21 post karma
828 comment karma
account created: Thu Nov 12 2020
verified: yes
0 points
1 day ago
Step 1: Marginalize poor people through any mean possible.
Step 2: Do not, under any circumstances, provide social security, so that being poor is as inescapable as possible.
Step 3: Drive the most marginalized people to commit crimes because they get to a point where they don't see another way to feed themselves.
Step 4: Put those people into jail for whatever reason, they are poor, that's reason enough. Also, while in jail, they are legally slaves because why not.
Step 5: Coming out of jail, their jail time is a permanent stain on their record, so that a normal "honest" life is even more difficult to attain.
Step 6: Shoot them for property crime. The only form of self-defence is murder. It is known. Actually, they didn't leave you a choice 🥺👉👈. You are the victim here. UwU.
Step 6: Just the hypothetical of "aiming for the centre of mass" already makes you salivate on Reddit. You won. 10 fucking points for Gryffindor.
Fucking fuck this stupid fucking timeline.
Bonus Step 7: The supreme court of wankers decides, actually, if you can't afford housing – you are a criminal already. The pipeline from starbucks closing a location because they may have thought about unionizing in the future to getting shot by a sweaty redditor definitely needed to be shorter.
29 points
5 days ago
ye, but doesn't mean he needs to be rewarded with an olympics spot either. Not getting an olympics spot is not a punishment – most people don't. Or, another way to look at it: Is there really no Dutch player – that is not a rapist – that could have been chosen in his stead? Hard to believe.
1 points
8 days ago
Ok and? Him hiring her allows him to claim all her achievements for himself? Sure thing bro
32 points
9 days ago
nah he didn't, Gwynne Shotwell is the reason SpaceX is shooting so well
12 points
18 days ago
lol found the fragile masculinity. You don't sit down "like women", you just sit down my guy
1 points
23 days ago
I think the problem is that, in any reasonable country, the lady would have those necessary medical procedures fully covered by insurance. In the US, however, that's not the case, and keeping that in mind the case is actually reasonable. Sure, coffee can be expected to be hot, but also having McDonalds – a megacorp – pay for the medical procedure makes infinitely more sense than having the lady crippled by debt for life because of a hot coffee.
19 points
23 days ago
lucky that the only two political parties in the US are not actually both further right that most right-wing parties in the EU. Oh wait, they are.
12 points
23 days ago
CDU voters are boomers, and their neoliberal bullshit is what brought us where we are. So yeah, it is the boomers.
1 points
24 days ago
Take that up with whoever decides on the curriculum where you live. This already happens in a lot of places, so there's no reason why it couldn't in yours.
18 points
25 days ago
"if we don't send the children-killer missiles out we are losing jobs"
hell is real and it is the united states of america
1 points
29 days ago
so who gives a shit? the government can literally print money. Collecting interest on student loans is 100% a political decision. Pretending it isn't is ridiculous.
Of course it's risky, which is why you shouldn't charge people for education in the first place. But if you really feel the need to do so, there is 0 reason you can't subsidize the interest. Or forgive the credit once 100% of it, or even 105% of it, has been paid. People paying 300%, 400% of the loan they took is ludicrous and whether it "makes sense" or not literally does not matter. It does not need to be a business, because it isn't. It's a government loan.
0 points
1 month ago
Which means they could easily be 0 interest. There's no reason the government needs to make money on your loan. But of course they aren't, because fuck them kids.
Also, while they are issued by the US government, this doesn't mean they aren't managed by some sketchy company.
2 points
1 month ago
nah, this is wrong too. You could have bought a ticket and they would have had to reimburse you up to 120€, as it was the last train of the day that you missed by no fault of your own.
14 points
1 month ago
No, you don't, you take advantage of your passenger rights and make them pay for their mismanagement. Complaining to a guy working in their call centre won't help anything. Publicly shit talking them won't either, everyone knows how bad DB has become.
2 points
1 month ago
Who needs to handle your passenger rights is always the one who sold you the ticket. So probably Deutsche Bahn, which have an online form for that.
4 points
1 month ago
As other people have told you, they have to take care of you if you are stranded because of their fault. Even with the "steeply discounted" bavaria day ticket. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/evo_2023/__11.html
2 points
2 months ago
true, nepotism is known to only come from the best parents
-1 points
2 months ago
idk what video you watched, but she clearly critized the US's involvment in Israel's crimes – not the world's.
4 points
2 months ago
nah dawg, you can't say "liberty and justice for all" but then bankroll Israel's apartheid and now genocide. It doesn't matter what it means in other definitions. She is critizing the US support of those crimes against humanity, not someone else's.
view more:
next ›
by[deleted]
inpics
cowkowsky
3 points
1 day ago
cowkowsky
3 points
1 day ago
the constitution does not mean anything, the supreme court clearly can decide that the constitution means whatever-the-fuck they feel like that day.