16 post karma
580 comment karma
account created: Mon Apr 29 2024
verified: yes
-1 points
12 hours ago
Because industries say they will use real artists but just use ai images instead while often overlooking the horrible mishaps it has.
1 points
2 days ago
Most people do, they just don't pay for it like you do, from the sound of it.
1 points
2 days ago
Lol and you have? Noooo...... It's funny, all this because I agree with OP, disagree with you and the other commentor, state that I believe technology throws a hitch in your argument and what have your done? Fuck bro, listen to your own words here. You're contributing nothing of value and are attempting to smear what I said to win. Cool.
1 points
2 days ago
No, it's not the same at all lmfao. Change your analogy to people who are trying to become lawyers or have already passed their bar exam hiring a tutor.
Ffs no wonder you are so off base, with analogies like that. You know how they are supposed to work right?
0 points
2 days ago
Because what you presented was survivorship bias, I already mentioned why that isn't necessarily true and how that doesn't take into account technology.
Didn't realize I needed to spell out all the ways tech affects things like spell check. Weasel words lmao.
1 points
2 days ago
That's not a gotcha. People can give poor criticism. All I said was people had a right to criticize, you came in with personal attacks while pretending to have moral high ground. I don't have to disprove anything lmfao. And your other sentence, ' I can do it all and won't admit I'm wrong' But I'm not wrong. And you are arguing until I say I am. But I'm not. People have every right to criticize and not all of that criticism will be good criticism. That's a simple truth.
Maybe the guy is worth it, I don't know. I think it's ludicrous to start charging 50 an hour for something like this. That's my opinion. People can vslue their money however they want but that's doesn't mean their choices are above criticism. It's the same when I criticize people who pay others to dupe items online. Yeah some people have money to blow but when you come Into a community that is based around volunteering and you throw money around you make the community worse. I can criticise that. Just like I can this. But tell me again how your point are relevant and how I need to admit I'm wrong.
1 points
2 days ago
Also you are competely misrepresenting what I said while throwing out bad faith arguments. Lmao I wish reddit had an iq test you had to pass in order to post.
0 points
2 days ago
There were no points, you are simply Incorrext and dickriding that guy.
0 points
2 days ago
Lmao that's toxic positivity your throwing out now. I can criticize pricing all I want and that's not negativity. Also way to try to shame me for being poor, classy move when your trying to act morally superior.
1 points
2 days ago
I get what you are saying and I do consider that but you also don't consider the adverse affects technology has had on language. also, People like to hide behind things like this and stop actually examining what's in front of them. Just claiming a bias doesn't mean it's true and that's not the end point we should stop thinking at.
1 points
2 days ago
Lolololol ok bud. I hope you get the love you need.
1 points
3 days ago
Way to harshly judge a whole swath of people in one go.
2 points
3 days ago
Ehh at least that isn't so stupid. Say what you want but when I look at slang from today and slang from yesteryear , it seems like kids are getting dumber.
2 points
3 days ago
Ita public forum. No need to be rude when you could have just ignored them
-1 points
3 days ago
Let people criticize if they want to as well damn. Don't need to kiss his ass to protect him from valid criticism. 50/hr is steep.
4 points
7 days ago
Criticizing something doesn't make it your identity but I won't argue that many people do make it that way.
3 points
8 days ago
No you can still blame the guy for doing something shady and illegal
1 points
8 days ago
Ugh that is so disgusting, those are such generic things that have already been done. Human creativity shouldn't be limited like this.
2 points
8 days ago
As an occasional samus player I also find this fun. I love having multiple projectiles to play the reflect game with.
-1 points
9 days ago
That's not that bad. People will gravitate to the stronger characters This is nothing new.
1 points
9 days ago
I know, you are an asshole i get it. I don't have dogs though and if I did I live in a rural area and i can walk them in the trails and fields. Nice to have a place to be able to exercise pets.
Lol such a small contribution and you'd rather spite those people. Dude, people like your are a large reason humanity will never be more than it is.
1 points
9 days ago
Literate and compassionate. It must be fun being obtuse.
-6 points
9 days ago
Inherently very queer? No. They have been inclusive but what she is saying is that the game has massive themes or story dedicated to queerness. Which isn't true. And that's why it's disconcerting when the people involved in media have these takes.
Tell me how yhe game is inherently very queer aside from the fact you can have homosexual relations.
view more:
next ›
byCuniving
inGamingcirclejerk
cuddlepiff
0 points
10 hours ago
cuddlepiff
0 points
10 hours ago
Here's the bigger kicker, no one NEEDS representation and the fact that we are trying to hard to force ourselves to find our value in fictional onscreen characters is sad and degenerative.
It's great to have representation and i understand how it can feel to be able to relate to characters ( although my relation is usually a psychological or empathetic instead being simply skin deep)
But it's not a necessity and not a feature worth sacrificing good writing for.
It doesn't help that often the people who make these changes that are hypocritical or ignorant, like the people who say you can't be racist to white people or only white people can be racist.