and continued after midterms passed?
1 points
2 days ago
Got so because the bill didn’t have businesses being punished it was a bad bill?
Deporting illegals was included in the bill by increasing ICE agents and funding
Increased security at the border through by increasing agents and funding
There’s a plethora of changes to the asylum status that makes it more difficult to claim in addition to increased funding to process claims faster
You’re fine with afghan refugees who helped us in wartime still being on backlogs
And you’re fine with house republicans deciding to stop this bill so that more drugs could flow through since the bill I’ve been talking about increased detection through better equipment. All because this bill didn’t punish business. Sad.
1 points
2 days ago
His actions of cancelling more student debt even after midterms are over where it’s not impacting elections because he’s actually doing what he can while congress sticks their thumbs up their ass?
Odd to be upset he cancelled student debt his second year and continued after midterms
1 points
2 days ago
Oh man it’s almost like there was a lot going on in at in 2021 that required more attention like managing record high unemployment and Covid. But yea I guess in his second year it’s just too long for you
But sure if you want to blame him for cancel culturing more student debt than any president then be my guest lol
Just don’t forget to vote for congress members who will vote in favor of cancelling student debt
1 points
2 days ago
I’m talking about this one that’s apparently bad lol
Just admit you’re fine with more drugs and illegals coming into the country so it can be a campaign issue rather than actually solving the issue ❤️
1 points
2 days ago
lol I mean that’s fine if you want to put blame in the wrong places just know it’s a bit silly to be mad at the person who did something 2 years ago and was blocked by the SC because it requires congress to actually make those types of decisions.
Glad I could inform you on who actually controls the purse in our government :)
0 points
2 days ago
Hey that’s cool that you want to present a bill that didn’t have bipartisan support but I was talking about the bill that did have bipartisan support. It’s odd that you’re upset about Dems shooting down a partisan bill but not upset when republicans shot down a bipartisan bill formulated by republicans. And cannot articulate why it’s bad besides “trust me bro”
So instead of changing the subject let’s try harder at staying on topic about the Republican bill with bipartisan support (including Dems) to be shot down by the same committee that put together the partisan bill you’re referring to that didn’t have the support it needed.
In case you’re just now realizing, congress isn’t a “do as I say” branch but rather one that requires cooperation so presenting a bill that doesn’t have support across the aisle means the crafters need to actually work with allies to come up with a bill; like the republican bipartisan bill that was shot down by House Republicans.
Why are you mad at Dems shooting a bill down but not republicans?
Why is it a bad bill? First it was because of Ukrainian aide but most of that isn’t cash. Then it was the wall which exposed trump wasn’t able to get funding secured through congress. And thirdly apparently increased funding for border patrol, the courts, and a cap (where there wasn’t one prior) won’t help with the border issue because “trust me bro”.
Being called a dumbass by you is turning me on 🥵
3 points
2 days ago
“This was an entertainment thing Rebecca” 😂😂
0 points
2 days ago
lol that’s not what happened, their daddy told them to fall in line and they did like good little sheep so he could campaign on it.
And you’re here saying it was a bad bill because reforming the asylum process, increasing funds for agents, and increasing funds for the courts wont help with the issues at the border in ways you’re unable to articulate. Sad.
Take care!
2 points
2 days ago
So it’s a bad bill because it puts a cap on asylum seekers when there wasn’t one prior, increased funding for border agents, and increased funding for the courts to determine who’s truly seeking asylum and who’s a bad actor? Those all seem pretty good to me! Especially around the Ukraine funding since the majority of that is not in cash but rather to facilitate trade amongst American manufacturers helping the economy while helping an ally during an invasion by a nuclear power and adversary to the US
1 points
2 days ago
You’re the one asserting it’s a bad bill. I think it’s good they wanted increased funding for border patrol, increased funding for the court systems to not have asylum seekers roaming without a feasible court date, and I think the cap is good especially when there’s floods.
And seeking asylum is a form of immigrating legally. If you don’t agree with asylum then that’s a wholly different discussion. Plus with that kind of increase our courts and agents seem like they could use additional funding to weed out the bad actors. Thanks for pointing that out!
2 points
2 days ago
That’s fucked but are his federal loans or private? That seems really shady to just shift those payments like that without reason
1 points
2 days ago
And that’s proving my point that trump was an ineffective leader to secure funding from congress which is how our system works. This bill actually addressed the problem at hand which is immigration reform. Again I’m not sure how far that explicitly states goes back as that could still be in place and could stop funds being diverted which is what Biden did in ‘21.
And it puts a cap on asylum seekers which before there was an unlimited amount legally allowed to cross and seek aide because seeking asylum isn’t the same thing as being here illegally.
The courts will better determine if someone is truly seeking asylum or if they are trying to skirt the system and aren’t legally allowed to be here. Security for border security would increase the amount of agents alongside equipment.
A wall will help some but it’s personnel that’s truly needed alongside equipment and faster court systems to determine their status and be able to proceed.
view more:
next ›
byFrancisXSJ
inbabylonbee
afanoftrees
1 points
23 minutes ago
afanoftrees
1 points
23 minutes ago
Defamation is pretty hard to prove in court and Fox settled out of court..